| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Review
from PinkPanther:
Very ordinary content - sums it up right. The last time I was here, there was the seemingly great deal of having access to multiple Karups sites for 1 join - but the newest content was so "blah" that deal still wasn't enough for me to want to stick around for long.
|
08-08-18 06:57pm
|
Reply
2
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Review
from Drooler:
Actually, there are quite a number of Europeans on KarupsPC. KarupsHA is where the North Americans predominate, and generally look worse. I do agree that some of the models, especially lately, at KarupsPC are less than stunning, though they have had quite a few hot babes over the many years they're been open.
That being said, my biggest gripe about KarupsPC is the quality of the photoshoots. There are too many shots of the same pose. They could have more variety in the same number of photos and at least that would be one improvement.
|
08-04-18 10:23am
|
Reply
3
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Review
from Jay G:
Excellent review. I love the "where old porn goes to die" part.
|
08-03-18 04:49am
|
Reply
4
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Review
from lk2fireone:
SO MANY PU MEMBERS HAVE COMMENTED ON THE SLOW DOWNLOAD SPEEDS AT TEAM SKEET (AND YOU HAVE STREAMING PROBLEMS, AS WELL).
IT MAKES ME REALIZE HOW LUCKY I'VE BEEN WITH MY TEAM SKEET MEMBERSHIP.
I LIKE SOME OF THE CONTENT: ATTRACTIVE GIRLS, AND THE SCENES CAN BE HOT.
BUT IF I HAD ANYWHERE NEAR THE PROBLEMS THAT SOME PU MEMBERS HAVE REPORTED, I WOULD HAVE SCORED THE SITE IN THE 50s AS WELL.
|
07-10-17 05:25pm
|
Reply
5
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from slutty:
(hugow's Reply)
i have an active membership here, and i haven't experienced any noticeable slowdowns from the last time I was a member a year or so ago. download speeds aren't great, but decent at 600 KB/s the last time I tried. I have always found the page load times to be sort of slow at this site (especially if you open a bunch of tabs really quickly), but nothing terrible, and I've definitely seen worse.
|
01-05-11 09:54pm
|
Reply
6
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Review
from BadMrFrosty:
I dont really think its fair to score a site purely on the speed of its servers. There are many, many reasons why the site is slow, not all of them will be the fault of the site itself.
|
01-04-11 06:43am
|
Reply
7
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Review
from Goldfish:
Did you try contacting the Web master?
|
01-02-11 02:15pm
|
Reply
8
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Review
from RustyJ:
The content on that site looks great. Wish they were more into hardcore though.
|
10-06-10 06:41am
|
Reply
9
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Review
from lk2fireone:
Excellent review of a very nice site. The photosets and videos are top quality, and I like the hardcore flavor they are now showing.
|
10-05-10 05:18pm
|
Reply
10
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Review
from Goldfish:
Are you saying teensexmovs is no longer part of their network?
I agree with your assessment for the most part. There are some gems in there but the site could use some work.
|
05-20-10 02:31pm
|
Reply
11
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Review
from Denner:
Been back to MetArt year after year - and still: my collection consists of very few MetArt-materials - mostly some photosets (forget the videos).
And again: I read this bottom line by hugow several times - and even if I like SOME MetArt photosets - I'm getting "partial" (like Virgil Tibbs said in the movie "In The Heat of The Night") to the bottom line by hugow.....can't help it...is this "inflation" of porn?
Is this just a going on and on in the same deal - for ever?
|
05-01-10 07:04am
|
Reply
12
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Review
from PinkPanther:
Different tastes. I love Met-Art, find their stuff quite erotic.
The photo-sets, that is. The vids still seem like they are made as examples of the most boring vids ever made.
|
04-29-10 04:39pm
|
Reply
13
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
hugow's Review
from lk2fireone:
Do you know how often they add updates (new videos) to the site?
What are the photos like? Are they vid caps, meaning low-resolution pictures? Or are the photos high quality pictures?
|
04-01-10 03:29pm
|
