| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1126
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Thomas20:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Even though Dave Mustaine used to write kick ass songs, unless it's actually in the lyrics to the songs, I think rock singers should not really tell us all about their opinions unless we ask for them or it is Bob Geldof telling us about starvation for which he is forgiven.
|
03-27-12 12:23pm
|
Reply
1127
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from ipg386:
Amazing, a porn site that actually gives you what you paid for.
|
03-23-12 06:21pm
|
Reply
1128
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from elephant:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Oh yeah, taking nothing away from that, the production is the best I've seen on any website, cannot fault it, they cater for that niche and have most kinks covered so to speak.
I'll never say no to not joining another of their sites in the future thats for sure and am very tempted in the fucking machines site.
|
03-20-12 03:58am
|
Reply
1129
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I hope you enjoy them and I look forward to reading your review.
|
03-19-12 06:09pm
|
Reply
1130
|
Adult Empire.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from olacoco:
What resolution/ bitrate are the high definition downloads? Most of the titles are very expensive so it would be nice to know that first.
|
03-18-12 05:51pm
|
Reply
1131
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
The only way to see the backroom casting couch offer is on the sites join page. I checked my past charges and that's why I know that it used to be 25$ for jus this site. of course it would be better if they offered the two options so that you can get just this site for 25$ and 35$ if you want both.
|
03-18-12 09:06am
|
Reply
1132
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from BadMrFrosty:
I'm not a found of public sex but my girlfriend is a big fan. She thanks you for the great review :)
|
03-18-12 04:42am
|
Reply
1133
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from elephant:
Great review as always with you rearadmiral
Yeah after my membership to boundgangbangs, I realized this type of stuff isn't for me, I'm glad I joined though still to work that out lol, anyway I agree with you that this form of humiliation is much more about a fantasy of a woman and for her pleasure than just being cruel and degrading to her.
Also though I'm the opposite and I don't mind so much the woman being the dom and I'd prefer that to be honest, I'm a massive lesbian buff and if I do watch any bdsm I do much prefer it just women. I guess we all have different tastes it must be hard pleasing so many.
|
03-18-12 02:27am
|
Reply
1134
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from exotics4me:
I enjoyed a membership at this site more than I thought I would. Similar to how I also enjoy Kink's Live Ultimate Surrender matches. I know it would knock the price up, but I think they should have a fully live site with each of their niches being covered on it. I would probably look for the lifetime membership option!
One thing you may not know being from Canada. Folsom Street Fair is a very liberal setting, nudity is allowed. From what I know from living in California, nudity is legal in the state, even in public. It's the lewd acts while being nude that are illegal. San Francisco though is probably one of the most tolerant cities in the United States, I would only rate Los Angeles and Miami above it. Not at all knocking Kink for shooting at a commonly nude fair, but thought you might find that interesting. It's a fair that leans very heavily on BDSM themes and though a few kids have been seen at the fair, it is 18 and over admittance.
I've tried several of Kink's site recently and this one runs neck and neck with Ultimate Surrender as my favorite.
|
03-17-12 05:15pm
|
Reply
1135
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Gazette Risque:
Great review! :)
However, I did cancel my subscription a while ago when they stopped doing actual public videos.
The uncontrolled environment is what makes public/exhibitionistic videos appealing.
Also, when they added a woman to dominate a the model, I lost interest. As did many others.
Nonetheless, great review!
|
03-17-12 11:43am
|
Reply
1136
|
Public Disgrace
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from gaypornolover:
Yeah even I've had a look at this site as I love public nudity and I agree about peoples reaction to it being really hot! Excellent, well-written review as always which gives a real sense of why you like the site.
|
03-16-12 03:52pm
|
Reply
1137
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
It used to be that you had to join both sites seperately if you wanted to get access to both but they increased the price on ECG by about 10$ and gave their members access to both sites. If you enjoy the content on both sites then it's a great deal because it's 35$ instead of the 50$ you'd have spent a couple of years ago. I don't know if it's a temporary thing but the deal has been there fr a few months already.
I'll answer your other questions at the same time and say that there are no pics on any of the sites. All the videos on BCC are shot by himself so the best you could get would be screen grabs from the video camera but the quality would be awful and the reason is the same as for why you will never see HD content. The cameras he uses look like models you can buy at Best Buy so I don't think they are professional models needed for quality pic grabs. It's about the same thing on ECG but I think the guy could still take a few pics because the content is a little different. Mind you ECG uses the same type of cameras so quality is not likely to be any better.
|
03-16-12 09:50am
|
Reply
1138
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from rome476:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I do have a regular VB membership and do a lot D/Ling. My interest in the VOD is that have Marc Dorcel and new Private for lifetime streaming for $10.
|
03-15-12 08:17pm
|
Reply
1139
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rome476:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I was wondering if you have any comments on Video Box's VOD service.
|
03-15-12 05:50pm
|
Reply
1140
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Ergo Proxy:
First of all, thanks for the review.
"It all comes down to how you perceive the value for yourself."
That was a good final remark! I am also registered at AEBN for some time now and occasionally watch this or that title. I joined mainly with the idea in mind to obtain some old fetish titles in a decent quality, but alas it's true that the quality and quantity starts to suck if you go back in time.
|
03-13-12 11:09am
|
Reply
1141
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rome476:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Do you think that stream for life is a good option? It seems a less expensive way to almost collect the title if it really is.
|
03-12-12 06:38pm
|
Reply
1142
|
AEBN Video On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Truly excellent review Admiral, telling me everything I want to know. Like you, I am not a big fan of those VOD sites. I probably wont give it a go, but your review intrigues me enough to take a look.
|
03-12-12 09:29am
|
Reply
1143
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from gaypornolover:
A beautifully written review which was a pleasure to read! I agree with you about the immediate streaming - really annoying - and it's sad to see them using the "free membership" trick, but it sounds like a quality site in terms of content. Excellent review.
|
03-09-12 07:44am
|
Reply
1144
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Cybertoad:
What did you think of the 3d ??
|
03-07-12 12:50pm
|
Reply
1145
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from lk2fireone:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks for checking. I really appreciate it. I'm pretty sure I've seen the 10 photos each for Karen Sather and Sandy Greco already.
And I was hoping the old photos would have better definition than what I've seen before. But my guess is that photos on the site are probably not better definition, after all.
So I will probably wait a while before joining Penthouse.
|
03-07-12 08:11am
|
Reply
1146
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from lk2fireone:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I'm interested in how many photos there are of the three models listed below. They were among my all-time favorite Pets :)
Karen Sather
February 1973 - Pet of the Month
Sandi Greco
May 1973 - Pet of the Month
Cindy Mcdee
July 1973 - Pet of the Month
If you don't have the info, because your membership ran out, that's OK.
|
03-06-12 09:24pm
|
Reply
1147
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from lk2fireone:
I was wondering how many photos there are for each individual model from the 1970s and 1980s? Are there just a few photos on each Penthouse Pet for each month back then, or is there more like 20-30 or more photos of the individual models?
I've seen some of the models back then which only had like 10 photos or so from their photoshoots back then (in the 1970s and 1980s). Does the Penthouse site have more extensive photos on their early Penthouse Pets?
|
03-06-12 01:21pm
|
Reply
1148
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Denner:
Fine, fine review here, honored rearadmiral...
Found some newer downloads - free ones - from the ol' Penthouse - which, btw - has not been too keen on giving us fine quality vids in the past.
It looks like, it's changed.
The quality and the style seems to have stepped up - and thanks to your review, I'll probably give this ol' site a try - thumbs up!
|
03-06-12 08:21am
|
Reply
1149
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from Tree Rodent:
Great review Admiral, thanks for the information. I have to admit I wouldn't have thought of touching this site with a bargepole until your review. My expectations were as low as yours. Not many cons, I would have expected many more.
|
03-05-12 04:53pm
|
Reply
1150
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from messmer:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
You are right, rearadmiral, to make a distinction between Kink.com material and that found at "Facial Abuse," as one example. If the genre is BDSM and fills the needs of both parties then I don't see anything wrong with it either.
|
03-05-12 02:23pm
|
