| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Hardcore Doorway
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from mbaya:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
The black version of this is Ghetto Gaggers. That site does not come with this network, but is instead part of Ghetto Doorway. I was last a member there almost two years ago, but never wrote up a review. It did have the same download limit problem then. By the way, JM is a DVD company that has hard content, but it is in no way connected to these sites.
Nice to see you back and posting on PU.
|
01-04-17 05:17am
|
Reply
27
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
from MargulisAZ:
I like quite a bit of the stuff on this site, but unfortunately it rarely updates anymore and a lot of the sub-sites I liked such as straponsquad.com don't update at all anymore. The so called new updates are just recycled old scenes.
|
01-03-17 11:57pm
|
Reply
28
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
from rearadmiral:
I like the genres they cover but I find some of their scene setups to be repetitive. The scenes seem to follow a set pattern.
If you're still a member there can you see if Brutal Pickups has updated recently please? I was a member there recently and the most recent update was May 2016. I like the public element of those scenes and would consider rejoining if they had new stuff.
|
01-03-17 04:57pm
|
Reply
29
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Comment
from Monahan:
Video Box is not adding any new content from Vivid, Here's their banner on the sign-up page:
Updates complete
Currently Archived
970 Movies, 5,155 Scenes,
4,579 Clips
|
09-25-16 03:49pm
|
Reply
30
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from snickelb:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
New vids are stream only for something like 3-days. I've no idea why they think that's a good idea. Maybe people see the vid, buy a 3-day pass, then find it's strevm-only and buy the monthly?
I'm not sure but it seems like not all new vids are stream-only either, maybe just certain stars/directors. Or maybe just brand new, just produced are stream, whereas an older vid released digitally for the 1st time will be downloadable?
Anyone else noticed that and have any idea?
|
06-03-16 06:16pm
|
Reply
31
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Cybertoad:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
Hi there,
Well best I can say it it has been many years since I was a member there and it improved allot since I was. From last year I could not say how it changed, but for me looks like was 2010 or there abouts. Maybe later but do not recall exactly. I did put in my review a low Toad Boner points because of quantity and not quality compared to other sites. The PU scale and guidelines do not seem to touch of the comparison so I used my own scale to show that they are good not great but based on PU standards they are pretty good, based on my own standards they are ok. I hope my review explained this well as It important members realize its a huge great massive site with allot of great content. But when comparing quality to other sites its ok. I need to see if I can find out when I was member before because its not the same look or feel now.
|
05-17-16 02:23pm
|
Reply
32
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
Thanks for your clear and intelligent reply.
I was afraid that my review was misleading. That is didn't show clearly the pros and cons of the site.
And I have doubts about the value or validity of a site score.
How the score should be used.
I've read most of your site reviews in the past.
And while I don't agree 100% with all the ideas and scores expressed, I think they are useful to help choosing which sites to join.
What I like most is that your ideas and viewpoint are fresh to me.
I feel like I've got into a rut in my reviews.
But hoping I will do better in the future. :)
|
05-17-16 09:38am
|
Reply
33
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
I am not trying to sell you on the site.
You look at my score of 90, and think that is a site recommendation.
It's not.
The score of 90 means that, if you personally enjoy the type of videos they offer, then you are getting a large amount of
professionally shot videos for a low price. Which would be good value for your money.
Except: If you experience the download problems that you experienced, that would reduce the value of the site.
Also, the large file sizes reduces the value.
Also, if the overpowering ads make the site harder to use, that is negative value.
I was trying to be honest and fair in my review. But it's really misleading to think that a score implies how much an
individual will enjoy a site. Personal preference is far more important in how each individual will enjoy a particular
site. But I think that if you enjoy the type of content that Naughty America does provide, it's deserves a high score--because the negatives that I experienced are less important than what the site has to offer.
I don't enjoy the site. It was a mistake for me to join-in spite of the low membership price. But again, that is based on my personal preference. Which should not be the controlling factor in rating the site. The rating or score should try to indicate how much a site is worth, versus what you are paying for access. It can get complicated trying to come up with a fair value of the site's score. But that would be a topic for another day.
I thought my review has value. It's not entirely comprehensive, but I think it tries to be an honest opinion of my thoughts.
|
05-17-16 02:08am
|
Reply
34
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
They did not improve Naughty America site recently.
I've read your review of the site.
I don't think anything has changed since you did your review.
I did list some cons or negative factors about the network:
1. The overpowering presence of ads on every page.
2. The over-large file sizes for videos.
3. Slow download speeds.
I gave the network a score of 90 based on the following:
Huge amount of content.
Professionally shot videos.
Wide range of niches.
Access to 4K videos.
Access to virtual reality porn.
If you joined the network, I doubt that you would enjoy the network any more than you did in your previous experience.
But---
I did not experience any PC problems while downloading files.
I did experience slow download speeds, but probably not as bad as what you experienced.
If you didn't enjoy most of the sex scenes before, there's no reason I can think of why you would appreciate them more today.
I thought I made it pretty clear in my review that I did not enjoy the network. But I believe that many people would appreciate the site/network for what it has to offer. And that was the controlling factor on why I gave the network a high score.
I mentioned that if I had remembered joining the site before, I would not have re-joined recently. But that is personal preference. I don't enjoy most of their videos.
|
05-17-16 02:06am
|
Reply
35
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from insomniacxxx:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
I had a chat session with RK support and they told me there is a 10gb per day download limit, and download managers are prohibited. The 10gb limit is also in their Terms of Use page. Maybe this is new since you left your comment, but I just wanted to clarify this.
|
04-16-16 02:04pm
|
Reply
36
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from mike11w:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
11.26.15 Update. Videosz continues to have new problems; After they reduced the number of updates per day/week they started to have streaming problems, often taking 20-30 seconds to load a scene, and the site goes down completely with a 404 error message several times a week. Now might not be the best time to join, until they get some of this figured out. I hope they can recover to their prior status, but it appears that the funds to keep the site top rate are dwindling.
|
11-26-15 09:06am
|
Reply
37
|
Asian Sex Diary
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from dageezer:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
I think you'll find I quite clearly said that there were NO downloads and it was a streaming only site in the cons section. Did you not actually read this mate??
The reason is because of all the rampant piracy that goes on these days, because of this I see this becoming more common a la 'Netflix' model of video distribution especially if you are a small company and as I also mentioned in the review the countries this is being filmed in do not always take so kindly to pornography so I get why the admins wanna keep this content 'lowkey'.
The content is what I give such a high score for, there is not another site that has this level of realism for this type of content that I know of currently.
Just because I have 0 reviews means absolutely nothing; just I have only joined this site recently.
|
11-16-15 03:10pm
|
Reply
38
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
from bkreidercrhl:
I am a collector of facial cum videos. The women are beautiful at Brazzers, however, I do not see many facial cum shots in the previews. Is there male talent that can deliver big loads and girls that can handle it their eyes ?
|
10-29-15 02:38pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from rearadmiral:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
I had heard about the California thing but I didn't know the industry then moved to Vegas. Thanks for the info.
|
10-20-15 06:09am
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Monahan:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
Unemployment in LA is a big problem. What they did to the porn industry has pushed the number of unemployed way up. Think of all the people involved in producing porn; cosmeticians, gaffers, grips, location staff, security, editors, production assistants, and a ton of distribution staffers are now either moving to Miami, porn capital #2, or are on the street.
While similar jobs in the main stream movie industry exist in general, the rocket scientists in Sacramento are placing other restrictions and limitations that Vancouver and Toronto are thrilled to see because they've been promoting the bejeebers out of their motion picture production enticements via tax breaks and subsidies.
|
10-17-15 11:21pm
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rearadmiral:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
What happened in Vegas? I might be living under a rock but I hadn't heard anything about that.
|
10-17-15 06:36am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
I read the question a bit differently I think. There are user reviews of a lot of sites on PU that haven't been reviewed yet on TBP. I think that's just reality since TBP has a handful of reviewers to PU having potentially hundreds.
I always read any TBP review but I often give more weight to the PU reviews - depending on who wrote them, how much detail is available and if the reviewer backs up his or her points with evidence. The reason for this isn't a slight against the TBP reviewers, but for guys like you and me we join a site because we want what the site has to offer. You and me are more likely to spend a lot more time on the site and find hidden gems or faults. For example, I've hit download limits on sites where the TBP review says there were none. The reason for that is probably the TBP reviewer is downloading a handful of scenes so they can write a good review. I'm downloading tons of stuff because I think it is hot porn.
I think you're selling yourself short by not counting what you, me and the other PU regulars contribute as being valuable.
But then maybe I misread your comment... :-)
|
10-10-15 02:23pm
|
Reply
43
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
Thanks for the comments.
Resolution is definitely an issue but the newer stuff is quite good at 1920x1080. The problem with the newer stuff is that it's pretty repetitive.
Unless there is a strong compelling reason for you to join this one is likely best avoided.
|
10-10-15 11:33am
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
LOL! Great answer! And I agree with your assessment of that Aurora Snow scene. I still have many of her older scenes back when she first joined the business and they still fascinate me. Probably in my top three scenes is one she did with Gauge. I'm grateful my head doesn't explode from joy every time I watch it.
|
09-30-15 02:07pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Amanda:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
Thanks for the submission, Pyrenees! :)
|
09-15-15 10:45am
|
Reply
46
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wraith0711:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
Thank you for your reply sir. I didn't mean to imply that the majority of the videos were HD, just that they have HD versions of videos on other sites that are just SD. I will tweak my review to reflect that and take in your suggestions to.
|
09-07-15 08:53am
|
Reply
47
|
Tushy.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
I can get that discount today, right now without waiting.
|
09-02-15 08:24am
|
Reply
48
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
+1 on what you said.
|
08-31-15 04:49pm
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#3
from daisay20:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
Oh sorry dude! Not you I mean the girl...instead... :(
|
08-27-15 08:21am
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from daisay20:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
Hey there!
Woman that way seems degrading??? Sorry, but maybe others feel sexy if t hey do that...
|
08-27-15 08:00am
|
