| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Georgia Jones
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(RLane's Reply)
You may already do that but in case you don't then always look at TBP and/or PU before joining any site. If there aren't any review then there's a very high chance that the site will be a major waste of money.
These days almost every girl that as done porn has a site and I'd say that 99.99% of them aren't worth the cost of a membership. I got burned too many times in the past when I joined solo model sites out of impulse without looking for reviews. Mind you when i first started surfing for porn. There weren't many decent review sites so most sites had less than trustfull reviews. That's why TBP and PU is so great.
|
12-12-11 07:43am
|
Reply
27
|
Georgia Jones
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from pat362:
TBP has never reviewed this site and I don't think they plan to do so. I think Georgia is super cute and it would be great if she had a decent site but I highly recommend you stay away from this one.
You would feel cheated if it was only a dollar. It isn't so you'll feel even more cheated because of that. If you go to her TBP page and scroll to the bottom then you will see a link to another sites review. The review only gave her site a 73% and that was 2 years ago.
|
12-11-11 05:29pm
|
Reply
28
|
Girls Next Door Club
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from rearadmiral:
This site looks pretty good. I hope it continues to grow. Thanks for posting the review.
|
07-21-13 08:08am
|
Reply
29
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from skippy:
The images are shot in very high resolution so when you blow them up, they are still sharp (unlike some sites that just take smaller pictures and increase their resolution). Many of the images are very sharp, but unfortunately, when you magnify blurry, you get VERY blurry. It all depends on the source image and the focus point that the photographer chooses.
|
09-17-13 06:32pm
|
Reply
30
|
Helen's Planet
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from tangub:
The majority of the photo sets start off with her clothed or partially clothed (partially clothed meaning wearing only bra and panties or other items of lingerie). Only 3 or 4 of the 44 sets on the site started off naked. Hope that answers your question.
|
12-10-11 03:59pm
|
Reply
31
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Joymii:
SexArt is a cool site. All three of us have different styles and worth a look. In my opinion, here's what to expect:
Joymii - young models, high end productions emphasizing passionate couple sex and girls as natural as possible. Less fantastical. eg. You should feel like that's the bedroom you have(or want), and the girl you want in that bedroom.
X-Art - will remind you of softcore films on late night cable, which is a good thing! A bit more dreamy quality.
SexArt - full on fantasy. If you like Zalman King or porn from the 90s, this is right up your alley
|
03-07-13 01:37pm
|
Reply
32
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from otoh:
I've not joined Sex Art, but have been a member both at X Art and at Joymii. They are very, very similar sites, so if you liked X Art, you should like this. But for my money, I prefer Joymii - the difference is subtle, but the photography just seems better - the sets, colours, angles are a bit different, a bit more interesting.
|
02-24-13 01:12am
|
Reply
33
|
Just Nude
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from tangub:
They do state on the sign up page though that you will not have access to the photos in the highest resolution so its not like they are trying to fool anybody. Personally i was quite happy with the 1600px photos for the $10 trial price.
|
12-08-11 11:07pm
|
Reply
34
|
Kari Sweets
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(RLane's Reply)
Did you ever see her Girls Gone Wild scene? She didn't show anything, but it was fun watching the "contest" between her and GGW guy to see who was going to control the situation. She won, hands down.
|
07-23-13 09:08pm
|
Reply
35
|
Kari Sweets
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Marcus:
Yep, you're right, she retired a long, long time ago. Apparently the 'new sets' are the same sets, just with a few of the images that didn't make the cut before - they show a bit more, but still no real slips or anything.
For the record, she was one of the hottest solo models I ever followed.
|
07-22-13 10:19pm
|
Reply
36
|
Kari Sweets
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from rearadmiral:
She's definitely cute, but the lack of zips is a deal breaker for me. Thanks for making that clear. I have no idea why a site wouldn't offer zips.
|
12-11-11 08:13am
|
Reply
37
|
Kari Sweets
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from Cybertoad:
This model is Smokin, very nice body and shape.
However with the limit content and no nudity and this being a porn review site. No nudity may not make it a high ranking site around tehse parts.
I thought 90 was a on the high side myself.
That's not to say the review is not a good one. I just didn't see anything in the review that jumped out and said this site was outstanding place to join.
CT
|
12-09-11 10:52pm
|
Reply
38
|
Kari Sweets
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from pat362:
I respect that taste vary greatly but there are some things that are a must for there to be a high score. She is a really cute girl but who will spend 27$ on a solo model site where there is very little content available in the preview section or the actual site itself and where you don't even know if she's still active? I Googled her name to see what info I could find. There's isn't much. She had a twitter account but only posted twice on February 2010 and nothing since then. She has or had a facebook account but there's nothing except a couple of pics. She states on her twitter account that she's 20 but if that's the case then based on TBP saying that her site was launched in 2007 then she was only 17 at the time.
Now her site is almost 5 years old and all you have is 175 photosets and 35 videos. I made the math and that means less than 3 updates per month on photosets and about 7 videos per year.
|
12-09-11 10:34am
|
Reply
39
|
Kari Sweets
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from tangub:
A very sweet model and she seems to have been around for years. Did you notice if the site is still updating when you were there?
By the way welcome to PU and i notice from your input so far you seem to be a fan of the softcore niche so i certainly look forward to reading more of your reviews.
|
12-08-11 11:54pm
|
Reply
40
|
Kari Sweets
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from Capn:
Whilst I can appreciate you rating it this highly if you are enamoured of her looks, no zips is a big negative for photo collectors; and those low res video figures are going to be a problem for vid. folks.
Lack of nudity may be another issue! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-08-11 11:35pm
|
Reply
41
|
Lela Star
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(RLane's Reply)
I would save you the money and heartache when you join a solo model site hoping to get some intimate stuff and some exclusif content. Only to discover that there is neither and what there is isn't worth the money you paid.
I got burned so badly when I first started surfing the net that I had no choice but to avoid all solo model sites. Luckily it's not as bad now (in large part because of TBP/PU) but it's still wise to ask before you take out your credit card.
|
02-24-13 10:21am
|
Reply
42
|
Lela Star
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from pat362:
My rule of thumb with all solo model sites is that unless you know exactly what you are getting inside the members area then it means that there isn't anything of value. If you have visted her site then you already know that you can't see the content so she falls under the avoiud like the plague.
I'd also like to add that she hasn't posted anything on her Twitter accout since last July and she wasn't really active as a performer a long time before that so you are certainly won't be getting anything recent.
|
02-23-13 06:16pm
|
Reply
43
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from Capn:
Beautiful as the models are, I like to see progression from fully clothed to full nudity in a set. The journey is as important as the destination for me.
It looks like they are nude from photo one in most sets?
Cap'n. :0/
|
02-24-13 03:22am
|
Reply
44
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Cybertoad:
(RLane's Reply)
I agree with you on the pixels, but in quality I found the way it was done was ok. I think knowing it was a large picture I thought would give a better photo then it did. There are other sites with large HD video and the quality is still not better then smaller sizes. To give a site a 90 I think it is done very well. I don't give out any reviews above 89 unless the site is exceptional. And why the site is very good, I found it has room to grow. Problem is the better a site is, the more picky reviews get above 90 for me. I start looking at details and ease of site. Things other sites strive to get reviewed, So I really like this site, I am just really picky on my reviews at 90 and above.
Appreciate the feedback.
CT
|
12-11-11 03:54pm
|
Reply
45
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(RLane's Reply)
I think MPL Studios is a good site.
But I also don't think it's a better value than Femjoy or Metart, both of which currently offer a 1 month membership at $19.95/month.
Different people, different tastes.
But my favorite of the 3 sites is Metart.
Then MPL Studios.
Then Femjoy.
But if Metart is priced at $19.95/month, the other sites should be priced about the same.
Of course, these prices go up and down, at different times, but it's worth waiting for a special price.
And if you sign up for a newsletter, you can sometimes get a nice discount for joining.
I know I've saved money on joining Metart Network sites because I signed up for their newsletter.
|
09-17-13 05:36pm
|
Reply
46
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Thanks for the heads-up - much appreciated. This is the first sale price that I can remember this site offering - the limit to their generosity is one month, however - after the first month, the price goes to $29.95/month.
|
12-23-11 07:14am
|
Reply
47
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Drooler:
I second what Tangub said about joining. I also missed out on the holiday special by signing up for a half year a little too early, but I have to say that the photography is simply outstanding. Really, MPL is setting the gold standard for quality photography of "artistic" nudes.
The approach is tasteful, creative, and sexy, without getting too "artsy" about it. They show there's a lot that can be done with those ideas in mind.
And the women are simply amazingly beautiful.
|
12-22-11 05:50am
|
Reply
48
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from tangub:
Damn....that's just typical after i went and paid $35 for a membership a few months ago. Times must be tough with all these sites clamouring for our christmas porn budget. I'm already sorted though after taking the thanksgiving half price offer at Met Art and as its my first time there i think it could keep me busy for up to 6 months trawling through their huge archives. Anyway I'd highly recommend MPL at that price to anyone who has not been there before.
|
12-20-11 11:07pm
|
Reply
49
|
Natasha Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from pat362:
There might be someone but I rather doubt it so here is what I think you should do. You should stay far away from this site. That is unless you have 25$ dollars that's buring a hole in your pocket and you really don't know what to do with it and even then I think you could find a lot better things to invest in then this site. This is your typical solo model site with a few clothed, semi-nude or all nude photos and videos and not much else. Now that might just be what you want but I still think you can find better. I'm including a link to a another members review of the other site owned by the same company. You'll see that the site didn't get avery good score and i don't think her's will be any better.
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=64579
You could start a thread in the forum on what you are looking for and if you are looking for a model that looks like Natasha then reference her site so that people get an idea of what type of model you like.
|
03-13-12 07:22pm
|
Reply
50
|
Only Opaques
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Capn:
Probably. 'Only' sites are usually quite comprehensive in covering their subject matter.
The only thing they are really shaky on is their definition of 'nude'
It usually covers wearing clothing!
Cap'n :0(
|
12-11-11 02:35am
|
