Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Zack's Review
from nygiants03:
You give Kelly Madison a 99, and Rachel Aziani a 50??? Something is not right here........
|
12-03-08 09:56pm
|
Reply
2
|
Wifey's World
(0)
|
Reply of
Zack's Comment
from williamj:
BIG LOADS is an understatement. Wifey is a queen of loads for sure!
|
12-03-08 03:40pm
|
Reply
3
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
Zack's Comment
from shooterbo:
If you think the trailers are great.....wait until you see the real thing!
|
12-03-08 01:17am
|
Reply
4
|
Naughty Allie
(0)
|
Reply of
Zack's Review
from mbaya:
Useful reviews have a lot more facts.
|
12-02-08 01:18pm
|
Reply
5
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Zack's Review
from badandy400:
As always, we welcome new members and try to help them on there way a bit.
My friendly advise is when whenever someone give a low 50s or high 90s score there needs to be very valid reasoning. it is going to be hard enough to convince people here that this site deserves such a low score, but it will not happen if you leave out details on the reason why.
Tell us why the issues you had were such a big deal to you. Saying "it is what it is because it is what it is" will not do the trick either, not that you have done that but it happens more often than we like.
Remember, the reviews we right are not for our own benefit, rather they are to help others. We all have different tastes. You have an issue with the shape of her tits which is fine, but I personally like them. But I can tell without paying whether or not I like how she looks by simply looking at a homepage or tour page. What is important in scoring is everything else. The model not having the features you are looking for does not constitute a 50! That would be like me doing to a solo site about a guy and giving it a 50 because I did not like the shape of his ass. Of course I would not like the shape of his ass, i am not into that sort of thing! So rating the site as a 50 would not be fair simply because it did not stand a chance with me, but someone else might come along and absolutely love the way the guy looks.
What would then be fair is for me to say I did not like his ass, then rate the site based on other features. Price, updates, videos and picture quality, amount of content, and so one.
Not liking a models tits is only worth a few points. There is much more to the site than that, and as I said, that taste will vary with each person that looks at your review. A good way to handle that is to say that you did not like them and to encourage the reader to check out the tour page first to make sure they have no issues with them. That would be a helpful suggestion to the reader and make you sound good. :)
Now about the guys dick. Many people going model sites because they are simply interested in the specific model. The dick she is sitting on becomes a little less of a concern. However, I will agree that an ugly guy can ruin a great scene as it can be distracting. Besides, small cocks make me feel better about myself!! :)
Just try to be as objective about your reviews as you can and load them with information. Your review is barely 12 lines, so it is more of a comment than a review. 12 lines simply is not enough content to convey your message. As for 50s, try not to write reviews while you are pissed off at a site about something. When a review is all negative people tend to not look at them because it is painfully obvious the person just wants to vent.
The bottom line here is: don not be talked out of your opinions about sites you like or dislike, just tell us exactly what puts them on your porntacular list or your shit list.
|
12-02-08 12:41pm
|
Reply
6
|
Naughty Allie
(0)
|
Reply of
Zack's Review
from Cybertoad:
Would like to see ore details in the review please. how many videos, quality etc.
Updates how many models .
Thanks
|
12-02-08 11:20am
|
Reply
7
|
Rachel Aziani
(0)
|
Reply of
Zack's Review
from Cybertoad:
This site is among PU's top rated sites, and no one then this review has gone under 80 in any review of this site. You gave it the lowest possible review but said little as to why you rated it the lowest possible score. You are entitled to your review opinion, I just saw the review score as severely harsh given prior evidence by others shows it to be a very satifactory site.
|
12-02-08 11:19am
|
Reply
8
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
Zack's Review
from jd1961:
I beg your pardon, but this is not an amateur site.
Sandy is an old pro.
|
12-02-08 09:34am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
