Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Follow CJ Wright
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The photo galleries are wonderful, and the quality of the videos is great. Many are HD with some lower definitions available. |
| Cons: |
The site can be hard to download from. I have high speed cable internet and can download a GB in a matter of minutes, yet almost every file I tried to download was reset by the site. Even one that was only 300MB. After less than 1 minute. From "Right-click Save" to 4 different download managers, it took luck & multiple tries to save a complete video.
There is also a new male being updated on the site. He's the last 4 updates. I don't know if you can "Follow CJ Wright" if he's not on his own site.
The photos are plentiful, but many galleries are non-nude. Almost 1/4 of them. Also not every photo shoot have a corresponding video.
There is also a download limit, which I exceeded many times, trying to download 1 or 2 files in a few hours. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're a fan of CJ Wright, the site is wonderful. Over 25 videos, more than 1/2 of them in HD, about 30 photo galleries.
The downloading experience and download limit will make this a tough site to rejoin, but I'm loving the content I downloaded. |
|
12-24-11 11:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
Hush Pass
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
There are 20 sites available to this pass. The video quality varies site to site. The two "Whitezilla" sites were the highest quality. The majority were HD with with WMV & FLV options, and segmented WMV files. Each video had 2 photo galleries available: HQ & captures. There is no Zip file option, but a basic download manager worked for me.
I didn't notice a download limit.
There is a lot of content on the various sites and many different subject covered from 18+ Teens to interracial, group sex, etc. It's all here. |
| Cons: |
Most of the other sites like "Freaky 1st Timers" & "Suburban Sex Party" had very blocky/mosaic like video. Best described as an enlarged low quality video. Not even 2005's standards. Many also lacked HQ photos but most had captures.
There is no search feature, so you must hunt down your favorite stars.
As for Whitezilla, the original guy has been replaced by another well endowed man. He has appeared in all but 1 of the last 10 updates on the Whitezilla site. Another actor has appeared in 2 updates on the Whitezilla Interracial site.
The navigation of the site is a pop-up page that can be annoying at times. You click on the site you want, and it pops up in a smaller sized HTML that floats above the page. |
| Bottom Line: |
The varied and mostly poor quality of the bulk of the sites is my biggest hang up. There is no excuse for this in the day & age of HD that not even basic quality can be found on a site that costs this much a month.
My main reason for joining was for Whitezilla, and I'm satisfied with that content. Over 50 HQ videos and galleries makes this a not so bad buy for me. If I had joined for most of the other sites, I would be extremely disappointed. |
|
12-28-11 08:13am
Replies (2)
|
Review
3
|
Twistys
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The content is quality. The photo galleries are zipped and many are availible in various qualities (low/med/hq). The videos are available in multiple formats (wmv/mp4/mov) and qualities as well.
The site offers an array of beautiful women, mostly European with a good dose of Latin & Asian models. Most of the content is female only (solo or all girl), but they have couple (m/f, etc) galleries & videos too.
The site offers search for female talent and content (Red Head, Cum Shot, Dildo, etc) which helped in navigation.
I also loaded my download manager with over 100 links and let it run with no problem. So many sites nowadays have limits or cookies that reset, no problem here. The site also met my internet speed limit, no lag at all. |
| Cons: |
Many of the women listed mid 2008 or before (going back to 2004) have their videos/galleries unlisted from their model page; but in some cases the content is still on the site. For example, Trina Michaels is listed as having 1 gallery, but there is not link to it like the more recent models. I found not only 1 gallery, but 2 so far, not by searching her name, which draws a blank, but by perusing content searches. On top of that, I found 1 video so far.
If you're a fan of male stars you are out of luck, they are not searchable or labeled in any way. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's a good site. Huge and high quality across the board, content wise. If they ever modernize the search ability it would be an A+ in my book.
They update everyday (literally) and there is so much to look at & enjoy, it's well worth the price of admission. Just be prepared to look around. There is a lot to see. :) |
|
05-07-13 10:07am
Replies (1)
|
|
