| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Latex Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from LatexRyan:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
This site has no affiliation with either the old Latexotica or the new Latexotica. I don't know what the plan was, but I feel that this was an attempt to produce a spiritual successor to Latexotica (of course we now have a true successor with the re-opening later this year).
I personally never got the feeling that it was mass produced nor that it was generic. In fact I feel that it was as far flung from being mass-produced and generic as you can possibly get.
Latexotica was probably the first genuine multi-model latex site and after it's second revamp (the first being the change of name from Amateurlatex to Latexotica) it carved out a very specific niche, non-nude latex photography with a more adult edge, something which Latex Heaven has tried and - in my opinion - failed to do.
Latex Heaven feels far more mass produced than Latexotica ever was.
|
05-19-12 02:51pm
|
Reply
52
|
Latex Style
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
from BadMrFrosty:
Decent review but I cant help but feel 80 is high considering the sites shortcomings. I know you addressed this to some degree in your bottom line but I would still like to see more justification for that score.
|
02-28-11 06:45am
|
Reply
53
|
Latex Style
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Review
from otoh:
Thanks for the review, which I read with interest, although my own interest in latex is a little milder and doesn't go as far as the full body and face variety. But looking at this site, and some others you've reviewed, I can see the appeal...
|
02-25-11 02:47pm
|
Reply
54
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from elephant:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
No problem, its a great site by the way, one of my alltime favs.
|
04-29-12 01:28am
|
Reply
55
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from pat362:
I wasn't sure what you guys were talking about because I'm a member and I simply log in to the network but that is a really stupid way to advertise a lesbian site. They only show 3 scenes from the Lez cuties site in the preview section for that site.
|
04-25-12 09:10am
|
Reply
56
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from elephant:
Hi yeah that is strange why they have chosen to do that, much preferred the old look of the site, those hardcore scenes will be from the other network sites though that you get when you join, lezcuties will only be girls.
|
04-24-12 02:56pm
|
Reply
57
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from dracken:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
It's been a while since I joined this site, but for some reason (if I remember correctly) It just didn't impress me. The whole network felt kinda flat (After some other euro sites this one was okay-ish)
But I'll join again next month and see if I change my opinion
|
03-16-10 12:23am
|
Reply
58
|
LOL Lesbians
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from elephant:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Yeah I think real amateur sites are very rare, most are pretend porn girls playing the roles, so sadly I've not come across many scenes with real first time on camera scenes, not on one niche site anyways, I don't mind so much though as they at least know how to things and have a little experience in acting. I guess some people do love 100% authentic amateurs though so fair point.
|
05-06-12 02:43am
|
Reply
59
|
Lovers In Latex
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lyncher:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Thanks for your hint about writing a review and comment at the same time. After writing a comment I realized it would be better to write a review instead (more characters possible), but I couldnīt delete the comment.
However, the comment is deleted now for good ;-)
|
12-16-12 01:52pm
|
Reply
60
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Sorry, my mistake. I meant David Hamilton, not Peter Hamilton.
But David Hamilton has been accused of using under-age models, as well. But he used a soft-focus effect, which is a better term than a fuzzy effect. And Galitsin used the same kind of soft-focus effect in some of his photo shoots.
|
10-19-12 01:45pm
|
Reply
61
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Some of Ronin's photo shoots are still at MetArt. But it's probably been 6 years or more since he's had any new work posted at MetArt.
I'm not aware of any shoots that are in his artsy style that were posted at MetArt in the last few years.
I think that in the early days of MetArt, they were more accepting of different styles of eroticism. At least in some of their offerings.
But since then, they have mainly focused on more mainstream, less artistic photography.
Let me rephrase that. The far-out artistic style were always, at most, a very minor part of the MetArt offerings. And now they are even less on view.
Even the fuzzy (not a very appropriate term) of Grigori Galitsin photo shoots, which I thought were somewhat artsy, are not in evidence at MetArt today. But Galitsin was a different case, where he was accused of using under-age models. So all of his photo shoots were removed from MetArt, I believe.
But I thought Galitsin's shoots had a certain artistic quality, sort of in the Peter Hamilton style, with a fuzzy (I'm not using the proper term to describe it) effect to the photos.
|
10-19-12 01:28pm
|
Reply
62
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from badandy400:
As long as everyone knows the price before jumping in then all is fair, at least as far as TBP/PU go. It becomes up to the PU'er to decide. Does anyone have any insight onto whether or not there are differences in cost to provide content in different areas of the globe. I am wondering if this plays any role, or if they are just being pricks?
|
04-29-12 03:46pm
|
Reply
63
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from BadMrFrosty:
I think it was just a vocal minority that kicked up a stink about this :) As others have said, we are still getting fucked over the metart but thanks to TBP, those that can ignore the fact that they are getting fucked over, are getting fucked over less.
|
04-27-12 01:56am
|
Reply
64
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from PinkPanther:
TBP doesn't run the site - they can't control issues like regional pricing. They can, however, reach out to popular sites, such as MetArt and see if they can get MetArt to give TBP customers a special discount - so that's what they did.
Then they created a forum where people like yourself can complain about the regional pricing issue.
You can't expect TBP to do more than that
|
04-26-12 11:05pm
|
Reply
65
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from Capn:
Well, that is probably because non european users generally do not seem bothered about the regional pricing scam as it doesn't directly effect them.
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-26-12 02:38pm
|
Reply
66
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from BadMrFrosty:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
If everyone thought like that then they would all be waiting for each other and nothing would change!
|
04-23-12 02:30am
|
Reply
67
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from BadMrFrosty:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
If just you did not join or turn off your lights you are correct in saying nothing will change.
If a substantial number of people actually did those things then the rest of the world would eventually pay a equal price for our porn and we would be wasting a greatly reduced amount of energy.
The attitude is the problem.
|
04-23-12 01:02am
|
Reply
68
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Denner:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Oh, yes - a support for regional pricing - the site owners and billing companies will like that - but most here at PU certainly do not...
Try to read all the threads about the matter.
And BTW: a general friendly attitude among PUs is the usual deal here...
|
04-22-12 02:48pm
|
Reply
69
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from BadMrFrosty:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Still regional pricing though. Don't join, boycott the sites that use this abhorrent practice!
|
04-21-12 11:09pm
|
Reply
70
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from gyang79:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Well I must say you have a valid argument. I have discovered the advanced search feature, cant believe I havent found it before. Def some gorgeous models on here. Navigation for this site is a bit tricky.
|
04-20-12 09:28pm
|
Reply
71
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from gyang79:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Yes I've subscribed to FTV girls before. Great site and gorgeous women. I highly recommend it!
|
04-18-12 10:19am
|
Reply
72
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from gyang79:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
East European models are the most beautiful, in your own opinion. If you like women that look like they have been starved nearly to death then thats you. Half the women on that site do not look happy to be there. It doesnt have to be hardcore for me to like it just a bit more lively. The women of FTV appear more lively, healthy, and def holds my interest over MET-ART. I thought id give them a try based on the great reviews but im utterly disappointed.
|
04-18-12 03:47am
|
Reply
73
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
I don't know why, but I just can't go for animals in a porn. If they producer needs more living creatures, throw in another 20 year old chick!
|
01-10-12 04:23pm
|
Reply
74
|
Mighty Mistress
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
from RustyJ:
You point out exactly the problems this site has. Monotonous content and lack of innovation are both quite true. Whether you like the faces of the models is more subjective but makeup is heavy all over this network.
If this was still in 21Sextury.com, I'd be all "go for it" about at least trying it but since I guess this one is now part of 21Sextreme, it's more about whether you like the general themes there. The price and amount of material are still in very good balance but I think 21Sextreme got a whole lot worse package than 21Sextury. There's DominatedGirls on 21Sextreme though which I like a lot.
|
06-26-11 10:44pm
|
Reply
75
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Ergo Proxy's Reply)
Hi Ergo Proxy, the camera shifting never bothered me because I didn't notice. The "creaking" was but I ignore it because the video quality and model are so good. This (to me) minor imperfection was not enough to affect the rating. Especially when, by comparison, most other sites' videos are so poor.
I used to be a gallery freak but find myself shifting more and more to video because a couple of my favorite picture sites were becoming too predictable and two of their main and most prolific photographers had some annoying habits (coloration, too much make-up, predictability) that showed up in each set.
|
03-22-09 08:33am
|
