Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from philfromusa:
I think the size thing was recently changed, as images from Amateur "Holly Jean" in "SERENE DESIRE" are at 3840 on the small side & 5760 on the long side.
|
01-02-13 09:50am
|
Reply
52
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Mikey24:
(RLane's Reply)
In your experience, which sites come close to Playboy in terms of model quality but also offers truly hi-res photo sets? I think Digital Desire comes close with certain models.
|
11-30-12 02:08pm
|
Reply
53
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from Mikey24:
Hmm so even the newer photo sets have a max resolution of 1920x1280? That's quite disappointing considering most other sites have avg. 3000pixels on the long side.
|
11-29-12 11:49pm
|
Reply
54
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Capn:
I really don't mean to sound negative, but there are so many, glam artsy photo sites that they tend to get pretty anonymous.
( Actually, Met art is a prime example of that.
It is so formulaic that each set blends into another ).
If he is going to be successful in this venture, he needs to find a good angle on the content.
Cap'n. :0/
|
11-22-12 04:19pm
|
Reply
55
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from elephant:
Yeah I did notice this photographer had gone solo now with his own site, its good for him I guess as he/she gets to showcase their work only and get more recognition but would have to remain at a lower end subscription fee till it has a good amount of models. Sometimes Metart though does seem a little intimidating with its vastness and you need lots of time to get through it, maybe a smaller site is a good idea if you really their photos.
|
11-22-12 09:45am
|
Reply
56
|
Rylsky Art
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Denner:
Ahm - still a rather limited amount of material - and especially vids. Looks fine in general, ok - but I'll put it on hold....and wait for more content.
|
11-22-12 07:30am
|
Reply
57
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(RLane's Reply)
Yeah,
In this case it didn't do me any good because it didn't take the details as correct the first time I filled it in.
On the second attempt it rechecked the boxes & I didn't spot that until I had clicked resubmit.
Cap'n. :0/
|
07-31-13 09:53am
|
Reply
58
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from Capn:
The billing process is unpopular for good reason.
Curse those pre-checks!!
Cap'n. :0(
|
07-30-13 03:59pm
|
Reply
59
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from tangub:
Oh that's different, I click on join and get a form requesting my bank account details to set up a direct debit. Never heard of this billing company webbilling. Don't think I'll be joining Teen Dreams anytime again soon. And yes I also see $29.99 or £19.99 (GBP) so the discount seems to have gone for me too.
|
04-13-13 12:55am
|
Reply
60
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Capn:
I don't think it has ever worked for non-US residents.
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-12-13 11:32pm
|
Reply
61
|
Tegan Summers
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from pat362:
If you haven't read my comments for Lela Star then do so because they apply to her site as well. The one thing that may be different here is that you do get access to a network of porn performers so $18 is not be such a bad deal. Be advised that a percentage of the performers on the network are no longer active in porn so content is likely to be older and there won't be any addition.
|
02-23-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
62
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from SelenaMetArt:
(RLane's Reply)
You are very welcome. :) If you are already a SexArt member, you can get a free 2 day all-access trial to check it out. If you are logged in at SexArt, look for "More Girls" in the upper right hand corner for our Upgrades area.
Member's area trials are currently free for 2 days, then rebill. You can cancel before they rebill at the biller's website, or you can write our Support staff and they will cancel for you.
If you have any questions, let us know.
|
08-06-13 07:24pm
|
Reply
63
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Wittyguy:
Just checked the preview again. Yes, they are recycling some content but can't say it's all recycled. FYI.
|
08-01-13 11:48am
|
Reply
64
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Wittyguy:
I haven't been a member in a while but I recently checked out the tour. The quality will be better at the other sites you listed (both in terms of vids and pics) since Viv has been around for so long. I should note that Viv seems to just be recycling old content now. If you've never joined it does have some good stuff to see but not at the same level. The other sites you listed are also more "heartcore" in terms of the sex being pretty tame while Viv is more standard hardcore in approach. Hope this helps.
|
07-31-13 12:07pm
|
Reply
65
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from kutloch:
Watch4beauty has been named a finalist nominee for the adult industry’s awards event of the year, the 2014 XBIZ Awards.
Watch4beauty has received a nomination in the Photography site of the year category.
|
11-27-13 04:07am
|
Reply
66
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from kutloch:
We would like to announce that the integration between Watch4beauty and MetArt has been stopped. However, Watch4beauty will remain independent . We are sorry for any misunderstanding that could have happened. We promise to continue in delivering the best quality and the most beautiful erotic models. We love what we do and we do it for you!
|
11-27-13 04:06am
|
Reply
67
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(RLane's Reply)
Yes, that's the way the Met Art Network operates, at least so far. Each site is separate, but you can get discount memberships on other sites in the network if you are a member of one of the other sites in the network. As to changing content, ALS Scan hasn't changed their content aside from having more boy-girl, which they were on their way towards anyway. I would expect that W4B will keep the distinctiveness of their content after they become part of the Met Art Network.
|
08-07-13 07:52pm
|
Reply
68
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from rearadmiral:
W4B is always a site that was on my list of sites to join but always got bumped by other sites. When you say that they're joining Met0art do you know if that means a membership to one will now include the other?
|
08-04-13 07:59am
|
Reply
69
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Capn:
If you are not in the US watch for that regional pricing scam, if they haven't dropped it.
Cap'n. :0/
|
12-10-11 04:31pm
|
Reply
70
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from KET924aab:
It is kinda odd RLane, almost like they must be piggybacking on the end of someone else's photo shoot, but they only have the time to do one vid and one photo set. It would definitely be nice to see multiple photo sets and vids from them, as they do have a unique style.
|
02-23-13 09:22pm
|
Reply
71
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from cjd2004:
I am not a member but I would assume that the larger zip contains photos that have not been scaled from the camera resolution.
|
03-01-13 01:04am
|