| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Stunning models.
Top quality photographic site.
Tasteful softcore erotica |
| Cons: |
Poor navigation and search
Limited updates
I had intermittent trouble with streaming |
| Bottom Line: |
W4B gets my vote for being that rare thing: a pornsite that occasionally delivers a truly erotic experience. Some of the vids of girls just doing a strip-tease were hotter than most of the hardcore banging I've seen other sites.
Other videos were uniquely creative: the retro-60's, psychedelic vid of Krystyna might be worth the price of admission alone.
Surprisingly, the "behind the scenes" videos -- of which there are many -- proved to be rather anti-erotic for me. Watching two girls hold their tongues still while in 69 so that the photographer can get a focused shot kind of takes the fantasy out of it.
This is really a pretty softcore site. I wish there were more videos of masturbation, for example. In the end, I decided it was a little too softcore for me, but I love the authenticity of this site. What it does, it does really well. |
|
10-15-19 11:51am
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
Passion HD
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Tons of content.
Top quality models, tending to be more weighted towards American than Euro.
Quality production values
Probably would be considered in the middle range of hardcore content between "softcore" and "gonzo." |
| Cons: |
*Search, save, and rating abilities pretty basic.
*Very standard porn scenes.
*Too much "gag" blowjob
*Every vid ends with come on face |
| Bottom Line: |
I had high hopes for Passion-HD but found myself pretty bored very quickly. This is "by the numbers" porn: undress, blowjob, lick-job, rotate through the positions, come on face. Wash, rinse, repeat. Not bad porn, but just not very good porn either. Canceled my membership after one month and ended up not downloading a single vid.
I am not a fan of gag blowjobs, nor come on face endings, but that's personal taste of course. For others mileage may vary.
I think there are better sites out there doing somewhat more imaginative and varied stuff. Sexart and X-Art for example. |
|
10-15-19 11:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
3
|
Teen Porn Storage
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
* Really cute euro teens, including some who made it to the big league later in their careers and many who never did but still are cute.
* Content/girls I've never seen elsewhere |
| Cons: |
* Poor streaming and download speeds makes this site essentially non-functional.
* Download formats are not Mac-friendly (not that I ever got to download anything -- see "con 1" above. |
| Bottom Line: |
What a shame. I've been intrigued by this site and its retro look for years but dissuaded by the lack of previews and the lack of real info about it. The content could be fantastic. Unfortunately, it's not accessible. When I say the download and streaming speeds are slow, I mean that the site is basically non-functional. You can click on any number of links and you'll get a spinning ball -- or worse: nothing happens at all. Vids never load as streams. Or you get 10 seconds and a freeze that never unfreezes. My browser was telling me that it would take 13 minutes to download a zipfile of photos that was less than 30 MB. My verified download speed on a cable modem was well over 100MBps.
Sad to say, this site is basically a ripoff. To the credit card service company's credit, they did void the charge and credit back my card when I complained within 24 hours. |
|
05-27-19 06:55pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
Wow Girls
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Huge amount of material
* Many former and currently famous porn stars
* .Impossible to find Sasha Blonde b/g scenes worth the price of admission alone |
| Cons: |
* There's simply no excuse for making it hard for users to cancel a subscription
* Search functions really don't work. Forget about using keywords for example.
* Updates seems slow
* Ultimately much of the content is ho-hum |
| Bottom Line: |
Wowgirls and its bundled sister sites, Wowporn and Allfinegirls, might just be the, um, motherlode of porn. There's a huge amount of high quality porn here. Wowgirls seems to have acquired sites like Ivanafukalot, Younglegalporn, and some other fantastic solo porn star sites. So I was amazed to find Sasha Blonde b/g scenes, along with Ivanafukalot, Chasey Case, and others. Sadly, a lot of the earlier stuff acquired from YLP has that crude monster dude with the shaved head and all the sensuality of a pile driver working the machinery -- I mostly can't bear to watch those scenes. Still, there's a huge amount of high quality content here, from softcore METArt stuff to group/anal and the rest.
Negatives: Search by key words for example simply doesn't work. You can't limit your results by using two key words, say, hairy and hardcore.
Navigation itself seems clunky. Hitting the back button winds you up where you don't expect to be.
While the production values are good, the content itself is pretty ordinary. There's not a lot of imagination in the scenes. I was surprised by how quickly I got bored. Other sites, like SexArt and X-Art are doing a better job I think.
And finally, it took me 20 minutes, several google searches, and an email to cancel my subscription. There is simply no excuse for that. It's dishonest. A cancel button or a clear link ought to be very visible in an account section. There is nothing at all anywhere on the website. 5 points deducted just for that. |
|
02-17-19 10:55am
Replies (0)
|
Review
5
|
Karup's PC
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* An enormous amount of content going back to the early 2000's.
* Mix of amateur, professional, MLIF, granny, hairy.
Mostly American models but some Euro too.
* A few videos of Zoe Kush before she disappeared, including one of her masturbating and fingering her asshole. |
| Cons: |
* Very ordinary content
* Limited search capabilities (e.g., can't search for solo vs. b/g)
* Much of the older content is not available for streaming and/or the files are so small they're not worth downloading anyway
* Not cheap |
| Bottom Line: |
This is where bad porn goes to die -- or rather, live for ever. Most of the amateur girls just aren't that attractive or are not very good actors and never made it any further in this "career." The few who made it to the A list moved themselves and their content elsewhere as soon as possible.
As for content, it's strictly by-the-numbers, mostly American models, with mandatory groaning, facials, and a lot of anal. If that's what you want, you'll find a life-time's worth on Karups. |
|
08-02-18 03:50pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
6
|
Team Skeet
(0)
59.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Plenty of cute young girls spread across a variety of niches
- Niches include: POV, "innocence high," baby-sitter, "she's new," and Euro-glamor (Lust HD)
- Search function is not bad |
| Cons: |
- As many others have commented, download speeds are horrendously slow.
- Even web-page loading speed is slow, with a long lag between clicking on any link and that page actually loading
- Streaming experience is so glitchy that I ended up abandoning it altogether and just downloaded at medium quality instead. Streaming would not scrub forward, would not restart at the selected place, wouldn't restart with audio. Completely unacceptable in this day and age.
- Many of the included sites don't have recent updates.
- User interface is usable but dated and below average.
- Cross-sells at membership page |
| Bottom Line: |
Team Skeet has a fresh-faced and flashy home page, but don't be taken in by it. Inside, this site is long past its "use by" date. The owners clearly don't give a damn about their customers, as evidenced by the terrible streaming/download speeds and ten-year old user interface. There are much better sites out there. I cancelled my membership within 3 days of starting. |
|
07-10-17 01:49pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
7
|
WTF Pass
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some beautiful European models, including many that ultimately made it to the A list. |
| Cons: |
Where do I start? |
| Bottom Line: |
This is where Euro porn B and C and F grade movies go to die. There is a huge amount of content across the network here and virtually none of it is worth downloading. Long unfiltered, uncut "reality" movies that go on for an hour with 5 or 10 minutes of mediocre jittery "home-movie" content embedded somewhere. Girls who look drugged, bored, or in pain. More anal than I ever cared to see in my life. Totally by the numbers porn: undress, blow job, cowgirl, doggie, anal, facial -- repeat.
If that's you're thing go for it.
Note: beware cross-sell sites on signup. They got me. They also try to cross-sell every time you try to enter the site. |
|
06-06-16 04:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
8
|
Erotica X
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Attractive women
Quality photography and videos.
"Women-friendly" |
| Cons: |
Performances are ultimately rather ho-hum.
Website navigation and UI is so bad that I felt that I was back at some Russian site 10-15 years ago, but with bigger, prettier photos. ie. Lipstick on a pig. It was so bad that it hastened my departure from this site.
Examples include not being able to go back to search results once you click on one of the results; losing your place in the model pages if you click on any particular model, etc.; baffling dead-ends. |
| Bottom Line: |
In the scheme of pornsites, I suppose this one rates a "Very Good." However, I found it quite disappointing compared to other top shelf erotic sites like X-Art. The models are beautiful and the quality of the photos and videos is technically good, but the performances themselves were, for the most part, pretty ho-hum standard fare. Overall, disappointing considering the good press this site has received elsewhere. |
|
08-03-15 12:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
9
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
That's your opinion, and that's fine. We're not talking slow here, we're talking sllllooooowwww. And it was consistently slow across a two week period and two different browsers. I don't care how good the content is, and it's good, if it's not delivered it's not worth a thing.
|
01-04-11 01:32pm
|
Reply
10
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Reply
I ended up contacting the billing agent, CC Bill, and to my surprise they credited me for the charge immediately.
|
01-04-11 01:30pm
|
Review
11
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The girls are still beautiful. They focus on Ivana, Masha, and a few others. |
| Cons: |
I wrote a previous review for this site when it was youngporn.net and I thought it was so good I needed to terminate my membership early because I was spending so much time there.
This time round, I'm quitting early for a completely different reason. The servers are so slow this site is unusable. Every page takes forever to load.
On top of that, they have a "100% satisfaction guaranteed" sticker on their join page. Of course, two requests that they terminate my membership and refund my money went unanswered. I'm cutting my losses and just terminating. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm not going back a third time. |
|
01-02-11 02:07pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
12
|
X-Art
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Drop-dead gorgeous MET-Art quality nubile models who, for the most part, you haven't seen elsewhere and who are not necessarily eastern european.
* Top quality photo and video shoots, though in smaller quantities than the usual sites.
* Imagine Met-Art with some hc: that's what you get here. There's not much b/g though it's increasing. Fair amount of toy insertion and a bit of soft Met-Art style g/g.
* Virtually no anal, gonzo, or other tasteless stuff. |
| Cons: |
* Boy/girl content is very limited but growing.
* No ability to "save" a favorite model.
* No ability to search for particular model types, though with the current relatively small amount of content, this isn't a problem. In fact it's a pleasure to look through the cover shots.
* No slideshow view. This is a must on a photo site of this quality.
* Would love to see a few more models with at least a bit of pubic hair. |
| Bottom Line: |
X-Art is that rare thing in the porn world: a truly erotic site. Not only are the models drop-dead gorgeous, but the photographer actually believes in editing. The result is quality, not quantity; eroticism not anatomy. The hc shoots, though limited in number, are tasteful and hot, though there are still far too many of the obligatory facial cum-shots that pervade porn these days. The non-hc content is so sexy that it works for me, even though I usually need a little "more." I also agree with one of the other reviewers that a bit more story-line and less studio shoot would be useful. I'd also love to see some real "behind the scenes" stuff to accompany some of the shoots.
With more hc content and a few more website features like slideshow and save favorite models, I would have given this site a 95. As it is, it's a great site for the price. |
|
10-05-10 10:53am
Replies (2)
|
Review
13
|
Explicite Art
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful, natural looking Euro women, with a variety of different looks and ethnicities, though mostly French-speaking. I view this as a nice change from the sites that have gorgeous but exclusively Eastern European women. A few women have some pubic hair left, which I view as extremely sexy, but most are shaved.
The photography and filming is top-notch.
The scenes are staged somewhat more naturally and are more varied than many porn sites, even though most of them are still in-studio under strobes. I liked seeing the studio set-up.
Performances also seemed somewhat more natural and hotter than on other sites. The men and women seemed less detached than in the Eastern Euro sites like teensexmovs etc. |
| Cons: |
No ability to save to Favorites.
Very limited search capabilities.
Many of the films come in two parts and need to be downloaded separately.
No streaming video.
No vidcaps, though virtually all of the films have a corresponding HQ photo shoot.
Way too much extreme HC for my taste. Most of the shoots end with anal. There is also peeing, fisting, and enormous dildo use. Maybe this is all now mainstream, but I find it a turn-off and sad. I hate to think that my kids, let alone my daughter, may come to think that these behaviors are a "normal" part of the sexual repertoire |
| Bottom Line: |
Explicite has no lack of beautiful women and original high quality content in terms of production values. However, the site needs work in terms of navigation options.
As for the content, it certainly lives up to its name. A little too well for my taste. |
|
07-24-10 04:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
14
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cute euro girls doing exactly what the site says: having sex. Not too much anal, gonzo, violence, tastelessness. Fairly frequent updates. |
| Cons: |
Very poor navigation, no search functions, poorly organized with multiple model names. Older recycled content. Very slow download speeds. No slideshow option for photos. Only wmv format for vids. |
| Bottom Line: |
Teensexmovs is now the orphaned sibling of its newer sister sites, teensexmania and now Nubile Girls HD (not to be confused with Nubiles.net, though I'm sure that's the point). The content is basically the same on all three sites and each is accessible as a "bonus site" on the others. But the others have much faster download speeds, though not a hell of a lot else.
This is the second time I've become a member of this site. About a year ago, it seemed much better and fresher to me. Now it seems tired. The slow downloads suggest that it's being abandoned by its owners.
As far as the content goes, the girls are really cute but the sex situations are pretty much all the same: indoors on a bed. It is also really a turn-off when you see really cute girls, and some of the studs, chewing gum while they fuck. I mean really. Can we have some simulation of enjoyment, please?
Right now the best euro teen site for my money might be younglegalporn.net (formerly youngporn.net). Does everything reasonably well, and the girls are MET-art quality -- in fact many of them are MET girls. |
|
05-20-10 11:29am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
15
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I agree -- the photo-sets are much better than the movies, which are a complete waste of time.
|
05-03-10 03:01pm
|
Reply
16
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I think they update a couple of times a week. Photos are excellent quality and zip file downloadable. For movies, they break it into scenes represented by thumbnails. You can download a specific scene or the whole movie.
|
04-29-10 11:17am
|
Review
17
|
MetArt
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Stunningly gorgeous models, photographed in the most tasteful settings. |
| Cons: |
This isn't soft porn -- it's flaccid porn. No heat at all. Cover thumbnails are small and difficult to see. Many sets don't seem to have working slideshows. |
| Bottom Line: |
After years of depriving myself of a MET-ART membership, I finally succumbed. What a disappointment. Maybe I'm just jaded, but MET-ART could be the perfect antidote to porn addiction. In the end, it's just one beautiful naked, hairless girl after another. Absolutely no heat, no spontaneity, no nothing. Vogue without the clothes. If that's your thing, go for it. |
|
04-29-10 11:10am
Replies (4)
|
Review
18
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Very beautiful young euro adults in a decent variety of stuff ranging from soft-core model shoots to hardcore. Site navigation is reasonably good. Movie and picture quality is adequate too. |
| Cons: |
Some people might complain that the site has an undue concentration on a few well-known girls like Ivana Fukalot, Masha and a few others. These girls are so beautiful that it doesn't bother me one bit.
Site navigation, save, and search options could be improved, but these are quibbles.
Sex scenes tend to be formulaic, but that's just porn isn't it. |
| Bottom Line: |
About as close to MET-Art hardcore as you can get. I'd say this site and teensexmovs are my favorites in the young adult category. I had to ask them to terminate my access before my subscription ran out because, as a porn addict, I was spending way too much time on the site. |
|
04-01-10 10:34am
Replies (2)
|
Review
19
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Search and navigation functions are fairly good, and I like the "Add to Favorites" feature. Lots of cute models. |
| Cons: |
Not that much hardcore in relation to solo and lesbo. Seems like the updates are really from shoots that took place a few years ago. Difficult to tell which shoots are hc, solo, lesbo etc. |
| Bottom Line: |
For a big, well-established site, I was a bit disappointed. Models and shoots seem a bit dated, with the best models being ones that were hot a few years ago. For the money, I think I prefer Nubiles.net. |
|
09-09-09 11:29am
Replies (0)
|
Review
20
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Beautiful young girls, plenty of original content, zip files for photos, good movie options |
| Cons: |
Very poor navigation options. No ability to browse by anything other than model name or "date added." No ability to save to "favorites."
Very little HD Movie content. |
| Bottom Line: |
Good stuff, but suffers from below average navigation. |
|
07-27-09 11:56am
Replies (0)
|
|
