| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
slutty (0)
|
Nice review Cybertoad, I agree with all your good and bad points, this site is definitely a great soft site.
|
09-22-11 11:42pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
I think your review makes sense. The major point I disagree with is you only scored Metart as 90. I personally think it deserves a higher score.
But I can live with that. Lol.
|
09-23-11 04:25am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
gaypornolover (0)
|
It might be pricey but WOW what a huge site! A million photos - it didn't realise such a site existed! It would certainly take a long, long time to look at all those pics! Photo sites aren't my thing but this is an excellent review, well done.
|
09-23-11 06:39am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
BradlyH (Disabled)
|
Nice review Toad, You are ripping the site up with Reviews lately, it's awesome.
I was a member at met art about half a year ago and i enjoyed it too, I received a discounted price also which made it that much better. I agree it does get repetitive after a while, the sheer size and amount of models almost start to blend even when the camera work is as it's finest. But at least we couldn't complain about Lack of Content !
|
09-23-11 10:31am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :
Hi Ike,
Yea I did dabble with a thought of a higher score. The repetitive stuff in my head made it hard for me to give it over what I did.
But it was not easy if that helps. I guess I was thinking in 12 years, maybe a tad more cutting edge should occur. How they would do that ? LOL I have no idea, but my brain tells me would be interesting to see where they would branch and how. It was Kinda like watching happy days back in the 70's/ At first it was like wow what a concept going back to the good old days, wen cool was cool. But seasons went by and cool became eh its cool. I think in repetitive thinking I am there with this site, its cool ...... but kinda thing. Hope that helps you have an idea where I got the score from.?
|
09-23-11 07:12pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Capn (0)
|
A solid review of a classic site.
I'm afraid though what I said in my comment last year still holds true for me.
'I appreciate this purports to be an artsy site, and I can take that at face value.
What really disappoints me about this site is the lack of variety & creativity.
It is all very formulaic & repetetive.
Sure beautiful girls, scantily clad to nude, usually outside.
Most of the thumbnail set 'covers' blend into each other.
There is so much material, I am bound to have missed a few gems in there, but searching through the 'covers' to find one that stands out gets dull.
A shame, but that is the way it strikes me.'
Cap'n :0/
|
09-24-11 12:55am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
RLane (0)
|
Very nice review, but the picture quality is better than okay. Sometimes for new updates they have either 7000px or 5000px sets.
|
12-11-11 02:02pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #7 - RLane :
I agree with you on the pixels, but in quality I found the way it was done was ok. I think knowing it was a large picture I thought would give a better photo then it did. There are other sites with large HD video and the quality is still not better then smaller sizes. To give a site a 90 I think it is done very well. I don't give out any reviews above 89 unless the site is exceptional. And why the site is very good, I found it has room to grow. Problem is the better a site is, the more picky reviews get above 90 for me. I start looking at details and ease of site. Things other sites strive to get reviewed, So I really like this site, I am just really picky on my reviews at 90 and above.
Appreciate the feedback.
CT
|
12-11-11 03:54pm
Reply To Message
|
