| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
from EverNight:
Just wanted to add that they do have daily download limits :( and the lowest seen resolution can be below 540p. They have older videos where 360p is your best option.
|
12-15-15 12:30pm
|
Reply
377
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
from rearadmiral:
This is an excellent review. Thanks for posting it. I appreciate the level of detail and that you kept your comments objective. I don’t find reviews to be particularly informative if all they say is “I don’t like this site.” I need to know why a reviewer does or doesn’t like a site (or parts of it) because that is often subjective and I may not share those same thoughts. I’d like to think that I could write an objective review of a site that I had zero interest in and still do it well by explaining the pros and cons of the site objectively. That’s what you’ve done here.
The comparison to Videobox is easy to make because they are so much alike. I’m into a VB membership now and based on your review I plan to join Videosz later this week so it’ll be a great opportunity for a comparison.
I’m really glad to hear that Videosz has dropped adding five DVDs per day. I wish VB would do that as well because the current model trades quality for quantity. If sites like Videosz and Videobox want to draw paying customers away from the tube sites they need to offer something that the tube sites don’t and that could be quality.
I’ll be joining Videosz later this week based on your review.
|
12-14-15 02:17pm
|
Reply
378
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
from daisay20:
Thanks dude for the update. I will go into D/L soon.
|
08-27-15 08:26am
|
Reply
379
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
from Pyrenees:
I also enjoy clarity. I never hit their download limit and I got everything I wanted on the first day. So we can all be happy =). Thank you for telling us.
|
08-18-15 08:33pm
|
Reply
380
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(exotics4me's Reply)
No, I was thinking of something less complicated, like "Big Alien Dick." After all, we already have "BBC."
|
03-20-15 12:40pm
|
Reply
381
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
from asdf123:
I joined BangBros yesterday and without even knowing i added the super pack. I'm currently trying to solve this problem without success. How much will they charge for the superpack?
|
11-07-14 12:13pm
|
Reply
382
|
Kiara Mia
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
from bebelover:
Yeah, it's a damned shame that Mercedes has not gotten with the program in all these years. I join every year thinking she will upgrade and NO, that's how she rakes it in, by charging schlubs like me every year. Get a about a 1000 people to join at 29.95 and you have made 29K that month!
Interesting market.
|
09-05-13 04:09pm
|
Reply
383
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from thaavi:
(exotics4me's Reply)
Sorry to bother you with my perspective or bad english, I just want to say this:
As you can see from the reviews done here lately, not everybody is focused on facts, numbers, measures and moreover there are reviews already that captures this side of the website. The main facts are given, there is no need to repeat them. I am thankful to all the users who tried to give their own impression of the site, this can give you an idea what it is really about. Your analogy with a car cannot be applied fully on an erotic side with this approach, because the numbers and specifications simply cannot describe the qualities. It´s not car business or sport performance, not everything you can measure. I and the others were trying to put across were some different qualities. But I can understand that for some people it can be meaningless. I hope not for everyone:)
|
06-04-13 03:25am
|
Reply
384
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#18
from pat362:
(exotics4me's Reply)
I like Jo and I also like Eve but ChaseGC's review gave me the info I needed to make an educated choice and her type of content is not going to be enough to satisfy me. I'd rather join a site that has both Jo and Eve videos but also other models and more importantly a little bit of variety. The only thing that seems to vary in her stuff is location and partner. I guess for a super fan or Jo that is enough but I would have wanted her to use toys in some of the videos.
Ah well. I'm sure some people are happy with her site and I really hope we stop seeing useless reviews of her site. There are now 5 reviews and only one is any good.
|
06-03-13 03:52pm
|
Reply
385
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from thaavi:
(exotics4me's Reply)
Looking for/getting discount? I´m still shocked by the suspicions made on us who are giving true effort...
The November 2013 is a date bug, I already informed the admin, the scenes with this date are already released on the site. So there is no self rip off
|
06-03-13 07:39am
|
Reply
386
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from thaavi:
(exotics4me's Reply)
All the technical facts and details have already been mentioned https://www.thebestporn.com/review/idreamofjo/#review There is no need to repeat them in members´ reviews I think. Members´reviews offer different perspective, like what we think it´s unique and different and what is interesting for us. Not just simple list of facts.
There is no content fromm DDF or 21sextury on the site. This is all original stuff. Some of the scenes of I dream of Jo are realised after some time on Viv Thomas site. That is the way how it works.
|
06-03-13 03:05am
|
Reply
387
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from thaavi:
(exotics4me's Reply)
Hi, no, I´m not working in adult biz, but I´m in contact via forum with people who actually are working in this industry and are in contact with some models like Jo or Eve Angel. That´s why I know Eve is working now only occassionally and only for Jo and Viv Thomas.
|
06-03-13 03:00am
|
Reply
388
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
from ChaseGC:
I'd like to know what set Jo & Eve did together in the mid-2000s where Jo looked 31 and Eve looked 29, when they were 23 and 21, respectively.
Do you guys really need reviews from site members who I have actually watched the videos? Can't you just make them up based on the number of typos you've found on the site?
|
06-02-13 02:19pm
|
Reply
389
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from thaavi:
(exotics4me's Reply)
1) Eve Angel doesn´t work anymore for DDF productions or any other production nowdays with two exceptions. First is I dream of Jo, she is a very good friend of Jo and Viv Thomas production, which is known it makes classy films and treats models very well.
2)I will notice the admin about that bug with date Nov2013, but it is a minor bug, the site is NO WAY recyklation, there is original stuff twice a week
|
06-02-13 04:36am
|
Reply
390
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
from Nick Spillum:
Hi there,
Thanks for commenting on this site The Nov 2013 is an error we here at Viv Thomas made on the site, it'll be fixed first thing tomorrow. Apologies for that, but trust me it wasn't designed to mislead anyone.
Secondly the point about original content. I can assure you Jo shoots content regularly and sends it over to us for editing. We release one video scene, and one photo set very week and sometimes additional bonus content during the week.
The "reunited" set was filmed this year, definitely not in the mid 2000s :) I think both girls would be extremely happy that they appear not to have noticeably aged in 8 years :)
|
06-02-13 12:02am
|
Reply
391
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Nick Spillum:
(exotics4me's Reply)
Hi there Exotics4me,
Thanks for replying and yes I did mention to some members of I Dream of Jo that there was a place where they could review the site here. As there were no PU reviews at all, I thought it might be a good thing. They love the site and rate it accordingly. If you're interested to review the site, let me know and I can organize you a review account.
Admittedly Eve doesn't work with tons of other people any more, but Jo does work with her regularly.
I can guarantee you that every single week there is a fresh new set from Jo. It's not recycled content.
|
06-01-13 11:43pm
|
Reply
392
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
from KET924aab:
Two reviews by newly registered members on the same day does raise a red flag. But no doubt Jo is hot, and does some of the best girl/girl scenes available.
|
06-01-13 03:14am
|
Reply
393
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
from pat362:
I checked the site out and I count 50 updates this year. That's 50 if you count videos and pic sets separately. Otherwise there have been only 25 updates this year. What I found interesting is that some of the new updates are actually from the future because they are dated Nov 2013. I think the webmaster should use that for promo because they are the only site that is able to release content ahead of it's being done.
I think Jo is a very attractive woman and I may one day join her site but it certainly won't be from any of the recent reviews or comments because these don't appear to be impartial and that in my opinion does not help the site but actually make me weary of joining.
|
05-31-13 03:40am
|
Reply
394
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
from thaavi:
I am a member of this wonderfull site and I can assure you there are updates minimally twice a week. Yesterday on 30th May was an update. Yes, this site is done in collaboration with Viv Thomas, but the site is NOT a rip off, videos originally filmed for the site are being realeased there every single week!
|
05-31-13 03:05am
|
Reply
395
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
from slutty:
Thanks for the info exotics! I had been wondering about that channel, for some reason I can never seem to figure out how much of stuff is where on the new VB tour. I didn't realize they pro-rated the channels either, that is really good to know.
|
05-20-13 09:13pm
|
Reply
396
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
from bbiillyy:
I think too many scenes at once and server is cutting or there may be a restrcition on server that only 2 - 3 files can be downloaded simoutaneously
|
05-14-13 05:47am
|
Reply
397
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from PinkPanther:
(exotics4me's Reply)
I don't know - I think if an analysis were done comparing ALS Scan & ALS Angels both to Met Art & their related sites in terms of the overlap in models, I would expect that the percentages of the 2 sites would be fairly close.
I don't think you were "off" in any way in thinking that both ALS Scan AND ALS Angels would be part of MetArt's network - especially when you think about the universe of models that Holly Randall has used on her site - many of whom are more ALS Angels material than ALS Scan in terms of age and boob-size.
It may just be a matter of time and prioritizing. ALS Scan has always been the more high-priority site for Alex and Co.
|
05-01-13 09:15pm
|
Reply
398
|
Val Midwest
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(exotics4me's Reply)
I'm more of a video collector and these sites tended to favour photos. I've kept some of the videos and they were probably substandard resolution even five years ago. One of these days I'll take the plunge and join a couple of solo sites again.
|
04-29-13 05:37pm
|
Reply
399
|
Val Midwest
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(exotics4me's Reply)
I've always wondered about that too, and can only conclude that it has to be the model's choice. But it seems to me that once a model gets into this business she might as well go all the way.
My biggest beef with these solo 'teen' models is that they are almost always poorly done. I'll admit it has been a while since I joined one, but the picture and video quality tends to be poor.
But like you I'm still drawn to these sites. This one (and the network) are on my list of sites to join at some time.
|
04-25-13 05:32am
|
Reply
400
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Drooler:
(exotics4me's Reply)
Yes, they're the same. Since I only want a few of the "hi" sized pics, I've resorted to opening the pic, looking at the browser title bar, and using that to get the photo number and just typing it in in place of the super long goobledegook default file "names."
Another weird thing I hadn't mentioned before is that for some reposted sets, the medium and hi sizes are identical, though they are labeled medium and hi (or high, can't recall off hand). So you can download a zip of each and they're really the same size pics.
Anyway, I've liked the photo quality and babes (mostly) at ALS Scan, but with these new changes, along with the addition of hardcore, it's become less appealing.
I'll probably go back some time, but there's no hurry.
|
04-24-13 11:19am
|
