| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Cuties Galore
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from messmer:
Great and thorough review, GR. I usually subscribe to 21Sextreme because I am a bit farther along on the road to absolute perversion but the reward system on both sites is the same. You get so and so many reward points each day you are a subscriber but after you are done with your subscription you can still go back under your old user name and password and cash in your reward points to download a video of your choice. That's what they mean by "buying." As a non-member you could also buy some points if you used up your accumulated ones, if a particular video in either site appeals to you, but I've never made use of that.
|
04-02-12 10:39am
|
Reply
27
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Well, the way it played out was that I wrote support about a week or so ago and suggested that it might be a good idea for them to change their announcement because it no longer seemed possible that they could keep their promise .. just let subscribers know that things had been delayed (they contracted out a batch remastering) and that the HD videos would be uploaded sometime during April.. This way subscribers who had looked forward to March would be reassured that all was not lost, and the answer I got was that I had no idea how the industry worked and that they would not panic about the delay because it was eminently possible for them to upload 90 DVDs even if it had to be on the last day of March.
I wrote back at the end of March, wondering where the promised change to the site and the HDs was, now that there were only hours left. Went to the site one more time to make sure they hadn't uploaded 80 some odd HD DVDs during the past few hours and found myself locked out.
When I got to my mail I noticed that they had granted me a full refund without my request. Actually I would have been willing to stick around and wait but I must have been a thorn in their side. And that's the story! :-)
|
04-02-12 10:05am
|
Reply
28
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MiztaBlu:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
No...Live shows are no longer part of NA, but you cant really blame them. While alot of people liked the Live shows, there wasnt quite enough interest and thus incoming revenue to keep it going. The cost to do those Live shows isnt cheap so they had to cut their losses.
I personally dont care for Live shows, but I know alot of people like them. Doubt they come back to NA though.
|
03-25-12 08:47am
|
Reply
29
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from hodayathink:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Breast implants. She hasn't shot any professional pictures or movies since she got them, but there are some pictures floating out there.
|
03-19-12 04:23pm
|
Reply
30
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from hodayathink:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
What I meant when I said that is that she's not "all natural" anymore, as of about two weeks ago.
|
03-18-12 02:33am
|
Reply
31
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
My guess is that the European public shoot are a lot harder to do so they're not posted as often. There was one posted in each of January and February so I don't think they've give up on them.
I've always found heat in a public scene to come from a model's nervousness and the reaction of the people around her. But you raise something that is just as important - the uncontrolled and unpredictable part of it. That's huge for me too. Thanks for pointing that out.
I thought about mentioning the Dom thing in my review but I thought it was a personal thing so I didn't. Obviously it isn't personal to me since you share my thoughts. I agree 100% that it makes a difference. I like Princess Donna a lot as a director and actor, but for me BDSM needs a male Dom. Sexist? Probably, but it's important to me to see a male doing the Dom stuff.
Thanks for taking the time to comment on my review.
|
03-17-12 04:49pm
|
Reply
32
|
Playboy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
from atrapat:
I doubt it. Never been a member but was a member of sister site Playboy Cyberclub some years ago. I don't remember any such thing when I was a member though it's something I would surely have looked into.
As far as I know, Playboy magazine is published as a franchise in many countries: they get the brand for the magazine and get to publish photo sets from the various USA editions but also do their own original content. So this site is unlikely to hold the rights (or be remotely interested in holding them) for a photo set from a celebrity that posed nude in an international edition.
Back in the day, Playboy Cyberclub would only get you a small portion from Playboy's archives and very small pictures. Things may have changed because I see that this site is now run by Brazzers Network. But I still doubt they publish anything not produced for the USA edition.
|
03-10-12 10:01am
|
Reply
33
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
from hodayathink:
She's not "unspoiled" anymore.
|
03-09-12 10:47am
|
Reply
34
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Cybertoad:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
I hear ya Capn, did want anyone thinking I was high-jacking the previous review being so close together. But I get your point perhaps even if duplicating the review may address downfalls.
|
03-09-12 09:39am
|
Reply
35
|
Audrey Bitoni
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Cybertoad:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
They may allow dl managers I just could not get mine to work.
Appreciate the feedback.
|
03-09-12 09:37am
|
Reply
36
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Very non-descript middle of the road really.
Competetnt but unremarkable.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-09-12 05:41am
|
Reply
37
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from Cybertoad:
Yes a nice review for sure, but I too agree kinda a freaky website.
Keep up the great work.
|
03-08-12 07:44pm
|
Reply
38
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Hi Gazette Risk, I guess you are out of luck because both VB and Videosz offer their HD content in 720p. I find the picture pretty good, so am well satisfied with both sites.
|
03-06-12 09:26am
|
Reply
39
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from BadMrFrosty:
Great review, I would have maybe given it a slightly lower score just because I find it a bit too freaky but otherwise you are spot on. Thumbs up.
|
03-04-12 12:44pm
|
Reply
40
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
I don't think you'll get lucky with PU because the last review was almsot 3 years ago while TBP's was last year. The reviewer gave a C rating to the navigation so I don't think it's much better than when you were a member.
|
03-02-12 06:48am
|
Reply
41
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
from pat362:
You should look at TBP's review since it was done last Septemeber so the data should be pretty up to date.
|
02-28-12 11:39am
|
Reply
42
|
Zero Tolerance On Demand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Let me rephrase my statement and say that the studio producing the content is dying and not the internet site. Of course at some point the site will die if they can't get new content but I know that ZT is still making movies but the number of actual new titles is very small. These days they tend to sell repackaged older videos.
|
02-28-12 11:05am
|
Reply
43
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Sevrin:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Oh yeah, the chat is still monitored pretty closely. I prefer it that way, to be honest. The models don't have a very good grasp of English for the most part, and double entendres are generally wasted on them. Besides, you can get access to the chats with a trial account and a lot of people attending have a drink or two in them. There's only one chat going on at one time and there are a LOT of people attending some of them. If they didn't keep a lid on the chats, they'd be a zoo.
|
06-08-10 06:01pm
|
Reply
44
|
iFriends
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Robbi81:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
There was a charge of $1 made and then there was another charge of $9.47 made. Doing some looking around, that $9.47 is possibly for fan club status. Thing is.... I never signed up for any fan clubs. As for verifying my credit card and giving the money back, Its been just over a week now and I havent seen any money credited to my credit card.
Id also like to note that when I tried emailing their customer service to cancel, I got a automatic message saying that they dont have either my credit card OR login info on file and asked me to login as a new user.
|
06-07-10 09:19pm
|
Reply
45
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from exotics4me:
Hey magman,
A little history on the Anette site and model. At one time this site was a standalone site that cost $25 a month to join with no bonus content, no Twistys access. Anette, according to a well-known Euro photographer, is a very shy girl in front of the camera. She had been in an accident when she was younger that left scars on her stomach. Some insensitive porn fans had asked about airbrushing the scars out, some sites did and it seemed to kill what confidence she had developed. Also, her age was in question since in a 2004 video on Club Sandy, she says she is celebrating her 24th birthday, which would put her around 31 now.
To the best of my knowledge, she has been inactive for a couple of years now. The content on this site is either from old content Shap has in the vault or is just being re-released as new content since it is now just a bonus site. I believe her last set on any site was on 1byday and was very softcore, not even masturbation. She's still one of my favorites and I was one of those who joined this site for $25 when it first opened. I highly doubt there will be anymore real "new" content of her anywhere on any site.
Agree 100% with you though, for a free bonus site it is very good. You may already know it, but Twistys also has the Nicole Graves (nicolegravesdotcom) site, for whatever reason they don't list it, but you can sign in on it with your Twistys login info. It's very similar to this Annette Dawn site, was once a $25 per month solo site.
|
06-02-10 12:28pm
|
Reply
46
|
Dream Kelly
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Your're welcome, magman - I just thought it was a pleasure/great to - now and then - read such a fine review as yours!!!!
It'd be welcome with more of that standard - here...
|
05-31-10 10:45am
|
Reply
47
|
Dream Kelly
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from Denner:
Nice review - no, not only nice - but very thorough..thumbs up!
Kelly is a sweet thing and it's impossible NOT to come across some material out there even if not a member.
This reviews gives you the - I think - entire picture. AND maybe I'll hold my horses and wait or just skip it. She's cute and all, but the site seems to been a little off??? (quite serious cons)
Anyway: It's a shame she's gone brunette - or am I mistaken??? She was so damn cute as a blond...
|
05-31-10 09:57am
|
Reply
48
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Comment
from james4096:
This is definitely not a site worth $30 IMHO.
But maybe they can get away with this. This has to be the only live action "dick girl" site on the internet, so anyone with that very specific fetish has little choice.
|
05-31-10 12:14am
|
Reply
49
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
from williamj:
I joined on your review. For the fee it was work it. I hope they keep growing and plan to send a few emails on how they can improve.
|
05-29-10 09:47pm
|
Reply
50
|
Tainster
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from atrapat:
(Gazette Risque's Reply)
Yes, that's what I meant when I said it's confusing. My guess was they copy-pasted the info from the basic package and left by mistake the pay-per-minute, pay-as-you-go and pay-per-view part (aren't those three the exact same thing?). The full package contents lists "all eromaxx videos (stream/download)" and there's no reference to credits in the full package so that's why I assumed it's a regular membership. I could be wrong, though.
I spent some time at the Eromaxx blog but there's no real information. Neither is there any info in the FAQ. The news section has a snippet that points in the direction that Tainster is Orgy Max 2.0: "We've taken the old network and given it not only a full facelift, but we've also added so many features and pimped out the technology in such a way to make Tainster the new leader in online adult entertainment"
Who knows :)
|
05-29-10 01:41pm
|
