Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : RLane (0)  

Feedback:   All (203)  |   Reviews (33)  |   Comments (51)  |   Replies (119)

Other:   Replies Received (71)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 51-71 of 71 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(0)
Reply of RLane's Review from philfromusa:

I think the size thing was recently changed, as images from Amateur "Holly Jean" in "SERENE DESIRE" are at 3840 on the small side & 5760 on the long side.

01-02-13  09:50am

Reply
52
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Mikey24: (RLane's Reply)

In your experience, which sites come close to Playboy in terms of model quality but also offers truly hi-res photo sets? I think Digital Desire comes close with certain models.

11-30-12  02:08pm

Reply
53
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(0)
Reply of RLane's Review from Mikey24:

Hmm so even the newer photo sets have a max resolution of 1920x1280? That's quite disappointing considering most other sites have avg. 3000pixels on the long side.

11-29-12  11:49pm

Reply
54
Visit Rylsky Art

Rylsky Art
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment from Capn:

I really don't mean to sound negative, but there are so many, glam artsy photo sites that they tend to get pretty anonymous.

( Actually, Met art is a prime example of that.
It is so formulaic that each set blends into another ).

If he is going to be successful in this venture, he needs to find a good angle on the content.

Cap'n. :0/


11-22-12  04:19pm

Reply
55
Visit Rylsky Art

Rylsky Art
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment from elephant:

Yeah I did notice this photographer had gone solo now with his own site, its good for him I guess as he/she gets to showcase their work only and get more recognition but would have to remain at a lower end subscription fee till it has a good amount of models. Sometimes Metart though does seem a little intimidating with its vastness and you need lots of time to get through it, maybe a smaller site is a good idea if you really their photos.

11-22-12  09:45am

Reply
56
Visit Rylsky Art

Rylsky Art
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment from Denner:

Ahm - still a rather limited amount of material - and especially vids. Looks fine in general, ok - but I'll put it on hold....and wait for more content.

11-22-12  07:30am

Reply
57
Visit Teen Dreams

Teen Dreams
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Capn: (RLane's Reply)

Yeah,

In this case it didn't do me any good because it didn't take the details as correct the first time I filled it in.

On the second attempt it rechecked the boxes & I didn't spot that until I had clicked resubmit.

Cap'n. :0/


07-31-13  09:53am

Reply
58
Visit Teen Dreams

Teen Dreams
(0)
Reply of RLane's Review from Capn:

The billing process is unpopular for good reason.

Curse those pre-checks!!

Cap'n. :0(


07-30-13  03:59pm

Reply
59
Visit Teen Dreams

Teen Dreams
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment from tangub:

Oh that's different, I click on join and get a form requesting my bank account details to set up a direct debit. Never heard of this billing company webbilling. Don't think I'll be joining Teen Dreams anytime again soon. And yes I also see $29.99 or £19.99 (GBP) so the discount seems to have gone for me too.

04-13-13  12:55am

Reply
60
Visit Teen Dreams

Teen Dreams
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment from Capn:

I don't think it has ever worked for non-US residents.

Cap'n. :0/


04-12-13  11:32pm

Reply
61
Visit Tegan Summers

Tegan Summers
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment from pat362:

If you haven't read my comments for Lela Star then do so because they apply to her site as well. The one thing that may be different here is that you do get access to a network of porn performers so $18 is not be such a bad deal. Be advised that a percentage of the performers on the network are no longer active in porn so content is likely to be older and there won't be any addition.

02-23-13  06:32pm

Reply
62
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from SelenaMetArt: (RLane's Reply)

You are very welcome. :) If you are already a SexArt member, you can get a free 2 day all-access trial to check it out. If you are logged in at SexArt, look for "More Girls" in the upper right hand corner for our Upgrades area.

Member's area trials are currently free for 2 days, then rebill. You can cancel before they rebill at the biller's website, or you can write our Support staff and they will cancel for you.

If you have any questions, let us know.


08-06-13  07:24pm

Reply
63
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment from Wittyguy:

Just checked the preview again. Yes, they are recycling some content but can't say it's all recycled. FYI.

08-01-13  11:48am

Reply
64
Visit Viv Thomas

Viv Thomas
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment from Wittyguy:

I haven't been a member in a while but I recently checked out the tour. The quality will be better at the other sites you listed (both in terms of vids and pics) since Viv has been around for so long. I should note that Viv seems to just be recycling old content now. If you've never joined it does have some good stuff to see but not at the same level. The other sites you listed are also more "heartcore" in terms of the sex being pretty tame while Viv is more standard hardcore in approach. Hope this helps.

07-31-13  12:07pm

Reply
65
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment from kutloch:

Watch4beauty has been named a finalist nominee for the adult industry’s awards event of the year, the 2014 XBIZ Awards.

Watch4beauty has received a nomination in the Photography site of the year category.


11-27-13  04:07am

Reply
66
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment from kutloch:

We would like to announce that the integration between Watch4beauty and MetArt has been stopped. However, Watch4beauty will remain independent . We are sorry for any misunderstanding that could have happened. We promise to continue in delivering the best quality and the most beautiful erotic models. We love what we do and we do it for you!

11-27-13  04:06am

Reply
67
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from PinkPanther: (RLane's Reply)

Yes, that's the way the Met Art Network operates, at least so far. Each site is separate, but you can get discount memberships on other sites in the network if you are a member of one of the other sites in the network. As to changing content, ALS Scan hasn't changed their content aside from having more boy-girl, which they were on their way towards anyway. I would expect that W4B will keep the distinctiveness of their content after they become part of the Met Art Network.

08-07-13  07:52pm

Reply
68
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment from rearadmiral:

W4B is always a site that was on my list of sites to join but always got bumped by other sites. When you say that they're joining Met0art do you know if that means a membership to one will now include the other?

08-04-13  07:59am

Reply
69
Visit Watch 4 Beauty

Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment from Capn:

If you are not in the US watch for that regional pricing scam, if they haven't dropped it.

Cap'n. :0/


12-10-11  04:31pm

Reply
70
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment from KET924aab:

It is kinda odd RLane, almost like they must be piggybacking on the end of someone else's photo shoot, but they only have the time to do one vid and one photo set. It would definitely be nice to see multiple photo sets and vids from them, as they do have a unique style.

02-23-13  09:22pm

Reply
71
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(0)
Reply of RLane's Comment from cjd2004:

I am not a member but I would assume that the larger zip contains photos that have not been scaled from the camera resolution.

03-01-13  01:04am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 51-71 of 71 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 1.18 seconds.