Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Adam And Eve TV
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
If you love glam shots porn, then this might be an interesting website for you. Good lighting, top performers, the big names. Well produced 'high class' environment settings.
Its all here. I especially fond the 'striptease and teasing' scene openings :D
Genuine uncut explicit hardcore porn: The good stuff!
All from the renowned Adam&Eve studio (PHE Inc). in max. 1280x720 resolution video quality. |
| Cons: |
But this site desperately needs work!
The cons:
- Limited choice. Current choice is 5x9=45 shows, with typically 5 scenes each, making that around 225 scenes.
- NO download possibilities! (real bummer)
- Lack of searching capabilities: for example: POV, striptease, none of that - you have to find out yourself
But the big turnoff is the lack of download capabilities. Fortunately, the latest thing on video cards is the 'live record/encode' feature (called ShadowPlay), so you can record whats visible on your screen - as a workaround. But ofcourse, its silly.
Another peculiar thing is that the music track is missing (!), especially during those striptease scenes... thats kinda awkward. |
| Bottom Line: |
Promising site for the future, currently too rudimentary and lacking choice.
If download is added, then this is a site to consider, until then: no, I shall not extend my membership. |
|
11-12-14 02:46am
Replies (3)
|
Review
2
|
Vivid
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I joined vivid.com for one reason: this amazing director called Michael B Skow, what he can do with beautiful models is stunning! Refined sex-teasing is his trademark, as I crave to see, wanting more!
About the site:
Vivid is a well established name known for their erotic productions, long before there was 'streaming video' offered on something called The Internet, started in the era of 'videotape: VHS'.
And these are still available for members to watch! Among the other 4 categories: Ed (education), parodies, Alternatives and ofcourse their regular movies.
So? good thing about this site? Roughly a *1000* of Vivid movies, including some iconic Ginger Lynn movies from the mid eighties. Unique !!
And ofcourse the very recent titles, directed by B.Skow (yeah!). All in good (720p @ 5Mbit/s)) quality. |
| Cons: |
The bad thing about this site? Low update frequency... roughly a new title appears in about three weeks(!) and once a title is launched, they will smear it out the scenes over 5 days... I mean: come on! Vivid. That is not the update pace we as consumers for erotic websites are used to anymore. We crave more and fast! This isn't the 80's anymore!
Another peculiar thing is that this site doesn't actually have an official _download_ means. Sure, one could install a plugin (like DownloadHelper 4.9 - that works fine), but it would be better if there were just an official download button. |
| Bottom Line: |
Great cinematographic erotic movies! (thanks to directors like B. Skow). Huge archive of renowned Vivid titles over the years. Good streaming playback quality...
Yet, low update frequency (one title (approx. 5 scenes each) in three weeks). No official download option.
Vivid definitely earns its place in the erotic movie industry, yet it may deserve an thorough rethink on how to present its appealing aspects to todays audience in order to maintain its status as top-A erotic brand.
Do I recommend this site? Depends... if you like to watch top quality sex-tease scenes? Yes! treat yourselves! B. Skow deserves this attention.
Yet, make sure you have the patience to be bored for a period of three weeks or so... cuz, nothing much happening there... and by then, a monthly subscription period is already almost over. |
|
01-29-14 03:16pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
3
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Amateur Allure deserves a new review, because they have upgraded the site to HD! (Thank you for listening!)
And it is true HD: 1920x1080 29,97 fps coded around 4500 kbit/s, so yeah... true fullHD with a reasonable bitrate. Bravo!
All the things in the past are still as it is (in a good way):
+ the most incredible attractive girls (around their twenties), all _very_ eager to perform.
Engaged in hot sexual acts in perfect glamourous lighting! Thats that 'allure' thing. They'd do it all with full devotion: Tease, smile, undress, suck cock on their knees, being fucked hard from behind, drooling into the camera and even swallow (multiple times) as if they were having their best meal ever! Using a spoon if hey have to. Truly Amazing Content.
+ What else? Great make-up and setting. |
| Cons: |
Unfortunately, also the cons remained more or less:
- Only one update per week (on friday).
- Ridiculous high priced in EUROs ... 36 EURO for one month? Come on... that is 45 USD! Please... one (low)rate for all! We horny Europeans will thank you for it.
- Ridiculous expensive on single month base (better price with 3 months or more)
- The site owner is obviously still struggling with time and resources (yes, playing with beautiful glamour girls can be exhausting - I am sure)
- HD conversion of old clips is way behind. |
| Bottom Line: |
Quality and originality comes with a price.
Now that Amateur Allure has gone HD, they have excelled themselves into an even higher level. Great Stuff... original content, hypnotic lighting in their eyes.
For example: Look at Remy LaCroix, the upcoming star for Elegant Angel ... check her out on AmateurAllure to discover how *possesed* she is with sexual hunger (don't worry, she got plenty of nurishment here).
This is still a relatively small site with amazing original, even unique content in high quality. The downside is: it is so addictive, you need more - but you only get one update a week :)
As with the term 'amateur', I finally understand the name of this website. Amateur does not refer to the girls (anymore)... since these are hardly amateur... The term 'amateur' refers to the website owners! (in the most best positive ways)!
Personally, I don't actually care whether the girls are amateurs or not... My dick can't tell the difference and I find it utmost pleasurable to watch them do the most outrageous sexual acts as if they were under a secret spell. These girls are really hot and Amateur Allure, makes them feel good too.
My advice to the site owner:
+ Thank you for upgrading to HD
+ Hire an intern to upgrade the old content to HD to provide better value with minimum effort
Or... sell the formula to a bigger site / network :)
I give amateurallureHD a big recommendation, although a bit expensive on monthly base.
European members might want to switch to the 'netcash' option, since this will quote the same amount in USD. (This trick still works).
Subcribe for 90 days for a better value per month. |
|
07-08-12 01:23am
Replies (2)
|
Review
4
|
Live Gonzo
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Exclusive content
-Very gonzo enjoyment, renowned directors, like Chris Streams (YEAAH!)
-Download managers work
-Variety of the top women in the biz being themselves in a seductive and natural way
-Decent price, although some are cheaper
-Each video on the site is good and exciting to see.
-Video technical quality is good (1280x720 and 640x368)
-No DRM
-No download limit that I ever ran into
-600 videoclips bonus content is nice |
| Cons: |
-Relatively small sized site, 121 archived videos (streaming) 108 HD video (download) at time of review. (but they are all hot, all good)
-Navigation of bonus content is poor
-Too few live content... one on wednesday.
-Poor poor poor update schedule, have not seen a single archived video since I joined! Really disappointing, because I crave those videos after seeing a few! Torture! :) |
| Bottom Line: |
I signed up for livegonzo.com for a period of 1 month and the content is very enjoyable. Especially if you are a Chris Stream fan. The top girls of the biz can be found here: for example: Jynx Maze, Alexis Texas, Bella Reese to name a few.
The downside of this site, is that there is just not enough updates... after seeing the available clips, you just want more... you need more! (but there isn't any). The last updated HD archived clip was dated 1st JUNE 2012 to proof my point. I mean, *come on*... that is over a month ago since last update!
I would only recommend this website/network, if they would get their update rate up and increase their amount of liveshows (the real stuff please with the top girls, not the bored unknown housewife-amateur-behind-the-webcam rubbish).
Still not complaining, because the content is original and the girls are super! So, please, Livegonzo? Get your update rate up... please! |
|
07-08-12 12:55am
Replies (0)
|
Review
5
|
Aziani
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Great production quality
All videos and photographs look very professional.
+ Beautiful (solo) All-American girls
+ Studio quality make-up and hair
There is hardly any model on this site, being unattractive.
Top stars including: Lexi Belle, Brooke Banner, Victoria Lawson
+ Hot looking into the camera / dirty talk style content: most solo, masturbation.
The girls convincingly enjoy themselves.
+ Hi-res video download formats:
WMV: 960x540
MOV/MP4: 1280x720 @ 3 Mbit/s (720p HD)
+ Great crisp photographs (1800x1200pix) as well |
| Cons: |
+ Tagging could be better
Basicly, there are 3 categories of videos:
1) Sybian
2) Rocker
3) Fingers and striptease
4) BTS
So why not use these as tags? Currently, as use you can't even do a basic filtering on 'Sybian only'.
+ Some functions are useless, like:
bookmark function
movie theater (it justs forwards you to gamelink)
bonus videofeeds (leads only to pay webcam services)
live studio cams (doesn't even work)
+ background could be better (then again, who cares about the background with these hot girls?)
+ |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined Aziani.com for one month, because I couldn't join DDFprod due to their stupid creditcard handler (They rejected it, whilst it is perfectly ok.) But I am glad to access Aziani.com instead.
The bottom line:
If you would enjoy watching young beautiful All-American girls demonstrate how intense they can have a proper solo orgasm, then YES! Most definately I recommend you to join aziani.com.
There is still some suggestions of (minor) improvements I'd like to give to the webmaster/owner:
+ Use a better tagging
+ Upgrade to 1080p HD
But overal, this is a very enjoyable site:
There is hardly any 'bad' video to be found.
Also the photographs are glamours, sexy and very crisp.
This site is a must for sybian lovers! I most enjoyed watching Victoria Lawson's Sybian experience: where she opens her mouth and spoons her tongue from the intense vibrating pleasure. |
|
05-25-11 03:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
6
|
Evil Angel
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ High quality porn from Evilangel movie studio
+ Great make-up and production quality
+ Featuring original fetish and intense sexual acts
+ Top girls doing tasty rimming and anal play!
+ Consistent quality; there is hardly any _bad_ scene to be found
Current site stats: Scenes : 4817 Movies : 858 |
| Cons: |
- Not all scenes are HD, and HD is not always 'HD' on this site. It can be Web-HD is '960x540 @ 2 Mbit/s' I Haven't seen 1080p (true) HD
- Only two formats: wmv and mp4. HD is only on mp4.
- Regional Pricing. Europeans pay a higher price (ridiculous!) |
| Bottom Line: |
I *just* joined Evilangel.com. Ofcourse, I already knew this famous movie studio from a long time ago.
The evilangel.com is the derived website from this renowned studio, featuring work from the most skilled (and perverted) porn directors ever known and the hottest sluttiest girls in the biz.
Although the site mentions 'now in HD', this is in many cases a bit misleading: 'HD' can also be Web-HD (960x540) and sporadically 720p (1280x720p).
But! With its original content and sluttiest performers, Evilangel can afford this shortcoming with ease.
Recommendation:
If you like tease, sluttiness and POV (just like me!) then evilangel.com is definately worth the join. Try to obtain a discount code and just say you are subscribing from the USA for extra low pricing ;) I manage to join for USD 19,95. (Couldn't find the TBP USD 9,95 offer anywhere) |
|
05-03-11 01:47pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
7
|
Juliland
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Original crazy content: art!
+ Top models cast (Lexi Belle, Jayden Cole, Bridgette B, Miko Lee)
+ Good resolution (1280x720 @ 6 Mbit/s vbr or so)
+ Outragious settings / surreal atmosphere / heavy fetish
+ Over the top roughness: beautiful girls with smeared eyeliner, spoiled mascara, drooling, smudged lipstick ;)
+ Advanced sexual acts! (choking, SM, bondage, wrapping, experimental) |
| Cons: |
+ Sometimes the roughness go over the edge: for example Miko Lee with menstrual blood (yikes), and still enjoying it...Thick black eye make-up and emotions portrayed are really scary sometimes. I came here to become erotically amused, not to be scared shitless! It's close to gothik/horror. If you don't mind your models resemble Marilyn Manson, then this is the site for you! That said, with this style of make-up, it is hard to tell Jayden Cole apart from Tori Black.
+ The toilet or bathroom scenes are really shocking disgusting filthy!
+ Older scenes are not 720p |
| Bottom Line: |
Juliland is a site created by Richard Avery. He has his own unique style, making him a true artist.
Most of the videoscenes were too heavy for my taste. But! I also manage to enjoy a dozen, which I qualify as 'one of a kind' contribution to my personal collection.
The video I have profound experience with: Lexi2, a POV, showing only Lexi's beautiful face and shoulders while masturbation. I wish Richard would be making more of these!
Where to improve?
This site is full of art, unique scenes: no doubt about it. As a result, it lacks formula.
For example, you'd like to be able to categorise what you as the viewer want to see. For example: POV, Head&Shoulders only... In short: it needs to add some content management.
My recommendation: Difficult one. This is not 'every man's site', that is for certain. Have a careful peak and decide whether this is a site for you.
For the more experienced/bored porn watchers: this might be the edgy site for you to explore how your personal taste and preference are. Can be very enlighting to see the girls you know elsewhere in a totally surreal crazy outragious setting and you might crave certain variation you never would have thought of. |
|
05-02-11 02:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
8
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ This site features the most incredible attractive girls (around twenties). I don't know how they do it, but all of them cooperate as if they were under a powerful pleasure spell or somekind (must have something to do with that sinister background tune and the bright ring lighting).
Among the latest killer blond models feature: Sophia (spelled as Sofia) Sutra and Samantha Saint. What an enjoyable feast to see them perform in perfect glamourous lighting! Thats that 'allure' thing. They'd do it all with full devotion: Tease, smile, undress, suck cock on their knees, be fucked hard from behind, drooling into the camera and even swallow (multiple times) as if they were having their best meal ever! Truly Amazing!
+ What else? Great make-up and setting.
+ Large archive: I count 240+ scenes
+ Among these archived scenes, precious gems can be found like Samantha Sin and Courtney (yeah!). |
| Cons: |
- Only one update per week (on friday). No HD - but it's still ok: 800x450 @ 8Mbit/s (but nowadays we'd appreciate HD badly, right?)
- Only two formats: WMV and MOV.
- Old clips are still around - but with ancient formats (320x240) and so on.
- Expensive on single month base (better price with 3 months or more)
- The site owner is struggling with time and resources (yes, playing with glamour girls can be exhausting - I am sure): news items have not been updated. But hey? as long as the updates are coming, it's fine by me. |
| Bottom Line: |
Quality and originality comes with a price.
Quality also cost energy and resources to make it.
This relatively small site is amazing with regard to original high quality content. The downside is: it is so addictive, you need more - but you only get one update a week :)
As with the term 'amateur', I don't actually care whether the girls are amateurs or not... My dick can't tell the difference ;) The girls are hot!!
My advice to the site owner:
+ Hire an intern to upgrade the old content to high res (800x450) to provide better value with minimum effort
+ Upgrade to HD if possible
+ Roll longer POV shots while she is on her back (these are really addictive scenes to enjoy!)
Or... sell the formula to a bigger site / network :)
I give amateurallure a big recommendation, although a bit expensive on monthly base. European members might want to switch to the 'netcash' option, since this will quote the same amount in USD. |
|
05-02-11 01:15pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
9
|
Mofos Network
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
mofos.com nowadays include 10 sites, filled with
great production quality videoclips in HD (1080p @ 8 or 12 Mbit/s) + some additional content like the videoblog and 5 bonus sites.
Featuring fine looking models, good make-up and hair. Combined with the nastiest acts you've ever seen :) |
| Cons: |
Not all sites are not equally sized. Most of them have around 100 video clips, some have far less.
Search function is a bit basic: click on POV + solo and you'd still get 'your ordinary fuck scene'. |
| Bottom Line: |
I signed up for mofos.com for a period of three months and it is an enjoyable network. The reason for signing up was 'I know that girl' and 'She's a freak'. I am recommending this website/network, but try to get it for the discount price! |
|
05-01-11 04:06pm
Replies (0)
|
|
