Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Arlen84's Review
from SelenaMetArt:
I wanted to thank you for your review. We very much appreciate customer feedback, and strive to give an exceptional member experience.
I'm sorry that we didn't meet your expectations in regards to the bitrate. I can tell you that the encoding has recently been bumped to 8000k. We'd love to have you come back and take a look. Feel free to touch bases with our Support staff, asking for Victoria, and referencing this thread. :)
Thanks also to everyone that has commented. Your support and enjoyment of the site means a great deal to us. We have an awesome holiday promotion going on now. So be sure to check your inbox, or drop Support a line for a link.
Happy Holidays from all of us at Metart!
|
12-20-13 10:24pm
|
Reply
2
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Parsnip:
(Arlen84's Reply)
Maybe it is just personal taste. My tv is HD, but I'm not sitting at a desk two feet from it! I would say that, apart from some comments about color balance, I have never seen any complaints from users on SexArt about the technical quality of the films, but I have seen a lot of complaints on x-art - to such an extent that they had to try to recode some recent films.
|
12-18-13 11:53am
|
Reply
3
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Arlen84's Review
from otoh:
Like Parsnip, I don't necessarily have an issue with this. Like with file sizes on jpgs, bitrate doesn't necessarily define the quality; it also depends on the codec settings and the source material.
Not sure what it is on 1080, but the 720 videos I downloaded from SexArt and The Life Erotic are 2,000K and they look just fine - their style (whether you like it or not) is a little soft, which can contribute to the low bitrate rather than the other way around.
I did download 10,000K 720 videos from Twistys and it was a waste of space - I reencoded them at 4,000K with no discernable difference.
|
12-18-13 08:17am
|
Reply
4
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Arlen84's Review
from Parsnip:
Interesting comments about bitrates and video quality on both this site and x-art. I don't know about the technicalities, but I watch these films on a 42" tv and have no problems at all with SexArt films, they look great with the barest hint of pixellation sometimes on dissolve edits. They are up there with joymii for quality and far better than x-art.
|
12-17-13 10:43pm
|
Reply
5
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Arlen84's Review
from rearadmiral:
I'm a big fan of this site too - and this genre. Since you like artistic porn I recommend you check out EroticaX. It's new and small-ish, but if you have a decent internet connection you could probably get away with the two-day trial membership. The models in EroticaX are similar to those in X-Art, and there is no real variation, but I'm a fan of that body type so I don't see that as a negative.
|
12-17-13 03:42pm
|
Reply
6
|
Body In Mind
(0)
|
Reply of
Arlen84's Review
from Drooler:
My recent experience of this site (membership ending earlier this month) is similar to yours. I can't understand why they don't make all of the image sizes available in zips.
I'm also disappointed by the blurriness in some of the images, especially the "extra" sizes, some of which when viewed at full size make you wonder who just hit you in the face with the pie. One really has to inspect the goods carefully here.
They had a few sets of the Hungarian beauty Gabi/Mia (as at Hegre) that looked interesting until I realized how poor the image quality was. I passed up on the whole lot.
Another thing is that some of material here is not exclusive. It's from PhotoDromm, Lizzie's Secrets (or perhaps Eva's Garden), etc. There's not a lot of this, but I think it should be noted. It could actually be a plus for people who discover Lizzie Ryan but can no longer join the now defunct (above unlinked) sites she appeared on.
I did find some nice stuff of certain models, such as "Karmen" (Jasmine Andreas), so I figured joining was worth it, but I hadn't been member for nearly four years.
|
12-17-13 01:20pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
