| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I agree with you that while the site is great it could be better. My suggestions are to have more scenario-based scenes, even if they're simple. They've shot a few where the female plays a real estate agent or a hotel manager or even as simple as the Samantha Rone scene where she shows up in a bikini wanting to go to the beach. I like the formula they have but would like to see them drop in something different more often.
I'd like to see some BTS stuff. They have a BTS page but all it is are photos and descriptions.
I like the sex as it is but really like it when after the first cum shot the female gets undressed while the male stays dressed. I'm a big fan of that and even though they do it maybe half the time I'd like to see more of it.
I really agree that extended cum play would be great, as would more scenes with multiple men, even up to a bukkake (or, to be more correct, a gokkun).
AA has been my favorite adults site for a long time. I'll take what they give but it would be nice to see a few improvements.
|
01-01-15 05:02pm
|
Reply
2
|
Cum Perfection
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from SimonK:
(Cum Play John's Reply)
Hi John. I like that idea very much.
I am still trying to find a decent model for the cum eating bowl.
There is plenty of cum play / cumeating (with straws etc) on www.cumforchloe.com which is a bonus site to CumPerfection so you see both sites content when you join.
Have you looked at the Chloe stuff yet?
|
03-08-15 01:17am
|
Reply
3
|
Cum Perfection
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from SimonK:
(Cum Play John's Reply)
Thanks John.
I will try and shoot that scene for you but it will be a while as the model I have in mind for the cum eating is working away until the end of September.
It is a good idea but hard to find models that will do it!
|
08-17-14 01:51am
|
Reply
4
|
Cum Perfection
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from SimonK:
(Cum Play John's Reply)
You have just read my mind Jon... Our next bukkake goes live in a couple of weeks with Candi Blows taking the shots AND we have Hannah Shaw walking around in the buff except for stockings with a hand held POV camera...
You will love this scene :)
|
07-21-14 08:59am
|
Reply
5
|
Cum Perfection
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Review
from SimonK:
Thanks John... You have hit the nail on the head there.
We now film all the cumshots from two angles, close up from the side and POV from above.
We include footage from both cameras in every scene now and repeat them both again in slomo so you can see where every drop goes :)
We also film the aftermath in extreme close up so members can see the cum dripping off their faces.
Have a look at the latest updates.
Would appreciate more of your advice please.
|
07-21-14 05:38am
|
Reply
6
|
Gloryhole Secrets
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Comment
from Enrico:
I agree John, This site is the highest quality gloryhole site I have been a member of.
|
07-09-15 03:22pm
|
Reply
7
|
Gloryhole Secrets
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Comment
from LPee23:
You are a true bukkake fan if seeing bukkake is not enough, and you need beautiful women doing bukkake in an artistic, glam setting!
|
05-03-15 02:00pm
|
Reply
8
|
Nubile Films
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Comment
from cjd2004:
"A lot of people get off after the male model has ejaculated, yet no glamcore site has yet seemed to grasp that post-cum video should exceed 30-60 seconds."
Women are capable of consecutive orgasms, so I don't see why videos have to end after the male has ejaculated. Why not have some cunnilingus or fingering?
|
09-24-13 03:54pm
|
Reply
9
|
Nubile Films
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Comment
from The Captain:
Yes we are working more toward that. I do not know if we can do 30 minute cum scenes but definitely we can make them longer.
|
08-02-13 09:21pm
|
Reply
10
|
Swallow Salon
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(Cum Play John's Reply)
Thanks for your comments. I understand you wanting to maintain the camera on the girl's face, but I'm okay with the ass shots - I just wish they'd get naked!
|
07-13-15 11:15am
|
Reply
11
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Review
from Pyrenees:
I could be wrong but this looks EXACTLY like the work of Blacked.com. I mean yea it involves whites and focuses on anal. But the camera angles, style, rooms, lingere, lighting and setup are exactly in that style. I would not be surprised to learn it was a sister site produced and directed by Blacked.com.
If you like this type of thing its kind of obvious what other site you should look at lol. They do the best doggy in porn.
|
07-06-15 12:59am
|
Reply
12
|
VIPissy
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Review
from oldfizzywig:
Nice review John. Got the point across with out being too wordy.
I think, though, that I must agree with Elephant, in that I too enjoy seeing girl-girl pee. Don't ask why, everyone's personal selection of why they like one genre of porn is different. Multiple girls pissing is just something that I would like to see. I would really like it if instead of just 2 girls, they had scenes of 3 or 5 or 10 girls all peeing together and on each other...
Are there any "associated sites" that are included or does one only get VIPissy? I see they are part of the Epoch network, and just wondered if there are any "bonus" sites included in the price of admission.
|
01-06-14 02:52am
|
Reply
13
|
VIPissy
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Review
from elephant:
Nice review John and it is a site I've never become aware of. I have to say though I much prefer watching women on women peeing. I do love my lesbian porn though so that is why, I wouldn't be into the site if it was just male-female scenes. 2 girls and a guy might be different, best of both worlds.
|
01-04-14 06:48am
|
Reply
14
|
VIPissy
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Review
from turboshaft:
Oh, and to add to the con questioning "is material this hardcore too transgressive?", I would say no, at least with regards to this specific subscription and its sister sites.
The genre of this reviewed site (boy-girl pissing) had already pretty clearly been taken to the extreme years ago. People like Max Hardcore and sites like 666 Bukkake are not for the squeamish, or at times even the comfortably consensual viewer. Then Kink's now out-of-date Pissing.com (still open, but a few years since last update) is as rough and hardcore with the fetish as any of their other sites but also just as consensual, something missing with way too many other sites.
Now we digital deviants have sties like Wet and Pissy and VIPissy--frankly, far less transgressive for me than the countless anal and cum/swallow fetish sites. Hell, compared to the latest R-rated "sex" comedy we could see advertised on TV and on giant billboards this porn is practically art that people not only want to genuinely see, but might actually find pleasure in seeing(!).
|
01-03-14 12:32am
|
Reply
15
|
VIPissy
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Review
from turboshaft:
Good review, John, hope there's more to come from similar sites!
I'm trying to figure if there's really that much of a difference between this and Wet and Pissy, since both's samples look so similar, share many of of the same models and scenes, and both are parented by the porn octopus Epoch. The only noticeable change from W & P I can tell is the focus towards more boy-girl golden showers instead of the former's solo and occasional (way too occasional for a guy like me!) girl-girl scenes.
Obviously, the Puffy Network subscription is the best deal at the moment--We Like To Suck, Wet and Puffy, and of course Wet and Pissy for $20/month--but that still seems to miss some of what VIPissy has if hardcore, in the boy-girl sense, is what really floats your porn boat.
|
01-03-14 12:16am
|
Reply
16
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Cum Play John's Reply)
I think you may be out of luck with your porn fantasy. The women shooting for X-Art and the other vanilla type porn companies don't want to get cum in their face, eyes, mouth and they certainly don't want to swallow it. More importantly the people shooting for those companies don't want to do that kind of stuff.
I'd like to add that I'm not so sure that many guys are into the facial thing. It is degrading to the women in those scenes and I'd like to think that more guys are into respecting the women but that doesn't mean that it's not a popular fetish. At least I know it's one that is often talked about on other forums.
Finally I think that cum eating may be a thing of the past if only because there is an inherent danger of getting an STD from doing that and the industry is now is so much trouble that more producers are going to ban that type of activity or they simply won't get as many women willing to do them. Evil Angel banned all creampies a few years ago and they didn't see a drop in their business. At least not one related to that so the same thing will happen when they drop cum swallowing.
|
09-22-13 05:54pm
|
Reply
17
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Cum Play John's Comment
from pat362:
I think you are barking up the wrong tree because I don't expect them to ever go down the route you are talking about. There are already plenty of sites with the type of content you want so why would a site like X-Art who's already an off-shoot of softcore sites but with the added hardcore part want to get in the ring with those sites.
The reason why anyone joins X-Art is because you want a mix of both softcore and hardcore content but where the HC is more vanilla in nature.
Have you seen any glamorous bukkakes? I think not and the reason is because it's not possible to do that. Bukkakes involve multiple men ejaculating on a woman and that kind of sexual act precludes the possibility that it can ever be glamorous. It would be like asking for a softcore orgy. There are certain sex acts that cannot be shot in a glamorous way and bukkakes and orgies are but two of those acts.
|
09-21-13 05:22pm
|
