| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Throated
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Comment
from jberryl69:
In participating on a forum thread related to jonni darkko, a number of these girls do get promoted - yes some are new to the business and as I said in my comments below, the shooter has changed. But if you take for example Karmen Karma, here's one girl that will appear in more vids for sure.
|
06-22-13 09:59am
|
Reply
52
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(Marcus's Reply)
No problems here either
|
06-16-13 06:08pm
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Cybertoad:
(Marcus's Reply)
Yes thats dead on to my thoughts on this.
|
06-08-13 08:14am
|
Reply
54
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Comment
from thaavi:
Ok, I need to reply about two things:
All the facts and technical details are here https://www.thebestporn.com/review/idreamofjo/#review. There is no need to duplicate these data in any of members reviews. No member review is balanced and fair, every review is subjective and created from very own feelings and thatīs the sense of it, to point out some things that cannot be described as just a simple fact.
Admin didnīt send us here to write glorifying reviews. He only mentioned it is possibility to write a review here, thatīs all.
|
06-03-13 02:56am
|
Reply
55
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from thaavi:
(Marcus's Reply)
In my very opinion the basic and essential approach of this site is so perfect, that the site deserves my rating 100%. The things I mentioned in cons are rather my wishes than something Iīm unhappy with, you know. Dunno what you are looking for, but the major things that are so special and unique for this site as visual variety of locations, outdoor/indoor scenes, artistic approach, genuine emotions, true connection, fantastic natural looking and acting girls - all of this was mentioned. There are some snippets on tube sites, so you can see it yourself to make your own perspective. You wouldnīt regret:)
|
06-01-13 05:14pm
|
Reply
56
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Randyman:
(Marcus's Reply)
Fame support told me I have to call the # on the back of the card and have them unblock them. I guess this happens all the time, since this company is located over seas. They said I should be able to join up after that. I hope so, crossing my fingers.
|
06-01-13 02:54pm
|
Reply
57
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Randyman:
(Marcus's Reply)
I just checked my balance, plenty of $ left on it, and I used it today to buy a PS3 game so I know it's working. This is the best damn site I ever saw and I hope I can rejoin.
|
06-01-13 12:52pm
|
Reply
58
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Randyman:
(Marcus's Reply)
I contacted the support team and they told me my membership expired because the bank declined payment. I joined up with a gift credit card so it's impossible that the bank "declined payment." I tried to rejoin using the same card but it won't let me.
|
06-01-13 09:37am
|
Reply
59
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(Marcus's Reply)
All I'll say is that a high score with no supporting data except for the insane adulation of the reviewer is a sure way to make the review useless. Case in point the two reviews for I dream of Jo. Sorry but you lose me when you describe a 32 year old woman has having a girl next door look. Jo/Monika is still an amazing looking woman but she has not looked like a girl in a very long time.
This may be a great site but none of the most I'll even go so far as to say that I'm now a little more nervous about content because of the reviews.
|
05-31-13 03:51pm
|
Reply
60
|
Karla Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Agreed, Marcus - Karla Spice is one of my all-time fave solo-girl models, up there with Sandy Summers, whose work, especially lots of her early work, still has a stunning erotic charge.
|
05-29-13 01:55am
|
Reply
61
|
Karla Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Comment
from tjpacinonetwork:
It's not being taken offline or closing or anything :) We will soon be moving to a new system where everything will more more user friendly! You can expect to see that within a few months.
|
05-28-13 03:19pm
|
Reply
62
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from tangub:
Thanks for the new review on this site Marcus, I had thought about going back there but based on your review I'm glad I saved my money. Going on your figures it seems the site has lost over 200 photo sets since I was last there.
|
05-27-13 08:49am
|
Reply
63
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(Marcus's Reply)
Thanks. I read in your review that the video aspect ratios are screwed up. I suspect I'll try the trial soon.
|
05-25-13 05:04pm
|
Reply
64
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(Marcus's Reply)
Thanks! I'll take you up on that. Did you try the trial? If so, does it still work? Subjectively, how do you like the video quality.
And I should add that what will likely tip me in favour of joining is hearing that Sarah is uploading blowjob scenes now.
|
05-25-13 09:39am
|
Reply
65
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from rearadmiral:
Interesting review. I've always been a fan of her stuff when I saw her on ALS Scan and wondered about joining her site. Based on your review I can at least go in knowing what the flaws are.
|
05-25-13 08:07am
|
Reply
66
|
Sexy Pattycake
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from tboy:
urgh, really sad to hear this is still the case :(
If she redid her website and upped her vids to HD with a more frequent update schedule and I'd be back like a shot!
I agree as well that it feels like a cynical ripoff but they know she has a dedicated core following so they can get away with it, it's tease taken to a real extreme.
|
05-15-13 12:49am
|
Reply
67
|
Indian Love Goddess
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from bbiillyy:
(Marcus's Reply)
@Marcus: i will review this site and waist my money of what they offering me in front. content they showing on front is from 1998 and 2000. Very very old content. If they dont care about the front end than how can we expect the quality in members area. Example in shops shopkeeper show latest stuff to attract customer not old.....
|
04-24-13 11:20pm
|
Reply
68
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from dgerity:
Ann Angel has left her site to persue
new technological breakthru in Glamor
Model live broadcasting. Her site
webmaster and the corporation owners
have refused to drop live showing of
Ann Angel Instead they now broadcast
ten year old video and photos on their site as
live performances and galleries of Ann Angel
scamming their cutomer who pay to see
Ann Angel live. They keep scheduling the video
reruns as live performances. I have
traced the server to their staten
island server.
|
04-13-13 05:57am
|
Reply
69
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from RustyJ:
So no zips's because they get pirated and it's no problem that they are a huge PITA to download individually since nobody cares about them anyway?
Makes no sense on at least five different levels :|
|
04-12-13 08:58am
|
Reply
70
|
Bryci
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#26
from Capn:
(Marcus's Reply)
Bit of a cheek, is a gross understatement.
It is an outright rip off!
Cap'n :0(
|
04-12-13 07:49am
|
Reply
71
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from Capn:
I'm done here.
I'll let others draw whatever conclusions they like.
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-11-13 04:26pm
|
Reply
72
|
Bryci
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#20
from Capn:
(Marcus's Reply)
I think that is worth docking the score by at least 15 TBH
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-11-13 04:07pm
|
Reply
73
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from Capn:
Gotta say I am a bit surprised you didn't spot the regional pricing issue, especially given your location.
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-11-13 10:04am
|
Reply
74
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from Capn:
For a photo collector, No zips = no subscription
These days no-one is going to download photos individually.
Allowing a custom zip feature may reduce the likelihod of piracy.
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-11-13 09:43am
|
Reply
75
|
Bryci
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from RustyJ:
(Marcus's Reply)
Oh, I guess I read your review too hastily ;)
|
04-11-13 05:15am
|
