Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jake88's Review
from rearadmiral:
Carefully consider any decision to add Evil Angel as a premium to VB. It may be that it works for you, but it might not. I know that with a monthly membership the Premium channels are pro-rated so they can be inexpensive if you wait to add them on until later in your monthly membership but I don't know how it works when you have an annual subscription.
The other thing to consider is video quality. I was a VB member a couple of months ago and added Elegant Angel. While it is true that the Premium channels offer 'HD' you can do much better on the actual studio site. It may not make a difference to you, but I'd join Evil Angel at the TBP discount and get true HD instead of adding the EA Premium channel at VB.
I should add that Evil Angel is among my top three favorite studio sites so that may influence my decision too. Your choice may be different, but think about quality and not just price.
|
01-21-16 01:56pm
|
Reply
2
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jake88's Review
from hardog:
Effective 2/1/15 there is no longer an option to download WMV videos. Unfortunately many of the older videos that were 200/300/400MB WMV files are now offered only as 70/80/90MB MP4 files. The video resolution of the smaller MP4 files do not compare to the higher resolution (crispness & clarity) of the older WMV format. IMHO this negates their previous attribute of having an outstanding older massive library. I suppose the task of converting the larger WMV files to MP4 was too much of a task for them to take.
|
02-02-15 07:20am
|
Reply
3
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jake88's Review
from mike11w:
VB has not added anything worthwhile in about 2 years. I would agree that there is older material that is worthwhile, especially if your vision is already blurry and you can't tell the difference between modern porn and 90's porn.
|
01-24-15 07:14pm
|
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|