Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from Wittyguy:
Just wanted to say very good review there.
|
05-27-10 11:59am
|
Reply
52
|
Oldje
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from BabyGetReal:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Dear magaman, Thanks for your comments and for naming a title that you like. I downloaded that one too. (It is laborious to find a specific title since there is no search mechanism provided at Oldje, and you can't even use the browser's find to look for a word in the title on the current page -- since the title is in a graphic!) Sorry, but there's nothing in "Working Girl" that seems better to me than in the others I've checked from Oldje. Anyway, I do appreciate your feedback!
|
05-26-10 05:54pm
|
Reply
53
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
from BadMrFrosty:
It sounds like the same sort of bonus site fiasco 21sextury have as well. Why these people cant be more like the other big networks is beyond me. Love or hate the content, at least with sites like RealityKings you know what you get when you sign up, regardless of what site within the network you actually sign up for.
|
05-21-10 04:43am
|
Reply
54
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Not a problem.
The Contact Us form can be used any time you have something you want to communicate to staff. Of course, you could just email us directly at: support [at] pornusers [dot] com
|
05-18-10 02:49pm
|
Reply
55
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
The site is now listed. You can enter your remarks at:
https://www.pornusers.com/review/teenbff/
We'll look forward to your reviwew.
BTW, in future, when you want to suggest a site for us to list, just drop us an email (see contact us link at the bottom of any page).
|
05-18-10 01:41pm
|
Reply
56
|
The Minion
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from BadMrFrosty:
Wow, I thought nothing porn related would ever disgust me and make me physically ill. This site has put an end to that :)
Good review though
|
05-18-10 07:34am
|
Reply
57
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment from Gazette Risque:
Already wrote a review but I can't add it yet as it's not added to TBP and PU.
But when it has been added, the review will be up ASAP.
|
05-17-10 02:10pm
|
Reply
58
|
Disgraced 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from pat362:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
It was a very informative review and I appreciate it. I'm still debating giving them a chance. My biggest issue with the site is that I don't like their preview page. I got burned too often when I first started to surf the net that I always equal a bad preview page to a bad site. I may miss some gems but better that than wasting 20 dollars on crap.
|
05-12-10 07:17pm
|
Reply
59
|
Disgraced 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rearadmiral:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
It does - thanks for the info.
|
05-12-10 05:58pm
|
Reply
60
|
Disgraced 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from pat362:
Thanks for an amazing review.
This is one of those sites that kind of appeals to me but the some of those negatives make it less appealing.
|
05-11-10 07:30pm
|
Reply
61
|
Disgraced 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from rearadmiral:
Magman - a question that I forgot to ask - is there much, if any, anal on this site?
Thanks!
|
05-11-10 04:14am
|
Reply
62
|
Disgraced 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from rearadmiral:
Thanks for the informative review. I like these kinds of sites and may have taken a chance on it. I might still give it a try, but at least now I'm going into it fully informed.
|
05-10-10 02:33pm
|
Reply
63
|
Disgraced 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from BadMrFrosty:
Great review. I had the same problem as you, the content at best is a little slap and tickle and not the BDSM it is portrayed as.
|
05-10-10 08:45am
|
Reply
64
|
Jurassic Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from mbaya:
Can you compare this site with others featuring old men with teens? Just curious as you don't mention any other sites of this type.
|
05-09-10 09:00am
|
Reply
65
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from atrapat:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
I didn't get a membership directly for Shay Laren but to another site from this company, which is no longer listed here at PU. That site only listed 5-6 bonus sites at its home page but my password worked at all but one of the 15+ sites that company had listed here at PU at that time: all the solo model sites did work; also Glamour Models Gone Bad and Amateurs Gone Bad. If I don't recall badly, only one of the sites did not work and it was not a solo model site; Digi Dolls or Bitchin Movies most likely.
I don't know if it's sloppiness on their side or an unadvertised feature but I doubt they have a membership maze set up. They for sure didn't have it a couple years ago and they were already listing just a few bonus sites at the members' home pages.
|
05-09-10 08:13am
|
Reply
66
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from atrapat:
Good review. Regarding the connection maze, I think you get access to all sites from this company with your membership. I was a member of a site from this company a couple years ago and my password worked at all sites.
|
05-08-10 03:35pm
|
Reply
67
|
Shay Laren
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from Monahan:
I'm really happy seeing this review. I keep thinking about joining but $30 is a high price to take a chance on this being just another lousy one girl site.
And I like Aria and Jessie a bunch so I may be able to cobble up some new stuff there as well.
Looks like I'll be spending some time checking the various connections out there before signing up. [I have a lot of Shay's stuff, but if this site has assembled most of what's available elsewhere, chances are good there will be new stuff for my collection.)
A one month sign-up to one of the "partner sites" may be in my future.
|
05-08-10 08:54am
|
Reply
68
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from heitorcontrol:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Hi Magman. Thanks for the reply;) I think they just want to cancel the MPG, sure why this is much bigger and with less quality, but what worried me was that the team mentioned the WMV to a future analysis.
MP4 HD and HQ are very good, but I see no need to speculate a recession WMV.
|
05-08-10 08:34am
|
Reply
69
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Thanks, magman. Everything seems okay now. See message above.
|
05-07-10 06:07pm
|
Reply
70
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Thanks for the reply, magman. Yes, I always have the same problem with this site and only with this site, otherwise I would blame Firefox. I really have to keep hammering that reload the page button until I see in the tab that something is starting to load. Same with the sign-in, same with the navigation within the site. I do use an accelerator once I finally manage to get to the scene I want and the downloads are fine and fast. So, no complaints there. Just wanted to know if I was the only one.
|
05-07-10 10:13am
|
Reply
71
|
Dream Kelly
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
from Drooler:
No need to apologize for the "rant." Hell, no new vid updates in two moons and all of the effort is put only into deception over the dating of file uploads? That's dirty. Thanks for the expose!
|
08-23-07 01:45pm
|
Reply
72
|
Cams.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Boobs4ever:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Im searching for a cam site like that aswell :P but not found any ether
|
08-07-07 01:42pm
|
Reply
73
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from Denner:
Great review
Peachez is surely a very cute girl which have become more and more daring during the last years.
magman sure gives us a status where Real Peachez and her site is today.
Thanks!
Denner
|
07-29-07 08:32am
|
Reply
74
|
Lightspeed World
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
from Monahan:
In my opinion, a site that whacks you $40 with no preview option is an automatic ripoff. ("You pays your money and you takes your chances.") If these guys charged $10 less ($29.99) they would probably get 3 or 4 times the signups and make a whole lot more money...and you know they know that.
However they must also know their site is crap and that it won't attract renewals (that's where the big money is) so they do a hit and run, cash in for a few months, then they'll go away.
Shame, because they could be good if they raelly wanted to.
|
07-27-07 11:36am
|
Reply
75
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from TimTams:
You are right when you say that "the videos are all kind of the same" & after the first few videos things quickly plateaued [until recently anyway!]. When this site first began it did so with a bang as many people had been waiting for Sarah Peachez to go hardcore. Some of her early videos are still way hotter then the "production line" style videos since.
Since the release of Peachez's long-awaited first boy-girl video [where she gave a blowjob/handjob to an ex-boyfriend with a big dick] people have been going crazy over her site. News of another blowjob video being released next month where Peachez gets her first ever facial has people hanging on for more.
The site actually began mid-2005 & the promoters of this site had promised that Peachez would release boy-girl videos by the end of that year but I guess better late than never! It will be interesting to see where Sarah Peachez goes from here as many fans are drooling waiting for her to go all the way.
|
07-22-07 06:52am
|