| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
morgentau's Comment
from host2626:
Thanks for the heads-up. I'm not getting in until they give proper HD downloads and without Brazzers' "6 months of uninterrupted membership" crap, I don't care about streaming at all. Last time I checked RK, some time this summer, their SD content was of too low a quality even compared with non-HD sites. There are at least a dozen sites nowadays that provide HD downloads, some for more than a year now, and once you've been there there is no coming back.
|
09-08-09 09:02am
|
Reply
2
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(morgentau's Reply)
The prices you show are much higher in Germany than in the US. You are being charged around 43% higher prices for the same membership (some memberships you are being charged an even higher premium than 43%).
The price offered through PU/TBP can have a slight discount from the regular price, depending on the membership option chosen):
United States prices:
Basic
1 month: $15.96/month recurring (billed every month at $15.96)
3 months: $9.59/month recurring (billed every 3 months at $28.76)
12 months: $6.66/month recurring (billed every 12 months at $79.96)
Premium
1 month: $19.17/month recurring (billed every month at $19.17)
3 months: $11.99/month recurring (billed every 4 months at $47.96)
12 months: $6.66/month recurring (billed every 18 months at $119.96)
So for the premium membership, even though it states a 3-month recurring membership, it's really a 4-month recurring membership.
So for the premium membership, even though it states a 12-month recurring membership, it's really a 18-month recurring membership.
|
08-28-09 06:39am
|
Reply
3
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
morgentau's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
This is definitely a well written review - I wish more people would take the time to include all those details. But... mediocre to poor video and picture quality, repetitive content and, false advertising? I know we all put different weight on different things, but with all those cons, I can't quite make out what's left to warrant a score like that.
|
08-22-09 05:05pm
|
Reply
4
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
morgentau's Review from morgentau:
more of the bottom line (sry about this):
I did not expect any HD content when I joined the site, so I'm only mildly annoyed with their false advertisement. Be warned though that this is NOT a HD site (yet). I was more annoyed with the advertisements inside the members area and used an adblocker to get rid of them.
The daily download limit of 10GB equals about 15hrs of content. I think this is reasonable since they have to pay for their bandwidth too, so I didn't include it in the cons.
If you spot one of their special offers - I joined for 15$ a month - do not hesitate to join. Due to the sheer amount and variety of content you most certainly will find at least a few sites to your liking. This holds especially true if you're still somewhat new to the world of porn and you are looking mostly for mainstream content.
|
08-22-09 04:19pm
|
Reply
5
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
morgentau's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Yeah - it's too bad. I was hoping that they would do things honestly and counter Brazzer's despicable bait-and-switch wait-6-months-before-you-can-see-them HD vid practice - but noooooo.
Instead we just get a straight-out lie from Reality Kings
|
08-22-09 12:03am
|
Reply
6
|
Asian Ex Girlfriends
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(morgentau's Reply)
Thanks for the info - it's still kind of creepy....
|
08-16-09 01:32pm
|
Reply
7
|
Sex Asian 18
(0)
|
Reply of
morgentau's Comment
from dracken:
Good advice here. I hate it when videos don't have a descriptive name and one has to go and re-name them later. I didn't even realize this could be caused by java script...I'll have to play around for a while and check this issue out. Thanks for the helpful info.
|
08-16-09 04:52am
|
Reply
8
|
Kamilla 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(morgentau's Reply)
Funny, I'd forgotten about that site! Oh, well. I guess we're both certifiably Kamila fans!
|
08-02-09 09:45am
|
Reply
9
|
Kamilla 18
(0)
|
Reply of
morgentau's Review
from Drooler:
I've been a big fan of Kamila myself and was once a member of this site. Agree with your review about the quality here, and that Kamila deserves better. It wasn't updating when I was a member, either, in fall 2006.
If you haven't found her elsewhere yet, here are some sites she's appeared on: Domai (as Zyta), Met-Art (Lida), MPL Studios as Camila (there's a pretty good amount of her here), TeenageDepot (as Donita, with a lot of photosets that vary in quality), and Rigin-Studio (as both Maria and Marya; no zips but there are several sets of good LARGE photos).
|
08-02-09 06:45am
|
Reply
10
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
morgentau's Review
from WeeWillyWinky:
Good review, but a few things to note:
1) I saw plenty of vids with higher rez than 852x480. Look in some of the newest vids.
2) I got access to only one bonus site. It seems you get access to the others only after you've been a member for a set period. Maybe it was different for you.
I ended up keeping a gazillion zips since I love skinny girls and this site offers them up in spades, and this is only the softcore stuff, since I don't watch HC. All in all I enjoyed my month and would recommend this site to just about anyone. But yes, the site was very sluggish and navigation is sometimes awful.
|
07-28-09 03:44pm
|
Reply
11
|
Policeman
(0)
|
Reply of
morgentau's Review
from mbaya:
Is the rest of the network interesting? Would you recommend any of the sites?
|
02-23-09 07:47am
|
Reply
12
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from PinkPanther:
(morgentau's Reply)
Joining one of the "second-tier" sites in the network, such as MandyIsKinky (I don't know about Lez Cuties) also starts you off with many more bonus sites - then you add 2 more each month.
|
01-30-09 06:55am
|
Reply
13
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from TrashMan:
(morgentau's Reply)
You get access to sites like LezCuties?
|
01-29-09 08:59pm
|
Reply
14
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
morgentau's Review
from TrashMan:
Good review.
I had the same major gripe with PixAndVids. The majority of the video content, the GOOD content, is the older stuff before 2007 and it is all blurry 400x300 resolution.
Would also be nice if they networked their sites, not requiring different memberships for network sites.
|
01-29-09 06:10pm
|
Reply
15
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
morgentau's Review
from mbaya:
A very thorough, nice, high quality review. Welcome to PU.
|
01-29-09 04:40pm
|
Reply
16
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ramscrota:
(morgentau's Reply)
Oh dear oh dear! You are basolutely correct! I'm so sorry - I'll put in a request for an immediate redrawal of that review, and thanks for pointing it out to me.
|
01-11-09 03:54am
|
Reply
17
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
morgentau's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Yes, that's totally true - of course, then you don't get the new material being updated daily as you do at Pix and Video - and in 6 months, or 60 months, you will not have access to Club Sandy's every other day updates. That's the choice - more and better bonus sites sooner or the newest stuff now and lesser bonus sites for now.
The actual count on bonus sites that you get with Pix and Video, since I just joined to take advantage of the "get Club Sandy for free in 6 months" offer is 29 - so you get Pix and Video plus 29 bonus sites for a total of 30 sites to start off with.
|
11-25-08 06:58pm
|
