| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Bongum.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from anyonebutme:
Probably a false positive. Kaspersky says no virus.
Besides, that site you sign up through verotel, is it bongum or verotel you think has the problem?
|
07-25-10 09:45am
|
Reply
27
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from marcdc1:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Thanks Ergo. No one upset here. I appreciate the dialog.
I went with the 95 because there is some great stuff here and i wanted to give credit to it (great in both quality, talent, and genre).
The trouble is there's also a lot of stuff that looks like it was ripped from a beta max in 1991 (Grainy encoding of 70s porn is disappointing).
To bottom line it: because there are individual producers having their work hosted at clips4sale there is a tremendous amount of variation. It's like I'm using a album reviewing website to comment about iTunes - it can be done but it's not designed to do it.
All the best-
|
08-01-12 04:54am
|
Reply
28
|
Dry Humping.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from Capn:
Looking at the tour page, I would tend to agree!
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-02-10 03:38am
|
Reply
29
|
Everything Butt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Jay G:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
All of us have very particular likes and dislikes and eventually I think web-sites will be more specialized, meeting your more particular desires.
For now, huge networks with many websites (with fewer updates) seem to be the rage now, because most of us love bargains, even when we get far less of the particular kind of stuff we really like best.
For someone who likes girl/girl with anal play, 21st Sextury has some pretty good scenes that I've downloaded recently. You might want to check out Lezcuties where some anal licking and anal dildo play between some very pretty girls looks good to me.
|
09-20-10 07:14am
|
Reply
30
|
Fetish Bunker
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RustyJ:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Yes, judging by previews, it looks very nice indeed. No hardcore though, I guess?
|
04-13-12 10:08pm
|
Reply
31
|
Fetish Bunker
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from RustyJ:
That seems to be common practice. As long as they are not advertising with promised updates I guess they aren't really doing anything too shady.
|
04-13-12 05:48am
|
Reply
32
|
Fetish Kitsch
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
from RustyJ:
Thanks for the review! It certainly looks quality for an amateur site. Doesn't sound like there's too much content but that's what you get with only two people doing it. However the originality alone might be a reason to subscribe for a month.
|
09-10-10 11:05pm
|
Reply
33
|
Fetish Nation
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from apoctom:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Thanks for the info. Unless I hear otherwise, I assume that they haven't changed.
|
03-20-08 05:41pm
|
Reply
34
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from xexbot:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
I gave the score of 79 for that exact reason. I can appreciate that my cons may very well be your pros. I tried to keep my score at least within the range and focus of other reviewers. Personally, it might have been closer to a 69 for me, but like I said, how do you applaud a site for doing the minimum to be a good site. It functions, it's clunky, but it functions. LOL. At the same time, I reserve bad ratings for sites that truly screw us over. I don't think everyone will be screwed over by these guys, but I don't think everyone is going to be happy with their purchase either. Thanks for pointing this out though. At least some people are paying attention ;)
|
06-21-12 11:20am
|
Reply
35
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ragnorok87:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
yes i am. click the join to get instant access or something then put in all the info then thats what happened to me. do you think you could contact or gert someone to contact them and tell them my problem. maybe they can help me
|
03-11-12 07:39am
|
Reply
36
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from xexbot:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
I personally rank Abby Winters higher, though I certainly have lamented on some of the softcore issues with them in the past too. I do think their models are much better, I really like their business model, and overall I think they are one of the best sites on the net. The fact that they may be a little too softcore for my tastes doesn't detract from how I would rank them. But, I understand not everybody likes the same things too, so you certainly have a valid point. I think it's safe to say the more popular Aussie porn seems to be a hit or miss with everyone else.
|
04-21-12 04:53pm
|
Reply
37
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Yeah I probably agree it is certainly more a photos place but shame the movies couldn't be longer. Photos just don't do it for me these days unfortunately.
|
04-24-12 02:51pm
|
Reply
38
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr smut:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Well if you are into Latex then it's really a shame because the update frequency for that niche is very low. As for the quality I can only say I liked it a lot even though it's not my favourite niche ;-)
|
03-22-08 06:09am
|
Reply
39
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from humiliatrix:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Not bots, I asked my sissies to post here since the older reviews expired.
Goddess Melissa
Humiliatrix.com
|
07-01-12 09:51am
|
Reply
40
|
Humiliatrix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Mr Fountain:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Well, I agree...they are supposed to not have any class and be mean to ugly guys like me.. All I can hope for is to kiss their ass, google at their gorgeous bodies, fist fuck, and sissy cum into a doggie dish, kiss their boots. But the main idea is forking over their membership dues and just being their bitch. I like them not having any class thats the way its supposed to be.
|
01-18-11 07:04am
|
Reply
41
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from TrashMan:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
A miracle indeed, but not today. I just went back to their members area. Not only has the design not changed (even though the homepage has changed) DRM is still in use. Sorry guys.
|
01-24-09 04:58pm
|
Reply
42
|
Hustler's Taboo
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from jd1961:
Here's another company that could be a mega site, with all the material they have and their reputation.
But these dinosaur companies seem to be paranoid about publishing their product online. They only want to sell DVDs for $40 in porn shops, like they were still in the 1990s.
|
01-07-09 11:48am
|
Reply
43
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from FeckAdmin:
We share similar values in terms of fresh, healthy, sex positive amateur women but after that the style differs. Their videos are more documentary style, with bright, fairly even lighting. We focus a lot on production style and lighting to create a mood, and our videos have sometimes been described as artistic (while still very explicit). They focus more on young (-23) women, and highlight their youth - we cover all ages. They are friends of ours and we recommend their site but a lot of people join both, as they get different things from each.
|
01-22-14 02:18am
|
Reply
44
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from FeckAdmin:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
With respect, you guys misunderstand our message. We don't deny we're porn - but we're GOOD porn. No faking, no lies about the quality and quantity of our content, genuine amateurs (mostly, a couple of our girls do mainstream porn as well), and high production values. And to the original poster, our stand on ethics isn't related to the content - it's how it's made, how the women are treated and paid, and the values represented. We don't judge people for their sexual perversions and in fact we dabble in them on the site from time to time, where the restrictions of the laws in our country allow. And we certainly aren't intolerant of any sexual act or flavour, you're quite wrong about that. Any consensual sex is fine with us (animals and children aside) but a lot of gonzo porn purports to show non consenting women, and we'd put that in the 'bad porn' basket as well, notwithstanding that it's fake. It's educating our kids, after all.
|
04-13-13 06:22pm
|
Reply
45
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from otoh:
"Joining is like to be getting a member of some special community which despises the watcher of "common" porn"
Whereas I'm not that familiar with the site, I agree with you wholeheartedly, EP - especially as the webmaster has basically concurred with the statement.
I confess it was a bit of a step for me to admit I like smut enough to pay to join sites, but having got over that, I've learned a lot about what turns people on, and whereas my tastes are fairly restrained and/or vanilla, I wouldn't at all judge what others like in that respect - and although some porn is obviously mass produced, there is plenty that's not, and features amateur, real models, but that is still proud to be smutty and pornographic.
This isn't a comment on the site itself; again there are different types of porn that appeal to different folk and if this works for people (it may well do so for me) then great. But this is a site where folk pay to see girls masturbate and I can't really see how that's not porn :|
|
03-21-12 08:43am
|
Reply
46
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from FeckAdmin:
You say "Joining is like to be getting a member of some special community which despises the watcher of "common" porn." That's partly true - Ifeelmyself IS a special community because the people you are watching masturbate are just ordinary girls and women, they aren't porn actresses (though some do appear on other sites we refer them to). When you watch a porn actress masturbate to simulated orgasm, you're keeping her in a job. (If you pay for your membership that is). On our site your'e privildeged to watch what these girls let you see, which is their real masturbation to genuine orgasm. And then, you can chat with some of them on the forum. They are not professionals but they are paid (more than ost pros for a similar shoot) and part of your membership fee also goes to paying per-click bonuses.
It's true that ours isn't a porn fantasy site, so you won't see a frustrated milf fucking herself with the mixmaster on the kitchen bench, or the hot co-eds molesting the pizza guy. That stuff is all over the internet, we're here to provide an alternative. If you want a caffeine fix you go to Starbucks but if you're a real coffee lover you find a cafe with a good barista that roasts their own beans. It's the same with porn.
But actually we do fantasy sometimes, but we do *thier* fantasy, not yours, and we think that's much more interesting. Like Strawberry masturbating while suspended by ropes, or Emile fantasising about being examined by an old school gynaecologist.
If you've observed so far that there isn't much variation then I guess you haven't seen the girl fucking herself with her deodorant, or on the railway bridge at sunset, standing by the window watching somebody outside, at her office desk watching porn after hours, on the train (which she filmed herself) - these things really do happen, these girls told us so, so we recreated them and here they are. No apologies for some same-ness of location, we have a studio for the first shoot with each girl and it has a darkened background so you can concentrate on watching the subtle things that comprise real masturbation and orgasm.
I especially like what you say, "I've never seen such glorification on any other site" - but it's the way it should always have been.
|
03-20-12 05:41pm
|
Reply
47
|
In Focus Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from PinkPanther:
It's not a reality site, if that's what you mean. I would say that it's pretty performancey, though I personally don't consider that to be a bad thing. My main gripe with this site is that they have gone the shitty-photo-treatment route over time. So where you used to have skin tone and all the things that are exciting about looking at hot nekkid women, now the photos are all laquered crap where you might as well be looking at one of those sites with 3-d cartoon images. The vids are still good, in my opinion, and older photos are better than the new ones.
|
08-01-11 07:07pm
|
Reply
48
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mr3633:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Ergo- Thanks for your reply. I'm receiving quite a bit of feedback from other users who unfortunately have experienced the same issues with multiple unauthorized billings. Most of these complaints have been coming form the folks over at Incredible Pass (and their huge network of sites).
|
03-19-08 01:33pm
|
Reply
49
|
January Seraph
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from SeraphOmniMedia:
Hi!
You have funny timing- I started encoding a video to the usual 5 formats last night and had just sat down to update my site when I noticed an email notifying me of your comment. I haven't updated in a bit, but you can read about why here:
Http://JanuarySeraph.com/blog which also includes what I plan on doing to make up for it.
The videos that you mentioned from one of my former sites are the subject of current litigation with my ex business partner, so I can't comment further about that until thats over.
However, I can tell you that I'm also adding a VOD feature to the site which will allow one to choose between buying a membership or just buying a video by itself. It's ready to go except for some stylistic elements I'm still working on.
If you liked my former FemDom videos, you'll be excited to know I've been developing a feature style FemDom video line that will blow the other sites of similar nature out of the water. I hope to begin production in the next few months.
Let me know how you enjoy this weeks updates.
Xx
January
|
02-28-11 11:55am
|
Reply
50
|
Kink On Demand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from asmith12:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Let's hope that their competition (TwistedFactory) will come up with something better :-).
|
04-28-08 04:27am
|
