Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Updated: |
07-17-11 05:41pm (Update History)
Reason: Wanted to add more detail
|
| Pros: |
Has potential. Not much airbrushing. |
| Cons: |
Over the top photo editing. Diminished detail due to photo editing. |
| Bottom Line: |
My biggest gripes are with the:
1)pic's quality 2)photographers who ruins the pics (content) with way too much editing 3)whoever directs the poses, setting, lighting, etc.
Photo editing / manipulation. So often I ran across photos that were over edited, they were edited so much that I couldn't edit them to make them look better on my computer. These photos were so much that the models hair would have no detail and would blend in with black backgrounds. There would be deep dark shadows on their skin ruining details. Too much editing takes away detail. Natural photos are wonderful.
There were plenty occasions that some of the models had unnatural colors. Such as, red or orange skin. They looked more alien that natural. Those were mainly older pics, but some of the newer ones had similar features. I think that was probably due to editing.
Poses / Setting...ect
For the most part, every model has the same expression. All they do is smile, some smile really hard. Nothing wrong with smiling – but they need to mix it up. Like: frown, smile, no expression, lick tongue out. Most importantly, try to look sexy or nasty.
The same hair style, especially on the black woman. A model will have 10 different photo shoots and will have the very same hair style on every single shoot. Example: Amber . Mix it up for crying out loud. I don't care if they wear a wig – just mix it up.
Every photo shoot should have at least one good shot with great clarity of:
1)(full body nude shot with good clarity/detail) standing or lying down
2)(boob shot) from the waist up to include the cute face of the model
3) (vagina shot) model laying down on back with legs spread open, but also with her face in view without being out-of-focus. Kind of like a missionary pose.
There were some many times that I was waiting for a good shot of a model with legs spread, but I was left dissapointed because the model would have her hand covering up her vagina on 10 pics with none of her fully exposed. It's ok to tease, but show me what I want to see somewhere in there.
Quality:
The are times that you want to see a model nude laying on her back, but on ATK they would either have the vagina in focus with the face out of focus or the other way around. Very frustrating.
Sometimes there are pics put on the site and the whole picture is out of focus or with the face blurry as if the photographer or the model was moving while pic was being taken. Why would something be put on the site like that.
The lighting in much of the photos is so bright that I cannot see any detail off the boobs. This is mainly for the white woman. A good photographer can compensate for that during the shoot.
Wide screen pics. In these days computer monitors and TVs are wide screens – not square.
If a model is sitting against the wall with her legs spread, why would you clip off the legs. The full pic would fit perfectly on a wide screen tv. Legs are nice – don't take them out of the pic.
Why are there so many pics of just one body part? So many times while I'm looking for one good pic of a model that I like, I can't find one, yet there's 10 pics of her leg, foot, or of a single tit.
Other:
There are two different sign-ins for the forums and the actual atk photo site. What gives? If I want to comment on a photo, I don't want to have to log in to a different site.
There should be a link were we can ask a question directly to the photographers or at least were we can give feedback. There should be an option to comment on a photo or photo sets while viewing it without having to go to another site.
The entire site needs a new design. I have never gone to a porn site were everything seems old. The navigation is terrible. The site seems like a forgotten site where no one cares to update it.
Every single gripe that I wrote about are wide spread throughout the website – yes every single gripe!!
I just had to write something about my experience there, because I believe the site has a lot of potential, if only they would work on these issues that I wrote about. Every single gripe that I wrote about are wide spread throughout the website – yes every single gripe!!
***Please give access to more than one ATK website with a membership, or at least offer a big discount to second website. I think membership would then go through the roof**** |
|
07-17-11 05:22pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
2
|
Karup's PC
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The site appears geared more toward photos - which is what I personally enjoy.
- This site has a huge concentration of the sexiest woman in porn that I have seen.
- There are about 3 photo updates 6 days per week.
- There's about 2 video updates 5 days per week.
- Plenty of HighRes photos. The high resolution photos are 1000x1500
- It seems like half of the site is in their higher resolution format.
- The newer photo sets have well over a hundred pics each – enough to get the shots that you want.
***Best upper body boob shots I've seen on any website.***
***My number #1 Standout is that the photo shoots has almost the perfect model poses and it seems standard in almost every photo shoot – at least with the newer shoots. I haven't found this anywhere else.***
- Site layout is great and very clean without any confusion.
- I think the overall site navigation was great with good search categories. |
| Cons: |
- The high resolution photos are 1000x1500 are pretty small for those with a larger monitors.
- The quality of the photos can be a little better.
- The older photos lower resolution photos are so small that they are useless – should bump off site.
- Way too much make-up – need more natural.
- Some bad lighting – either too dark or too bright degrading detail.
- Unnatural skin colors
- Not enough butt shots for those who like that.
- The solo masturbations vids are boring, rushed, no moans, not much looking into camera, no words.
- The hard core videos are pretty boring – a little realistic clean roughness sometimes. |
| Bottom Line: |
Potential Score: 95-100
I know there's quite a bit of personal negatives – that's because I am a critical person – however, this site is actually the most satisfying site that I have visited to date.
During my month of membership, I never got bored – that was a first. There's so much content and good content to look through that it'll keep you busy.
My biggest issue is the small photo sizes – but I hear they will be increasing the sizes very soon
When the larger photos come in, the site score should go through the roof.
For those who have smaller monitors this site is great, but if you're like me and have a larger monitor – you may be a little discouraged in the beginning. After a bit, I actually got a little use to it – but I'm looking forward to the larger images. My monitor size 26”
Boob shots: The closer-up portrait photos of the models from the belly up are perfect boob shots and they look absolutely amazing on my monitor.
The photos can use a little boost in quality especially for the landscape photos – but the quality is as good as any site.
I highly recommend this site – you won't be disappointed.
The customer service is great and they actually work with you and answer your concerns. |
|
11-29-11 09:55pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
3
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Clean layout of site.
Has a good proportion of higher resolution pics. |
| Cons: |
Hit and miss on the video quality.
No standard in terms of poses. You will not get similar poses from set to set. The thing about that is you will not get the poses that you want.
Focusing issues throughout.
There is rarely any ethnicity on the site.
Not enough models.
Not enough attractive models. |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall I was very disappointed with the site mainly due to the quality of the photos.
In my opinion most of the woman on the site are not too attractive. 50 - 75% of the woman is a 5 out of 10. 5 being average. If you like stunning women from time to time - look else where.
If you like a standard among poses from set to set , you will be very frustrated here. You'll be lucky to get a nice boob shot or butt shot on every set let alone the common poses. The poses are very random, because of this, you will never know what you're going to get on the daily updates - I know that some people likes this however. I was disappointed more times than not.
This is a hairy site, therefore, I thought they would be superb when it comes to seeing a clear detailed shot of the vagina. They were just good enough on the closeups. On most of the shots when zoomed out to more of a full body shot - the quality went down the toilet - and the vagina were of pretty bad detail. This was frustrating because the photos were very large, yet they were lacking in detail.
There were terrible lighting issues throughout. Some of the photo shoots were so bright that the details were burned out and blinding. Some of this may be due to photo editing. On many occasions the photo editing ruined detail, such as not being able to see detail of the woman's hair.
There were too many occasions of the hairy extreme, which included hairy legs, hairy asses, and arm pits.
If you like female masturbation videos - stay away from this site. Theses are among the most boring women masturbating that I have ever seen; the females will not utter a word; they rarely make moaning sounds; you could hear a pen drop they're so quiet; the females rarely looks into the camera nor interact; seams like they pull on or play with their pubic hair more than masturbating; the masturbation seems very fake on most videos;
The worse part of the videos is the extreme closeup shots. They stay zoomed for half to 3/4 of the videos in many cases. |
|
02-06-12 07:17pm
Replies (5)
|
|
