| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
551
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#24
from Scotchfan:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Just to add that as a long term member the 3 month membership is most definitely the way to go.
Thought the review here was pretty fair. This is certainly a site I would avoid joining unless their material is your thing. However, if you like hard anal, double anal, facial pissing and drinking and scenes with multiple guys on one girl or two or more girls shared amongst the guys then this may be the site for you.
It certainly has proven so for me which is why I have accepted the awful layout and odd procedures.
It IS also costly. You have to get your head round the fact that you will not be able to download every single thing they have ever produced for a months membership then cancel.
In their defence, comparisons with other sites are unfair. Someone mentioned Kink. Subscribe to a Kink site and get 4 new scenes in a month. Legalporno issue at least one new scene a day, probably around 50 a month. Hell, in december they released about 20 double anal scenes. 20 double anals (many of them first time for the model) in one month. Seriously,I don't mind the payment model because I realise it is the only way such content can be funded (i struggle to think of more than a couple of sites with 20 double anals, let alone in one month).
Not a site for everyone but if it is content you are after and the content appeals I think the site is "best in class" by some margin.
|
02-09-15 10:23am
|
Reply
552
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from greg909:
Can you download individual high-def images yet? When I was last there, it was all-or-nothing for each set, which made me not want to bother with this site again.
|
02-07-15 09:10am
|
Reply
553
|
Digital Playground
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from host2626:
"Streaming only"
I stopped reading there :).
|
02-02-15 02:02am
|
Reply
554
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Pele:
I been a member pretty much since start, so i can confirm that the stuff here is pretty accurate. The site is quite messy one, but the content is really good if you are into this kinda porn.
One thing i would like to add is that if you buy the membership option (which i recommend as it is the best value for the money, especially the 3 month one), if you go below 10 tickets you can charge 100 tickets at discounted price, was about 65 euro last time i did it.
At times i think it is a bit expensive too, but if you look closer it is not necessarily so. I think scenes cost about 2.5 tickets on average so, so with that 65 euro i got 100 tickets, so it is about 0,65 cent per ticket or 1,63 euro per scene on average. with 100 tickets i get like 30-40 scenes depending what i buy. Good thing is the tickets don't seem to expire so i am not in a hurry to buy if i don't find anything interesting. On Monthly membership sites how many times you don't like the update you get?
Of course with monthly sites you can join them every 6 months or so and download all the scenes you want, so that way it is really good value of course.
they also have a forum where the site runners post pretty frequently, which is pretty nice.
But if you decide to join, be ready for the messy site, it can get buggy and one thing i dislike is that the watermarks on the scenes can be pretty big at times and they are not in the down corner, but i a bit more up and can sometimes get in the way of the action.
Bottom line is, that if you like stuff like this, there is not many alternatives, so you have to pay the premium price. And they update 1-2 scenes a day almost every day.
|
01-30-15 08:56pm
|
Reply
555
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#20
from host2626:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Some small single-model sites like vivianadoldano.com, clubshayfox.com, janetexposed.com, etc., have a similar model. A few videos for the monthly fee, but for the good stuff please go to clips4sale or similar. What you end up paying for is a clip catalog. It can make sense on a single-model site, if you are fan enough to join then maybe you can be milked for a bit more. It doesn't sit well with me when a larger site does it.
|
01-16-15 02:27am
|
Reply
556
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LPee23:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I use Bulk Image Downloader for photo sets that aren't in zips. I haven't tried IDM yet. Does it let you queue up all the downloads you want, then basically just walk away while it does the work?
|
01-15-15 06:31pm
|
Reply
557
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#18
from host2626:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
If it was made clear from the preview or the model pages what I would have to access to for the monthly fee and what would be a pay-for catalog, I may consider it. As luck would have it, the few scenes that are not too disgusting and that I would be interested in will require an extra fee :). There is way too much porn out there so I can afford to stick to some principles in this matter.
|
01-14-15 10:56pm
|
Reply
558
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from host2626:
Thanks for the review. I was considering joining this site. Not because I enjoy crapper sex, but mostly because I am a big fan of Zuzana Z and they have some exclusive scenes, and some other models may have a few seconds of nice angles between two swims in disgusting piss and shit and whatnot. Anyway, with this pricing model, no way. It's not like it is even preventing their stuff from appearing on the Net either.
|
01-14-15 01:14am
|
Reply
559
|
VIPissy
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Monahan:
You said, "Newer scenes also offer a few options that may be of interest to some members. They have ‘bonus clips’ of a trailer, a cut with close ups and a wide angle cut. This may not be of much value to all members but it certainly shows the site’s attention to detail that they’d make three full-length videos of the same scene available. (I sampled a few of these and can say that there isn’t really much of a difference between the primary scene and the wide angle cut.)"
This is a great idea that I would like to see replicated in other sites. More than once I've seen close-up material that excludes some body parts that I would have enjoyed seeing.
One example is how on a basic fuck scene the camera is fixed on the guys tool as he's porking some babe with unwelcome closeups of his hairy asshole. You get an occasional glimpse of the babe's pussy as it's getting the workout. What would be great is to see a long shot of that same scene where the babe's boobs were flopping vigorously and we can see her face and its reaction to the action.
|
01-09-15 10:59am
|
Reply
560
|
VIPissy
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Cum Play John:
I just wish VIPissy offered more POV male-female compilations of their prior work.
It's not that this would be to everyone's liking, just that you cannot find such glamour models receiving pee streams anywhere else on the net.
They could also make compilations of the other genres as well.
But just the continual POV angle from the male perspective would be intense.
|
01-01-15 12:18pm
|
Reply
561
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from elephant:
Great to finally work out what this site is cause I've been curious a few times so cheers guys. I agree its such an odd way of doing it and can only seeing it appealing to rich porn users who have big bucks to buy the new stuff.
They could probably be one of the biggest most popular sites out there like evilangel if they went more mass market route and made it membership gets it all scenario.
Its why you don't see many talk or review the site, basically its business model is aimed at the minority and die hard fans who'll pay the big bucks. I know porn production isn't cheap but I'm sure there is good profits in giving your members full access to the whole library with their membership as that's the model 98% of sites do.
I'll stay away from here for now as I'm no fan of ticket systems.
About the dressing up of the girls, yeah really don't like the porn fashion they choose to opt for, its well off putting and not remotely sexy to me. Natural and feminine clothes wins hands down everytime.
|
12-29-14 05:38am
|
Reply
562
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from EverNight:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
For what it's worth I believe the best value would be to do the 3 month membership and NEVER buy tickets directly. Buying tickets seems to always be a worse value than getting them thru the membership.
That would give you 120 premium + 90 free tickets over the 3 month period. 1-2 new scenes enter the ex-exclusive area each day and can be purchased with the free tickets you accrue as a member. And I believe tickets never expire. So basically what they are doing is encouraging continued membership over joining and downloading everything in bulk though they don't make that super obvious.
|
12-28-14 08:49pm
|
Reply
563
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I thought I'd answer your query. The free stuff as far as I can tell is all the stuff that the studios sineplex and sinsatinal shot prior to becoming what is now LP. For that reason you can no longer get new sineplex or sensational movies because they don't exist anymore. If my memory is correct. One of the owners of both studios started LP a few years ago and that's why he was able to offer the Sineplex and Sinsational movies for free to paying members of LP. If as you guys say they haven't added any new (actuaklly they aren't) videos to the free stuff then maybe it's because they have uploaded the entire Sineplex and Sinsational library or the rest is leased to other companies who aren't allowing anyone else to use those scenes.
It any case. It doesn't bode well for future customers of LP because unless they are new then they will only want to download the more expensive scenes.
|
12-27-14 05:39pm
|
Reply
564
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks. I think you answered all of my questions and then some. In many ways I'm really glad that they make joining so hard because I know that if it wasn't then I would join and regret it two seconds after I had my membership. For me the only appeal is the models who wind up working for them because their style and type of porn is not something that stimulates me sexually. In fact it tends to have the opposite effect. I was hoping that maybe the trailers for some strange reason picked the worse parts and that there might be a pearl somewhere but I guess I'll have to look for treasures elsewhere.
A thoroughly informative review with no bias.
|
12-27-14 05:22pm
|
Reply
565
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from EverNight:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks for the pricing. I believe 1 free ticket is awarded to a member for each day they are a member. Those free tickets can then be spent on scenes that are 1.5+ years old. You can see just those if you go off the main site's url to "/ex-premium-videos".
|
12-27-14 04:04pm
|
Reply
566
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from EverNight:
I looked into the "free" scenes some more and I think I *may* understand it now. The truly free scenes (free w/ membership) are licensed from other studios they are not any of the exclusive LP produced content. The exclusive LP content must be bought with tickets. Once LP content is 1.5 years old it moves to an ex-premium video section. Those videos can then be purchased w/ "free tickets" which you earn each day you are a member. So...as I understand it the real LP content never enters the true free section which is what had confused me. It's a complicated system...but no other site produces the same type of content they do so I guess they can get away with it.
Rearadmiral do you know how much tickets cost to buy when you are a member?
|
12-27-14 11:58am
|
Reply
567
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from EverNight:
Thanks for the review. I've always wanted to try this site. I think their content looks very good but it looks like no videos have been added to the free section since Aug 2014 and that makes me hesitant. I also don't know that any of the "real" legal porno videos ever go free. It seemed to me that the free ones are from a different studio. None look to be in that "white room" they always seem to use. Also really disappointed to hear the videos are not recorded in 1080p. I'm surprised by that.
I appreciate learning more info about the site though. It's weird business model makes info about the site rare to come by.
|
12-27-14 10:40am
|
Reply
568
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from pat362:
Another great review and I'm glad I was able to help. I want to add that just buying tickets will not be any easier as you still have to do the same things those buying a membership have to do.
My opinion in regard to the type of porn they produce is mostly based on the trailers for their scenes because this is about the only stuff I have seen and I'm hoping you can answer some of them as you are a member.
1-Am I wrong in thinking that a lot of the stuff they shoot is pure circus gonzo with an emphasis on intense penetration, many DAP as well as a few TAP and a low desire in making the women comfortable?
2-Do many of their scene feel sterile? That is to say. Do they have more of a feel of a medical exam involving penises rather than people having sex?
3-Would your average gonzo fan truly enjoy their type of porn or does it push the boundaries of pleasant to look at?
4-Are the women who most are clearly beautiful made to look trashy and slutty and not as beautiful as they obviously are based on their appearance on other sites?
|
12-27-14 10:10am
|
Reply
569
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I'm from the old school where no one had any clue what HD meant so I don't care that the resolution is subpar when compared to almost anything done today. As long as I can see the performers and the action than that is more than acceptable. I found some movies that I thought I never would on the classic porn and it makes staying a member well worth it for me.
|
12-18-14 06:00pm
|
Reply
570
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
These days I get more pleasure out of the movies the classic porn site uploads than anything else other sites have to offer and we are talking about some mediocre looking movies. it's just that they are the movies I've been looking for and I can live with a good movie that looks bad. I can no longer stand bad movies that look good.
|
12-16-14 05:47pm
|
Reply
571
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I agree with everything you said but let's be honest. It's old farts like us that still pay for porn so sites might as well cater to our needs because the young ones are getting their porn on tube sites so trying to attract them as new customers or retain them is a waste of time.
|
12-15-14 05:43pm
|
Reply
572
|
Perfect Gonzo
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from jook:
As usual, a BIG thanks for a thorough review. As I mentioned elsewhere, it seems we have similar taste and I joined a week or two ago based on your review.
To be honest, I'm not crazy about the site. While I agree with most everything you said, I don't feel the models are beautiful, or at least they're not my type. Or maybe the gonzo genre is not for me. It's a shame since the site has so many good things going for it. But the repetitiveness is also a big minus for me, though most sites seem to share that flaw. It's like you've seen one, you've seen 'em all.
On a positive note, it is apparently run by professionals who seem to be concerned with treating their customers like valuable assets. What a novel concept! ;) And they are responsive. The site is set up great, the 4 (or 2 for the older videos) choices of downloads is a plus and the production is a plus. I would also like to thank the webmaster for being active here.
|
12-15-14 05:24am
|
Reply
573
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Parsnip:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Hi RA - with regards to darkness, I was referring to both, not necessarily in the same film. There have been largely negative comments from members on the site about some of the recent material (and lots of positive comments from the staff who know where their next paycheck is coming from). Interestingly, quite a few are from female members saying that they don't like it but are OK with it being there if other members do like it.
I saw an interview with Colette from X-Art in GQ a couple of years ago, where she said that although they were aiming at females & couples, they were aware that the majority of their members were male porn users - and they are coming from years of watching much more extreme material. I think that, in the end, this is why the glamcore sites go downhill. It's a commercial decision, and I don't blame them for it. Unfortunately it means there isn't anywhere for people like us.
|
12-12-14 03:31am
|
Reply
574
|
Happy Naked Teen Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from graymane:
Ya'know, RA .....After reading your review a second time, I can see more clearly where you're coming from.
I think I might've put too much emphasis on the girl-girl activity you dwelled on ......as well as another similar agonizing turn-off of mine you mentioned that was seemingly sprinkled about...namely Lesbos chewing up more time than I thought I needed to endure.
I guess I might've jumped to conclusions and likely over estimated.
I appreciate thee settin' me straight, 'ol buddy .....the young girls factor is makin' it look better by the minute.
|
12-06-14 12:38pm
|
Reply
575
|
Happy Naked Teen Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from graymane:
Do love to wrap myself visually around models presenting features depicting "beautiful and youthful attributes" > emphasis on youthful.
Don't you just love those gals sometimes featured here who're well within legal but are blessed with anatomical genes making them look deliciously below the eighteen boundary?
But, my good friend, had I been looking at this site contemplating membership ..... considering your usual well written, wall-to-wall coverage ....you've guided me again from plunging into something I might regret.
|
12-06-14 03:21am
|
