Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Wow Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(host2626's Reply)
It's probably better if you make this a new comment.
If you re-post this as a new comment, it will have a better chance of being noticed by more members.
Anyway: 18OnlyGirls changed its name to AllFineGirls some time back.
Recently, 18OnlyGirls is no longer listed at PU.
I'm not sure why.
Sometimes sites are no longer listed because they go out of business.
Or because there is some problem at the connection with PU and PU stops promoting the site (listing the site).
Separately, even though I posted at PU that 18OnlyGirls had changed its name to AllFineGirls, PU never bothered to list AllFineGirls as the new name of 18OnlyGirls (probably because the name change slipped through the cracks).
Anyway, 18OnlyGirls is no longer listed at PU.
I haven't been a member of 18OnlyGirls in a while, so I don't know if the site is still updating.
Wow Porn and Wow Girls still exist.
18 Only Girls still exists (under the name of All Fine Girls).
It's difficult, or unlikely, that you will find current information on 18 Only Girls or All Fine Girls at PU (or at TBP, the sister site of PU), because 18 Only Girls is no longer listed.
Since I'm not a current member of any of the three sites, I don't know what the update rate is.
I like the models at the sites, and the videos are professionally shot.
But the membership fee is too expensive for me, to be a continuing member.
I'm sorry I can't give you the details on the update rate for 18OnlyGirls.
Perhaps a current member of that site will post that information, if they happen to read this comment.
|
10-28-16 01:47am
|
Reply
2
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Pyrenees:
(host2626's Reply)
Lets face it what is gold to one person is bronze to another.
I respect your opinion.
In all fairness I only kept 30% of Total scenes.
Because as you point out positioning, camera angles and content are important to me.
It is obvious to me we have slightly different taste.
Again in fairness I prefer a LOT more doggy and a LOT more flexibility.
I do however disagree on the quality of scene point. I agree those other sites have equal quality. Perhaps I was over ambitious in speaking the praises of the sites I was simply excited =).
One thing of note. I NEVER liked missionary in all my years of porn until I watched it on this site.
In conclusion you made valid points and I respect your opinions =) Thank you.
|
07-04-15 01:15am
|
Reply
3
|
Digital Playground
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(host2626's Reply)
I agree. That's ALWAYS a deal-breaker for me too. The only reason I joined was based on stingerxxx's comment that if you have Internet Download Manager the site streams in HTTP so you can capture that. Without that knowledge I would never have joined the site.
I hope I haven't broken any of the PU rules by revealing that.
|
02-03-15 05:27am
|
Reply
4
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#21
from rearadmiral:
(host2626's Reply)
Thanks for the tip. I've heard of clips4sale before but always considered that to be an expensive way to buy porn. But it seems that same thought didn't occur to me when I joined LP...
|
01-17-15 06:55am
|
Reply
5
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#19
from rearadmiral:
(host2626's Reply)
I compare it to a company like Kink.com that has some porn that pushes the envelope a bit but still uses the traditional subscription model. The Kink shoots have to cost as much or more than the LP stuff does. Apart from VOD sites I don't know of any other site that bills subscribers like this. And I hope there aren't many others...
|
01-15-15 05:29pm
|
Reply
6
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#17
from rearadmiral:
(host2626's Reply)
I'm glad I joined, because I had wondered about the site for a while, but with the cost per video I likely won't be back.
But it is some damn good porn though...
|
01-14-15 05:26pm
|
Reply
7
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Parsnip:
(host2626's Reply)
No she didn't write anything grrrrr!
I've just had a look. They've deleted all the negative comments and added a big gushing interview with one of the performers where she goes on about how anyone who doesn't like anal has a closed mind and all that shit. Real stupid straw man arguments.
It's exactly what x-art did a couple of years ago. Bigging up all the anal scenes, censoring negative comments, insulting those who don't like anal.
Funny really. It even the same down to this - a month ago the guy who runs the site said they wouldn't do anal - when they were making this film at the time. Once Colette at x-art said they had one anal scene in th can and wouldn't do any more, and two weeks later released a dp scene! They're the same right down to the lying about it!
|
12-02-14 12:52pm
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from pat362:
(host2626's Reply)
About the only exception to this rule is the site "the classic porn" but since they mostly offer porn that is at least a decade old and older than it's really not the same thing. The only complain someone could have about their content is that the video and sound quality leaves a lot to be desired but I don't care. especially when I have found so many amazing movies from my younger days.
|
11-05-14 06:06pm
|
Reply
9
|
The Sandfly
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from TheMoreYouKnow:
(host2626's Reply)
Yes... incredibly ridiculous... and I concur regarding ilovethebeach.com, as far as I know, they're the best out there in this genre.
|
06-13-14 01:55pm
|
Reply
10
|
POVD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from skippy:
(host2626's Reply)
Absolutely true about the fish eye. What is interesting about this site is that many (not all) of the videos are a mix of go-pro on the head and tripod-over-the-bed-behind-the-guy video. This method avoids the shake-as-you-bang effect. There are also a few seconds here and there where one of the cameras is visible. One of them is a small, decent quality HD video camera with internal stabilization. And there almost always seems to be a 2nd person involved in the shoot in one way or another. So these guys are not out to make cheap videos, they are out to make a lot of money by spreading their collection over as many sites as possible. That strategy will work once their collection is a little larger, but right now it is just frustrating.
|
05-23-14 02:00pm
|
Reply
11
|
Perfect Gonzo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PerfectGonzo:
(host2626's Reply)
Hi, thanks for your comment.
You have to look at bitrates and "HD quality" in the context of technical evolution. We started shooting Allinternal content in 2003 using a PAL (non HD) camera. All content shot from 2007 through today is HD. A total of 1024 of our 1650 scenes are shot in HD, 16:9.
Yes, the highest available members area bitrate is 12,000 kbps on HD movies. Considering that you'd need a 12+ mbit Internet connection to stream this it should come as no surpise we do not put 12,000 kbps trailers on the tour. They'd stutter and buffer for most users and irritate the average surfer.
I have prepared a screenshot with the details of a recent scene: http://goo.gl/P1EGWf -- the filesize is 3.9 gb for 54:49 minutes.
Hope that helps.
David/Perfectgonzo
|
11-27-13 02:32am
|
Reply
12
|
Pure Mature
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Comment from host2626:
[3000 characters limit]
It's like this image that tonightsgirlfriend is often using to promote their site. Another "wow it has everything" moment: the whole body, the face, a good angle showing the curves, the legs, the ass, a good dick sticking out, nothing is obstructed by his ass, legs nor hands. This at least is a real screenshot, but guess what, in the actual movie it lasts like 1.5 seconds while the camera is traveling from his ass to her face. These guys DO know what images and angles to use to entice people, yet they always fail to use them in their movies.
Re: orgasms.xxx
The day I went to see the site they had just released the Zuzana Z. hardcore video. I couldn't believe my eyes, I am a huge fan and instantly joined the site. It was well worth the money just for this video. The rest is generic stuff of the joymii and x-art kind. Half of it is girl-girl which I do not care about. The rest is mostly generic young east-euro actresses, shaved pubic hair, no tanlines, no curves, generic faces, I couldn't tell one from the other if I saw 10 movies of each. And concerning orgasms, Zuzana Z. seems to have had a real one, but the rest that I have watched hadn't even bothered to fake. And the camera work is a bit better in that the guy can stay a bit longer on the same angle without moving, but still most of it is unrevealing filler. Even for the Zuzana B/G movie, I cut and kept only about a couple of minutes of the video.
But hey, don't mind me, the world doesn't mind these things apparently, *I* am the weirdo here. Sorry for the rant.
|
10-18-12 12:44am
|
Reply
13
|
Pure Mature
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Comment from host2626:
Don't get me wrong, the action on puremature.com site is definitely "softer". I mean it's hardcore action, but not for the Brazzers/Bangbros/etc lowest common denominator demographic, the kind that leaves comments like "Take the cock and shut up!" or "Teach them to cum on their cocks" :). It's more like the Pornpros "white room" scenes, in fact it is exactly like that, since they all come from passion-hd.com, which seems to be by the same guys who made puremature.com. The action is definitely of the same type as in joymii and x-art.
I was upset because of two things. As I said the video quality is low, from the blueish-reddish tint on many videos, to the lack of definition and artifacts. Way below what we find on NA/ZZ/RK.
But more importantly it is the camera work. The site and thumbnails give an aura of passion and intimacy, but in reality movies are not shot differently from other sites (and I cannot name a site whose camera work I do like). I shouldn't have had this reaction by now, but the thumbnails built my expectations too high.
What I want to see in my porn is female bodies being fucked. I don't want to see a long closeup on her face, and certainly not of HIS face nor ass . She has a nice body, if you must have a long introduction, why not use that time to build our excitement by showing said body? Not a closeup of the face again, nor waist-up for minutes; stop trying to do art-schmart, you can't even shoot straightforward porn. Then when the action starts, keep showing the girl's body, let us decide what we want to focus our eyes on.
I don't know what angles you want to see in a movie, or even if you care. For instance, here is the thumbnail for the Jewels Jade movie. Wow, it has everything. Whole body shot, legs spread, pussy being fucked, it is like being there. (And her having this landing strip instead of her usual pedo-shave doesn't hurt either).
But then, see the screenshot wall (I used "moviethumbnailer" from sourceforge.net). The screens are taken at 10 second-ish intervals. That angle from the thumbnail is nowhere to be seen. No, it didn't slip in the 10 secs between two screenshots, and even if it did, that'd still be no way to advertise a movie, and again, we have much longer face shots that serve no purpose in a porn movie. The rest of the movie is pretty standard, like everywhere else. Lots of bla at the beginning, long BJ, and 7 minutes in out of 22, the intercourse begins. Non-revealing angles, closeups... I personally care a bit about the doggy around 13:40, 15:00 and 16:00, but the rest is just filler. Same school of camera work (or lack thereof) as in every other site.
[3000 characters limit]
|
10-18-12 12:42am
|
Reply
14
|
Pure Mature
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Comment
from otoh:
Sort of agree with GPL, but either way, thanks for the comment. I sort of had my eye on this site as I'm quite keen on the heartcore/whatever genre and something like Joymii or X-Art which featured models in their 30s or 40s would work really well for me. A shame, then, that this site - although purporting to be a bit more sensual - seems to be more run of the mill porn.
Also interesting that you were disappointed with orgasms.xxx - it's sort of on my list - any more specifics on what you didn't like? And/or what sites do you like in this genre?
|
10-16-12 07:22am
|
Reply
15
|
Pure Mature
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Comment
from gaypornolover:
This is an excellent comment but it could easily have been a full review, which would have been better for you and the site. Why not contact them and see if you can resubmit this, with a few tweaks, as a full review?
Welcome to the site.
|
10-16-12 05:35am
|
Reply
16
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from joekramer08:
(host2626's Reply)
Sorry, I didn't realize that. I have joined other Eurpean sites (like firstanalquest.com and hardcoreyouth.com) and their scenes were 29 fps. If you watch a 29 fps scene and a 25 fps scene back to back you can notice a difference in the smoothness of the movement...believe me, I can see a difference.
|
12-30-11 03:52pm
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Cybertoad:
(host2626's Reply)
Mixing it up means for me to answer the question:
I stay within my comfort zone, until something peaks my interest.
A good example is sexmachines and sexvilla, these are not normal interests for me. But I love gadgets and animation in my own home life.
So when a niche comes into play that is oof interest I take a peak.
I am not into pain scenes or any derogatory acts towards women, so it has to have some taste to it. Now as far as scenes go mixing it up means. 50% solo scenes, 30 Lez and the rest straight sex or the above.
I would probably be more into the straight sex more but so hard to find scenes where the guys will just shut the fuck up. So I avoid allot of sites because of this ego induced type of filming the last few years.
|
12-07-11 08:12am
|
Reply
18
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Comment
from adultporn:
http://i44.tinypic.com/2n6fcwi.jpg
Misleading members. The videos are shot in HD 1080p, but the videos are not available in HD 1080p for viewing as stated on the Realitykings banner and website.
|
04-05-10 12:59pm
|
Reply
19
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Comment
from happyending:
I had the limited trial membership.
Streaming Flash "720p" - MP4 H.264 3000 kbps (1024x576) starting September 1, 2009 for all new releases.
|
10-18-09 03:43pm
|
Reply
20
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from insomniacxxx:
(host2626's Reply)
I had noticed that, and as someone who doesn't often buy DVD's, this is just fine by me. I guess I didn't think of it as non-exclusive, since it is exclusive to the company (New Sensations). It's still not content you're going to get on any other site. But I guess if you do buy their DVD's, then yes, this site is redundant. Thanks for pointing out the omission.
|
05-05-09 04:46pm
|
Reply
21
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rome476:
(host2626's Reply)
Host is exactly right; the biggest drawbacks are that they don't plainly IDthe DVDs the scenes are from and don't provide a away to seach the "network " [that is really just the DVD scenes spread out at different "sites"]. It's too bad because there is a lot of good material and the price is good.
|
05-02-09 08:29am
|
Reply
22
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from desade:
(host2626's Reply)
I even saw a 'European' 'geo-targeted price' of €43,95. This is unbelievable. Why should Europeans pay almost twice the advertised price ? This is an absolute disgrace. There is no other word for it. I don't know who 'invented' this 'geo-oriented pricing', but is not only a form of 'geo-discrimination', I would also label it outright greed. There should be a law against this. I will never ever join this network.
|
03-14-09 09:41pm
|
Reply
23
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Tree Rodent:
(host2626's Reply)
That offer must be for 3 months, or it's the first reverse discount. Congratulations you have a first! Reminds me of Reginald Perrin - "great sale offer at Grot Shop...20 per cent on everything."
|
01-03-09 06:37am
|
Reply
24
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Tree Rodent:
(host2626's Reply)
Yeah that sucks! Ask them for the discount rate. Sometimes a site will go with the TBP rate if you quote it. But as I have said elswhere, it does look as though Pink are practising Regional Discrimination. They did change the name of Teens For Cash to Pure Cherry Girls, and it was exactly the same site in everything except name, so that's why I thought it may be the same thing with the MILF site.
|
01-01-09 01:55pm
|
Reply
25
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
It's possible MILFSeeker has become Hottest MILFS Ever. That site is available on the Pass. Also if you use the link from TBP you should get a $10 discount to make it $29.95 instead of $39.95. Beware of the cross check sign ups. I was nearly suckered when I tried to sign up but I noticed. It meant although I liked the site I have not resubscribed.
|
01-01-09 11:53am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
