| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
AV Lovers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tom22:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Yes, but a small one that was well placed out of the prime viewing area would work just as well and not annoy their customers.
|
07-31-10 10:17pm
|
Reply
352
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Yes, but we're still wondering how the site goes from incredibly dodgy practises to legit? Change of management? Taken over by the mafia? Rick taken over by aliens? Answers please. Anyone?
|
07-31-10 06:46pm
|
Reply
353
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Tree Rodent:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Yes I agree about the sameness thing. It shouldn't really be a problem because it's the naked girls we want to look at, but at times it's nice to see some different settings, style, and lighting, which sometimes makes the girls look the same too. On the other hand Karups has some good material, is one of the good guys as far as sites go, and there is some really good material.
Have to check out ATK, but I think that is mainly soft core.
|
07-31-10 06:39pm
|
Reply
354
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from malikstarks:
I've been a member here many times, last time was early this year. I can't really speak to the negative reviews, but I've never had any problems personally with them.
Also I'm not sure why people have said they are no longer updating, my experience has been they have always updated every day or at least several times a week. They have never hid their update schedules and the dates are openly visible.
Also never had any problems with billing, they've used Epoch for at least the past year who is reputable biller. When I wanted to quit it was just like any other site.
Finally to the poster who mentioned that they get rid of certain sites completely that is a legitimate gripe. Although let's face it these guys basically are about taking chances as far as site concepts are concerned and there should be at least some recognition of that. When you take chances as they have done it's possible that you will sometimes fail miserably as perhaps a site like sleep creep had done.
Porn is a business at the end of the day and perhaps sleep creep had such little interest that it didn't make sense to keep even the archive intact. However it's not like they advertise sleep creep on their front page and when you get in it is not there (at least not when I checked).
I actually still have a link for this site at $9.95 a month to anyone interested (among a few others) send me an email.
|
07-31-10 05:47pm
|
Reply
355
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
Yeah I'm with you on that one. I thought haven't I heard that name before with regards to bad reviews and dodgy behaviour? Then I checked and saw all the bad stuff that was reported going on. Run run run away. Not touching the place with a barge pole. Thought I'd let a senior member of the forum make a comment before I said something. Good question - so why the sudden change from BP to Greenpeace?
|
07-30-10 05:26pm
|
Reply
356
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Read your newest comment about them allowing the deal to existing members. I think it's a good deal, but would have been a great deal if they kept the TBP price and only charged $14.95 for VB DVD and $14.95 for both premium channels. I haven't tried the Evil Angel premium channel yet, but have the Vivid one twice and really liked it, so I'll be joining in the next week to try both premiums out. I haven't ever had much success with VB's customer service. I sent them a message months ago to tell them the "warning" age box was not showing up right on my browser, so I couldn't even get in the site without using a different browser, never heard back from them, but the problem has been fixed.
|
07-28-10 10:36pm
|
Reply
357
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
from Capn:
Do you think that was a pang of conscience? ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-28-10 01:07pm
|
Reply
358
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from alexmedia:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
They will have problems anyway after record companies find their music in porn movies.
|
07-21-10 11:44pm
|
Reply
359
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Perhaps I need to clear my browser cache. But what I am seeing is still the mis-sorted/mis-dated thumbnail page. The page itself looks fine, as long as you don't care when the photosets were actually posted. But I usually like to check the daily updates, to see if there are any photosets I might be interested in.
And the page I am looking at has the wrong dates listed for the most recent photosets.
For example:
07.21.2010 MILENA D "GOODNIGHT"
07.21.2010 LORENA B "GRACIOUS"
are the dates listed for the two photosets above, which were supposedly posted today, July 21, 2010.
But those photosets were actually posted:
July 15, 2010 MILENA D "GOODNIGHT"
July 04, 2010 LORENA B "GRACIOUS"
Those are just a few of the photosets that are being posted with the wrong date.
If you use the Internet, you can find the actual date each photoset
was originally posted.
But it's not a major problem. I believe Met-art will fix it sometime soon.
But if your computer shows the correct dates for the two photosets I listed, then the problem is with my computer, which is still showing incorrect dates for many of the recent photosets.
If you are seeing the correct dates for the two photosets I listed, I would appreciate your stating this.
Or if you are seeing the incorrect dates for the two photosets I listed, I would appreciate your stating this.
Because I am interested to know if I am seeing the current update page, or if I am seeing an older update page, and need to clear my browser cache, or try some other fix.
Thanks in advance.
For anyone who would check that update page:
http://www.met-art.com/new.html
|
07-21-10 07:26pm
|
Reply
360
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#16
from rearadmiral:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
I'll check that out. Thanks for the tip.
BTW - I've been watching more Rocco and you're right about him being rough in a fantasy way now without being degrading like he used to be. I'll be downloading a lot of Rocco stuff now that I might have otherwise overlooked.
|
07-21-10 06:46pm
|
Reply
361
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from rearadmiral:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Based on that ringing endorsement I'll be downloading the other scenes in this title too. And with Amy Brooke what's not to like? Young, petite, B-cups and does anal. That is pretty much perfection!
|
07-20-10 09:22pm
|
Reply
362
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from rearadmiral:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
PinkPanther:
I’m not sure that we have different tastes at all. I think the problem may be a combination of us each talking about something different and the fact that I might not know what I’m talking about.
First the fact that I don’t know what I’m talking about: my only experience with Rocco dates back to the days where he was rough for the sake of being rough. I haven’t seen enough of his more recent work to realize that he’s changed. Consider me duly informed. I downloaded a bunch of it from the EA site and will definitely watch it.
As for degrading porn, I view anything as degrading that is obviously over the top and clearly intended to degrade. The measure I use isn’t the Dominant person (usually male) or me as the viewer. I judge degrading on how the woman appears to react to the situation. Max Hardcore is probably the poster child for rough and degrading porn, though there are others too, like Khan Tusion. What makes me think of Hardcore’s and Tusion’s work as degrading is because they clearly intend it to be that way. There is no sense of it being something the women are into and there is no sense of fun. It’s as if they wouldn’t want the women to be into it and enjoying themselves.
I mostly agree with your comments on Kink.com sites. I’m a huge fan of their stuff because it is hardcore BDSM without being degrading. The submissive women on the sites clearly enjoy what’s happening to them. And even though I rarely watch the interviews before or after the shoot, I know that they are there and the women comment on what they liked and how into it they were. It’s obvious that the women who work for Kink.com are into BDSM play – it isn’t intended to be degrading for the sake of degradation. Any degradation is part of the play that brings the women enjoyment. But like you, I find that the biggest problem with Kink.com sites is that they can seem a bit sterile and repetitive. It may be that the individual sites focus so narrowly on one or two aspects of BDSM that it becomes difficult to get interested eventually. The Training of O is a bit different in that it is more dynamic and uses more BDSM conventions. I understand that many people don’t like the strict roles in many Kink.com sites, but I think that is part of the allure that I like. So on this point at least we can admit to different tastes.
So I’m off to view some newer Rocco stuff. And if the scene you’re referring to is the one in Rocco Ravishes Hollywood, then you’re absolutely right about that. That is truly an amazing scene!
|
07-20-10 02:57pm
|
Reply
363
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Thanks for the information on Evil Angel over at Videobox. No one really mentions this is detail in any of the PU reviews. I've been curious about EA and Vivid as add-ons and wondered if they're worth it. Sad to say, but I wonder if these add-ons are now necessary to make Videobox worth a renewal since they seem to be using second and third rate American porn to supplement a steady diet of second rate European stuff.
I guess abuse is in the eye of the beholder. I see Rocco as just a bit less abusive than Max Hardcore but I don't see some of the hardest stuff on the Kink.com network or Society SM as being abusive. I have no idea to explain this different perception. Rocco does have quite a following and is certainly a talented director and performer.
|
07-20-10 03:42am
|
Reply
364
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from alexmedia:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Interesting...how much is it to license real music for porn movie?:)
|
07-19-10 07:39am
|
Reply
365
|
Talia Shepard
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment from PinkPanther:
The explanation from the new webmaster:
"The photos sadly were broken links, not working and causing the server to screw up. We tried to re upload them but because they are so small in comparison with the others in the same category, it was causing the script to bottom out all the time. Very frustrating for us.
We shot a ton of new photos though so it'll be populated quickly. Videos/camshow wise, a lot of older stiff that didn't fit into the new guidelines so yeah, they had to go.
I know some people don't understand it, they get frustrated, they think I am imposing some massive rule or something. These people need to read Talia's blog, the girls are very, very happy with the changes.
Just because a girl does something for her site, doesn't mean she wants to do it. Sometimes it's because she felt she had to do it or nobody would care."
Given that the webmaster lives in a different country, though, and takes pride in doing his own photos of his models, it's hard to see how this site is going to build up to any great size in less than 6 months - and their new guidelines are "No toys, no masturbation". Apparently their models didn't like doing that stuff and only did it because they felt they had to. The new webmaster made the ethical decision to say, "Well fuck that - you don't have to do it and you're not enjoying it so we won't have it on our sites."
|
07-16-10 06:56am
|
Reply
366
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from slutty:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Thanks man,
Just sort of curious what it was - thought it was an odd thing to list on a porn site.
|
07-14-10 09:00pm
|
Reply
367
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from GCode:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Hmm, a lot of these models you speak of on Karups PC are from the states. But, maybe I missread and all these models you speak of are actually on KarupsHA? Hmm, have you seen American modelson Karups PC or is justme's difference between the two appear correct? I wish the tour was a bit better for karups and you could check out the model index. Unless, I'm doing something wrong, I cannot find a way to get there from the tour.
However, whichever site you are talking about, the models you are talking about are quite good. I like Amia Moretti and Amy Reid and would not mind seeing some more 'Amateur' content of them.
|
07-13-10 09:36pm
|
Reply
368
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from anyonebutme:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Porn industry is larger in the U.S. versus Europe, which gives the photographers the wider range of girls who are entering the adult business.
|
07-13-10 03:05pm
|
Reply
369
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
I got a similar offer but I didn't get burned but I can appreciate the fact that once burned twice cautious. I'm actually curious about their special offer. I'm wondering if they aren't feeling the recession pinch alittle more these days. I've noticed that their most recent updates aren't all that great.
|
07-13-10 02:41pm
|
Reply
370
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
Thanks for the additional info PP.
Definitely on the list then.
Capn. :0)
|
07-04-10 05:48pm
|
Reply
371
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from atrapat:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
The thing is that if you check a list of DVDs by Zero Tolerance studios to hit the streets in the last 6 months and leave aside compilations and the occasional interactive one, I'd say all of them but one (released a couple weeks ago) are currently available at Zero Tolerance On Demand.
I wasn't specifically complaining about the scenes not being available online the exact same day they hit the streets: Elegant Angel obviously tried to copy what Zero Tolerance does but their last DVD on the free tour is from two and a half months ago and there are 14 DVDs released since then that aren't listed at the free tour.
|
06-27-10 09:14am
|
Reply
372
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
I agree with you about the fallow period, Pink Panther. I am not subscribing at present but keep going to the site regularly to see how good the updates are .. and they seem to be depressingly the same from one day to the next: generic porn. The only DVD site that originally gave me what I was looking for, American Vice, had lot of niche DVDs I had never seen anywhere else before but even they turned flat shortly before they shut down.
|
06-26-10 06:56pm
|
Reply
373
|
Action Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
OK. Now it finally all makes sense!
|
06-26-10 05:17am
|
Reply
374
|
Action Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
LOL. It is an aMAZing bunch of pages to get through, authenticate through, AND scroll through. It's 3-D hell. Makes me wish I WERE an ant.
Or perhaps it's designed by empirical behaviorists and the whole thing is an ongoing research project, and we ARE, in fact, the ants!
|
06-25-10 05:52pm
|
Reply
375
|
Met Cams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Sevrin:
(PinkPanther's Reply)
It's not just the hosting that is changing. MET's cams were subcontracted to people who will not be involved with the new site. The new site is affiliated with Streamate.
Yeah, I've been holding off on a follow-up, since this is still up in the air. Originally, the old site was to come down at the end of this month, and now they've given members up to August 15 to spend any remaining credits or buy new ones, using the old met-cams.com site. To me, that means that the response to the new site has been overwhelmingly negative.
All in all, it is nice to see that MET is listening to its members, and wants to keep us happy, even if that means making a U-turn with regards to its cam site plans.
|
06-23-10 05:08am
|
