| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from lk2fireone:
(Goldfish's Reply)
When I had dialup service, my download speeds were about 3-4 KB/s, but sometimes slower.
With DSL, I am getting a maximum download speed of 150-160 KB/s.
As far as structuring the poll questions, I did not know precisely how to split the speed options. I know that dialup is much slower than 100 KB/s for max download speed. But since the poll is a multiple choice format, I wanted to provide simple choices.
If the poll, instead of multiple choice, offered a way to write in each individual's actual maximum download speed, we would get a more precise idea of what PU members are using.
But I think this poll gives a nice approximate answer to what PU members are getting for download speeds.
This reply was somewhat directed at badandy400's reply #8. And for the sake of simplicity, it's better to use Kilobytes, instead of mixing Kilobytes and Kilobits for the answers.
|
05-30-10 12:12am
|
Reply
52
|
Fuck My Jeans
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(Goldfish's Reply)
It's a shame because they could have started each scenes with the girls walking with jeans on. They could have filmed from different angles, which would have allowed us to see the amazing backside that some of these girls have. No instead they use the jeans as a way to distinguish their sites from other anal themed sites.
The amount of time the girls spend in jeans is ridiculous. This is almost pure gonzo. The girls appear and voila they are now nude and
within a very short amount of time they are screwing.
|
05-22-10 01:57pm
|
Reply
53
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BadMrFrosty:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Im a current member of gag-n-gape and still have network access to teensexmovs.
|
05-21-10 01:40am
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Goldfish, I admire you for that! Like someone on the show "Hoarders," I keep way too much stuff and don't purge anywhere near enough.
|
05-19-10 05:48am
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Denner:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Goldfish, as replied to RB - I'll try to go for that 4:3-deal - Thanks!!! And guess your're right about the old days and "full screen" - I'll remember that...
|
05-09-10 09:33am
|
Reply
56
|
Full Screen Teen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from yote78:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Agreed.
In fact, the trailer runs only about 10 seconds and then locks up. But, as I told an earlier replier, don't judge the site just by the trailer.
I wouldn't call it a great site by any stretch but if you're into solo female masturbation this site is worth at least a short peek. I enjoyed it very much for the month I was a member, despite the shortcomings I listed in my review.
|
05-07-10 07:45pm
|
Reply
57
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Thanks for the comment Goldfish. You’ve reviewed more sites than I have so you’ll also know that there can be no better compliment than for someone to say they’ll take or avoid a membership based on your review. As I said above, I’m not a fan of this kind of site either but ALS Scan has all petite women which I like, and the scenes are not repetitive as with other sites. The Caribbean stuff and the public nudity is icing on the cake. It really is an excellent site.
When I joined a few weeks ago there was a special offer of $9.95 USD to join ALS Angels. While this site has a lot of similarities with ALS Scan it also has some differences. I’m thinking that since it is a stand-alone site I may do a review of it even though it is the same company – but it isn’t part of a network. If the special offer is still available I’d recommend it. It is excellent value at $9.95.
|
05-06-10 03:40am
|
Reply
58
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Denner:
(Goldfish's Reply)
I'm just a few days into this network - AND been going through most of the sites....NO, not all has been upgraded into HD - and I think the deal with upgrading OLDER videos here are not existing - BUT: generally most videos here are from ok to great in quality - and girls/models - be back with a review - but so far I do NOT regret joining!
|
05-02-10 07:44am
|
Reply
59
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tree Rodent:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Thanks goldfish. I always find that facility useful. They have not only a list of what you have viewed or downloaded, but a still from each clip. Makes it easy to see what you have viewed. It's handy if you want to find a clip you have viewed, or the dvd where it's from, but can't remember the name, or can't find it.
|
04-24-10 07:30am
|
Reply
60
|
Exclusive Teen Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from slutty:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Hey Goldfish,
The newest sets I saw were (m/d/y):
HDteensvideo: 8/8/09
Exclusiveteenporn: 4/9/10 (appears to still be updating, or perhaps just recycling content - only 2 video sets per month)
Bestfuckedteens - says 4/22/10, but I really doubt this is accurate as it appears to just display todays date no matter what
teensamateurvideo - says 4/22/10, once again I doubt it
fucking-young - newest video is 6/25/09
pearlteens - says 4/22/10, but I doubt it
magic-porn.biz - newest video is 11/15/08
In general, I would say that few if any of these sites are still updating, or updating very infrequently.
These are dates listed on the site, and I couldn't really tell if they were doing any recycling as I have never been a member here before.
Hope that helps.
|
04-22-10 02:36pm
|
Reply
61
|
Her Sweet Hand
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RagingBuddhist:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Thanks for getting back to me on this. Yeah - that watermark was way over the top. Good to see it's gone.
|
04-10-10 04:52pm
|
Reply
62
|
Her Sweet Hand
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
It's good to see someone who's been here recently. This is one of the sites that I seem to go back to every once in a while.
I'm curious you've happened to notice if they've leveled out on the bitrates. A few months ago, they were all over the place. The other thing I'm curious about is the watermark. Are all the newer videos marred by that overly large square monstrosity they'd been starting to use?
|
04-09-10 05:26pm
|
Reply
63
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nostromo:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Hi Goldfish:
Yes, i was charged the equivalent of 19.95$ in euros.
Thanks Goldfish, i already edited the comment.
|
04-05-10 12:54am
|
Reply
64
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from slutty:
(Goldfish's Reply)
I agree Goldfish, of the newer stuff I downloaded, some of it is pretty decent quality although nothing I downloaded was full HD. I think that the material that is lesser quality is either re-post (although I can't recall having seen it ever) or content they made a long time ago that never got posted. I haven't seen any of their material anywhere else, although that by no means shows that it is exclusive. I still think it is a pretty good site, and at least they have not gone more in the direction of their sister-site Twistys.
|
04-04-10 09:30pm
|
Reply
65
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from GCode:
These models are quite stunning! I like Misti on the preview page...woo she is hot. Interesting review and a site I'll add to my favorites for consideration later on :) Thanks for the heads up. Take care.
|
03-14-10 07:44pm
|
Reply
66
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from pat362:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Sadly for me it's too late. My membership ended on the 13th. To add insult to injury. I tried to log in on the 12th, but kept on getting refused. I noticed that they put up a note saying that someone was downloading excessivelly and that was the reason for the slowdown. I might be willing to believe that if it was for just a couple of times but I had problems for 3 weeks. I hope it's just technical but if it isn't then they aren't going to be able to keep getting new mebers
|
10-17-09 06:55am
|
Reply
67
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rome476:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Thanks for the responses; Does ATMOVS also have teensexmovs and privateteenvideo?
|
07-03-09 01:16pm
|
Reply
68
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Reg Berkeley:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Look, I'm not one to start a flame war. If you don't like our site, then by all means. Frankly, "bland" isn't the first word that comes to mind involving AmericanVice. Crass, vulgar, distasteful, profane...that's my cup of tea :)
But all this talk of video quality made me want to jump in. We are a DVD download site. Our content comes from DVDs. All non-BluRay DVDs are MPEG2, which utilizes 720 x 480 (640 x 480 on PC...see another thread on square pixels versus round pixels).
We also maintain the proper aspect ratios on letterboxed DVDs and have gotten big kudos because of this. We even letterbox our screen caps to prevent distortion.
So unless you're trying to compare our DVD content to a HD site...then I can't apologize for the quality. We're bound by the nature of the source material.
All our videos are encoded at 2000K, which is the point of diminishing returns on encoding MPEG2 content. These files are about 400MB on average per scene. I'm not exactly sure what else we could do to address your comments about the quality.
|
06-22-09 05:46pm
|
Reply
69
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from Cybertoad:
With such a low rating I expected to see more cons, but was a good review.
|
06-22-09 09:00am
|
Reply
70
|
Only Blowjob
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(Goldfish's Reply)
With three updates a wekk,the site has grown quite a bit since yu were a member. However, I would agree that their video style is definitely an acquired taste.
|
06-21-09 12:19am
|
Reply
71
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(Goldfish's Reply)
Basically, I like to keep things simple, so I can understand them more easily.
But as far as the pricing for membership at youngporn.net:
What currently shows at both PU and TBP is:
Cost:
Monthly: $29.96 (recurring)
Monthly: $39.96 (non-recurring)
Multi-Mo: $69.00 (3 months, recurs $29.96/mo.)
When I click from the TBP site to youngporn.net site, and then click the "Join Now" hot link, and enter the information requested, and then click to the next page for signing up, the prices I see for membership are the same prices I now see listed at PU and TBP.
Cost:
Monthly: $29.96 (recurring)
Monthly: $39.96 (non-recurring)
Multi-Mo: $69.00 (3 months, recurs $29.96/mo.)
When I posted my original comment about membership price, I was trying to keep it simple. I did not give all three membership options. I just gave the membership option that I thought was most appropriate for PU members, which was the monthly (or 30 day, if you want to be entirely accurate) recurring membership.
|
05-27-09 07:51pm
|
Reply
72
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Khan:
(Goldfish's Reply)
for the record ...
I asked the TBP Editors to update the listing. It *did* show the price noted in this Comment.
|
05-27-09 06:30pm
|
Reply
73
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from xbigvmanx:
(Goldfish's Reply)
I notice this on a lot of porn sites while being stationed here. I have discovered that in order to get to the US side I would have to go thru an US proxy since my ISP is going thru a european proxy. I am wondering if anyone knows if its safe to make transactions if I went thru proxy like ninjaproxy or something?
|
05-04-09 09:10pm
|
Reply
74
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from TheRizzo:
Very nice review. Totally agree, I really enjoy Nubiles.
|
05-03-09 12:46pm
|
Reply
75
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
from Jeffrey99:
Nice review. Currently a member there now and have to agree that the bonus sites are complete crap. I love how they try to make it out that they are saving you like $50 on access to the bonus sites. However I think they all quit updating like 5 years ago.
|
05-01-09 01:03pm
|
