| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
701
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Tree Rodent:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I'm getting that way myself. What looked great a couple of years ago now looks merely okay. Some of the modern higher resolutions look gobsmackingly sensational.
|
01-04-14 09:42am
|
Reply
702
|
Club Red Light
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Another excellent review. This is another one which has been on my shortlist for about two years, but I've never got around to joining. Your review at least gives me an idea of what I'm buying, so thanks for the info.
|
01-03-14 07:56pm
|
Reply
703
|
Device Bondage
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
It's one of those cases where it really hurts to pay that amount but you don't feel so bad because you know you are getting something that is worth it and more importantly you know this amount means you'll get more of it in the years to come.
|
01-02-14 11:12am
|
Reply
704
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I don't know if they have changed all that much. I just think that they are so much bigger now then they were just a few years ago and that's bound to have serious effects on the way you deal with your customers. I still remember when there were only a few sites and not the staggering number they have today. At least they still put out amazing porn on a regular basis.
|
01-02-14 11:11am
|
Reply
705
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Tree Rodent:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Net Video Girls wastes a lot of talent. Most of the time it looks like a chimpanzee is holding the camera, capturing random shots of anything that wanders in and out of view. However, I don't remember it being part of the deal before.
|
01-01-14 04:49pm
|
Reply
706
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Tree Rodent:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
It looks different to the last time I was there, which was last year. I don't remember that many ads on the home page either. There's also bonus membership to Net Video Girls.
|
12-31-13 07:16pm
|
Reply
707
|
Device Bondage
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from pat362:
That's quite high for anyone but especially so if you are a returning member because you won't be getting as much as a new member will.
They have over 700 videos which is impressive and probably justifies their higher cost than most of the other Kink site. Luckily for me this type of content doesn't appeal so I won't ever have to make a decision to join or not.
|
12-31-13 05:54pm
|
Reply
708
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
The good news is that Kink finally fixed the problem and uploaded two new scenes in late afternoon. I'm easy going with these things but since Kink only updates once a week then missing two weeks worth of updates is half a monthly membership. I was luckier than some people because my membership is still active but I'm sure some people weren't as lucky.
I'm glad the problem is fixed but it's still inexcusable to pass off old content as new. Just be honest with your members and say that there was a major glitch. Uploading older content makes people nervous.
|
12-31-13 05:45pm
|
Reply
709
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Can't speak for broke amateurs because their preview section is so poor that I would never join based only on that. True that the girls are really cute for the other two sites and sad that most never do more than these sites. I know the guy isn't located in California and that's why most of the girls don't make the jump to the industry.
P.S: I forgot to mention but the special offer is 19.99$ for the 3 sites mentioned yesterday.
|
12-31-13 09:13am
|
Reply
710
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Another excellent review. I'm a member there currently and I agree about ECG and BCC being two of the best sites around, especially if you're into the casting niche, which I am.
One of the biggest downsides of this type of niche is having your one chance of seeing a porn video and photo set of a beautiful non professional girl wasted because of ineptitude. Occasionally you see what could be an amazing porn experience being completely ruined. It's a hard job, and I couldn't do it, but I wish some of them occasionally did it better. Having said all that, I think these two sites get the balance right most of the time.
|
12-30-13 06:00pm
|
Reply
711
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
See the fact that he goes out of his way to avoid showing his face is a problem for me because that means he'll avoid shooting from certain angles for fear that too many shots will have his face in them and he will have to use that stupid circle or he'll have to edit too much content to remove his face.
Mind you this guy is a genius when compared to the idiots at girls do porn. They also avoid showing the performers face and they use an actual camera operator but the shots are 100 times worse at GDP than here.
The sad part for me is that both sites manage to hire some really cute unknowns with great potential but completely mess the shoots so that these one and gone girls can never make it onto my wish list for more stuff.
|
12-30-13 01:48pm
|
Reply
712
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from pat362:
How does the shooting style of the newer stuff compare to the older content? My biggest issue with this site was that it was so badly shot that it was nearly unwatchable. The fact that he takes his face out of the video is also a problem for me because I need a connection to happen between both performers and that's ruined when one of them has a circle hiding his face whenever his face should be in the shot.
The static cameras are a problem for me but if he could actually use and handheld camera properly then that might be okay. I keep getting a special offer to join but since I have only saved a tiny portion of the past videos that I suspect the newer stuff will also not work for me.
|
12-30-13 01:34pm
|
Reply
713
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from pat362:
I don't know if this helps but there are some notes on the TBP review that mention a possible download limit but there was no available info to confirm or deny the statement.
|
12-30-13 09:58am
|
Reply
714
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Sorry I can't answer this admiral. When I was a member I never encountered one, but that maybe due to me downloading a photo set and video together before moving on. Capturing each photo manually took ages so I didn't download that many videos in one day.
|
12-29-13 05:04pm
|
Reply
715
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Tree Rodent:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I think you'll be impressed with the quality of photography. It's true what some members have said - it's not the highest of HD when compared to the top spec, but the material is so so good. One more thing - when you cancel you get offered a discount
|
12-28-13 05:38pm
|
Reply
716
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from hardog:
There is a decent tour available at the main link where it shows each site in the network.
Look for "Watch the site" in hypertext and visit the tour page for each site listed.
teencoreclub.2006
teencoreclub.2010
teencoreclub.2009
teencoreclub.2012
teencoreclub.2011
Been a member 5 times since 2006. Worth the money in my opinion. They've added new content (and sites) every year. Its a network where you spend 50.00 one time a year... I remember spending $30.00 in a seedy bookstore and walking out with a single magazine.
BTW: there is a program/extension for Firefox called DownThemAll that lets you download all the pictures on a page at one time. TeenCoreClub puts 50 pics on a page. DownThemAll lets you download 50 at a time. It's still more tedious than a zip file but it beats grabbing pictures one at a time.
|
12-27-13 09:23am
|
Reply
717
|
Kelsey Obsession.net
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from KelseyObsession:
Hello RearAdmiral -
I sincerely apologize for the issues you had joining the site. Based on the date of your review, it appears you joined just as we were switching over to a new system, and a few bugs happened in the process. We quickly made the necessary changes, and I hope our support team responded to your concerns.
If they did not, please contact Support (at) KelseyObsession (dot) Com and I will be happy to help you further.
- Kelsey Obsession
|
12-27-13 12:51am
|
Reply
718
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from graymane:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Just because you're a nice guy and so likable ......
I'm gonna fill you in on a site I've been subscribed to for years (unbroken)that has gobs of clips featuring Tanner.
I just checked it out, and figuring you're so enamored with this gal it might be worth your while to shell-out a meager $15 just to see what its all about.
Click on this link Skin Video and it'll land you at the best of porn and their write-up as well as other reviews.
OK .... I guess the ball is now in your court,.
|
12-26-13 03:10pm
|
Reply
719
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from elephant:
Yeah I agree with Pat, at one time this site could of been the dominator of teen sex porn, it had lots going for it, seem to find the cutest of cute but sadly they must of been hit by the recession and now the updates are rare and certainly not enough to have regular subscribers, so I think they rely on not showing people there has been so little updated and charging one of the highest price for a site on the web.
Its a tough one, if you've never seen the material before there are some great gems in there but $50 you can spend you money on 2 or even 3 sites and get loads of great porn done in better resolution.
|
12-26-13 06:55am
|
Reply
720
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I don't know if you have already joined but if you haven't then I suggest you join Try Teens. The reason why this is for me the best choice is two fold. The first part is that your membership will give you access to white teens black cocks, brutal invasion, teen anal casting and defiled18 as well as a few others with mostly leased material. The second part is connected to the first one and it is that try teens and white tens black cocks are probably the two sites with the most content out of the entire network and the ones that never really stopped updating(except maybe in the last two years).
The only fetish that you won't have an abundance of are probably dp's and that's because they created double teamed teens. That said you will get a decent amount of dp's anyway since DTT was only created in 2008 while try teens was created in 2004.
|
12-26-13 06:50am
|
Reply
721
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from pat362:
I have been a member of this network on more than one occasion and there was a time when I would have recommended that you join but those days are long gone. The network has been dying for the last few years but I now consider dead simply because they no longer update with new content. They may have slipped the odd exclusive scene in the last few months but I'd say that 95% of all the content added in the last 6 to 12 months is all leased material. To me that means a dead site. Now unless this is your first time and you feel comfortable with the fact that you are not getting new stuff from the moment you join to the moment you leave and are pretty sure that download speeds will be very good then go ahead because you will find some amazing scenes on this network. At least I hope they are all still there.
I can't call them a scam site because they probably still have a huge library of scenes but their overall business practice of charging such a high amount for older content is borderline crooked to me.
|
12-25-13 06:42pm
|
Reply
722
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from graymane:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Few things make me laugh anymore .......but your reply just did,
Thanks.
|
12-25-13 10:36am
|
Reply
723
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Ah yes, I agree. The best way to get a preview is to go to the TBP review then click on the "Network Sites. This network provides access to 25 sites." Click on each individual site and you'll get a reasonable preview.
Before you part with your money read the reviews for this network. If you're thinking of joining and want to download photos you have to do it manually. I think it's best to join one of the sites on the network for $29.95, which will give you access to a limited number of other sites on the network as it'll take you ages to manually download photos from just a few sites.
Oh yeah - Merry Christmas Admiral, and to Graymane, Khan, and all the regulars.
|
12-24-13 05:29pm
|
Reply
724
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from graymane:
Enjoyed your review, RA .....
Having gathered you're notably kinder in your judgment, presentation and score for Babes than was I ..... I'd like to follow up on behalf of those who are considering joining this site and are looking at both our reviews.
rearadmiral's overall knowledge and ability to find and comment on most of the important things concerning plus and minus about sites of this nature are quite more superior to mine.
Unlike me, he knows where to look, find and report on stuff I oftentimes don't know exist.
I jus' call'em like I see'em, ..... an' do a pretty good job, but I know when to step back.
And that ain't saying I don't know my porn, Heck, I suppose its fair to say I was perusing graphic erotica when RearAdmiral was just gettin' into comic books. I honestly believe I've followed porn from its inception.
But December, 2013 ....I yield to one waving the torch when it comes to reviews ......(The Admirial)
Based on that, I would advise those considering joining this site to weigh heavier on what RA has put in this review.
|
12-24-13 03:42pm
|
Reply
725
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Arlen84:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks, I certainly will check it out. :)
|
12-19-13 12:47am
|
