| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from graymane:
(Marcus's Reply)
AMEN!
|
01-04-15 01:08pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jay G:
(Marcus's Reply)
Doorstop...... good, but I already have so many doorstops going back to my old Texas Instruments & Commodore 64 computers (Remember 64 KILOBYTES!)
|
06-20-14 07:35am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from LPee23:
(Marcus's Reply)
When HD came out years ago, some people cautioned that the extra detail may not be appealing when it shows blemishes. As we all know, the market has since voted overwhelmingly in favor of HD, with standard definition video being below almost anyone's standards today for a paysite.
|
04-30-14 01:03pm
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from pat362:
(Marcus's Reply)
In that case then I definitely don't watch porn for more than an hour.
|
07-20-13 06:47pm
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from graymane:
(Marcus's Reply)
A resounding echo for Marcus's sentiments for Fame Girls.
I've found nothing, anywhere in commercial porn, whether hardcore or otherwise that gets my juices flowing like these three gals ....above and especially prominent among them being Ella, a stunning blond knockout whose body I suspect must'a been sculptured by the Gods, who started modeling for Fame Girls either in early or preteens, who, now is twenty, is still non-nude, still WOWS'EM ... and who's notoriety has grabbed global attention.
Yeah ..... there's a lot of non-nude action out there better than the hard stuff.
|
07-16-13 03:49pm
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from pat362:
(Marcus's Reply)
The art of tease is one thing but how much tease can you really get out of a non-nude model doing mostly glamour shots? I can understand being attracted to a specific model because of her overall appearance
but at some point you must want more than just looking at her with clothes on. My biggest issue with non-nude or for that matter nude modeling is that it can be visually pleasing to the eyes but it's not going to sexually excite me and sooner or later I want more from that model.
|
07-16-13 03:00pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Cybertoad:
(Marcus's Reply)
Yes thats dead on to my thoughts on this.
|
06-08-13 08:14am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from gaypornolover:
(Marcus's Reply)
LOL I'll take her husband - I always liked him, though I prefer Joe in Family Guy!
|
01-06-13 08:37pm
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from marcdc1:
(Marcus's Reply)
I'm with Marcus. This is acting and a fantasy.
If done well I think it can be very hot especially in some of the amateur sites where I think it is more about fantasy and less about acting.
I agree with the rest of the post where if it is done as abuse - that's not my think. to put some context to this conversation I think myhotwife is an incredible sexy wife where the husband talks about "pimping out his wife. A site like facial abuse is less erotic.
|
10-27-12 06:29am
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from jberryl69:
(Marcus's Reply)
Interestingly enough I found on a Google search a site called Barelist a Bio that states:
Biography: Nikky Cassidy was born in Quebec Canada and is 5'5 and 114 lbs with a big pair of enhanced 32D tits.
Looking at the photos from her website, some of them don't look enhanced and they don't look D'd, but then some do, so it's hard to say.
I found no other reference to my query of "Nikky Cassidy" cup size.
|
06-01-12 08:59am
|
Reply
11
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(Marcus's Reply)
I agree with Marcus. A solo model site with an update once or twice a week is fine, but most sites should post an update at least once a day (or 6 times a week) to boast having "frequent updates."
|
05-16-12 10:53pm
|
Reply
12
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Monahan:
(Marcus's Reply)
I agree with Marcus...except in one aspect. Many ads are now disguised as part of a site's content so clicking on the link and expecting to see something created by the site instead gets you redirected to another site and a sales pitch. That's an intrusive pain in the ass that I don't need and, if it continues, would make me change my vote to "I hate them."
|
05-11-12 10:08am
|
Reply
13
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(Marcus's Reply)
Thanks for the reply.
Glad my advice was helpful.
|
03-27-19 02:21am
|
Reply
14
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(Marcus's Reply)
AT THE START OF THIS REVIEW, I EXPLAIN WHY I AM USING CAP LETTERS.
"NOTE: I'M USING CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR MY EYES TO SEE AND EDIT.
NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE."
I TRY TO PUT THIS MESSAGE, OR SOMETHING SIMILAR, IN MY REVIEWS WHEN I USE ALL CAPS.
ZOOMING IN CREATES PROBLEMS, BECAUSE PART OF THE PAGE IS OFF SCREEN, SO YOU HAVE TO USE THE BAR AT THE BOTTOM TO SEE WHAT'S OFF-SCREEN.
I KNOW PEOPLE TEND TO THINK I AM BEING RUDE OR SHOUTING WHEN I USE ALL CAPS. EVEN WHEN I LIST MY REASONS FOR USING CAPS.
IF ALL CAPS BOTHERS YOU WHEN READING A REVIEW, JUST SKIP OR IGNORE MY REVIEWS, COMMENTS, WHATEVER.
IT'S NO BIG THING.
THERE ARE WORK-AROUNDS TO USING ALL CAPS, BUT UNLESS THE PU STAFF REFUSE MY POSTS, IT'S SO MUCH EASIER FOR ME TO USE CAPS.
MAYBE WHEN YOU GET MUCH OLDER, YOU MIGHT UNDERSTAND A LITTLE BETTER:
MY EYESIGHT IS POOR.
I'M NOT DOING THIS TO BE DIFFERENT, OR STAND OUT.
|
03-10-19 05:45pm
|
Reply
15
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from dgerity:
Ann Angel has left her site to persue
new technological breakthru in Glamor
Model live broadcasting. Her site
webmaster and the corporation owners
have refused to drop live showing of
Ann Angel Instead they now broadcast
ten year old video and photos on their site as
live performances and galleries of Ann Angel
scamming their cutomer who pay to see
Ann Angel live. They keep scheduling the video
reruns as live performances. I have
traced the server to their staten
island server.
|
04-13-13 05:57am
|
Reply
16
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(Marcus's Reply)
I find that her other site is even more of a scam because you can't download anything. I don't agree with sites that offer streaming only of their videos but I at least understand why they do this but I really don't understand why you would prevent paying members the ability to download the photosets. She appears to still be doing cam shows but I'm not sure if they are only for ehr site or if she freelances on other sites. She is quite active on Twitter.
|
03-10-13 07:50am
|
Reply
17
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Marcus's Reply)
The only reason I called it a scam is because there is so little HC on this site that almost everyone joining will feel cheated since this is suppose to be her HC site. This is compounded by the fact that she has a few other softcore sites so unless someone sees your review prior to joining then they will rightly assume that Ann is doing only HC stuff on this site.
That's not to say that a few months or a year from now that the site won't be full of HC porn but that won't help all the people who like you joined expecting some HC porn from a favorite girl.
|
03-10-13 05:37am
|
Reply
18
|
Ann Angel XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from pat362:
Thanks for the review.
If I read your review correctly then her site is pretty much a scam since she hasn't actually done any hardcore sex yet. She may have done some midcore stuff but that is not the same thing at all.
|
03-09-13 06:48pm
|
Reply
19
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from tangub:
(Marcus's Reply)
It seems like she's paranoid about having her content stolen...I wonder what's the betting there's no downloads available like in her old site.
I also found this in the news...."This is the only place you will be able to see over 50,000 pics of me that I have been adding each week for the past 3years, as well as over 60hrs of video".....but when i check the tour I only see 18 updates listed. Will look forward to your review if you take the plunge.
|
10-14-12 01:17am
|
Reply
20
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(Marcus's Reply)
ok, thanks. They're going to look into adding that site.
|
10-13-12 05:47am
|
Reply
21
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(Marcus's Reply)
I mentioned the info in your post to our editors and they asked me to ask you where on the site you found this info?
|
10-13-12 05:33am
|
Reply
22
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Comment
from tangub:
I guess she's not bothered about making any money from the new site since the "join now" button leads to a 404 page.
|
10-05-12 11:16am
|
Reply
23
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from tboy:
Wow that's a new low, thanks for the warning.
|
12-31-11 11:23am
|
Reply
24
|
Anna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Review
from rearadmiral:
Good God! If I had spent $25 to get NOTHING I think I'd be less polite than you! Wow! Thanks for the warning.
|
12-31-11 09:03am
|
Reply
25
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from pat362:
(Marcus's Reply)
I think we can both agree that whichever option someone picks. That person will have had at least one dollar stolen from his pocket and if he or she is not carefull than that amount could go up pretty quickly.
|
03-29-13 06:32pm
|
