Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Wasteland
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Review
from rearadmiral:
Thanks for reviewing this. I'm a big fan of BDSM stuff and might have considered joining this but, like you, I don't see the point if there is no sexual contact. You may have saved some of us some money here.
|
12-13-13 02:12pm
|
Reply
27
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(pornpundit's Reply)
Nothing wrong with logos if they are discretely tucked away near the bottom and away from the model's face and other interesting features!
All I can add to your remarks is: to each his own. To me large logos are a mutilation of a picture or video and I'm always ready to voice my opinion on that because I really believe a site, by reducing super large logos could increase its business.
To you they're helpful in sorting! Why a big watermark/logo should be important when it comes to that I'll never understand. Wouldn't a smaller one identify who produced the set/video just as well or is it a case of impaired vision? But here we go again: Not everyone's taste and methods of collecting are the same.
Thankfully there are enough sites of all kinds to keep both of us happy. As they say in Germany: "One man's owl is another man's nightingale!"
|
07-15-08 10:24am
|
Reply
28
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from Khan:
We've looked at this several times now and don't see a problem. Each time we check, when we enter the id/pw/email and click the "join by credit card" link, it brings up the page where we'd enter CC info.
We can only suggest that you contact the site directly.
Sorry we can't be of more help but again, the site seems to be working fine for us.
|
07-15-08 08:58am
|
Reply
29
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from mr smut:
I would have been able to enter my credit card details ... strange isn't it? Have you tried to contact them via mail?
Cheers,
Smut
|
06-22-08 02:39pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
