Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from Drooler:
Some of the girls get excited, some don't as much. It seemed to register with Sandy Sweet and Tristan Kingsley, to name two who immediately return to memory. They're not all just what Tupperware and walruses have in common.*
*being good with a tight seal
And no, I haven't been locked out.
|
12-03-09 03:14pm
|
Reply
27
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from Denner:
BTW: Drooler is right about the style here - though the site is called Fucked Hard - it's generally not though/rough.
The main deal with a girl getting a massage that turns into blowjob, 69, fuck ect - is done in a pleasant and quite erotic way.
The models are mostly top - the name of the site is inaccurate, though.... but you can't win them all.
|
12-03-09 08:40am
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from Monahan:
(BabyGetReal's Reply)
Agree with all of BabyGetReal's list....plus excessive time given to the guy's ass, dick and scrotum...plus the guy blocking the view of PTA.
PTA = Pussy tits and ass.
|
12-02-09 08:46pm
|
Reply
29
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review from BabyGetReal:
CONS CONTINUED:
-There are many key terms for searching, but female orgasms is not one of them. I've asked Victor to add it and he said he's working on it.
-Most of the girls are not as young and gorgeous as at other sites. That would be OK if they were genuinely aroused, but most aren't. In some early videos, they have matted disgusting hair.
-Many of the recent videos are split into intro, main, and aftermath. I don't see the point of having to download 3 pieces when the intro and aftermath are very short, yet add significantly to the main video.
-Navigation problem: when you find a video by actress or title, you can't find out the action keywords, or what year it was made.
-They limit you to 5 gigs/day. Once, this caused me to be blocked for 24 hours, but for the most part, it isn't a problem.
-Although less than half of the videos have anal (which I could do without), Victor seems to love it and makes a big deal of a girl's first anal, also her first facial. I dislike the emphasis that this site puts on those, but YMMV. None of the anal was with condom, which makes it worse.
-In the early years, still photos appear to have been taken during video shoots, not separate modeling sessions. Generally, I find them much less erotic than those at other sites where there are separate sessions optimized for still shots. Also, there are typically just a handful of full body shots, then dozens and dozens of blowjob and facial shots. Not to my taste at all. There are way too many closeups in the still photos. Even when I find the actress quite attractive, in the early years of the site, usually I can't find a single still that I want to keep! In the last few years, stills went to 1600 pixels, and many are of better quality and some are more erotic. Still not as good as the stills on many sites.
|
11-20-09 03:21pm
|
Reply
30
|
Young Models
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from OneMan:
That's great news. Some webmasters are honest, and mistakes DO happen of course.
Some, unfortunately, are not so scrupulous....I had one guy in South America, whose "independent merchant" ripped off some of his customers - including me - and disappeared. Did we receive any compensation ? No....nada....not even an apology....just procrastination and "wo is me!!" bs.
Fair play to you, for pointing out that this site is run by a decent guy. maybe we should have a section devoted to publicising decent sites in terms of customer service ? It's all too easy to criticise, but we are less likely to take the time to commend and recommend !
|
10-03-09 03:09pm
|
Reply
31
|
Young Models
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from ControllingMind:
Result!
Good job you mentioned it here on PU. Well done and good on the webmaster for sorting it out.
|
10-02-09 12:50pm
|
Reply
32
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from OneMan:
I think its a little unfair to expect people to list specific video titles. It is after all, very subjective.
Also, a site like this, has 1000's of videos, and they often have nothing but general titles: like: video 400b.wmv, for example or high23.wmv.
These generic titles are actually a bad point of this network, as you need to download to different folders for each of the sub-sites, or you end up with multiple videos with the same name !
So, for example, in TeensSexMovs.com, there will be a title high3.wmv, but you will also find a different video in Teen3Somes.com, with the same title ! So, you need to be on the ball, or you will be over-writing already downloaded videos.
|
09-30-09 05:47am
|
Reply
33
|
Young Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from khf2004:
(BabyGetReal's Reply)
BabyGetReal,
Please check your yahoo,
I just sent you an email...
Should you have any more issues questions or need anything else please feel free to contact me directly.
I have issued a credit to you account for the full amount.
Again thank you and the Porn User staff for bringing this issue to my attention.
|
09-29-09 03:59pm
|
Reply
34
|
Young Models
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from khf2004:
BabyGetReal,
Thanks for posting this message, if you could please reply to the message I sent you VIA your Porn User's account.
I will look into this billing issue and have any issues corrected ASAP.
Thanks again
|
09-29-09 02:15pm
|
Reply
35
|
Young Libertines
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
from Willard:
Hello.
Your review understands easily, and is very interesting.
After finishing having read your review, I became a member on the Karup's Hometown Amateurs.
Thank you!!
Your recommendation is a correct, very good site.
Well, it is a matter of Young Libertines.
I was a member in the spring of this year.
Because time has passed for a while as for me since it seceded, the review cannot be written.
Your review is very correct, impartial, and good.
I came to like video of Cathy of this site.
And, I found her to the advertisement of Teeny Lovers.
It became the member of Teeny Lovers at once.
However, her video did not exist in the site.
I was disappointed.
Afterwards, I saw the video of Cathy of New Porn Talents and Cream Pie Mania.
It was a yawner.
I like her of Young Libertines very much.
It is very lovely that she frantically kisses the boy.
|
09-29-09 11:06am
|
Reply
36
|
Young Models
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Let us know what happens. It's one thing for sites to have poor book-keeping and make mistakes. It's another for them to have systems that are all about taking advantage of people that had the mis-fortune of giving them a credit card.
Private.com was so bad that even when they offered me a free month's membership later, I wanted nothing to do with them. They have an auto-cancel feature at their site. I cancelled, received no e-mail confirmation, then they wouldn't respond to e-mails for weeks on end.
Mystique.com is another site that's built to rip you off, from my experience. They offer deals, then they charge you "erroneously" over and over and it's up to you to prove they were wrong each time - when they reverse the charges, their responses are always surly - no apologies for making their customers do their book-keeping for them.
|
09-29-09 06:42am
|
Reply
37
|
Young Libertines
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review from BabyGetReal:
Cons continued because I ran out of room:
- Infrequent updates, about one/week while I was watching.
- The “top visited” and “top rated” lists are relatively useless: they list only 10 each (a mix of photosets and videos, so less than 10 in each category), and the number of ratings are low.
- Dialog is in Russian(?), and there are no subtitles.
(END OF CONS)
|
09-28-09 07:44pm
|
Reply
38
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I wouldn't recommend this site to anybody as a source of boy-girl porn - which doesn't mean I wouldn't recommend it to anybody. Sorry you made the wrong choice for boy-girl porn. Check out some of the DDF sites - especially with their great August deal.
|
08-24-09 07:36pm
|
Reply
39
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from exotics4me:
I had read your profile right after reading this comment. If I could throw a tip, check out the Viv Thomas bonus content that Teen Dreams has. His movies are some of the most believable on the internet. The other thing, I've often wondered how much arousal or excitement a younger woman can show in front of a camera crew and someone giving her directions. I've been a member on TD many times over the years, but I prefer solo videos and pictures. Of all of my experiences with porn sites, I came away believing the most aroused females in porn are in solo or girl/girl sets. Maybe try out some of the DVD sites like Videobox and go for the "Classic" videos, though not exactly classic, these are still usually from the 80s and 90s.
|
08-24-09 07:35pm
|
Reply
40
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review from BabyGetReal:
My review, continued:
In valerie225-bg-2, stunt cock Jimmy (in about 80% of the videos) actually has some cuddly foreplay with her -- almost unheard of. In valerie268-bg-1, she gets going in CG and doesn't want to stop when Jimmy whispers "get off", so she makes Jimmy cum right after pulling out, while they're still in CG position. Wow, an orgasm from real arousal, not a forced facial! Hooray, Valerie!
leighlani-bg-1 and leighlani-bg-2 are outstanding. She has many, intense orgasms. She is a redhead, and her orgasmic flush is wonderful to behold, encompassing not only her chest but even around her upper back. Although both videos end in a facial, the guys (different in each vid) seem to cum in response to her final orgasm, not by jacking forever.
veronika-bg110 is a curvy babe who cums often and hard and long with a guy who is not a regular stunt cock. She is very responsive, and at one point when working up to yet another cum, and he stops, she says "I want to fuck you! What are you doing?"
sedona299-bg-1 seems young and innocent but overcome by her hornyness, just the way I like it. Many intense orgasms.
andi-bg-1 seems a real couple, and she cums hard and often. There is real affection and intimacy. Very nice despite a weak facial at the end.
jaelyn-bg-1 cums quickly but very intensely, and often. Guy cums over her navel right after pulling out, nice. Unfortunately the cameraman zooms in during her orgasm so we never get a clear view of her lovely shaking and writhing body during orgasm. Shame on him!
morgan285-bg-1 is a young, really hot, horny, innocent-seeming girl who says she has never done a BJ or had a guy cum in her mouth. Its likely an act, but well enough done that I found it all the more arousing.
arissa-bg-1 is a fun girl who doesn't seem jaded like most of the pro-ams on KarupsHA. She is gorgeous, thin, with a lovely tan. Although stunt cock Jimmy is all business as usual, Arissa's personality makes it fun. She cums a few times, and manages to get Jimmy to cum over her navel right after he pulls out, instead of jacking off on her face.
brandi2-bg-1 is petite, skinny, and maybe a little shy with a wonderful "I can't help cumming if you fuck me" vibe. She succeeds in making Jimmy cum over her butt, instead of a facial.
veronica248-bg-1 is a skinny natural babe with a buff guy who pulls out while he's coming.
veronique-bg-1 is a 19 year old, tiny, dark-skinned lovely who cums aplenty.
Others that are very good: ginger3-bg-6, maxine2-bg-1, sabrina3-bg-1.
I watched very few of the solo scenes, tho there are many more of those than of the boy-girl scenes. So if some PU members have examples of the best ones, please share a list! Andi-solo-1 has some lovely pussy contractions with a pocket rocket vibrator -- of course the damn cameraman moves away from her pussy, to her face, during her orgasm! Nevertheless, these were the best pussy contractions I found here (for better, InTheCrack or early BubbleGirls).
|
08-23-09 06:55pm
|
Reply
41
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review from BabyGetReal:
This is a continuation of the Cons part of my review that didn't fit in the box:
- Mediocre videography. Nearly all spend way too much time in closeups, so you can't see the lovely writhing body, and some are quite jerky (handheld camera with incompetent operator). The site policy seems to require that CG be recorded only from the back/butt of the girl, too often zoomed in. Many nice orgasms are lost with the girl facing away at the wall, with us seeing only her butt up close. Almost never do you see the girl from the front in CG. Worse, the girls are directed to twist around so the camera (behind them) can see their face. So they're not looking at their partner! Whoever thought this is a comfortable, much less erotic position for the girl? In mindy4-bg-1-HD, Mindy shudders wonderfully when she cums. However, in part D, the cameraperson zooms into her face three times, so we miss the wonderful pelvic shuddering, and instead see a blurry face (it was clearer with the whole body shot), sometimes with the wall in focus behind the face. Yikes, what was the cameraperson thinking?
- The cameraman likes to zoom in on the girl's face during orgasm. Now, when she has great pussy twitches all along (sometimes he lets us see a few of them), I find it incredibly frustrating to miss seeing the pussy twitching during the orgasm. Not that the face isn't beautiful during orgasm, but couldn't we please see the twitching pussy occasionally!! Better yet, have a second cameraperson and see both with instant replay! (Nubiles is another site with this problem. I've complained and they seemed to listen but I haven't seen any improvement.)
- Sound is very uneven, barely audible in some vids then breaks your eardrums in the next. Not only is it uneven from one video to another, but also within one video: apparently the microphone is in the camera, so as it gets closer to one person's face you hear them breathing loudly while you can hardly hear what the other person is saying.
|
08-23-09 06:53pm
|
Reply
42
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(BabyGetReal's Reply)
Always keep in mind that even people who appear to have the same taste can still have major differences of opinion when it comes to a site. Something in our brains seems to be triggered by certain faces or situations or positions or actions of the models. Even something they wear might bring back highly erotic memories .. and my brain might go WOW while yours might go BOOOORING! So don't trust too much. :-) What usually decides me is a combination of favorable review by TBP, PU (reviews and comments), and a tour of the site itself, before I subscribe to it. And, sadly, even after all that I get burned at times. Good hunting for THE site!
|
07-30-09 06:28pm
|
Reply
43
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
from messmer:
Didn't I warn you in some other thread about the quantity of b/g material? BTW, I agree with your present assessment, and their videos were never very good. I went mostly for the pictures.
|
07-30-09 04:25pm
|
Reply
44
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
from mbaya:
I thought of this as a photo site. How are they? Often photo sites have weak videos.
|
07-30-09 04:01pm
|
Reply
45
|
Dare Ring
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
from mbaya:
I like the creativeness of the site, but the negatives are a deal breaker for me. First, no updates. Next, only 12 episodes and not all of them are worthwhile. Another minus is a daily download limit that comes to only 2 full scenes per day. Speaking of that topic, the scenes are divided into 7 clips with no whole video download option. The videos are average quality, only 640x480. Finally more g/g than I want to watch. This sounds like a lot of money and wasted effort to download only a handful of scenes worth watching and even they are not in the kind of quality I would look for. I would be afraid that if I joined and wrote a review I might have trouble giving it a 70.
|
07-29-09 03:43am
|
Reply
46
|
Dare Ring
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
from GCode:
lol at the ring toss being a naked dude with a woman throwing the ring on to his erect dick.
Interesting site but I think the price is a bit high for the amount of content you get. However, thanks for bringing a site that is qoute end quote, against the grain for anyone who may be interested.
|
07-28-09 07:03pm
|
Reply
47
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from messmer:
(BabyGetReal's Reply)
Well, maybe you'll feel about GOW the way I felt about Anilos. After I had downloaded clips and videos of four of my favorite models I felt that I had gotten my money's worth. I know that you'll be able to download GOW's b/g clips in one day, but if you find something that really appeals to you then it will be worth it, won't it? Good luck. GOW is highly regarded by my because of the naturalness of its models!
|
07-28-09 06:25pm
|
Reply
48
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from messmer:
(BabyGetReal's Reply)
Hi, I would not subscribe to GOW for any g/b scenes. There's only a tiny number of them. In GOW's case I subscribed mainly for the g/solos and g/g contents so I can't comment on the quality of the b/g scenes.
|
07-28-09 06:13pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
