| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
from dracken:
I kept avoiding this site because it sounded much, much too softcore for me, but if they have at least some interesting content I might stop by. Thanks for pointing it out.
|
03-21-10 02:01pm
|
Reply
102
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
from Capn:
I thought 'How odd?'' when I saw the 'Only' in the name & you went on to discuss hardcore.
When I looked into it, it isn't done by the 'Only' sites, so that would explain it.
It may cause some confusion though.
Cap'n. :0/
|
03-21-10 12:25pm
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Cumming on a belly or back was, in the earlier days of Porn, a contribution to the notion of avoiding pregnancy rather than the characteristic now known as "the money shot."
Back in the 70's it was not uncommon to hear the guy saying "I'm coming" followed by the babe pleading with the stud to "pull it out. I don't want a baby."
|
12-06-09 09:17pm
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from lk2fireone:
(pinkerton's Reply)
pinkerton "The conclusion of porn sex back then in the early 80s was the guy cumming on the girl's body rather than in her mouth/face, usually on her chest or ass."
I think it's a lot classier cumming on the girl's body than on her face. It's degrading to cum on her face, but that's what today's audience seems to expect.
|
12-06-09 11:52am
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Denner:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Great choises - would not mind - but incognito, though, LOL...
|
11-12-09 08:51am
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Duante Amorculo:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Yes, porn stars get very poor boob jobs. Overly obvious unlike many movie actresses and singers.
|
08-21-09 11:07am
|
Reply
107
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
from TrashMan:
Heh, Ive used VideoBox with newer computers, never older ones, would have never known that the site struggles with older computers. Thats Web 2.0 for ya.
I can't say I've had download speed issues, although my speed issues are with my ISP, not VideoBox :P.
Haha, it is good that you wrote the review. It adds not only to the overall rating of the site but to the activity (notice how at the bottom of Pornusers' homepage they show the highest rated and the most active). As older reviews expire newer reviews like yours carry more weight :).
|
01-17-09 04:35pm
|
Reply
108
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(pinkerton's Reply)
I'm certainly not a tech-wizard here - but according Windows XP, those files I mentioned are 720x480 (not 740, sorry) - there are ALSO files at 640x480.
But bottom line - the fullscreen quality has improved a lot for most newer clips...
|
11-16-08 05:57am
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Monahan:
(pinkerton's Reply)
That would also be me. I'm obsessive about stashing anything that looks like it might be worth watching to the point that I have a ton of stuff I've never looked at. But periodically I'll find something at random and I'll really enjoy it. It's rare that I'll load a video that's true crap so I have areal treasure trove of boner exercise material that just keeps on growing.
Now with the new administration in place and UpChuck Schumer's (d, NY) anti-pornography tirade on Thursday, we may be in for some real challenges gathering up the good stuff if thye Dem's have their way in the next year or two, so I'm betting that external hard drive sales may be booming soon.
|
11-09-08 11:50am
|
Reply
110
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
from Cybertoad:
Id have to disagree with this as well, as it doesnt say straight hardcore anywhere on the site. So if looking for another niche would be fair to guage the site on what it says it offers. I'm a huge fanb too still a member. ( lol funny they just released a BG scene lol)
oh well good review, just didnt agree on the score should have been higher. my thought thanks
|
10-11-08 11:35pm
|
Reply
111
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
from Denner:
I'm with Rizzo here.
This site has top-ratings with most PUs (too) for good reasons:
Updates twice a day (included remastering of older content - and that's ok - to some degree).
High quality videos/photosets.
Mostly great, great models.
The site is foremost a solo-girl place - and that's not hard to see in the preview - so, yes, if your mostly into hc, you could choose Hands On Hardcore instead. Still this site has the motherload in DDF-productions - and it may have gone a little downwards lately with too much repeating of older stuff.
But it's still a site which have earned a place at now number 3 at TBP's top. I still agree with that TBP-score....
|
10-11-08 09:33am
|
Reply
112
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
from TheRizzo:
I gave you a trust ranking since you gave your reasons for the score, but as a fan of 1 by day, I had to disagree with the score given in this case.
You are correct though its definitely not a hardcore site, so anyone looking for boy/girl hardcore will probably not be a big fan of the site.
|
10-10-08 11:35am
|
Reply
113
|
Budapest Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(pinkerton's Reply)
looking at the homepage you might be right, but looking at the company site like German Goo Girls makes me expect highly good videos....if with drm? nobody knows:)
|
08-22-08 03:54am
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#31
from Pinche Kankun:
(pinkerton's Reply)
SHE IS NOT INGESTION VANILLA PUDDING... IT IS BODY LIQUIDS THAT'S COMING OUT OF A MAN'S DICK!!!!
How could any man's dick get hard from viewing something so fucking disgusting?!!!!!!! >:( >:( >:(
This is not FEAR FACTOR!!! This is porn for Christ's sake!!! >:(
|
03-13-08 11:39pm
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Pinche Kankun:
(pinkerton's Reply)
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA :D :D
|
01-30-08 11:48pm
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Frosted fur pie doesn't do much for me, either.
|
01-26-08 09:21am
|
Reply
117
|
Thainee
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Denner:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Hey pinkerton
The Thainee-video - mostly hardcore - are between 60 Mb and 380 Mb - and 720x480 - pretty good quality - not top like Pier999 for exampel.
The three other sites are all solo and lesser size up to 60 Mb and 480x320.(Tussinee are doing some fine solo-stuff)
|
09-07-07 02:06am
|
Reply
118
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
from wiild1:
"In one movie, a gorgeous brunette (Suzie?) is wearing stockings and looks sooo hot, but cut to the BJ scene and she's taken them off! Still a hot movie but could've been better had the stockings stayed on!"
He He He, Suzie should read and take note of this review and remember to not remove the stockings before the BJ...come ONNNNN Suzie!!! :-)
|
05-21-07 12:41pm
|
Reply
119
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Pinkerton is right.
These guys at DDF Production spread the videos/photos to different sites.
1-By-Day seems to been the motherload. I found a lot of content from there at their other sites. See: TBP and DDF Production.
But still, 1-By-Day is a great site.
|
04-22-07 09:57am
|
Reply
120
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
from Bela:
Thank you for the excellent review - I'm glad you really like the site.
I have just one small comment: when we say "exclusive content" it means that the content is exclusive to DDF Productions. It's very rare to see any of our content on other sites and there are only two I know of who have been given limited licences for various sets in the past. Our policy for the past few years has been to not give out licences at all. 99% of the content on our sites are exclusive to DDF sites and I would say about that on average about 80% of the content on each site is exclusive to that particular site.
Thanks again for the great review. Keep enjoying the site!
Best Regards,
Bela
DDF Productions
|
04-05-07 05:19am
|
