Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
151
|
Girls For Matures
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Review
from Rick:
Dude, just wanted to say that your reviews (and comments/replies for that matter) have been awesome!! We really appreciate your contribution.
|
02-02-07 12:43pm
|
Reply
152
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from exotics4me:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Snowdude, thanks for the compliments.
Veronica Vanoza, PixandVids has a solo set and a b/g set. ClubSandy has a b/g set. 1byday has the most, 13 sets, 9 solo sets, 3 g/g sets and 1 b/g/g set. Several of those sets are with the short hair. They have the g/g set with Silvia Saint as well.
I always liked her as well, she reminds me of Lora Craft, who also has gone through the very short hair stage as well. I haven't been on ATK lately, so I'm not for sure how much they had of Veronica. 1byday is great if you have never tried it, it has an entire hardcore section, an entire lez section as well plus all of the models solo and machine/toy section. You can go to 1byday and click on "DDF Model List" it will then give you the letters so you can search and see the 13 sets. I've found that 1byday has a better selection of different models than the others, but my preference stayed with pixandvids because of the massive amount of Eve Angel they along with Club Sandy have. When I re-join ATK, I will review it and throw a mention in about Veronica and how much content they have.
Hope this helps.
|
05-01-07 07:09pm
|
Reply
153
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from King:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Hey Snow Dude,
Dev8 is the name of the company that runs these sites (Give Me Pink, Spermswap, Asstraffic and more)
I added why you should be beware of trial. Silly me assuming it was obvious ;)
Let me know if you want to know more
|
04-05-07 11:09am
|
Reply
154
|
Goddess Heather
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Khan:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Please know we appreciate Users limiting official Reviews to sites they're currently members of OR have been a member of w/in the last six months. The reasoning here is to ensure Reviews are based on current observations. Past six months, not only is there the chance the site has changed, but also that the reviewer's memory isn't as fresh as it might be.
Note that Comments don't carry the 6 month time limit that Reviews do. Though imo, it's fair to say about how long ago your observations are based on.
As far as your (or anyone's) replies to a fellow Users' review, I don't see any problem with you asking questions or mentioning how a reviewer can provide more helpful information. Obviously, being mindful that we're all entitled to our individual opinions will help keep such suggestions constructive.
As you've mentioned, we're all learning as we go here. As reviewers learn what kind of information their fellow users find helpful, I'm confident most will want to include it. After all, it's all about having enough useful information to base your buying decisions on, right?
With regards to the "low priority" comment ... no need to apologize. I simply passed on what I was told was *generally* the reason why a site may not have at least an express review. I'm guessing there are any number of actual reasons this might be the case.
|
01-31-07 03:26pm
|
Reply
155
|
Goddess Heather
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Touching on the part of your reply that says ...
"... the site hasn't even been given an express review on TBP which means it's likely a low priority site ..."
I'm told that because there are so many sites wanting an official TBP review, that these days, reviews are only done after the site owner requests one. To do a review the reviewers need access to the site so other than brand new listings, if no express review has been done it's generally because the owner/webmaster has not requested one and/or hasn't provided access inside the site.
As far as your other comments ...
I think it's obvious from my initial reply that I tend to agree. However, because of my status as a staffer, I won't dwell on it (or say it every time) least I discourage users from submitting their opinions of a site. That said, it's perfectly appropriate for *you* to let other users know how you feel about their reviews if/when you feel so inclined.
|
01-31-07 12:53pm
|
Reply
156
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from godsgirls:
(SnowDude's Reply)
if you go to www.godsgirls.com you can use the drop down menu on the top right hand side to browse our models. you will see that there is something for every taste.
xoxo
|
05-04-07 09:18pm
|
Reply
157
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from BostonPJR:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Glad to see it cleared up. It is a shame though that none of the 100% reviewers bothered to stick around and add a few reviews of their own. Might have been nice to see what else they were into.
|
03-22-07 02:38pm
|
Reply
158
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from godsgirls:
(SnowDude's Reply)
initially when we found out that we had received a link from thebestporn.com our instinct was to be polite and link back to them. we hadn't thoroughly looked over the FAQ and some of our site members came and made reviews. i am sorry that you feel that the reviews are one-sided and i apologize for any confusion that the reviewers may cause but they are still reviews from people who have thoroughly used our site and the link from our site to tbp was promptly removed when we realized what was happening. we apologize on behalf of our error and our overzealous members. we do hope that anyone who uses our site finds the same enthusiasm that our other members have found haha.
|
03-06-07 03:28am
|
Reply
159
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(SnowDude's Reply)
SnowDude remarks, "I have been criticial of this too and I'm not sure what the admins can do about it. ... I would argue that it hurts the site more than it helps because people won't take a review of 100 seriously."
If it helps to know, we've kicked this one around quite a bit ourselves. On the one hand, we suggest (in our terms and FAQ) against one-sided reviews. But on the other hand, we must be mindful that if *we* criticize those we see as one sided, it may unduly discourage users from sharing their opinions and we certainly don't want to do that.
We touched on this issue in a recent User Poll (9-Feb-07) and found the users who responded were pretty much split in their opinion as well.
Because of the nature of the PornUsers site, with the exception of outright spam, we're trying to take a hands-off approach to users Reviews and Comments. We want to avoid being seen as censoring the comments or replies. While we'd hope all users would offer fair, well balanced, and unbiased remarks, we also understand that this is not always the case. I think you'll find that sites which work to build a strong sense of community have especially loyal members. That in itself is considered a major plus by many.
Over the long run, we feel certain that as the number of reviews grow, one-sided reviews (good or bad) will be balanced out. We're also relying on our users' good judgement to determine which comments have merit and which are less than helpful. Towards that end, we're working on a new feature that'll allow users to rate the perceived quality of reviews. But I can't say more about that just yet.
Ultimately users just need to be mindful that *everything* they read here is simply someone's opinion. Some you may agree with, some you may not. In the end, you will form your own opinions about the sites you join. And of course when you do, we hope you'll share them here for the benefit of your fellow users.
|
02-13-07 10:36am
|
Reply
160
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from roseman:
(SnowDude's Reply)
yeah :)
|
02-06-07 11:16pm
|
Reply
161
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from roseman:
'' Goth & Tattoo: Does It Float Your Boat? '' hmm ... why not? :P
|
02-06-07 03:24pm
|
Reply
162
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from godsgirls:
not all girls featured on godsgirls are goth and/or tattooed. we strive to find a variety of beautiful girls. we believe that we have "something for everyone."
|
02-03-07 01:25pm
|
Reply
163
|
Hall Of Fame Stars
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from jd1961:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Is this a new feature? Let's see... Eve Angel, Teen Dreams, yup it works!
|
10-30-07 10:13pm
|
Reply
164
|
Hall Of Fame Stars
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from exotics4me:
Hey SD, my favorites in the classics are mostly early 90s material. Back when Asia Carrera first started out. I remember the 80s porn from raiding my uncle's stash, but I didn't turn 18 until the early 90s. I noticed on DVD Box that they have around 50 "classic" DVDs now, so I do think it is catching on. I also downloaded a clip the other day of Nina Hartley, remember her? The clip I downloaded though was a new one of her being a dom. She still looks good. My favorite though and the one that turned my attention to exotic women, Jasmin St. Claire, strangest thing, I was looking up her bio the other day to find out we are born on the same day of the same year.
|
10-30-07 02:04pm
|
Reply
165
|
Hall Of Fame Stars
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from jd1961:
Look, when I wrote Christy Canyon, it turned into a link! it seems she has a site.
|
10-30-07 01:39pm
|
Reply
166
|
Hall Of Fame Stars
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from jd1961:
I don't know, but Christy Canyon's jiggling breasts are a good selling point to start! Thanks for bringing this site to our attention, it has a trial option I may give it a try.
|
10-30-07 01:38pm
|
Reply
167
|
Housewife Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from nygiants03:
Well this site isn't tricking nobody into saying these are real housewife's. It is simply for people who get turned on by though of a horny housewife sitting alone one day, and gets fucked by some random guy. Everyone knows these are just porn stars acting, nothing special about it. If it were a real amateur housewife website, the models would no be so pretty nor would the video quality be as good as it looks.
|
06-04-07 11:17am
|
Reply
168
|
Housewife Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from Gazette Risque:
I know what you mean! Most of the models on that site can't be even over 25.
And indeed the scenarios were very poorly written.
If I compare it to MyFriendsHotMom.coom or similar sites, which also have some scenarios that are just too ridiculous at times, this one should indeed be called something different.
I was thinking more along the lines of awebsitethattheownersdontcareaboutandjustwantyourmoney.com... hmm might be a bit too long. But you get the idea.
Some pornsite owners are getting lazy, itīs good that TBP is here to let people speak their minds on those sites.
So, rant on!
|
06-04-07 09:30am
|
Reply
169
|
Housewife Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from exotics4me:
SD,
I have a couple of clips from "wife" sites like the, "Interracial wife bangers". The stories in those are so sad that I just skip them. One, the husband comes in the kitchen, falls, knocks himself out. The ambulance is called. The paramedics run in and take him to the hospital. The wife grabs the one EMS and says, "I will feel sick too, could you take my temperature?"
How sick is that one ha ha? Her husband is dying. Believe it or not though, in my line of work, one of my main objectives is to understand fantasies and why people have them, since some people disturb themselves with their own sexual fantasies. One of the most, I would say top 3 for husbands, is walking in and catching their wife having sex with another man. I've been meaning to check some of those reality sites out, to see how the storylines play out and how believable they are.
I think most porn sites are getting worse these days since they have ran out of scenarios.
|
06-04-07 02:26am
|
Reply
170
|
Housewife Kelly
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
from marcdc1:
I agree. Although as a former member of her site I have to say it was very hot. I would recommend it again.
|
07-26-12 10:57am
|
Reply
171
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from RoseAnn:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Oh, absolutely not, lol. I just thought I'd comment to help others who might not realize that the site facts often will be more current and it's easy enough to check the dates on both the listing update itself and the review. So no issue taken at all!!
We really like seeing the folks here at PU who've very recently been members of a site and can offer really up-to-date information about it.
Thanks!
|
05-25-07 09:32am
|
Reply
172
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from RoseAnn:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Hi SnowDude,
Thought I'd give you a quick reply here concerning your comment for site, Hungarian Honeys:
"The TBP review says there aren't any, although it sounds like you found some."
The express review was done back in July of 2005, so it's hard to say what the content counts may have actually been back then.
We do site fact updates every few months, so your best bet for seeing fairly current content counts would be the actual listing above the review, but there is no way to determine counts for a certain model. Unfortunately we're not able to break out picture and video counts by specific models, so the counts are for all the models.
Hope that helps!
|
05-25-07 05:06am
|
Reply
173
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(SnowDude's Reply)
SD,
There are videos, but it is a hassle to find what you are looking for. I had noticed that TBP said no videos, but it is right on the first page of the members section, "videos" up at the top of it. I don't know if they just missed it, because I did at first. I kept thinking if I clicked on the model it would bring up videos too. The videos categories are out of whack as well. The one Eve Angel video is a 4 way lesbian movie, it shows up in the blowjob category, the solo category and the Big Movie category. There is no order to the videos either, just 30 or so pages of thumbnails showing each one.
Veronica has no movies, but has 33 picture sets and Olivia de Treville has 14 picture sets, but no videos.
From what I can see a lot of the videos are of New Sensations biggest stars, Adrienne Sage, I even saw Taylor Ann, who I know is not Hungarian. Overall, it looks like if someone spent maybe a week on the site working on it, they could make it a decent join, especially for picture fans. They have around 50 sets of Anetta Keys, no videos though. They have pictures of her that I have never seen, where she had braids when she first started porn. It is kind of like finding an uncle's old magazine stash ha ha.
|
05-24-07 12:13pm
|
Reply
174
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mudman:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Snowdude:
I Shot Myself gets a an 84 from me, because it is shot by the girls themselves. It's unique and fun and suprisingly good. There's a wonderful fresh difference and honesty to the whole thing. So removed from the "oh Babe, oh babe" approach to porn or adult nakeness. The pictures and videos are clear, largely crisp and unigue.
The site also gets an 84 from me because it is shot by themselves and the photo option have their limits due to the lengths of the girls' arms. It makes for some fun and great close ups, but the varied of angles and distance is physically limited. The site is also relatively young and therefor doesn't have the volume of major sites, but it is a gas.
So, high on the imaginative and low on the limitations of one's reach. It's a good and fun site to be experienced at least once and for at least one month, just not a great site.
I think it could be considered a great site. if it actually partner up with it's sister site, I Feel Myself. If it were, I Shot and Felt Myself, that would be a 90's cool.
|
03-12-07 05:41am
|
Reply
175
|
India Sex
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Hereford:
(SnowDude's Reply)
Hi, thanks for your comments but it's really bad the video quality is terrible plus 1 of the complete movies the link is broken. The general layout also looks very amaturish etc.
I personally didn't look to hard at the photos but they seemed ok ish.
I appreciate it is a bad score but it is by far the worse site I have had the "pleasure!" of viewing.
The subject matter is going to be difficult to get genuine material from but at this price, lack of contents and terrible video quality etc I felt the score was deserved.
Someone else may view the site and feel different and hopefully someone will gain enjoyment from the site.
Hereford
|
02-10-07 10:45pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
