Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Rating
26
|
Beautiful Nude.biz
(0)
83.0
|
No Review.
|
12-08-11 09:43pm
|
Rating
27
|
DDF Network
(0)
83.0
|
No Review.
|
12-08-11 09:32pm
|
Review
28
|
DOMAI
(0)
83.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Stunning models
-Great variety of models
-Quick download speed
-Some 3000x1999px images
-Great price for amount of content |
Cons: |
-No videos
-A lot of sets don't have images higher than, 2000px |
Bottom Line: |
Overall this is a great soft core porn site with a great selection of models; although, it's sister site (GoddessNudes) has better image sizes then this one. It has a really good navigation model list, but when you go to a letter of models, you'll have to go back to the member's page. They do update everyday and they have a good selection of bonus items on the bottom right of the model index. Overall, I would recommend this to anyone. |
|
12-08-11 07:11pm
Replies (5)
|
Rating
29
|
LSG Models
(0)
81.0
|
No Review.
|
12-08-11 09:35pm
|
Review
30
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+Lots of models
+Zip (large size only)
+Updates weekley
+HD videos
+Quick download speed |
Cons: |
-Not a popular billing company
-few low resolution images for newer sets
-okay site navigation
-slow navigation |
Bottom Line: |
First of all this was a pretty good site a few years ago, but now they haven't given the same effort as before. The site has an okay navigation with very poor loading times at certain times of the day. I like the favorite and rating system on the site, but when you have to dislike something it takes you back to the main members page and then you have to go back to the favs page.
There are about 2000 models on the site with an update weekly. They update at three times a week with about three or four new content every update. The download speed is quite fast including a download of a 500MB video. Now the billing company is Pure Web Power, but I haven't contacted them yet but when I do I'll add to my review. You do have access to their bonus sites using your TeenDreams login, but I think the majority is the same content on TDs
For the videos they do offer HD for NEW content. They only offer MP4 with no other type of media. The sizes they offer vary between old to new, the new offers 1080 (Full HD), 720 HD), 360 (med) and 180 (mobile) with the old videos vary but most of them only have the medium size. The videos download pretty quick with an average of 200MB for HD videos. There are about 1800 videos on the site.
For the galleries, there are about 7000+ sets ranging from solo, lesbian to boy/girl. The quality of most of the images are quite good ranging from 2013 to 2006. For the sizes, they do vary from year to year, but for recent sets their largest I've seen is 2040 for tall images and for long there is 1360x907 which is a huge disappointment; although, the quality of them are great. Most of the older images are usually 1728px and sometimes 2046px or 2000px from 2007 to 2012. Images in 2005 are usually 1752px. As for the zips they only offer Large size with no other sizes to select and when you also select an image it gives you the large without any other size.
Bottom line, this is a good mega site with tons of content with great quality, but is very slow at times and is a little bit hard to navigate. Overall this is a site I would recommend. |
|
07-30-13 01:31pm
Replies (4)
|
Rating
31
|
Playboy Girls
(0)
79.0
|
No Review.
|
12-08-11 10:09pm
|
Review
32
|
Girls Next Door Club
(0)
74.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+Zips (full, large, med, small)
+HD videos (1080 & 720)
+Fast download speed
+Small watermark on images and no marks on videos
+Gorgeous models
+CCBill |
Cons: |
-Poor site set-up
-No rating system
-Image quality is okay
-Not much model bio
-Only 17 models
-No extras |
Bottom Line: |
This is a fairly new site; although, they have updates since May 20, 2012. Last update was July 14, 2013 and seems like they update a couple times a week. As of this review there is only 17 models.
As for the videos on this site, I counted about 38 videos. The quality of the videos are quite good and are offered in: 1080, 720 and 540. They also offer HD streaming, WMV, Quicktime and Mobile in 1080. The average time of the video vary but are usually around 10mins.
For the pictures there are about 11,142 images. The quality of the images are okay and seems to be not that great when you zoom in. All image sets are in Zip in which you can download either: Full (5184x3456 or 4272x2848), Large (3000x2000), Medium (2000x1333) and Small (1000x666). Average images per set vary around 30-150. They also have a small watermark on the bottom right and left with some images have a dark transparent bar also on the bottom.
Bottom line is, this is a good hardcore site and I would recommend this. I only noticed one M/F sex scene with a few F/F scenes. Videos look better then the most of the images. The site has a very poor navigation set-up, there are only "Home", "Updates", "Girls" and "Live Cams" tabs to chose from. Also there isn't any rating system to rate the models or sets and there isn't an area to look at your profile. I would've liked to see a favorite like thing along with a profile and I would've loved to comment on a few sets, but they didn't provided that extra. By the way all scenes are indoors and there isn't no model bio for some models. Now this is a good site, but it needs improvement. |
|
07-18-13 02:26pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
33
|
Ether Nudes
(0)
69.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Offers CCBill
-Low monthly bill for $4.99 or for 60 days it's $12.95
-HQ images up to 3000px
-Some never before seen models |
Cons: |
-No zip files
-Only 54 models
-around 2036 photos with an average of 20-25 pics per set with a few models with only 1-8 pictures
-No videos
-Poorly designed site |
Bottom Line: |
Now this is a good site, but if it was updated more, had a better members page and had a lot more photos with zip files, it would've been a whole different story.
First of all the members area is like looking at a forum with pictures of last updated, most viewed, random files and list only two categories to show, which are albums and models. You can pick between small (800px) or large (3000px) sizes, but sometimes it may not work to get the smaller pic. There is a watermark on the bottom right, but it's not that big deal.
Now would I recommend this to anyone? The answer is maybe but more towards NO, only because there isn't much content on the site plus it gets really boring after a day. For the price of this you can save for a bigger site and get more for that than going for this site. |
|
12-11-11 07:42pm
Replies (0)
|
|