Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
Mighty Mistress
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from RustyJ:
You point out exactly the problems this site has. Monotonous content and lack of innovation are both quite true. Whether you like the faces of the models is more subjective but makeup is heavy all over this network.
If this was still in 21Sextury.com, I'd be all "go for it" about at least trying it but since I guess this one is now part of 21Sextreme, it's more about whether you like the general themes there. The price and amount of material are still in very good balance but I think 21Sextreme got a whole lot worse package than 21Sextury. There's DominatedGirls on 21Sextreme though which I like a lot.
|
06-26-11 10:44pm
|
Reply
77
|
Adult Empire
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from kev60:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
A fake????? Really! I'm real and my review is real. I stayed just one month as I went on vacation. I emailed them to cancel and got a reply the next day saying they had complied.
I did figure out a way to make searching easier.
Yes, it is not the slickest site to navigate, but it has more content per dollar than any site I've ever been a member of.
I'm off again on vacation in a couple of weeks (I'm retired), but I'll be rejoining as soon as I return. There are many sections I've yet to explore.
|
03-03-11 11:53am
|
Reply
78
|
January Seraph
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from SeraphOmniMedia:
Hi!
You have funny timing- I started encoding a video to the usual 5 formats last night and had just sat down to update my site when I noticed an email notifying me of your comment. I haven't updated in a bit, but you can read about why here:
Http://JanuarySeraph.com/blog which also includes what I plan on doing to make up for it.
The videos that you mentioned from one of my former sites are the subject of current litigation with my ex business partner, so I can't comment further about that until thats over.
However, I can tell you that I'm also adding a VOD feature to the site which will allow one to choose between buying a membership or just buying a video by itself. It's ready to go except for some stylistic elements I'm still working on.
If you liked my former FemDom videos, you'll be excited to know I've been developing a feature style FemDom video line that will blow the other sites of similar nature out of the water. I hope to begin production in the next few months.
Let me know how you enjoy this weeks updates.
Xx
January
|
02-28-11 11:55am
|
Reply
79
|
Latex Style
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
from BadMrFrosty:
Decent review but I cant help but feel 80 is high considering the sites shortcomings. I know you addressed this to some degree in your bottom line but I would still like to see more justification for that score.
|
02-28-11 06:45am
|
Reply
80
|
Latex Style
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
from otoh:
Thanks for the review, which I read with interest, although my own interest in latex is a little milder and doesn't go as far as the full body and face variety. But looking at this site, and some others you've reviewed, I can see the appeal...
|
02-25-11 02:47pm
|
Reply
81
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Mr Fountain:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Well, I agree...they are supposed to not have any class and be mean to ugly guys like me.. All I can hope for is to kiss their ass, google at their gorgeous bodies, fist fuck, and sissy cum into a doggie dish, kiss their boots. But the main idea is forking over their membership dues and just being their bitch. I like them not having any class thats the way its supposed to be.
|
01-18-11 07:04am
|
Reply
82
|
Strapon Cum
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from DpornGuy:
I agree, since I reviewed it, the site seems to have added allot of materials. Interesting that there aren't many sites cloning or copying the idea.
|
01-17-11 11:30pm
|
Reply
83
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from miko5:
Where the 95 % approval comes from ? Very simple answer, my friend. Abby despite all it's limitations in terms of camera work and some unattractive girls (especially lately ) it is the only lesbian site in the Internet 100% TOYS FREE. It is a fact but g/g video makers don't get it : lesbian porn watchers hate toys.
|
12-06-10 05:52pm
|
Reply
84
|
Susan Wayland
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from Lionheart:
I hate when websites try to get too creative with membership rates. There should always be the same flat rate, or really superior perks with a higher membership price, access to content should never be considered a perk
|
11-01-10 02:39am
|
Reply
85
|
Susan Wayland
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from MichPaul:
I was a member one years ago but was in need to cancel my membership. I've joined two month ago and I agree that the new system was new for me as well.
However, before this system I got 1600x pics in zip archives and videos in hd 720p or 1080p. It the same today. However, I like the content and would stay with or without additional options. But, now I'm curious to see the pics in 3000x. I don't feel ripped-off as the recent pics quality is common from many other websites and the video quality in hd is still over the top. But I'm also just wondering what type of service "recruit" is as I've joined as "super"...
|
10-31-10 07:53am
|
Reply
86
|
Susan Wayland
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from DpornGuy:
that is the most outrageous thing i've heard... Making members stay 2-3 months so they can access content? you pay, you get access from day 1... unreal..
|
10-31-10 04:37am
|
Reply
87
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
I definitely don't agree with Spencer's review of the site. The cons he lists don't touch on what seems to be common complaints in user reviews and comments about their content in the last couple (few?) years - mostly the lack of nudity and repetitiveness of the shoots.
While it's still somewhat unique in it's niche, I'd have to rate this as a low 80's site now.
|
10-02-10 04:32pm
|
Reply
88
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from Capn:
I think it really depends what you are looking for.
I agree perhaps it is not your genre.
They have become very formulaic, which if it appeals might well merit that in some folks eyes.
Not for me though.
Too repetetive & too sprawling a site for a mark over 80, let alone 95.
FWIW That is just my opinion.
|
10-02-10 03:32pm
|
Reply
89
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from messmer:
I wouldn't give them 95% nowadays but that's because they split up one site and made three out of it with an increased price if one wants all of them. I disagree with the rest of your remarks, though. If a site features natural girls and then sticks with natural girls they are being true to the niche, which is a plus for me. Just like going to a hardcore site and then complaining that there's too much b/g, g/g content.
|
10-02-10 08:54am
|
Reply
90
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from Drooler:
I've also been at a loss to explain the popularity of this site, but some people really go apeshit over it. The way you described it is pretty much how I've always seen it, too.
|
10-02-10 07:26am
|
Reply
91
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jay G:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
All of us have very particular likes and dislikes and eventually I think web-sites will be more specialized, meeting your more particular desires.
For now, huge networks with many websites (with fewer updates) seem to be the rage now, because most of us love bargains, even when we get far less of the particular kind of stuff we really like best.
For someone who likes girl/girl with anal play, 21st Sextury has some pretty good scenes that I've downloaded recently. You might want to check out Lezcuties where some anal licking and anal dildo play between some very pretty girls looks good to me.
|
09-20-10 07:14am
|
Reply
92
|
Fetish Kitsch
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
from RustyJ:
Thanks for the review! It certainly looks quality for an amateur site. Doesn't sound like there's too much content but that's what you get with only two people doing it. However the originality alone might be a reason to subscribe for a month.
|
09-10-10 11:05pm
|
Reply
93
|
Bongum.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Glad it seems to be sorted out.
Always nice when you get a responsive webmaster too.
:)
|
07-26-10 10:22am
|
Reply
94
|
Bongum.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from Khan:
I asked one of our editors to take a look and they didn't get any kind of warning so I'm guessing something else must have triggered your alert.
The site seems clean to us.
|
07-25-10 01:49pm
|
Reply
95
|
Bongum.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from anyonebutme:
Probably a false positive. Kaspersky says no virus.
Besides, that site you sign up through verotel, is it bongum or verotel you think has the problem?
|
07-25-10 09:45am
|
Reply
96
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from messmer:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Sure sounds like DRM because the file formats work perfectly for me on VLC. I didn't think any sites still protected their contents with something that everyone has so emphatically rejected. :-(
|
04-03-10 11:32am
|
Reply
97
|
Rubber Eva
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from messmer:
Strange, my f4v (obtained from Naughty America) and flv videos all play fine with VLC. Do you have the latest player?
|
04-03-10 10:20am
|
Reply
98
|
Dry Humping.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from Capn:
Looking at the tour page, I would tend to agree!
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-02-10 03:38am
|
Reply
99
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from dracken:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
It's been a while since I joined this site, but for some reason (if I remember correctly) It just didn't impress me. The whole network felt kinda flat (After some other euro sites this one was okay-ish)
But I'll join again next month and see if I change my opinion
|
03-16-10 12:23am
|
Reply
100
|
Art-Lingerie
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from Denner:
Ahem....Is the site open for formel reviews?
https://www.thebestporn.com/review/artlingerie/
(see review status)
Or do we still have to wait till April - and if so: Why?
You let in paying users!
|
03-08-10 08:09am
|