Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(gareth's Reply)
Too bad, gareth! Are you going to write a review? I would really like to know if they changed for the better. For a while there were too many complaints that the videos especially were mostly talk with very little explicit sex or even exposure thrown in.
|
07-15-11 12:34pm
|
Reply
2
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(gareth's Reply)
Hi gareth, did you type in your former username and password under returning customers? If you no longer remember write to the address mentioned above. I didn't get a reply first time around, as you can see, but when I sent them another email this time they did respond and supplied me with my former user name and password and showed me step by step how to rejoin at the reduced rate. I haven't done so yet because I am waiting for a new external drive at the moment. :-)
|
07-15-11 11:56am
|
Reply
3
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
gareth's Review
from ace of aces:
nice to see, that even members are not the "99ers" (i call the 99 points reviewers so) anymore. i never understodd the high ratings for that site anyway. imo there was always a lack of mostly everything.
|
08-26-10 08:17am
|
Reply
4
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from abbywinters:
(gareth's Reply)
Gareth emailed me, re-stating his concern that there are not enough GG shoots (I presume he's referring to what we call "girl-girl hardcore" or "T3" shoots).
It ends up being a chicken-and-egg situation - people want more shoots, which cost more to produce, but people are generally not willing to PAY for more shoots, so there's a balance to be had. We're a business - not a charity - and we're out to make a modest and reasonable profit, without letting the quality take a hit.
We're looking at other options to make this work for everyone - an "Overload" pod, where we can add more shoots, but only people who want more will have to pay for them, or a pay-per-view plan, where people can choose to only download what they want, rather than a subscription based plan. Of course, we'd keep the regular subscription based plans as well.
There's a fair bit of back-end work to making this happen, and we're not convinced it's necessary (or, more to the point, worthwhile).
For people in Gareth's situation, we recommend you dip in and out - subscribe for a month every six months or so, catch up on all the stuff you missed, cancel rebills, and repeat again in six months time. This allows our customers to try other sites as well as ours (and I'll be the first to admit that we're not all things to all people!), spread the love amongst our very worthy peers, and keep maximum variety for you.
All in all, it's win / win / win, right?
|
08-23-10 11:30am
|
Reply
5
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
gareth's Review
from abbywinters:
Hi Gareth,
Sorry to hear you received no response - that's one of the things we're very careful on, replying to every message we receive. Perhaps you could email it to me personally on garion.hall@abbywinters.com ?
We think the quality of models is improving, but as you say, that may be a taste-based thing.
|
08-23-10 05:03am
|
Reply
6
|
Cum on Her Face
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(gareth's Reply)
That's always a problem for me when a site does not update the preview page. How can I tell if they are still producing new stuff or if they are recycling the old. Thanks gareth.
|
10-25-08 08:29am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
