| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Blacks on Blondes
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from Shen:
This is a hugely positive review, thanks for writing it! Guess this must be your favourite site with a score of 99 right? Haha, I'm glad you found this site as enjoyable as it is.
The only thing between me and getting a 6-month subscription to the Dogfart Network is the 4K charge per video. I'm a sucker for that format so it might add up too much otherwise. If they could incorporate a price upgrade instead, that would be marvellous.
|
07-26-19 05:15pm
|
Reply
52
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(marcdc1's Reply)
I'm less surprised that they had to stop doing those kind of scenes than that they were able to do them for that long. The rule that a sub isn't supposed to be tied down during the fucking portion of a BSDM scene goes back to the beginning of porn so technically speaking Kink should never have been able to shoot even one video or if they did then they would have to take them down and as far as I know they are all still on the site.
|
07-06-17 10:32am
|
Reply
53
|
Bound Gangbangs
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from pat362:
Not sure if you are aware but the reason why it is dead is because Kink had no choice. Their main CC processor threatened that if they didn`t change their format then they would no longer work with them.
At the heart of the problem is something that is kind of quirky about BSDM porn. You can be tied down and for lack of a more appropriate term tortured but you can`t be tied down and fucked. That doesn`t mean that you don`t get the odd scene with both and somehow this is overlooked in a lesbian BSDM scene but ultimately a performer cannot be tied up and fucked at the same time. Kink might have gotten away with it but too many of the bound gangbangs had a sort of rapy flavor and that`s bound (sorry for the pun) to raise major red flags with credit card companies.
Who would want to be associated with a website that promotes rape even the fake exaggerated kind. In the end Kink decided to change the format and remove the physical restrains like rope and simply get the men to hold the performers down. Even that last part is getting rare now.
|
06-30-17 06:53pm
|
Reply
54
|
Bound Gods
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Was this site a production of Kink.com? If so, the answer is that there are no new Kink.com productions at all any longer. When they moved out of the armory in the Mission District in SF, they said that they would be shifting their production to Nevada, but they then decided to stop their own productions entirely and to go to an all-licensing model, so unless they make a different new business decision, then even after COVID-19 restrictions go away entirely, there will not be new Kink.com productions, only licensing of material from other porn producers.
|
09-27-21 08:23pm
|
Reply
55
|
Bound Men Wanked
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from tangub:
I'm not sure if I'm understanding this correctly so please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but the conclusion I've reached from reading this is that you've not even subscribed to Bound Men Wanked and that this review is based on having access to 6 bonus or promotional videos within Kink network and is in effect pure speculation based on those 6 videos and what you can see in the site tour at Bound Men Wanked.
|
09-13-17 11:29am
|
Reply
56
|
Brandi Love
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from pat362:
Nice review. Now many anal scenes does she have and is she the stra oir athey of other performers?
|
10-16-12 11:02am
|
Reply
57
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from zhaileyramareer:
How could we advertise to this site?
|
10-07-14 11:03pm
|
Reply
58
|
Bree Olson
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Some of the women on this network used to be prolific performers but they are now all retired. The only ones that still shoot the odd scene are Allie, Aaliyah, Ashley, and Anissa.
|
04-14-14 05:29pm
|
Reply
59
|
Bree Olson
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from HardXJ:
Hi Marc! I wanted to thank you for the nice review. About the pricing, soon, we will change the pricing as well: It will cost 1$ for 3 days! There is tons of things on Bree that people can watch! She is amazing!
Thanks again for the review,
MC
|
04-14-14 04:59am
|
Reply
60
|
Bree Olson
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from pat362:
Bree has been retired for at least 2 years so any content on her site must be that old or older. In fact I believe most of the performers on the network are semi-retired to completely retired.
I think the fact that the entire network is available for 15$ is why I don't really mind that you are getting old content but I can't see too many people coming back for more since there won't be much.
|
04-13-14 09:21am
|
Reply
61
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from JamesDavid:
Thank you Marc!
Touching on a couple of your comments if I may?
"I guess I could say I'd like to have more content. But that's kinda cheap. I always want more contents. LOL."
2018 into 2019 was a tough year for us, my wife (Bryci) was diagnosed with Celiac disease and she fought with being angry about it, being sick more than she wasn't etc. We didn't film near what we wanted in 2019 and yes, we stopped doing hardcore for more or less the entire year. One of the things about Celiac.. it screws with your brain. Makes you angry, it's like someone else is driving your life and you're a passenger. (her words) She's made youtube videos about this if curious.. go to youtube, search "ourbellalife" and you'll find out channel. Not sure if I am allowed to link here. =)
We just started shooting hardcore again, and B tells me she wants to shoot weekly again, really have fun like we used to so things will be back to normal. The site started in 2009 so there is 11 years of content in there for $19.95/m and in addition, extra content from all other sites so although I understanding wanting more... ha, we're doing the best we can for now. :)
"more use of dildo instead of real thing than I would have gone with"
We started hardcore in 2013 at Bryci's request because she told me she didn't like filming with toys. She kept doing dildo vids etc for years but she stopped in Jan 2019 because she simply had enough. She doesn't enjoy dildos basically, and she calls the shots for her site 500%. The solo videos, she would shoot them herself, tripoded. Not sure if she'll return to toys or not, I have learned the hard way to say never say never. lol. So maybe she will? Can't say for sure, I'll pass this on to her though.
"(old stuff) sometimes spotty lighting. It's rare and unavoidable in a pro-am site."
I hear you on this! Lighting is always an issue because we want to be in the moment and amateur more so than pro. We have large windows so we try for daylight more often than not. It's getting better for us! :)
Again, Marc, thank you for your review. It's appreciated!
|
01-27-20 10:46am
|
Reply
62
|
Butt Naked In The Streets
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(marcdc1's Reply)
Glad to help. Give Teasers VOD a look. They're the best I've found.
|
09-17-12 05:54pm
|
Reply
63
|
Butt Naked In The Streets
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(marcdc1's Reply)
I've been a member at Teasers VOD twice and highly recommend them. For me I prefer certain elements in public nudity: 1) stars I know, 2) U.S. settings and 3) not too much editing. The reason for 2 and 3 is because I think a huge part of the allure for these sites is how nervous the model is, and a model in Budapest is likely to be less nervous than a model in Los Angeles just because in the U.S. the risks are higher. Teasers has all three of these elements. But there is one warning - if you want to join Teasers I recommend that you do it soon. They've stopped updating due to a cease-and-desist order from the City of Los Angeles. There is still a lot of material though that makes the $30 fee an excellent value. Part of the reason I recommend joing now is that another site, Nude in L.A., shut down completely. That site had my #1 and 2 requirements but the shoots were edited in such a way that the nervousness was gone so the shoots lost a lot of 'heat.'
Another choice is ALS Scan. They haven't done any public nudity stuff in several years, and admittedly they did shoot that in Europe, but some of the shoots are great. I especially like the shoot with Ashley Bulgari - she is SO nervous. It's a fun shoot to watch. ALS Scan isn't a public nudity site, so I wouldn't suggest that you join just for the public stuff, but ALS Scan is one of the best porn sites on the 'net so the public stuff is just icing on the cake.
Public Flash is also good, It has my #1 and 2 preferences but can be a little more tame with usually just flashing rather than full nudity.
FTV Girls usually has some public stuff in each scene, and some of them can be pretty daring, but they're usually more tame than Teasers.
There's also Public Disgrace. This site is in a league of its own in combining BDSM, public nudity and public sex. If you're looking for degradation and humiliation (but with full consent) along with the public nudity I'd definitely try this one.
I've reviewed all of the sites I've recommended so you can get more details there. I've also reviewed a few I didn't like too so that may be of some use to you too.
Good luck!
|
09-17-12 05:46pm
|
Reply
64
|
Butt Plays
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RustyJ:
(marcdc1's Reply)
No, they are not really strong in dialog and there really is no dirty talking to mention. I guess that is not so typical on these European sites unless it's Rocco Siffredi or someone like that.
Personally that does not bother me as I find it often a bit awkward.
|
02-02-13 12:15am
|
Reply
65
|
Candy Christopher
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from graymane:
You got my attention...... No Candy for this guy.
|
04-21-13 01:24am
|
Reply
66
|
Candy Christopher
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
This is another site where I wish the webmaster would chime in to defend their content. But I guess we all know better - 300 x 200 pictures? Last I checked, this isn't 1985.
Isn't it funny how the crappiest sites are the hardest to review?
|
04-20-13 07:39am
|
Reply
67
|
Candy Monroe
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from Shen:
Thanks for the review marc. Straight to the point and a lot of good detail. The Dogfart Network seems to have a whole host of sites I'm interested in, knowing that this site has a humiliation niche was something I was unaware of before.
|
04-18-19 12:30pm
|
Reply
68
|
CFNM Secret
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from mbaya:
I saw when I was posting my review that the site you are reviewing is not CFNM Secret on Reality Kings, but the Brazzers CFNM site.
|
01-22-20 07:14am
|
Reply
69
|
CFNM Secret
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from Kody:
Being able to cut right to the positions you like sounds like one of the best things ever though. Does this count for all sites in the Brazzers network?
It's funny to think that they're probably one of the first networks I ever heard of but I still haven't joined yet!
|
03-15-18 11:41am
|
Reply
70
|
Chanta's Bitches
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from Jay G:
I belong to the Kink network but don't have access to Chanta's bitches with it. Lucky you.
It is an old site I belonged to a few times over the years, but it hasn't filmed new material since 2009. Chanta retired. She was one of the best.
|
06-05-17 07:56am
|
Reply
71
|
Cherry Petite
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from nygiants03:
(marcdc1's Reply)
I have heard of naughty at home, but not to familiar with the other sites. Lelu is hott, cant believe I never heard of her before.. Thank you for this :)
|
09-02-12 08:55am
|
Reply
72
|
Cherry Petite
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from nygiants03:
(marcdc1's Reply)
thanks,
actually I am. I just wrote a review on housewife Kelly ;p If there are any more amateurs like her I would love to know about them.
|
08-29-12 07:02pm
|
Reply
73
|
Cherry Petite
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from nygiants03:
Hey marcdc,
Would you consider her really amateur after watching her videos? I am into the whole no faking, real orgasms type of videos that only real amateur porn delivers. I mean the type of videos where it seems to the model that the camera isn't even rolling.
Much appreciated
|
08-29-12 06:44pm
|
Reply
74
|
Cherry Petite
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review from marcdc1:
I'm an idiot! I just edited the review to show the correct number of pix and videos. My apologies to those of you that saw the error.
|
08-13-12 06:27am
|
Reply
75
|
Cherry Petite
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
from pat362:
The site you guys are thinking about is Cherry potter which is part of the pornstar network. I think this is an old site that either bought part of the content from the previous site or Cherry started her own after leaving the other site. I think the content for both sites is at least 3-4 years old regardless of what they are claiming.
I think Cherry left porn a while ago.
This is the other network with Cherry stuff.
https://www.thebestporn.com/review/pornstarnetwork/
|
08-11-12 10:01am
|
