| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Blacked.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from pat362:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
I will post my review next week and you can then compare what you wrote in yours to mine. I hope you will comment on it and let me know how I did.
|
03-01-15 05:41pm
|
Reply
27
|
Blacked.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
I'm sorry but you will have to point to me where they changed the type of porn they produce because as far as I can tell. It is pretty much the same stuff it as always been. They tend to be on par with the kind of stuff Brazzer put out except that their stuff is more vanilla in nature. I know they are the one mega site that shoots the least amount of anal of all the others but that's about it.
|
02-28-15 05:00pm
|
Reply
28
|
Blacked.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
I think my comment is in large part a warning to you and any other reviewer that giving any site and I mean any site a perfect score is paramount to a death blow. Not matter how well intentioned you are. Your review will always feel as though you aren't being honest. I haven't joined blacked yet but I know I will sooner than later but your review will not be a tool I can use to judge if it's really worth joining because you simply didn't write enough info to truly justify your score.
It's tough to review a site and even more so to remove oneself from the final judgement of the site. I looked at your review of Naughty America and you gave the site a score of 50. A site that scored in the 90's with TBP and normally scores pretty high with most other reviewers should never receive such a low score unless they altered their entire site since past reviews.
I think blacked has great potential and time will tell if if does but there is absolutely nothing original in their porn. It's still pure gonzo. You have one woman (sometimes two) with one male performer in a large bright room having sex on white furniture. The only thing that differentiate them from similar gonzo sites is that this is interracial porn which is sadly a niche that is sorely under represented. They automatically get a minimum 80# in my book because they offer interracial porn. I will wait until I'm a amber before I decide how much higher above 80 they get.
I hope to see more of your reviews and hopefully you add more info to them so that we can see what you truly like and don't like.
|
02-26-15 01:57pm
|
Reply
29
|
Blacked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
from pat362:
You are entitled to your score but by your own admission. It lacks certain things that you would like to see so it can't be a perfect site and therefore 100% is too high for an imperfect site.
You want to give it a high 90 than that is fine but 100% is not a score that should be used lightly. it also wouldn't hurt to have more meat on your review. A high score review should have tons of data to support the claim.
|
02-25-15 02:01pm
|
Reply
30
|
Box Truck Sex
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
Thanks for your kind words. Even without a discount this is a good value as it is innovative and updates regularly. It'd be great to see an America site or studio do this.
|
01-07-17 12:06pm
|
Reply
31
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
from Eraroten:
Great review, I also enjoy the site very much. I have a yearly sub, and also got multiple of their other networks as a one time upgrade bonus during various sales for 40 € each.
Regarding scenes from 2010 and back, I found out that they all still work if you access them through your mobile phone.
On PC and my iPad all I get is a broken video that can't be played, but on my android phone it works perfectly fine. Don't know what's up with that and considering this problem has persisted for years, I don't think they plan to fix it.
|
07-23-19 07:52am
|
Reply
32
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
from mbaya:
Welcome back. You have two excellent reviews.
|
07-22-19 02:16pm
|
Reply
33
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Comment
from Onyx:
Haven't joined Brazzers in a while, but in general I find using a download manager almost necessary to get the best speeds and to be able to resume downloads when things go wrong.
|
11-29-17 06:24am
|
Reply
34
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
from benmar51:
C`MON People. . . When someone takes the time and effort to construct a thorough, detailed review like this - A big ``THANK YOU`` (at the very least) is in order. . . I personally agree that Brazzers puts ALL other porn-producing websites to shame - in quantity of product. . . production values. . .top-of-the-line stars. . . ease of use, or whatever other criteria you want to use. . . THAT said, I would ONLY join it by using EPOCH as the biller.
How do you do that, you ask?? . . . When entering your credit card info, put an expiration date past the actual one - It may take a couple of tries, but, you WILL be redirected to the EPOCH page (and it`s 1-click cancellation!). . . Trust me, this really does work.
Thanx, again, Pyrenees.
|
11-24-17 08:58pm
|
Reply
35
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
from bkreidercrhl:
I am a collector of facial cum videos. The women are beautiful at Brazzers, however, I do not see many facial cum shots in the previews. Is there male talent that can deliver big loads and girls that can handle it their eyes ?
|
10-29-15 02:38pm
|
Reply
36
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from malikstarks:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
Thanks for the insight, I never really knew what went down with that. I always maintained my membership throughout all that (only pay $10 a month) but then again I never really thought thoses scenes were all that great anyway.
Looking at it now, they could probably get away with bringing it back at this point given some of the stuff that is out now and considered mainstreme
|
05-16-15 12:02pm
|
Reply
37
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from LPee23:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
What was the story with the Lisa Ann scene?
By the way I was going to PM you this question, but even though you have PM's enabled, the link to PM you is not working for some reason. Please PM me the full details, I am curious, or post here if you want to.
|
02-28-15 06:10pm
|
Reply
38
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from LPee23:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
It's kind of crazy that almost 3 years have gone by since PSP closed, and people still haven't let it go. Brazzers must have thought it would be quietly swept under the rug after a while, because there is no way they could have predicted such a strong and ongoing response from their customers. Taking it down just gave it notoriety. It's ironic that PSP is now by far the single most powerful brand name among the Brazzers sites, and yet it is the only one that no longer exists.
|
02-28-15 04:54pm
|
Reply
39
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
from LPee23:
" How about you create a Premium site where all of the removed content could be purchased?"
You said it man. I couldn't agree more.
|
02-25-15 06:26pm
|
Reply
40
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Comment
from RustyJ:
It's gone downhill and most updates are not interesting. Some ugly shemale stuff and low res oldies. Rocco's site is the biggest attraction there but even those films come eventually to Evil Angel.
|
07-25-15 09:03am
|
Reply
41
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Comment
from rearadmiral:
One of the reasons I like Pornusers so much is that it's an opportunity to share information like this. This might make the difference from someone liking or not liking the site. I've joined several sites that had major flaws but thanks to other PU members I knew about them beforehand so I went in with that knowledge. Devil's Film is on my list of sites to regularly rejoin but the update schedule is such that it only merits a rejoin once a year.
|
07-24-15 03:50am
|
Reply
42
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from snickelb:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
New vids are stream only for something like 3-days. I've no idea why they think that's a good idea. Maybe people see the vid, buy a 3-day pass, then find it's strevm-only and buy the monthly?
I'm not sure but it seems like not all new vids are stream-only either, maybe just certain stars/directors. Or maybe just brand new, just produced are stream, whereas an older vid released digitally for the 1st time will be downloadable?
Anyone else noticed that and have any idea?
|
06-03-16 06:16pm
|
Reply
43
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wraith0711:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
Thank you for your reply sir. I didn't mean to imply that the majority of the videos were HD, just that they have HD versions of videos on other sites that are just SD. I will tweak my review to reflect that and take in your suggestions to.
|
09-07-15 08:53am
|
Reply
44
|
Face Fucking
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
I can't dispute the facts that many established performers have shot for these guys but I still say that their brand of porn should not exist because it's simply too toxic for most performers (not to say all).
|
03-01-15 05:43pm
|
Reply
45
|
Face Fucking
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
I must disagree with you. The two sites you named are known to shoot extreme type of porn. I would say that queesnake shoots ultra extreme content so the type people interested in that are not your run of the mill porn fan. The women who choose to shoot for those sites know exactly what they will subjected to because it's just too extreme for them not to. The same can't be said for the women who get fooled into shooting for FF. I know because I read a first hand account of what happened to one of the women who shot for these guys. I'm talking about a woman who had already shot for a couple of Kink sites so she was comfortable with the more extreme part of the industry. As far as I can tell. She is the only woman to have walked out of her shoot before it got too violent. I saw some of the pictures and she didn't look good after just a few minutes of starting her scene.
I'm okay when the women who choose to shoot a certain type of scene know exactly what is going to happen and know that their safety is paramount to the people shooting the scene. that doesn't man that accidents won't happen but those are usually the exception and not the rule. You will have to point to me which FF scene you are dead certain that the woman was thrilled with what happened to her and would gladly sign up for another run. I have never seen it and I know some women have shot more than once for FF.
|
02-28-15 05:11pm
|
Reply
46
|
Face Fucking
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
from pat362:
I'll grant you it's rare and there isn't a single day that I don't wish that it was extinct. Their brand of porn is what you get when you mix the most fucked up stuff Max Hardcore did toward the end of his career and add a cup of insanity. They are the poster child for misogynistic porn.
There is no current site that compares to them which is saying a lot.
They changed their name from facial abuse to face fucking because they were probably having a hard time getting any woman to shoot for them. I would be curious to know how they manage to entice any woman to actually shoot for them.
|
02-26-15 06:12pm
|
Reply
47
|
Faith 69
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from marcdc1:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
Thanks for reading. If you're looking for younger and HD, I HIGHLY recommend lelu love.com. Still ametuer and an all around great site
|
03-01-15 05:00pm
|
Reply
48
|
Faith 69
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from marcdc1:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
Hi Pyrennees,
Thanks for the challenge - it's good to keep me honest.
I have to confess I'm an easy grader. To me truth in advertising is the most important quality, to me. Faith's preview section let's you know she is a "curvy" girl in her mid-to-late 30s. If my memory serves she was born in '78. So I don't knock a site for being what it is. She's has a "housewife vibe" - but never tricks you into thinking she's something else. I'm ok with that.
The newer material is at HD rate. Again I'm judging the site based on what it says to be, she's selling amateur porn, made by her, so I don't knock her for not having a camera that costs 1,000s of dollars. I get that as a couple doing this on their own, they can't afford to upgrade their camera every 6 months when something new comes out on the market.
To sum up. I'm all about being what you are. If you give a customer an expectation and then deliver on it, we should "reward" you with a good review. If you try to take my money by selling me something you're not. I will flame you.
You mentioned my working being "unique" that makes me think you found an error. Is there something that need to be fix? Thanks for reaching out to me
|
03-01-15 03:56pm
|
Reply
49
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(Pyrenees's Reply)
I agree that this is a great fetish network. I wish some of the dormant sites would become active again. This network covers a broad range of fetishes.
|
01-04-17 05:40pm
|
Reply
50
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
from MargulisAZ:
I like quite a bit of the stuff on this site, but unfortunately it rarely updates anymore and a lot of the sub-sites I liked such as straponsquad.com don't update at all anymore. The so called new updates are just recycled old scenes.
|
01-03-17 11:57pm
|
