| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
from slutty:
Doesn't every site do this? I get stupid emails from many sites I've joined, and unsubscribing from them has generally been pointless. Isn't this the point of having a spam filter?
|
03-06-12 12:05am
|
Reply
27
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Yes, the automatic joins to other sites on top of the crappy vid quality doesn't help the appeal of Porn Pros.
|
08-28-09 05:44pm
|
Reply
28
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from mbaya:
(Victorycreed's Reply)
Tricks like this are a turnoff. I don't like Reality Kings due to other tricks they have tried in the past. Give good value at a reasonable price and you will always have customers.
|
04-08-10 09:11am
|
Reply
29
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
from atrapat:
A couple days ago, I also got that message with a user name and password. It contained the exact same user name and password I was automatically issued about a year ago when I joined Reality Kings.
I'm absolutely certain it wasn't a cross-sale as mbaya suggests since that username/password is the same I was given last year and this recent message was sent to an email address I haven't used to sign up to adult sites for about a year.
It's been only two days since I got the email message but I'm keeping a close look at my online credit card statement.
|
04-07-10 11:43am
|
Reply
30
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
from mbaya:
Could you have missed a checked box when you joined another site?
|
04-06-10 08:58pm
|
Reply
31
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(Victorycreed's Reply)
Thanks indeed for the long reply.
I like the free group chat concept but, in my experience at other sites, if the model has to keep the chat lively without a moderator to help her, it's a recipe for disaster. I used to think some of the moderators were too anal but then I saw that having a bunch of guys all making requests at the same time, repeating themselves every couple minutes and no moderator to kick them out is not what this chats were meant to be.
Wish they did them at Europe-friendly times; that steak incident is sure memorable. I agree Molly is an absolute hottie; guess there's no need to recommend you her site Molly's Life. Thanks again for the reply.
|
08-19-09 02:37pm
|
Reply
32
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(Victorycreed's Reply)
In your original (updated) comment, you asked that people don't tell you what you already know. So you can skip my reply to you as you like, because I am not an expert on email.
You ask if people have noticed an increase in spam.
Personally, I have not. The increased spam you have seen lately is far beyond what I get in my email boxes.
Even accounting for your 3 email addresses, for public, personal, and business, you are getting a large amount of spam. I've had one main email address for over 10 years, and I don't get anywhere near the spam you are reporting, in sexual, career, or other types of spam.
Somehow your email addresses got into the spam databanks.
So like I suggested before, either you get a really good filter, which will direct almost all the spam to a spam box, or you get new email addresses. I'm not an expert, but my understanding is that once you're in the spam databases, you're screwed, because the spam will not go away in the future, as long as those "infected" or "exposed" email addresses are current.
|
02-02-09 10:23pm
|
Reply
33
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(Victorycreed's Reply)
If you're getting a large amount of spam emails, either you get a really good filter, or you get a new email address.
A new email address is inconvenient, sure, but you would cut down the spam you're getting (until something else goes wrong).
Life can be a bitch. That's what makes it interesting.
Regards.
|
01-31-09 07:00pm
|
Reply
34
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Not a member of Reality Kings.
But as far as spam, that's a personal issue, and a fact of life. Unless you're really good with computers and know how to filter your email, if you've been online for a while and have a regular email address, you're almost sure to get a lot of daily spam.
Some of the spam will be sex-related, other spam will be general junk offers.
Just like what you get in the old-style mail box, except that you don't get sex-related spam in the mail box. And that's only because it costs real money to send the old-style mail.
|
01-31-09 01:33pm
|
Reply
35
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
from badandy400:
I think we all get spam! I have not personally noticed any spam that I can attribute to Reality Kings. But, that is not to say that they do not. I get spam from Brazzers but it always seems like it is coming from someone else trying to get referral kickbacks.
|
01-30-09 12:48pm
|
Reply
36
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(Victorycreed's Reply)
If you are downloading the "big" videos you get 15 attempts. So 5 gigs would be about right depending on their size.
|
12-19-08 10:24pm
|
Reply
37
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
from nostromo:
Torbe, no?
|
05-05-10 04:58am
|
Reply
38
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
from Denner:
Just got to add:
What's this smartness??
|
04-09-10 05:17am
|
Reply
39
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
from ace of aces:
who is lucky?
|
04-09-10 12:54am
|
Reply
40
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Review
from moonbyrd:
"After several months, some of the videos I've downloaded were unable to work anymore." Why wouldn't they work? They are regular WMV files without any DRM. The only reasons I can think of why they woudln't play would involve corruption of storage media, which has nothing to do with the site itself.
Also, the highest resolution is 720x480 and the second highest 480x352. How are they not different? 720x480 is identical to the original DVD. There is of course some inevitable loss of quality when the video is transcoded to WMV, but in many cases it is hardly noticeable. The only way to improve would be to use the original MPEG2 without transcoding.
There is one problem with the videos I haven't seen addressed in reviews: the aspect ratio. The picture is squashed vertically or horizontally depending on the source material, and you absolutely have to use a player that can correct this.
Also about 90s to early 2000s videos: I think the oldest videos on the site are from 1970's and the newest from the last year or so. Personally it would be fun to see more classics but they tend to suffer from horrible DVD transfers to begin with.
|
12-21-08 12:03am
|
