> but i don`t think that my given information are wrong......
I didn't mean it; what I've actually meant is that I'd like to see more site-specific information which would show why your ratings are different.
> they took another which didn`t accept credit cards or something like
> this. i also think there was no possibility to dl in one part,
> and the older videos had weak quality (wasn`t it dl as a zip?!) you
> are a member of that side right now? does anything changed?
I'm/was a member of a few other kink.com sites (see my reviews of UltimateSurrender and SexAndSubmission), and yes, their billing/authentication system is still a pain in the neck (they do provide alternative billing though, so occasionally it does work :-) ). As for DL as a zip - they usually do have it (you can get whole single episode as a zip, which is enough for me). Cannot be 100% sure about fuckingmachines.com without being their member, but usually such things are quite consistent across different kink.com sites.
Just in case if you do care (if not, please ignore):
What I think is the biggest problem with your reviews, is lack of specific information about the sites - all reviews are quite similar to each other, and it is very difficult to understand why do you rate site higher or lower. I was going to put 'no' trust rating exactly because of 2 your reviews: this one and 'Obscene machines'. Reviews are very similar to each other, and it is not clear why one of the sites got much higher rating (14 point higher - that's quite a lot). Then I went to site home pages and was able to guess what's the difference between them, so your ratings are likely to be consistent (so I didn't put any trust rating for now), but IMHO it should be obvious from reviews too.
Also a side note: as you're into this niche, did you try fuckingmachines.com? It would be nice to see your review/rating of them too (so it will be possible to compare it with other 2 sites you already reviewed).
> fast dl speed (up to 672/kbs)!
Is this kBit/sec or kBytes/sec? For kBits/sec it doesn't look too impressive, for kBytes/sec it sounds "too good to be true" :-).
I agree the downloads are slow but when I down load I'm in no hurry to view. I build a library and view as I please. I'll make note of slow downloads when I do future reviews. you can't say the quality of the videos is poor they look very HD on my system. Thanks for the insight.
About the TBP rating - I do not get it either.
I remember, that I really look forward to this site when joining, but got pretty disapointed. Probably because the preview looked fine, but the videos where NOT - think I saved 2, 3 or 4 on my HD, but they're way gone.
Some of this you may already know; I'm mentioning some info for other members as well, should they come upon this.
Looks like they're got 48 videos up so far. Some are the same as at VivThomas and judging by the file sizes and time lengths, my guess (and it is a guess as I'm not a member) is that they're probably better in quality than what his site offers. This site needs to tell us what the screen dimensions are of their vids. Anyway, the one of Judith Fox and Frank Gunn is HOT HOT HOT.
There's a fair amount of VivThomas softcore, lez, and hardcore here in the pics section, but mostly up to 3500px, which is far larger than his own max size of 1280. It's GREAT that this site lets you completely preview all of the thumbs of every pic set. Wow! Some of the stuff is otherwise non-exclusive (Sophie Moon at the train tracks, etc.), but at larger sizes. And some I've never seen before.
It's been up since April 1st this year, and offers a vid twice a week, T and Th.
Thanks for asking, 'cause that got me to check out this site. Hopefully they'll add some Mia Stone, Susana Spears, etc. from VivThomas.
You'd be risking $10 for the full access trial. I know I'm going to do that fairly soon myself.
Ace, I have never been in the site so I couldn't guess if their content is exclusive or not. And again, I was not suggesting you shouldn't "warn" other users that the content doesn't appear (to you) to be exclusive.
The only point of my remark was to help you understand that "not-exclusive" and "clone" are not the same thing when referring to a site.
You see, as a staffer, when I see a mention that one site is a clone (virtually a copy of another site), I check that TBP staff have it listed as such and if not, I pass it to the TBP editors so that we maintain an accurate listing.
So, when we see a site referred to as a clone, it's usually included what other site it's a clone of. Lacking that 2nd site specification, I posted a reply to ensure you were aware that the terms were not interchangeable.
You do understand that a site not having exclusive content is not the same as it being (considered) a clone of another site, right? That's not to say your comment about the non-exclusive content isn't valid, only that calling it a clone may or may not be accurate.
The 99ers, as you call them, are probably just big on amateur sites - and I'll still say that Abby's has got to be the best of 'em. You hit the nail on the head - it IS a matter a taste.
As far as boy/girl content goes, I don't think you can say there are NO boy/girl scenes. There are four (now dated) scenes up, along with a recently added voyeur-like scene. I'm figuring this is in response to a recent poll they had up on the site, asking if they should do more boy/girl. I know I voted "yes"...
Hi Ace of Aces...glad to hear you liked the site! We just began releasing videos in HD two months ago and now have 26 online as of today. Soon we will be releasing three brand-new HD videos per week; this is in addition to the 253 SD videos currently online.
I believe the majority of competing sites (sites similar to Xisty) do not offer trials at all, so we feel offering 5 days at under 10 bucks is a great way to check out the site. Although our focus is solo content, we are slowly beginning to shoot more hardcore and lesbian. If you're still a member make sure you login to check out our first hardcore HD video released today.
Thanks so much for your review; we always look forward to hearing member feedback! If you have any problems with the login system, please submit a support ticket so our staff may assist you.
07-29-0712:15pm
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
