Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(IDoctor99's Reply)
Thanks for your reasoned response. I can see where you would love the site if you were an exhibitionist, trouble is I'm not. On the surface a "marriage" of exhibitionist and voyeur (like most Porn Users) would appear ideal but I really have a problem with too amateurish a quality of picture and video and have even more of a problem with isolated body parts which, in a true amateur forum, would almost have to be the norm by default because, as you pointed out, these are real people who don't want to put their reputations on the line, therefore I truly understand the necessity to either leave out the face altogether or to mask it in order to make it unrecognizeable.
For you this may be an admirable thing to do, for me, my reaction is to feel cheated, therefore I prefer sites that contain "doubtful" amateurs. In other words those who might be exhibitionists for money but are not (yet) the silicone enhanced, air-brushed Barbie-Doll-like professionals found in Penthouse and Playboy.
Reading between the lines of your post I think both of us agree that because of the innate nature of your favorite site it should not be rated by the average Porn User. Yours is a site where like-minded folks mingle and have a wonderful time in each other's company. And that's fine and deserves a high rating ... if it is treated like a forum and not another Porn Site.
|
11-28-07 11:43am
|
Reply
2
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Review
from Khan:
For the Record ...
We took a long look at this one and decided it did NOT violate our rules. While it's true, we do not allow webmasters or those associated with a site to submit reviews, we find that this is a bit of an unusual situation.
IDoctor obviously has a vested interested in how the site is perceived, however, we're categorizing that bias as we would that of an exuberant fan.
None of us here at PornUsers.com are new to overzealous fans coming and raving about a site. We've found this especially true when the site in question has a forum or live chat interface where equally zealous fans can be rallied.
As always, users here should use their own best judgement to determine when a reviewer's perspective is of value to them.
|
11-19-07 06:01am
|
Reply
3
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from asmith12:
(IDoctor99's Reply)
> obviously you can't seem to get your mind around the idea.
No, the idea of the site is obvious (there is nothing really new about it BTW), it is you who can't seem to get your mind around the idea of THIS site, and the idea of THIS site is about unbiased reviews. And your so-called review cannot possibly be unbiased because there is your content on the site (moreover, originally you've put your ID in your "review"). You've wrote in one of your replies: "of course I want to promote it to others." - THIS site is NOT about PROMOTING anything; it is about sharing information.
> It is my firm and honest belief that there are few, if any, porn sites offering a better experience on the web for anyone interested in such material.
Even if it is firm and honest, it is biased.
|
11-18-07 02:21pm
|
Reply
4
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from asmith12:
(IDoctor99's Reply)
> Whats the problem with finding a good thing and wanting to spread the word?
The problem is with creating your own content and trying to "review" it and put "rating" on it. Comment would be more appropriate for this kind of things (not exactly sure if even it would be ok with the spirit of the site, but in any case it would be better than fake review/rating).
> Can you guys be any more rude to somebody wanting to help out fellow porn watchers?
Sure we can, just ask about it politely enough.
|
11-18-07 01:18pm
|
Reply
5
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from asmith12:
(IDoctor99's Reply)
Even if you do not receive any money from the site, you admitted yourself that you want to get more people there; that means that your "review" is biased from the very beginning, and rating you put in you review is completely useless. It MIGHT be suitable as a comment (not sure).
|
11-18-07 12:45pm
|
Reply
6
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
Wow - After reading this review, I can almost picture a late night infomercial...
But this line really got me-
"If it wasn't for member contributions from individuals like myself, there would be absolutely no content at all and the site wouldn't exist."
Sure... no bias in the rating on THIS one!
|
11-18-07 12:06pm
|
Reply
7
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Review
from Denner:
agree with asmith - PU's with any connection to a site can't and should not make reviews....
There is a place called "Browse News" for inputs.
|
11-18-07 10:56am
|
Reply
8
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from asmith12:
(IDoctor99's Reply)
As I understand policy of this site, people affiliated with the site are not allowed to make reviews of the site they're affiliated with, because it cannot be anything but shilling.
|
11-18-07 09:26am
|
Reply
9
|
Newbie Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
IDoctor99's Review
from asmith12:
> Leave me a comment and let me know you saw this review!
You're obviously shilling for the site, and this is not welcome here.
|
11-18-07 02:05am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
