There was a while when they offered access to the network for $30 and a single site for $20, I'm not sure why the dick around with the pricing structure so much here, but I agree it would be nice to have an ability to join the network (for a month instead of 5).
I just noticed that both 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn are now $29.97/month. The last time I checked, at least one of those sites was $19.99/month, with a PU/TBP discount, as far as I can remember.
A lot of sites are offering specials, where they reduce the membership price. But the Diesel sites are trying to keep their prices up, or even increasing them.
Yeah it's run by Diesel and it looks about 90% exclusive (I've seen a few of the sets on 18/YLP already I'm sure).
Note that it's not included in Diesel access yet and I'm not sure what the USP is compared to their other sites other than it does seem more geared towards mobile devices.
That is one of the reasons yes that I wasn't crazy about, the confusion on what you got on the site you join as unsure why there is 2 sites which seem to share the main content, I think it would be much more better if they merged the 18 only girls and the Young Legal Porn. I've always joined the network but really confusing as to what you get on each site, much clearer to just have one.
Even when ou are on one of the 2 sites there seems little mention of the other sites you get with no link to the network sites they have, can't quite understand why they do that, be better to advertise the other network sites too but I don't see any mention of them in any link.
I have a feeling the confusion as to what you get is one of the main reasons this site is maybe passed by by people. And $39.99 for the network isn't that cheap when you compare it with Teen Sex Mania is it.
I agree that Teen Mega World is less expensive, and offers greater quantity (through its network) and better technical quality videos.
But I've been a member of Teen Mega World twice recently. I didn't bother to write any reviews of their sites, because there have already been some fine reviews written by other PU members.
And I was looking for something different.
So in spite of the higher price, I thought I would give 18 Only Girls a try.
And I like that 18 Only Girls is less hardcore than Teen Mega World. I also like that 18 Only Girls has some nice photosets. The photosets, as I mentioned, are not the high quality of sites like Met-art and Mplstudios, but the photosets are still nice. I wish the photosets were better, I wish the videos were better, and there are other ways 18 Only Girls could be improved. But I think it's still a worthwhile site, even though there are better (and cheaper) sites around.
There are plenty of sites that I would like to try. But I only have so much money, and so much time. And it takes a while to go through a single site.
I still need to upgrade my Internet connection, so I can get faster downloads. There are so many photosets and videos to look through, to find something I might really like. And the people at PU are not doing my job for me: they like videos and photosets that I don't. Grrrr.
I need not only a faster Internet connection, but also a couple of clones, that will have my same tastes and opinions, that will search out material that I can really enjoy. But I can't really afford to make or build a couple of clones of myself, at this time. :)
Yeah I do agree with this it would be hard to beat Teen Mega World, its very good perhaps needs better navigation and search engine but can't fault the quality of girls they have. I guess though if you've been recently or still a member but looking for some more of the same this site could be good, this prce going up though does put me off though $19.99 for one site and $29.99 for the network would be good and atract more customers I would think.
Actually, I read slutty's review of this site yesterday, which is why I decided to join the site today, because of the high score he gave the site.
I also re-read your review of the site yesterday. When I read your review originally, that you wrote back in January of this year, I decided to avoid the site because of the low score you gave it.
I think that slutty's and my and your tastes are somewhat similar, in that we often enjoy similar things. We are not exactly the same, but slutty and you serve as useful guides for me, while other PU members can have far different tastes, and their reviews, although honest, have less relevance for possible sites I might join.
Having said that, I've been thinking about this site for a long time. I think some of the models are very attractive.
Your review put me off the site, and I didn't join, because you gave it a low score.
But slutty's review gave the site a much higher score. He does not think the site (or its network) is perfect, but he thinks it has at least a certain value.
So, because I think there are some really attractive models at this site, I thought it was worth taking a chance that I would appreciate at least some of the site material.
I've been a member of this site for less than a day. And I don't think the site is perfect. But because I really like some of the models, and I have looked at some of the photosets and videos, I think it was, for me, a worthwhile join.
It isn't really a clone anymore they release material on the two sites seperately now - although the older material is pretty commonly shared. The videos I dowloaded all seemed fine to me, the camerawork can be a bit poor - given the self-shot nature of some of the shoots, but this didn't really bother me that much The mid-mp4 was plenty crisp for me.
I went all the way back to their 2007 releases, and they have both low and high h.264 videos (mp4). I'm pretty sure they had these when I was a member here last time...
I agree the login is fucking irritating, but they email you a link now that fills out all the security info for you except the captcha.
I can understand the frustration of joining a site and finding a lot of duplicate material from another site, I haven't seen any of that lately, but maybe its just new to me.
I'm not sure about your complaint on variety, there are 300 models on this site. Given they are all young, and euro, so there isn't a lot of variety in ethnicity or age. But I think it is a reasonable variety of models that is consistent with most euro sites.
Everyone has their own tastes I suppose, I think the material is pretty good here and I don't feel as though I wasted my money. I guess maybe I go against the grain sometimes, I for one can't understand why people like 21sextury so much, that place just pisses me off for some reason.
There are a lot of young girls here, many are nice-looking (not really great-looking, but ok to nice). But with the poor quality and other problems, the site is not worth joining.
Personal taste varies so widely. The two previous PU reviewers gave scores of 88 and 90, the reviews were 9 months or less old, and written by established PU members.
But I give more weight to your review on this site, because when I've read your reviews on sites I've been to, your views generally agree with my thinking (Except I've never joined most of the sites you've joined. I focus mainly on softcore pix).
Thanks for the review, Denner. This site has gotten some air time recently and I was curious. I'd only been a member of Kamila18 years ago before some of these "new" sites had appeared.
After having read about all the trouble you had with this site it seems as if it's not really worth a recommendation. What a shame because some of the girls seem very inviting to me.
I can very much understand that the fact that you can still log in after cancellation leaves a foul taste. Take care!
Well, if they go flake-a-zoid on you and charge you again, just dispute the charge. Very rarely I've had to do that, and I don't know how it is in Denmark but in the US we have to do it by post to preserve our rights.
Sounds like the site has "gone South" a bit (an expression that I doubt Southerners use), meaning it has turned the wrong way. Well, one metaphor to explain another -- that's not very helpful. It's going badly.
Thanks for the warning. I don't like being handed uncertainty either. And I'll avoid it anyway because the more I look at it, the more I realize there's "been there, seen that" content on it. And there's no updates list for the visitors.
Hey Denner,
It might actually not be so bad. It's probably just that the site hasn't cancelled your access. (I haven't had any problems with SegPay myself.)
This strange kind of limbo happened to me once with another site (different billing from SegPay) and I wound up with 5 free months! Just as well, though. The site wasn't all that good anyway. I didn't exactly rip the carpeting off the floors.
I guess I'm lower on the integrity scale (I do admire yours), but I figure if someone's going to leave their front door wide open 24/7, they shouldn't complain if there's a little pilfering as a result.
Hey, some of it looks pretty good! I think I've seen a set or two from it elsewhere. How are pics? Are they 1024s or big fat 2048s?
I'm sorry I didn't do a review of this low rent site this past summer, but I was so unimpressed that I visited twice, and just removed it from my bookmarks.
Only split pieces are available with no full-clip option, but the quality is excellent. The materials are arranged by model and you can't preview videos, I understand. With regard to Nubiles, I dunno. Must have a look.
My current ISP DSL download speed maxes out at 150-160 KB/s. I am seriously considering paying more for a faster connection.
Until I do get a faster connection, the 3-day trials are not that helpful to me. To download a single 1.3 GB video file takes about 2 hours 30 minutes, and if I'm surfing the Internet or looking at other sites, that slows my download speed so the download takes even longer.
I can't really watch these videos as streaming, because they mostly stutter and stop, stutter and stop, while playing.
So I just need a faster connection. :)
There do appear to be a large number of videos at the Tony Bucks network. My experience has mainly been softcore photosets. I haven't seen any of the videos at Tony Bucks at other sites. There are some attractive models here.
about email responces. part of mailservers does not accept emails from our customer service. they using some strange spam filters without letting know to their customers. we cannot do anything with this. out emails just bouncing back.
please make sure what your mailserver accept mails from our cs before tell to someone what we does not respond to emails.
here few email domains from last emails bounced back:
I can see how Denner got confused by this email. I would have probably made the same mistake. The idea of a membership that does not let you watch or download stuff sounds kind of strange. And calling it "trial rights" doesn't clarify much either, unless it comes with a little star and a note which specifies what are those rights.
I wouldn't call this a fraud, really, but I would say it's a very confusing offer. On a side note, I also don't like those big red ads on the 21st Sextury homepage that say that you can get access to the network "now for only 9.95$ a month". What they neglect to add is that this is the price that you get if you buy the annual membership OR if you stay as a loyal member for 4 months.
Anyway, it's obvious that we should always read everything carefully before clicking "accept". But it would probably also be a good idea for Sandstone to calm down before answering to a user's criticism, even if it as harsh as this one.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
