| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from Drooler:
I've noticed those inconsistencies, too, in the database and just generally in the naming of the models. Whenever I see someone first on MetArt or on MetModels and then she shows up on the other site, I always look for the name in my own "database" file system. Sometimes it's easy, and sometimes it's a pain if I'm sure I've gotten pics of the model before but not with the name shown at the time.
The editing mistakes might be due to using pages and code from one set to another, where they don't double check everything that needs to be changed before they post a new set. I've seen worse, but it's still a problem, of course.
|
06-06-09 02:06pm
|
Reply
2
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from lk2fireone:
Review has lots of nice details. If money is no object, then belonging to both met-art and metmodels would be nice. Because then you would get to see all the sets at both sites. But since money is limited for most of us, met-art is the better value. The quality and style (teen glamour) of both sites is basically the same. The main difference is that met-art has a huge amount of content compared to metmodels.
|
06-06-09 11:44am
|
Reply
3
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from zzzins:
Nicely informative. I'm a big fan of Met-Art and always wondered what extra Met Models had to offer.
|
06-06-09 10:46am
|
Reply
4
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(nutcrackr's Reply)
I've been passing up on several of the more recent sets. Take the Suzie Carina "Pink" set today. Pretty ordinary, as you say, and I've got a huge stock of this girl already with some really nice sets.
The site's a real mixed bag of sometimes hot, too often not. Lately, more not than hot.
|
09-04-09 03:38am
|
Reply
5
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from jd1961:
Hegre is a poor man's Galitsin!
|
06-07-09 11:22pm
|
Reply
6
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(nutcrackr's Reply)
I agree it has gotten boring. Not always, but too often. I was on a year's subscription, which ended, but I'm biding time before I go back. It's a shame, because the site has so many pluses, but it doesn't matter if the content isn't interesting enough.
The boredom factor is one reason why I wonder how much longer the site will go on.
As for their forums, they should either deal with it (listen, respond, take action) or not have forums.
|
04-16-09 02:29am
|
Reply
7
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from Drooler:
I think you sum up well what has been going wrong with the site, particularly what you say in the final paragraph of the bottom line.
That fetish stuff has got to go for sure. Back in the days when they had regular sets of Marketa Belonoha, Sophie Paris, Divinity Raye (but different name at Hegre), and Katie (from Brazil), they were certainly better.
But even the stuff they do of Anna S and Orsi doesn't show enough sensuality, IMHO.
|
02-14-09 12:04pm
|
Reply
8
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(nutcrackr's Reply)
It's why I call Majoly "The Master Shellacker." Same everything but done by Tim Fox would have been a lot nicer.
|
10-02-09 01:37am
|
Reply
9
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from Drooler:
I'd taken to calling Majoly the "Master Shellacker" for what are obvious reasons. But actually, the most-most recent stuff is looking more natural/less 'shopped. Maybe we're being listened to. And maybe it's not just us.
There was a photographer who was even WORSE -- Magoo! Haven't seen that name for a while at MetArt. Fortunately.
|
04-05-09 01:35pm
|
Reply
10
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from Wittyguy:
Good review (here and on Hegre Art too). My only advice is that if you start reviewing sites that don't have as many reviews as these is to give a few more site statistics (pic and video sizes, zips, etc.). Otherwise things look pretty sweet.
|
03-27-09 03:00pm
|
Reply
11
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(nutcrackr's Reply)
They're strict about download managers. Here's an excerpt from the current terms of use:
"Site owner reserves the right to limit the amount of materials viewed or downloaded on this site. Multi threaded downloading programs, site ripping software, and spidering bots are not supported on this site.
Enjoy MPL Studios' web site, but please adhere to the downloading guidlines when using it. Fraud and Filesharing have made this level of site security necessary. There are three downloading violations that will block your account or have it closed for Terms of Use violations:
1) Repeatedly attempting to download more than 2 zips at the same time
2) Multi threading downloads (making multiple requests for the same file)
3) Using a bot to spider or scrape the site."
I am a current member. I like the site, though it doesn't do it for me each and every day. But photo quality is usually really good, and they're very selective about the babes there. Anya and Alisa are among the top favorites.
Sometimes the galleries are "postcards" or BTS stuff, without nudity. I generally consider those to be compliments to the fully nude stuff, which sometimes has no stripping.
|
08-08-09 10:43am
|
Reply
12
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Comment
from Drooler:
I've noticed. It's a positive change. Navigation problems (that I'd complained about in my review) seem to have been resolved. The setup is now more like FemJoy. It's easier now to access zip files.
It's nice when a site makes internal improvements but keeps its front door the same. Usually, it's the other way around.
The only thing I don't like is the black background color. Makes it look as if you're at at different site all of sudden. But I can live with it.
|
08-08-09 02:09am
|
Reply
13
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from tangub:
(nutcrackr's Reply)
Yes there was still no sign of that image upgrade as of when my membership there finished early December.
|
01-12-16 12:49pm
|
Reply
14
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from YankeeBastard:
Nubiles Captain, I love your site and I don't think you need to do one thing to improve it, it's PERFECT the way it is. I totally respect you for sticking to your guns in keeping the original vision of this site and providing us all with the best solo content on the web. If people have a problem with your content, or the way you release it, for how dirt cheap you offer it, piss on 'em.
|
03-12-14 01:21am
|
Reply
15
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from YankeeBastard:
Nice review nutcrackr.
|
03-12-14 01:14am
|
Reply
16
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Nubiles Captain:
(nutcrackr's Reply)
We have larger sizes immediately for the new and last few months of the new sites we have as it uses a different back end production system. Once we upgrade the system for Nubiles.net we can go with the larger sizes. I will have to check with the tech crew to see if we can do some older girls in bigger sizes.
|
02-13-14 02:37pm
|
Reply
17
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Cybertoad:
(nutcrackr's Reply)
Wonder if size increase is planned will it only be from new material on?
|
02-13-14 10:27am
|
Reply
18
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from Nubiles Captain:
Thank you for the review.
We do plan to increase the image size soon.
You bring up some interesting points about the update schedule. When we first started the site back in 2003 we decided to launch all the content of a girl at once instead of like our competitors that made you wait month after month. We had some many people thanking us for that so we thought it was a good thing, though I do agree about the variety. If more people can give us feedback, I am not opposed to doing that and we will change the watermark at the same time.
Again our member feedback asked the pics match the videos. If we did not we always got mad emails asking where the video was that matched it. And for only doing 4 sets we found it was the perfect amount, for the really popular girls we shoot them again (like Sasha P, trying to get her back) but some girls more then that and it gets too repetitive. Sometimes a girl looks worse then her casting so its hard to tell.
We are going back are redoing older videos to 1080, its on the to do list.
Also not sure if you are aware but we now give away 3 new sites for free with your membership if you like hardcore. Nubiles-Porn.com, Nubiles-casting.com and Momsteachsex.com.
Thanks for the feedback, it is things like that that helps us improve. I hope other people tell us what they think.
|
02-12-14 06:56pm
|
Reply
19
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from rearadmiral:
Excellent review. I know I've scored Nubiles a lot higher, but on subsequent visits I found that it just lacked some heat. I think your comment on the site trying to be jack of all trades and master of none is right.
|
02-12-14 05:20pm
|
Reply
20
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(nutcrackr's Reply)
True, it doesn't necessarily stop piracy; it just makes harder, for everyone. And I've tried downloadthem all with Firefox on this site, but it didn't work.
|
05-31-09 04:49am
|
Reply
21
|
Zemani
(0)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Comment
from lk2fireone:
You can try sending an email to Zemani, and request an extension of your membership, because of the problems you had with your membership.
I bought a 12-month subscription to Muse.org in 2009.
The main photographer for the site was Richard Murrian, who has contributed to Metart.
There were almost no updates during the time I was a member (for one year).
And many times, when I tried to log in to the site, I could not get in.
Because of the lack of updates, and other problems at the site, the site eventually said they would give 12-month members a 6-month extension of their membership.
I mailed customer support asking for the extension. Never got a reply to any of my emails. Never got an extension.
So sites can, for one reason or another, give you very poor service for your money.
I believe Muse.org is now dead. Good riddance.
|
08-04-15 11:03pm
|
