| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from malikstarks:
(Victorycreed's Reply)
Damn your the man for keeping that link, it's still advertising updates from 2008!!! That's like finding a four leaf clover! You better not let that out at too many places lest they take it down (which I'm sure they will at some point).
I've already been a member for like two years at that price but I'm still keeping that link just in case something goes wrong. I'm pretty sure they aren't offering that discount just for canceling anymore.
And for those not sure it is $9.95 recurring.
|
12-30-09 06:21pm
|
Reply
27
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from hodayathink:
(Victorycreed's Reply)
$9.95? Where? And I mean for one month, not 9.95 a month if you sign up for a year.
|
12-27-09 08:23pm
|
Reply
28
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
from anyonebutme:
But not 1080p videos? I'll still take a pass on Brazzers.
|
12-26-09 03:48pm
|
Reply
29
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
What? No fine print that says, "All members from Mindanao and East Timor"?
|
12-26-09 03:22pm
|
Reply
30
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from hodayathink:
(Victorycreed's Reply)
The older women do tend to still be/look mid 30s or so, but every few weeks you do get a woman that does look noticably older. And the logging in to multiple sites is long gone, everything is hosted at naughtyamerica.com now, so there's just one login.
Also, in their tagging options, you do have a chance to differentiate scenes between natural and fake breasts.
|
09-04-09 10:49pm
|
Reply
31
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Yes, the automatic joins to other sites on top of the crappy vid quality doesn't help the appeal of Porn Pros.
|
08-28-09 05:44pm
|
Reply
32
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(Victorycreed's Reply)
Thanks indeed for the long reply.
I like the free group chat concept but, in my experience at other sites, if the model has to keep the chat lively without a moderator to help her, it's a recipe for disaster. I used to think some of the moderators were too anal but then I saw that having a bunch of guys all making requests at the same time, repeating themselves every couple minutes and no moderator to kick them out is not what this chats were meant to be.
Wish they did them at Europe-friendly times; that steak incident is sure memorable. I agree Molly is an absolute hottie; guess there's no need to recommend you her site Molly's Life. Thanks again for the reply.
|
08-19-09 02:37pm
|
Reply
33
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from messmer:
(Victorycreed's Reply)
I never had any problems with re-logging on and site navigation was actually quite good. I did have a huge problem with the repetitious nature of the various niches and what bugged me most was the same thing that bugs you. The "Matures" looked too young while their "sons' friends' " looked too old. Not one of them was in their teens or even early twenties making the whole fantasy implausible. But lots of people like the site, so there must be something that is good about it.
|
08-18-09 06:18pm
|
Reply
34
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from messmer:
(Victorycreed's Reply)
Hi Victorycreed, I can't really argue with you except when it comes to enhanced breasts, natural will beat artificial any time in my eyes. In everything else I agree. I got a real tempting offer from Naughty America to re-join but refused because I found, like you, that there's too much sameness to every scene.
|
08-18-09 08:10am
|
Reply
35
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(Victorycreed's Reply)
In your original (updated) comment, you asked that people don't tell you what you already know. So you can skip my reply to you as you like, because I am not an expert on email.
You ask if people have noticed an increase in spam.
Personally, I have not. The increased spam you have seen lately is far beyond what I get in my email boxes.
Even accounting for your 3 email addresses, for public, personal, and business, you are getting a large amount of spam. I've had one main email address for over 10 years, and I don't get anywhere near the spam you are reporting, in sexual, career, or other types of spam.
Somehow your email addresses got into the spam databanks.
So like I suggested before, either you get a really good filter, which will direct almost all the spam to a spam box, or you get new email addresses. I'm not an expert, but my understanding is that once you're in the spam databases, you're screwed, because the spam will not go away in the future, as long as those "infected" or "exposed" email addresses are current.
|
02-02-09 10:23pm
|
Reply
36
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(Victorycreed's Reply)
If you're getting a large amount of spam emails, either you get a really good filter, or you get a new email address.
A new email address is inconvenient, sure, but you would cut down the spam you're getting (until something else goes wrong).
Life can be a bitch. That's what makes it interesting.
Regards.
|
01-31-09 07:00pm
|
Reply
37
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Not a member of Reality Kings.
But as far as spam, that's a personal issue, and a fact of life. Unless you're really good with computers and know how to filter your email, if you've been online for a while and have a regular email address, you're almost sure to get a lot of daily spam.
Some of the spam will be sex-related, other spam will be general junk offers.
Just like what you get in the old-style mail box, except that you don't get sex-related spam in the mail box. And that's only because it costs real money to send the old-style mail.
|
01-31-09 01:33pm
|
Reply
38
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
from badandy400:
I think we all get spam! I have not personally noticed any spam that I can attribute to Reality Kings. But, that is not to say that they do not. I get spam from Brazzers but it always seems like it is coming from someone else trying to get referral kickbacks.
|
01-30-09 12:48pm
|
Reply
39
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Review
from moonbyrd:
"After several months, some of the videos I've downloaded were unable to work anymore." Why wouldn't they work? They are regular WMV files without any DRM. The only reasons I can think of why they woudln't play would involve corruption of storage media, which has nothing to do with the site itself.
Also, the highest resolution is 720x480 and the second highest 480x352. How are they not different? 720x480 is identical to the original DVD. There is of course some inevitable loss of quality when the video is transcoded to WMV, but in many cases it is hardly noticeable. The only way to improve would be to use the original MPEG2 without transcoding.
There is one problem with the videos I haven't seen addressed in reviews: the aspect ratio. The picture is squashed vertically or horizontally depending on the source material, and you absolutely have to use a player that can correct this.
Also about 90s to early 2000s videos: I think the oldest videos on the site are from 1970's and the newest from the last year or so. Personally it would be fun to see more classics but they tend to suffer from horrible DVD transfers to begin with.
|
12-21-08 12:03am
|
Reply
40
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(Victorycreed's Reply)
If you are downloading the "big" videos you get 15 attempts. So 5 gigs would be about right depending on their size.
|
12-19-08 10:24pm
|
