Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Stockings Babe XXX
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Great stocking and pantyhose pics of various styles, colors, and consistencies.
- Hardcore stocking sex videos and pictures.
- Very personable attitude on camera.
- The price is right. |
| Cons: |
- Slow to update. Was the reason why I quit.
- Needs a cameraman instead of her husband(?) holding the camera for POV or in a fixed position for shots that are too tight.
- Julie seems to be "hands off" with the site. No replies to emails. |
| Bottom Line: |
Julie is a very hot mature stocking sex amateur who shows what she's got and gives exactly what she promises you. Her site has a lot of potential, but she needs to update more and get some more camera angles going. She probably won't hit the level of Lady Sonia, but if stockings and stocking sex is your thing then this is a great site for the money. |
|
08-03-11 01:45pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
2
|
Lily Wow
(0)
63.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Good quality pics and videos.
- Nice sized pic and vid galleries.
- Nice stocking foot pics.
- A lot of footjob and b/j videos and pictorals |
| Cons: |
- Annoying music in all of the videos. Audio is almost always muted in favor of it.
- Lily is thin, but wears stockings much to big for her. While stocking wrinkles are sexy, the ones she puts on almost seem to droop off of her legs.
- Videos seem to drag on most of the time and the aformentioned music makes it worse. |
| Bottom Line: |
Lily has an average stocking/pantyhose/feet site going on. She runs the gamet from tease to hand/footjobs to hardcore sex. Unfortunately, all the videos on the site play music that is meant to be sensual, but ends up being annoying because the audio of the actual scene is almost always muted. So you can't hear the nylons shusshing, voices, or moans. And even when you can hear them, the music is so distracting that you can't enjoy them. Finally, she should check if the stockings she wants actually fit before buying them as many times they are unforgivingly loose around her legs. |
|
08-03-11 02:02pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
3
|
Natasha's Nylons
(0)
58.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great pair of legs
- Nice quality shots
- Many nice quality videos at no additional charge |
| Cons: |
- Misleading banners and promotional pictures (namely on the OfficeGirl.net site) with hardcore b/g content. As of 7/29/11 there are no sets or videos with hardcore b/g. It never truly gets dirtier than the occasional pussy shot and dildo play...and the dildo isn't used for insertion 9 times out of 10.
- The pics you'd get as a member only serve as an extension of the free pics you can get from the promotional sites as they are nearly all tease pics. This would be okay if the site were promoted as a tease site, but is promoted as a nylon sex site.
- Pic galleries are non-DL manager friendly. If you want the pics, you have to right-click and d/l each one individually.
- Has a saucy Scots accent, but only speaks in exactly one of her videos out of about a couple dozen.
- Has a nasty and disinterested look on her face in many of her videos.
- Bad communication. |
| Bottom Line: |
Natasha has a lot of potential as a leggy MILF that knows her assets. However, her site relies on bait and switch tactics to rope you in by showing her in hardcore orientations such as b/g and b/g interracial sex, but the actual content is softcore teasing and is on par with what you would see from a softcore leg tease site like Akira Lane's or Sandy's Nylons, but pretends to be at the level of the Michelle's Nylons site. And like I mentioned above, this would be fine if the promotion of the site reflected it. The hardcore pics shown in the free area of the site don't even exist in the members area. If you ask about the pictures, you are ignored or given a nasty reply.
So I will tell you what she doesn't want to tell you - THIS IS A SOFTCORE TEASE SITE! If you see the banners of her doing reverse cowgirl...don't believe it. If you read the sample pictorals promising cumshot endings...don't believe it. If you see a sample pic set looking like she's about to plunge a dildo inside her...don't believe it. She does not cater to the hardcore nylon sex enthusiast as she claims. Save your $22 for someone with just as saucy legs but delivers on what they promise. |
|
07-29-11 01:59am
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
Nikki Park
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Cute face and tight body. |
| Cons: |
- The majority of the promo sets and videos found around the net and in the sample area are not on members side of the site itself.
- Bad quality videos
- Average quality photos
- Photosets are non d/l friendly.
- Poorly maintained site |
| Bottom Line: |
Simply put, this site is a trainwreck and is the quality of something that you'd see from an adult site 10 years ago. The promotional videos and sets that you can get off of places like FreeOnes don't even exist on the site. The looped video on the front of her site of her having sex in the shower amongst other clips from the collage aren't there either. In fact, at the time that I was a member, there were only about 5 videos total, all Quicktime, and all entitled "big".
It also looks like this is the first website the webmaster has ever maintained. There are times when all the pictures on the site go down, but the links still work. Other times, you can walk right into the members area without putting in your username and password (I erased all my cookies once to see if it was just an automatic login, but lo and behold, I could access without a check).
Do yourself a favor and just download her sample sets off the free sites. It's the best she has to offer. Pay for a membership and you'll be paying $20 on a site that still looks like it's under construction and launch date is TBA. |
|
08-16-11 05:18pm
Replies (2)
|
|
