| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#34
from Toadsith:
(Davit's Reply)
It is so much better than the term "Whore Brand", which just seems mean to me. I only recently ran across the term "Tramp Stamp" myself (maybe a year ago at most); indeed it does have a bit of a British charm to it and as some of my writing I'm sure reflects, I'm quite fond of British colloquialisms. I'm currently working through the latest iteration of Top Gear (40GB worth of it) and have run across a boat-load of new phrases and terms that I hadn't heard before. That is such a fun show - I can't wait till Season 11 comes out - though I still have a backlog of 7 seasons to finish watching first...
|
03-07-08 05:19pm
|
Reply
27
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
32" 1080p monitor/tv here. Believe me, you won't be disappointed if you've got hi-def. But make sure you've got the processor to run the 1920 vids. I'm overclocked - running at 3.6 ghz - and I sometimes have to reboot to keep them from running smoothly. Seems I'm settling for the 1280 resolution - but they look GOOD!
|
03-07-08 04:15pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#31
from messmer:
(Davit's Reply)
I agree with your sentiments! I never did like tattoos or piercings. And I also like that natural, homey, nice girl look that will prove to be a deception later on as she reveals her true self ... to paraphrase your words! :-) Do you know any sites like that?
|
03-07-08 03:59pm
|
Reply
29
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from williamj:
great review...I agree with everything your saying. Its really a great site.
|
03-07-08 09:25am
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#27
from jd1961:
(Davit's Reply)
Or maybe the pages were stuck together!!
|
03-06-08 07:59pm
|
Reply
31
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from WeeWillyWinky:
Thanks for the good review, Davit. This one is on my short list and most likely I'll be signing up very soon. Since acquiring a 22 inch monitor I've had a yen for huge, clear pics. Since I can't have these beautiful women actually use my face as a chair, this might be the next best thing. ;)
|
03-06-08 04:30pm
|
Reply
32
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from Toadsith:
Useful review, thanks - repetitiveness in these super-niche sites is a real difficult hurdle - though I must say the unique nature of this site's content has me intrigued. I hadn't realized until today that they had gotten rid of the Token system (I know, I'm behind on that one) - I've been rather interested in the site for awhile, so I may have to join now that it has been unleashed.
I took a quick ganger (the action, not the waterfowl) at their "What's New" page and I think the best answer to your question about update regularity is one video and two photo sets per week, with a little bit of wiggle room... It would be nice if they put a date on the coming soon stuff though.
|
03-06-08 03:51pm
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from MargulisAZ:
(Davit's Reply)
Lol, I can relate to this. I was in a 3 year relationship where the girl I was with couldn't stand porn, but she was way into fisting. Kind of odd, but there you go. She was only 17 at the time too (I was 19). The point is that she didn't know about me looking at porn either, but eventually I told her and she was not happy to say the LEAST! Ultimately she acquiesced to me viewing it "on occasion", which was a big relief to me because I'm not sure I would have the willingness to stop viewing either.
|
03-05-08 01:53pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from pat362:
(Davit's Reply)
The only instances that I can remember where I've enjoyed any kind of talking by the cameran/director, is in the Ben Dover movies. Now I don't know if you'd classify this as talking, but during a certain moment in a scene he'll ask the girl if she'd like to try something new. The he pretty much shuts up except to ask if the girl is all right(depending on what she was asked to do). That's what I meant about talking. You are right that most of what passes for comments in todays movies is at best an annoyance and at worst a big turn off.
Man I miss porn scenes/novies with actual passion in them.
|
03-04-08 06:26pm
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(Davit's Reply)
Yeah, it reminds me of the issue of whether to have the lights on. The guy's more likely to want to see things (I just love the view), but the girl's happy enough just feeling things and might be embarrassed by her own body and/or turned off by the sight of the guy with his weird looking pecker, his tufts of back and shoulder hair, and his pimply ass.
And it's surprising how bad some women can feel about their looks, and I mean really attractive ones!
In a standup act, Chris Rock says that he wants a girl that weighs 360 pounds, because that way he knows she's completely happy with herself and doesn't care what other people think about her looks. (Sure, it's an exaggeration, even a distortion, but it's to make the point.)
|
03-04-08 03:38pm
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Pinche Kankun:
(Davit's Reply)
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HA HA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAHA!!!
:D :D :D
|
03-03-08 11:09pm
|
Reply
37
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Davit's Reply)
Ho-ho, good one: "It goes down on you, too."
I had a download of one vid that, when the site was really slow about a week ago, after waiting over an hour for it, it quit at 93% complete. Owwwhhh! I love this stuff too much!
BTW, someone there has a real knack for puns, such as Peaches vid titled "Wiggley's Bubble Bum." Some of them are pretty funny!
|
03-02-08 08:30pm
|
Reply
38
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from OneMan:
(Davit's Reply)
Um...it has when you are buying euros with the pound !!!!!
Especially when you had thought that the cost was $30 (£15) but was actually 30 euros (£23.50 !)...which was the point I making...
...I think I got 20 with mixed up with 30...bit you know what I mean.
|
03-02-08 04:10pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from jd1961:
(Davit's Reply)
Suze Randall was good at talking to her models, but she's a professional photographer. In fact, it's interesting to watch her work in her photoshoots. but these cement heads, with their constant "show me your tits" commands make me pound my head into my keyboard!
|
03-02-08 01:58pm
|
Reply
40
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Drooler:
(Davit's Reply)
The thing I said about the site objectifying women was meant to be kind of tongue-in-cheek, if you'll pardon the expression. An ardent feminist (in the "received wisdom" sense) might point to the site as the perfect example, but I think the site just reflects an honest, natural love for beautiful women and their lovely behinds. Nobody's ever going to make me feel guilty about that.
There was a survey that came out of England fairly recently that showed that men choose women based on their looks more than any other reason, and that women choose men based on their wealth more than any other reason. It's no surprise. But in the received wisdom, do we see men complaining about being treated as financial objects?
Robin Williams once said that "divorce" is from an old Latin term meaning "rip a man's wallet out through his genitals." It gets laughs because it resonates with the truth! We ARE treated as financial objects, sometimes quite ruthlessly. We just don't organize and have conventions about it, and the reason, I think, is that we know there are more enjoyable ways to spend our time. Besides, it's simply unmanly to whimper and complain.
And if porn objectifies women, it perhaps does even more so to men. The survey "Do you care about the 'looks' of the male talent in porn scenes?" has users saying that in hardcore scenes the men are just props! If that isn't the language of objectification, I don't know what is.
|
03-01-08 09:01pm
|
Reply
41
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(Davit's Reply)
Thanks for all of the comments, Davit. I wrote that review back when the token system was in place, and at that time I gave it a 70. I've only been able to change the "addendum" part in the "post review" area.
I raised the score to 83 since having rejoined now that the token system is gone. I think it's a pretty fair score considering the update frequency, the pic sizes (really wish they'd go beyond 1800 - 2200px), and the price.
I agree with you that there's a lot of repetitive stuff in the galleries but it is a matter of taste and preference. Sometimes I don't mind it at all, and sometimes I get tired of it. It is one way for people to “soak their brains,” in ass, I guess.
The videos get pretty repetitive, too, for that matter. But sometimes my horny reptilian brain don’t care ‘bout ‘dat. Susana Spears can walk, crawl, and play with her civilization-threatening booty to the end of time. Yes, I’ve been downloading loads of vids myself.
I did describe in detail in the review how the photos are so often "either full-body length with the woman’s face buried in a mass of hair, or just the ass all by itself, nearly every single time!" This is my biggest gripe: very few head to upper thigh shots lying face down. I wish they'd get out of their "rut" (a-hem) and have such shots in every new gallery at least. Every ass worshipping site should have them, IMHO. And they can get VERY repetitive with those!! Ha-ha!
Anyway, I can tell you're quite in love with the site. I've had an on/off relationship with it since Nov. ’04. We’ll probably disagree about some things, but I think we can agree that InTheCrack’s on the up now and is probably the best ass site out there. Here’s to it getting even better – from one ass-crazy man to another.
|
03-01-08 08:22pm
|
Reply
42
|
Sapphic Harem
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from jd1961:
(Davit's Reply)
It happens often that magazine covers are presented attractively but don't deliver the goods. thanks.
|
03-01-08 03:18pm
|
Reply
43
|
Sapphic Harem
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from MargulisAZ:
(Davit's Reply)
I agree with that. There are definitely a couple review sites that leave me baffled as to why certain sites get such high ratings. That's why I've always tended to look at the user reviews more than the professional ones, although TBP seems halfway decent.
|
03-01-08 02:56pm
|
Reply
44
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from williamj:
(Davit's Reply)
The overall portfloio of XXX material is massive and the well worth a peek. I've see that their now getting into strap-on play. If they just did more oral? If your into teen cunt being very hardcore you'll enjoy the site overall.
|
03-01-08 12:03pm
|
Reply
45
|
Sapphic Harem
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from MargulisAZ:
lol, awesome review. I love the brutal honestly. Good thing I read this too because I've toyed with joining that site before.
|
03-01-08 11:49am
|
Reply
46
|
Hanna's Honeypot
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from elephant:
Would certainly agree with you, sure she is nice and that but certainly not as cute as some that would of been better choices. I didn't get much from her site, solo stuff doesn't interest and theres not much lez stuff here.
|
03-01-08 03:26am
|
Reply
47
|
Lez Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(Davit's Reply)
Yeah its a personal fantasy for me is seeing a much older woman of class, really pretty say like Michelle Pfieffer or elle mcpherson on that level anyway, that type of beauty and she gets to sleep with say a couple of the lezcuties, wow my dream come true, its unlikely to ever happen here your right, it is niched at younger teens, just would love a site with good looking olders having good looking teens.
I did hear that the movie quality might be improved but can't say they have for sure as its been a bit back since was a member, hope they have. they certainly have sexy girls here, love pretty girls doing anal, it seems so naughty. Orgies would be awesome too.
yeah tushy lickers, I never much liked the site, the girls weren't as cute there, its okish but kind of samey each scene i thought.
I don't know of anymore no mate, good lesbian sites are rare, there is certainly gaps in the market for lesbian porn. Wish I had some cash to start my own, love to get them ideas out and make a good site for the people. if you were filming them all day as a job, got to be weird, would you start to get slightly bored of it, I dunno... nahh I doubt it lol.
|
03-01-08 02:59am
|
Reply
48
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(Davit's Reply)
Alright Davit
Yeah its very average is this site, didn't think much of it at all to be honest, sure theres cute girls here but every scene was very samey and the dildo use was just nearly every movie. I as well don't go for solo stuff, find it boring so couldn't really get much from the site. Yeah I think they must save the best lesbian stuff for sapphic erotica.
|
03-01-08 02:47am
|
Reply
49
|
Sapphic Harem
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
from jd1961:
Davit, are all those magazine style covers one sees on the preview page photo sets? And if so, what are the photos like at this site?
|
03-01-08 02:00am
|
Reply
50
|
Anal Toy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Comment from Davit:
Well, my search has brought me to In The Crack, which seems to offer all that Anal Toy Girls offers - but without the male hands, and with less toys too! See my comment for that site.
|
02-29-08 07:30pm
|
