| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(RLane's Reply)
Obviously I can't speak to any other review site's listings or what links they use.
As far as *our* listing ...
I spoke with one of our editors and was told that back in Dec of last year, we recieved an email from Diesel Action saying they were consolidating all of their sites into one site (18 Only Girls).
That is all the info availavle to us at this time.
Hope that helps.
|
01-25-14 07:57am
|
Reply
2
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Khan:
When you say. "Young Legal Porn link" I'll have to assume you mean the direct URL or a link you're using from some other site since we no longer list Young Legal Porn.
Don't know how much this will help but we deactivated the listing for Young Legal Porn a while back.
Without going to the editors I have a hard time seeing why except there seems to have been the merging of some programs and sites. Like I say, I don't have the specifics at this time.
|
01-24-14 03:04pm
|
Reply
3
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from PinkPanther:
As a long-time member, I've got to say that their regular price of $59.95/3 months, recurring at $54.95/3 months is a great deal itself, given the quality and quantity of their updates.
|
03-16-12 05:23pm
|
Reply
4
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Sarah:
ALS Scan rarely has any discounts and when we do they are generally offered only to current or past members.
But you can email webmaster@s2.alsscan.com to see if any are currently being offered.
|
03-14-12 01:05pm
|
Reply
5
|
Artfemme
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Drooler:
August, 2006 was the only time I joined. Max size was 1200 pixels. I took a few other notes, too: very slow server, links to 3,000 pixel images that didn't exist anyway.
And: NO ZIPS.
Well, once was enough. Their "recent updates" are from 2006, too, so go figure.
|
01-27-12 11:16am
|
Reply
6
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I have been dinged a few times by the pre-checked cross sales.
From my experience, what I've learned:
You can not get a refund on a pre-checked cross sale.
Even if you call the billing company within minutes of the pre-checked cross sale going through, and even if you have never used the subscription to the pre-checked cross sale site, you will still not get a refund.
The only thing you can do is cancel the subscription to the pre-checked cross sale site as soon as possible, so you won't be billed the expensive, additional charge for the cross sale site going into the monthly rate.
Because the monthly rate for the cross sale site is almost always very expensive, much more than the normal monthly rate for the site you can find elsewhere.
So it definitely pays to examine any site join page, to make sure any pre-checked cross sells are unchecked.
|
11-23-15 08:13am
|
Reply
7
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from Parsnip:
Nice review. The "cons" aren't things that matter to me. This site is next on my list to try :)
|
11-26-13 07:51am
|
Reply
8
|
Beautiful Nude.biz
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from tangub:
(RLane's Reply)
Yes the download frustrations spoiled what would have otherwise been a nice site.
|
12-11-11 02:37am
|
Reply
9
|
Bikini Pleasure
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Monahan:
I would say the ratio is about 60% bared boobs and 50% bared pussy. The bikinis usually come off altogether.
There's self touching but no insertions or hard core.
|
09-20-14 04:59pm
|
Reply
10
|
Bikini Pleasure
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Capn:
It is a guess really, because as I like more clothing to give a longer strip I would never subscribe to such a site.
Going from the tour though, I would say there would be a fair amount of nudity, but I doubt it would feature in most sets.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-11-11 07:54am
|
Reply
11
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from BradlyH:
(RLane's Reply)
Glad to hear you like that sort of set but there are very few that are along that tone so it might just give you a taste.
I liked clothes sets, there are some very sexy ones on petites-parisiennes that i have found. BUT unlike BT there is a bit of a tease, a flash or something to set an erotica tone.
Sets that show nothing but a smiling beauty in nice clothing do nothing for me. I need something to give it a erotica kick. I may as well flip through a sears catalog if not :)
I think BT should be on every ones list. Looking back now i underscored this site slightly.
|
12-26-11 08:50am
|
Reply
12
|
Catie Minx
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from pat362:
I checked her site out and also her blog site and here is what I can tell you.
1-She is a cam model first so be advised that you will probably get bombarded with offers to see her do cam shows. I seems that you get access to some weekly free cam chats but you'll still have to pay to see some action.
2-This is a really hot looking girl who once had great small breasts. She is still hot looking but she recently got implants.
3-There is so little to see in her preview sections that you really don't know what your money will get you.
4-There are no update schedules anywhere so who knows how old the content is. I can confirm based on Freeone that she has been doing cam stuff since 2011 and by default some of the stuff on her preview sections has to be older thana few months since she now has implants and nowhere do you see that.
**It's your money so you can do what you want with it but I wouldn't touch this site even if it was half the price it is. It is afterall 30$ so that is very high for solo model site.**
|
03-17-13 05:37am
|
Reply
13
|
Club Capri Anderson
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from pat362:
Did you by any chance try to reach the site? If you did then you noticed that the link takes you to glamour models gone bad and not her site so that means her site no longer exist.
Mind you that's not a major problem because the site was probably not worth the cost. Performers that don't do a lot of porn rarely have a site where they'll do more. Capri's claim to fame is that she was one of Charlie Sheen's escort when he went ape shit. She was able to milk this for her 15 minutes of fame and has disapeared back in the escort business where she probably makes huge amounts of money.
|
12-15-11 11:35am
|
Reply
14
|
Dirty Ashlyn
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from tangub:
She certainly looks different here, I don't think I've seen her with the blonde hair before. Think I preferred her more as a natural brunette than a fake breasted blonde. Only 2 days ago I discovered some nice pre boob job photo shoots of her at My Glamour Site.
|
05-13-12 01:17am
|
Reply
15
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from Cybertoad:
Rlane,
I actually thought this site would have rated higher the your other
review. This site seems to have very nice quality photo's at least in the tour section. It takes practice to get reviews down to how you like them done yourself. Like Staff said it your call how and why you rate something. I do like that gave a few details in the end about the sites.
If you are not able to find more to put in a review, look at others that may have posted many reviews.
And letting people know cost, how many photos or video etc.
Remember the reviews often get people to go take a look based sometimes on what you out in a review, so the more you give in details the more a person gets info about the site you are / were a member at .
Welcome to PU
|
12-09-11 10:59pm
|
Reply
16
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(RLane's Reply)
For the record ...
You *may* use whatever standard you wish to come up with the score you assign a site. Of course it does help if that standard more or less follows what other apply or you at least explain anything unique about how you arrived at your score.
While some other users may not feel it's fair to mark off for certain things, it's really your call.
Welcome to PornUsers
|
12-09-11 07:02am
|
Reply
17
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(RLane's Reply)
No perhaps not, but you listed it in 'cons' without a rider on it.
Welcome to PU BTW !
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-09-11 05:25am
|
Reply
18
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Review
from Capn:
To be honest, you can't mark down a photo site for not having videos.
If it didn't have zips, yes.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-08-11 11:33pm
|
Reply
19
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Abel Semen:
Not a member, but it seems to be the *tiniest* bit harder than Met-Art now. Models actually kiss each other, lick their lips and otherwise act overtly erotic, but its still only softcore as far as I can tell from the free portion of the site. Not nearly as big a difference as between Met-Art and Sexart, for example.
|
04-18-12 12:00am
|
Reply
20
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from tangub:
I think the revamp and renaming of the site is an attempt to give the site its own individual identity. Under the name Met Models I think most people had the impression that it was just the smaller inferior sister site of Met Art where they dumped the content that didn't make the grade to be showcased on Met Art.
From the tour it looks like they are using the exact same site layout i've just encountered at the other Met sister site The Life Erotic which is a big improvement as they have addressed some of the cons i mentioned in my review of last year such as the lack of a decent model index. I also notice from the tour that they have doubled the update rate to 2 per day from 19th January so i guess that would be their justification for the price increase.
|
01-26-12 03:41am
|
Reply
21
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Click on "Free Tour" and it shows you that it updates once a day.
|
12-12-11 08:55pm
|
Reply
22
|
Eva's Garden
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Claypaws:
I was a member about two months ago. They do not really have a download limit (unless it is larger than I would ever hit). But they make accessing and downloading difficult with irritating timeouts. If you click a download link (for a zip), you have to begin downloading it within about 2 minutes or the link times out. You cannot use a download manager but DownThemAll in Firefox works provided you start the download within under two minutes. So you cannot queue them.
Links from thumbnails to photos also time out in a few minutes. If you have had the thumbnail page for a photo set on display for more than about five minutes, then clicking a thumbnail just gives you the black bar that you describe. You have to return to the model's main page, open the photo set again from that page and then you can click thumbnails again successfully for the next five minutes. It is happy with opening in a new tab but only if you work within those timings.
Your entire login times out after a while. I cannot remember how long but I think it was somewhere between one and two hours. If your login has timed out, you cannot access anything until you restart the browser and then log in again.
They have a forum but they ignore all criticism and suggestions. They respond quickly to reports of definite faults though, such as blind links or missing images. Occasionally, they respond to praise of individual photo sets or models. Disrespectful comments are removed, which is fair enough. But they do themselves no favours by ignoring all constructive criticism.
|
05-16-12 05:36am
|
Reply
23
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(RLane's Reply)
Thanks for adding that clarification on the photos. I don't normally download photos so I checked a few to give the specs for the review and must have hit all ones that offered the higher resolution.
Like you, I think one of the draws of the site is that a lot of the models aren't found anywhere else. I also like, as I noted in my review, that some who get a start here go on to be big-name porn stars and we get to see them at the beginning of their careers when they're still innocent. I suspect that since the site is primarily a softcore site and seems to treat the models well is one of the main reasons that they're able to attract so many first-timers.
|
08-04-13 07:51am
|
Reply
24
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from anyonebutme:
Their oldest stuff is 1090px on the long side. Their newest stuff is 1600px.
Then they have some "big sized" sets that are either 3000px or 4000px but they are more random than anything else, not even close to their complete collection, and only include a sampling of images from a given set.
Assume you're getting 1600px on their new material.
|
12-11-11 05:02pm
|
Reply
25
|
Georgia Jones
(0)
|
Reply of
RLane's Comment
from Drooler:
I can only give you old info as I joined just once in Feb 2009. The resolution of the pics was 72 dpi -- pretty standard. The largest dimensions of the photos was 1400 pixels on the long end.
I didn't save a whole lot as some sets were too dark. One I did save showed up later in larger dimensions at Stunners.
Georgia's a favorite of mine. Too bad this site with her name on it doesn't do her justice. Typical.
|
12-12-11 07:26pm
|
