| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from Drooler:
Thanks for this review. It is by far the best of the three posted to date. I've thought of joining this site, but the relatively small pic sizes (by today's standards), slow loads, poor navigation, and category overload -- not to mention the price of admission to all that -- are not what I want to experience.
Categories are supposed to help us find what we want more quickly, so there can't be too many. With 35+ here, they loose their value. It's kinda like inflation.
|
02-08-08 02:47am
|
Reply
177
|
Best Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Pinche Kankun:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Man, I am close to saying... FORGET IT!! :(
I have tried so many time to fuss about sorry ass nutshots like those and they still produce them!!
It's like people really want to see a man jack his dick off!!
When a man pulls out a woman's hole and nuts really hard immediately all over her, not only is she impressed by that, but she knows that he is a healthy man and that she really did something to him to make him nut that hard!!
Porn does not want to portray that image... The fact that women can make men nut really hard and that they are hard to fuck cuz pussy feels that good!! So what do male pornstars do before their session:
- They jack off somewhere before their session so it can look like they can last long in the pussy, or
- They cut to another session, so he can subside, or
- He just gets too much pussy, it is almost meaningless to fuck on camera!!
In the past 2 weeks, I rented like 10 movies and 97% of all content within all those movies were:
- Jack off into facials
- Pure Head
- Facial Cumshots!!
Man, oh my gosh!! >:(
|
01-30-08 11:14pm
|
Reply
178
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from ace of aces:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
that`s exact this what i want to hear.
|
01-28-08 04:24am
|
Reply
179
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from apoctom:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Thanks for the news. If I run into any trial limitations, I'll post them here.
|
01-24-08 07:59am
|
Reply
180
|
Monster Pimps
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from jd1961:
Porn and terrible names go together. It seems to be a tradition. They just don't think these things through.
|
01-24-08 05:06am
|
Reply
181
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from apoctom:
Thanks for the excellent mini-review. I've had this site in my favorites list but I haven't had a chance to get around to it. I'll probably check out the trial soon.
|
01-23-08 10:19am
|
Reply
182
|
TNV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Hey, WeeWillie,
Thanks for the clarification. I love groups of beautiful nude females, but hate DRM. Appreciate the info!
|
01-08-08 07:26am
|
Reply
183
|
Scoreland
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from Pinche Kankun:
Man, I love the Scoreland Babes and their boobs, but I hate their cumshots! BRO, you would think a guy having sex with a woman with wonderful sized headlights (Not too big, Not too small), bouncing up and down while she rocks on your hard knob, would pull out and shoot nut all over her set of knockers without anyone having to move an inch... BUT NOOOO!!!!! They go straight for the face!!!
Why can't boobs flicks like these end in massive nutshots that land all on their boobs and belly?!!
|
01-07-08 07:21pm
|
Reply
184
|
TNV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from Jay G:
Thanks for the warning.
The tempting pictures on the homepage of groups of very pretty & very naked females is tempting, but DRM means "Downloading Really Messed-up" (Just joking, "Digital Rights Management" simply means that the videos play remarkably poorly, then disappear after a short period of time).
I've never belonged to a DRM site without lots of problems. Now I just stay away.
|
01-07-08 12:00pm
|
Reply
185
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
I got de crystal ball!
|
01-07-08 12:44am
|
Reply
186
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
It was a lot worse in the old days.
|
01-06-08 08:56pm
|
Reply
187
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
Another Zappa fan, awright! Agreed, some of the symphonic stuff is really arcane. Well, Edgar Varese was a big inspiration, and if you've heard any of that, well, easy listenin' it ain't! I can go about as far as the Studio Tan (album) stuff and really enjoy it, but that's about all.
BTW, for a really great live performance of "Montana," check out his concert in Sweden in the early '70's (YouTube). Great extended guitar solo, too!
|
01-06-08 12:43am
|
Reply
188
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
For what it's worth, I should clarify a bit more. I think some Euro-based sites -- well, their payment processors actually -- might be avoiding dollar-to-Euro transactions because of the potential for litigation.
The suit I mentioned was for transactions from 2/96 to 11/06. My topmiss transactions came after that, so I think people are just being cautious.
I guess we'll have to open accounts in Europe so we can access all of the porn! LOL
|
01-03-08 08:44pm
|
Reply
189
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from Denner:
Agree....
Must be a reason for this full access trial offer - well, some of the stuff is so old it's almost embarrassing.
Maybe Mr. Markham should call the site: Vintage Toy Teens
|
01-03-08 02:31pm
|
Reply
190
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from Drooler:
Actually, I have a theory, but it needs a bit of explanation.
I used to be able to subscribe to topmiss, which is a French site (the language is French and the currency is the Euro), but I've been rejected from signup for several months now, much to my chagrin.
About a month ago, I received settlement documents from a US District Court class action lawsuit for people identified as having been wrongly charged fees for foreign transactions. I suspect that my topmiss subscription might have been caught in that milieu.
Is it the same with Club Seventeen? I can't say for sure, of course, but it might be.
Fortunately, some Euro-based sites, such as the DDF sites, seem to have bypassed this problem.
Sometimes the law is an ass, and sometimes an ass is the law, but in this case, the law keeps you from enjoying ass!
BTW, topmiss isn't listed at PornUsers because it has no English version.
|
01-03-08 12:50am
|
Reply
191
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from Drooler:
I'd joined this once 16 months ago and had the same experience. Even kept a note to self that it was "loaded with toy shit." The content doesn't look new and it's hard to tell what actually is without going on a research excursion. Some of it I'd seen before joining at other sites.
Just what the world needs. Another site with Toy Obsession Syndrome.
|
12-30-07 04:17pm
|
Reply
192
|
Teens From Tokyo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Toadsith:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
"lab rat" - yes, that is a much more concise description than I came up with and really signifies just how alien the style seems to me.
You are also right about their softcore work - it is pretty universally top notch stuff - often a little too softcore for my tastes, but undoubtedly artistic and impressive. Unfortunately the photography on Teens From Tokyo is quite limited.
|
12-26-07 09:01pm
|
Reply
193
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
And there's another one: Daisy Beach. They have 3 pic sizes up to 3000px and a lot of panty/almost-nude. Personally, I hated it for this reason, but you might like it. It's never been reviewed so far.
|
12-20-07 04:15am
|
Reply
194
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from Drooler:
Since you like girls in panties, you ought to check out nextdoor-models (put w's in front, .com at end). I've been there a couple of times myself and the pics are at 1800px. Thing is, I prefer nudity, and there wasn't that much -- though a small percentage of the galleries, especially of Riley Shy and Amy Reid, got hot and naked.
|
12-20-07 01:43am
|
Reply
195
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from ace of aces:
(WeeWillyWinky's Reply)
thanks a lot for youre indeed specific answer. i think i won`t try that site mainly because of the non exclusive point
|
12-13-07 04:07am
|
Reply
196
|
Cute Panty Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from ace of aces:
do you know if they have softcore content? (mastrubating etc. or only teasing?)
|
12-12-07 04:07am
|
Reply
197
|
Voyeur 4 You
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from littlejoe:
some of the stuff on that page looks staged, and the claims of high school content is probably untrue. but the locker room/bathroom/ hidden stuff is real. its put up on newsgroups all the time, and is real hidden videos
|
12-08-07 10:39am
|
Reply
198
|
Voyeur 4 You
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from jd1961:
The 18 U.S.C. 2257 Statement on the front page proves that that the claim is not true.
|
12-07-07 02:09am
|
Reply
199
|
Asian Panty Peeks
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
from APP Webmaster:
I wanted to address some of the comments......
As for navigation, everything is very simple in the members area. There are only 3 pages which link to all the content. Each week one favorite photoset is zipped up for easy downloading (NEW FEATURE).
All the bonus movies are in one place, easy to find.
One idea of the site is to give the viewer the entire photoshoot so they can experience the shoot un-edited. That's why most of the images from each set are on the site.
Once or twice the site does refer to a clothing and costume-play style in Japan called "Gothic Lolita", which was referenced to describe the style of clothes the model was wearing.
Anyway....thanks for all the positive comments:
- Good looking models.
- High-quality pics.
- Vids look OK (MORE have been added recently).
- Interesting style, lots of mirrors, costume-play.
- Regular updates.
They are appreciated!
|
10-25-07 04:27pm
|
Reply
200
|
Sweet N Soft
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Comment
from HeatherMcXxx:
It makes you wonder what these sites are thinking, doesn't it? Like Wee Willy says, "Apparently instead of trying to sell their content this place is happier just to piss you off." Do they really believe that ultimately some frustrated visitor will think, "Well, I guess these pop-ups aren't going away. Time to sign up!"
|
09-15-07 08:43am
|
