Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
226
|
Racks And Blacks
(0)
70.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
Updated: |
02-13-18 02:26pm (Update History)
Reason: Adding more to move from "good" to "excellent"
|
Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all Brazzers network (30 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Clean search. Keyword searching along with a search bar. Lots of sub-topics to pick up on.
- Ability to "favorite" sites so you can find them again easily.
- Mostly interracial but there are non-white female performers. Something lacking in a lot of mainstream porn.
- action break down you can cut right to the positions/stuff you like
- 1080p 1.8 mb/s
- The mobile site works well on my iPhone.
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive |
Cons: |
- 27 scenes as of February 12, 2018
- Last update was in 2007
- Typical porn valley look. Make-up tends to be heavy. "Big Tits" means nearly all the models are surgically enhanced.
- Picture sets are large (a couple of 100 pics in each set) they are mostly screenshots of the action in the video.
- Cookie-cutter porn. Straight to the action with little plot
- Cross-sells at sign up
- Little imagination for a network that usually has pretty good directors I found the "plots" to have little to offer
- Models are mostly busty blonds with far too little diversity. |
Bottom Line: |
There is no reason to buy this site. It's nice that it's included in the network. But with less than 30 scenes and no updates in over 10 years, there's just no point.
It was nice to see action with Bree Olsen cause I think she retired but that was the only bright spot. Hilary Scotts video is also hot as hell and worth checking out
Outside of the benefits of the network, I found little of interest on this particular site. |
|
02-12-18 02:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
227
|
Raquel Devonshire
(0)
79.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Make no mistake Racquel is HOT!
- Cam show are also hot (although she attracts a **different** crowd.
- good quality vids
- some of the network content is hot and in high quality. |
Cons: |
- Her posted movies don't have the same enthused dirty talk that her cam shows have (I love dirty talk!)
- the rest of the network is not as hot as she is.
- a little pricy |
Bottom Line: |
- maybe if Racquel went to another network I would go back, but with so many great network co-ops there are better deals out there. |
|
01-19-07 04:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
228
|
Raw Attack
(0)
83.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- multiple file size available (.mp4) for me I find 780p is the perfect balance between size and quality. These files are about 1 GB and 1280X720 5.2 mbps
- 1080 files are about 2.75 GB 1920X1080 12.1 mbps.
- I don't have a 4K monitor so I didn't download anything that size.
- comments on videos allowed (although doesn't seem to be widely used)
- Scoring system with favorites and likes (again either isn't widely used or there are very few members here. I see a lot of great videos that have under a dozen likes)
- Decent tagging system (could be made better with more options or even user suggested ones)
- Lot of anal content
- More model diversity than most sites
- Plenty of great talent some of my favorites: LAUREN PHILLIPS, CHERIE DEVILLE, Julia Ann, Violet Monroe, Riley Nixon, PENNY PAX, KATRINA JADE.
- Good handling of photos. You can download .zips of the screenshots (about 100 pix) and the photoshoots (about 300 pix)
- EPoch and CC Bill are processors.
- Exclusive scenes |
Cons: |
PROS:
- Good organization. Viewing can be arranged by: date, popularity, title, or category (sort of a "tag"). Tags well done; for example there's a tag for Japanese instead of just "Asian"
- Long movies. 45-60 minutes
CONS:
- site says "ameatures" but I see plenty of long established stars here (I'm not complaing I love these ladies; but don't say one thing and do something else 😞)
- Not to double down on the same point, but I hardly see any ameatures. I see plenty of great established stars, and some new up and comers.
- "Hardcore" is mostly M/F with some M/M/F. Still hot action but have a higher bar for what I call hardcore. Especially given this is the preimium site inside a strong network
- Only about a 100 videos as this point.
- No unique "hook". This is cookie-cutter porn. I like sites that have more of a personality and niche. |
Bottom Line: |
I have a long term membership to the Spizzo network and tried out the upsell for Raw Attack. I liked the content but don't think the extra price makes it a good deal. If they included RA with the rest of the network price this site would easily be in the 90s.
With this few of scenes they really should roll it into the wider network. I loved the content, but can't justify an upsell just for 100 or so more videos. I feel like every site in porn is trying to nickle and dime me these days.
Despite my complaints it's a good solid site with great hardcore action. Good producation and great talent. It cost me $10 for a month of the upset, which is fair. But There wasn't enough to keep me around. If I were running the show I would move this content to the front of Spizzo showcase and make it the flagship site. Here in the back it doesn't get showcased and I think most of us don't think of Spizzo when we thing of the top flight porn networks. Quit the upsells and show the strength of your product (I bet they'd make it up in more sales) - ok sorry rant over. |
|
11-24-19 07:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
229
|
Real Sensual
(0)
77.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- Processed by Epoch or Rocketgate
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 3840X2160 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- loading and downloading is quick even on my basic cable connection
- all content is exclusive (to the best of my knowledge)
plenty of hot talent. Some of the standouts were: Jasmine Jae, Carolina Sweets, Christy Love, KRISSY LYNN, CHERIE DEVILLE!, Natasha Nice,
- STILL UPDATING. Updates several times a week
- mostly m/f shoot with some f/f and threeways thrown in.
- Not just the same faces. They seem to balance stars and up and comers well.
- Average movie time is approximatly 30 minutes
- Trailers are available so you can check them out before downloading. Nothing worse than killing bandwidth on a dud. |
Cons: |
- New Site: Content Started in March of 2019
- No real personality. I'm all for hot fucking but there's no real plots and not a theme. Call me old school but I like a reason for the action.
- Only about 50 shoots as of December 1, 2019
- Lack of organization is a problem. With this much content, you really need more search capability than star/Date/"popularity"
- I couldn't get my download manager to work.
- Ads behind paywall
- very few creampies (I know most big places don't think there's demand. I think they're wrong.)
- Watch out for cross sales when you start up. |
Bottom Line: |
Keep your eye on this one. While they're isn't enough content here yet, they are adding more at a great pace and will soon be a real contender.
If they had more content I would put them in the high 80s.
With so little here it's hard to notice anything other than the lacking. I appreciated the casting. I found a couple of beauties that I hadn't seen before along with some real stars (see the pros for my who's who. God does Cherie DeVille have a bad scene anywhere!?).
I liked a lot of what I saw. I wish they'd do a little more hardcore; but that's just me.
I think a year from now (if they keep to their current shooting schedule), this site will be a power house. |
|
12-01-19 12:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
230
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
95.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all Brazzers network (30 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Top notch talent. My favorites on this site are: Ella Hughs, Ashley Fires, Krissy Lynn. But again there's no shortage of great talent here (especially if you looking for more of a MILF look)
- Clean search. Keyword searching along with a search bar. Lots of sub-topics to pick up on.
- scenes have clear descriptions so you can see how hot each shoot is
- action break down you can cut right to the positions/stuff you like
- 1080p 1.8 mb/s
- The mobile site works well on my iPhone.
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- Still updating: average 3-4 times a month
- Focus on cuckolding/cheating wife - lots of fun plots
- Almost 560 as of May 21, 2018
- Now that I have a long-term membership I'm appreciating the ability to save and like scenes for better organization |
Cons: |
- Brazzers is a top notch site and this is one of their flagships so there isn't too much I can say for cons.
- I couldn't get my download manager to work. (Maybe I messed something up?)
- Preview is very limited. I wish I could have explored more before buying. But the price is certainly reasonable for such a large catalog
- Picture sets are large (a couple of 100 pics in each set) they are mostly screenshots of the action in the video.
- Cross-sells at sign up.
- Capta to enter (for me every time I log in)
- Cookie cutter. I feel like the directing is the same each time. You know the positions they'll move into everything seems rote
** This cookie cutter part is the biggest downfall. It ultimately lead me to give up my membership. |
Bottom Line: |
Part of what I like about this site is the "theme" is open enough. So you never know what the next update will bring: could be slutty wife playing with hubby's best friend, or naughty bride, hot interracial, or threesome. I like that there's spontaneity. The plots are often very light-hearted and silly. Fun. But sometimes I like more intensity.
There's enough of a plot to have fun but still plenty of great action.
There a good mix of ethnic diversity - more than most mainstream porn.
My recommendation: If you're looking for lots of "hotwife" sex you can't go wrong. There's plenty of content, variety, back catalog and new content. A solid buy. |
|
05-21-18 06:17am
Replies (1)
|
Review
231
|
Rebecca's Office
(0)
73.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Sexy Milf who enjoys making content.
- Rebecca is beautiful with large (enhanced) tits and a killer ass
- A real woman with curves and large breasts
- vocal sex, there's nothing sexier than listening to a woman lose control while orgasming
- great cheating wife/cuckold theme. Her Cuckold BJ video is one of my all-time favorites!
- video/pix descriptions are hot and well written but sometimes oversell what's inside.
- almost exclusively inter-racial
- newer photoshoots are zip downloadable
- about 120 videos (range from 10-20 minutes)
- Over 300 photo sets (about 20 pictures per set)
- picture sets have a great set up with a hot sexy story for each set.
- Older material is 640X480 1.17 Mbps. The newer material is HD
720X400 3.2 Mbps.
- variety: gg, gangbangs, groups, bj, anal, hardcore. |
Cons: |
- navigation is lacking. One long scroll to find everything
- for a site with more than a decade of business there's not that much content.
- some pictures are taken out of focus. Most are just fine.
- More than a few videos have lighting problems, either darkroom, or night vision, or over-exposure. I know I'm buying an amateur site, but some of it could have been easily fixed.
- videos have no setup and no lead in - straight to the action
- Dropped from the network it was a part of
- Going out of business soon (maybe this is a plus and you can grab it for a deal? - Or find her content on pay per download site. |
Bottom Line: |
This used to be one of my favorite ameature sites, but the recent pairing back keeps me from recommending it. Between the lack of substantial updates, the limited fan interaction (next to non-existent). It looks like she uses her membership site as a path to hawking her premium downloads (they seem to have better production, maybe they're newer). Either way, I hate the nickel and diming.
Rebecca seems to have fallen into a bit of unoriginality. Coming back to the site after a long break I found hardly any new creativity. I can see why she's decided to move on. She had a great run and I wish her well in the new endveours she is taking on. I might seek out some of her download-only videos because she is one of the true greats of the ameature cheating wife genre. But her site has lost the bright shine it once had. |
|
05-22-21 06:57am
Replies (3)
|
Review
232
|
Rebecca's Office
(0)
89.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Sexy Milf who enjoys making content.
- A real woman with curves and large breasts
- vocal sex, threre's nothing sexier then listening to a woman lose control while orgasming
- almost exclusively inter-racial
- about 100 videos (range from 10-20 minutes)
- Over 300 photo sets (about 20 pictures per set)
- picture sets have great set up with a hot sexy story for each set.
- Older material is 640X480 1.17 mbps. Newer material is HD
720X400 3.2 mbps.
- variety: gg, gangbangs, groups, bj, anal, hardcore.
- dreamnet.com network with dozens of other models included. |
Cons: |
- most photos are not available as zips (the newest are zipped)
- navigation is lacking
- for a site with more than a decade of business there's not that much content.
- some pictures are taken out of focus. Most are just fine.
- More than a few videos have lighting problems, either dark room, or night vision, or over exposure. I know I'm buying an amateur site, but some of it could have been easily fixed.
- videos have no set up and no lead in - straight to the action |
Bottom Line: |
I'm enjoying this site more than I thought I would. Rebecca keeps a blog and I found it very erotic to read about this naughty businesswoman.
I wish the updates were a little more often and that she'd put up more video updates, but all in all a good value. I would rejoin this site and recommend it. |
|
03-20-15 04:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
233
|
Ruth Blackwell
(0)
70.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- Reputable billers
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 640X480 3.2 mbps (more of a con)
- Ruth is hot! For a large number of the videos she's pregnant and one hell of a great MILF.
Ruth does a great job of dirty talking -, especially in the FFM content. I've watched a lot of these over and over
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- mobile site
- all content is exclusive
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. Organization done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well.
- All interracial.
- Some FFM content along with plenty of gangbangs, MMF.
- Customer service is great. I had a minor problem I sent an email in and got resolution quickly and easily. This is the kind company everyone should run |
Cons: |
PRO Cont:
- Other shinning scenes costars: Riley Shy, KELLY WELLS (my god she was the queen of dirty!), Jayma Reid, HAILEY YOUNG
- rating of videos makes it easy to find the best of the best.
CONS:
-NO LONGER updating. Which is really confusing because they keep pushing out old scenes but don't remaster them at all. I don't understand what the motivation for that is.
- I can't tell how long ago they started but they max resolution is 640X480 3.2 mbps. That's ancient quality by today's standards.
- Just over 100 shoots. Ruth left porn way too early.
- Basic setups and lacks originality. Most videos open with Ruth convincing her friends to try BBC - she then talks trash all throughout the video (and it's amazing!). Another motif was her trying to have a baby fucked into her. Lastly, there was the "I'm pregnant and still can't get enough"
- Scenes get republished so I see they have new dates but it's old content and not "remastered" so I really don't get the pt.
- no behind the scenes |
Bottom Line: |
With all the pros you'd think they would have gotten a higher score. If there was more of a back catalog I would have gone into the 80s and if they were still updating they'd be in the mid-to-high 90!
I haven't seen Ruth on any other sites so I think she must have left the business. It's a shame she's the kinda performer that did so well I'd have like to seen what she did in a directors chair.
While on the idea of directing the production value here is top-notch. Lighting is good, the sound is spot on, and the talent really shines. I've seen these other girls in other places and here they really get down and dirty.
Bottom line: If you like pregnant interracial you have to join this site. There's a good deal of that here and that's hard to find. If you want to see a hot blond talk trash to her slutty friends join this site. Unfortunately, if you like this site you'll work your way through it's limited content too quickly. |
|
09-08-19 04:01pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
234
|
Sadistic Rope
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Top talent. The women are beautiful. There is not much in the way of body diversity - this is a very athletically inclined site.
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Most videos are about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- Search bar (although limited navigation tools). If you know what you want you can find it pretty easily. If you're looking to browse there are very few tools to help.
- "featured" section give good access to greatest hits. |
Cons: |
- No longer updating last update was March 2015
- Small catalog (by kink.com standards) just over 100 shoots.
- The male talent is mostly from the same actor (he does a great job so when it ain't broke don't fix it. But I know some will prefer variety)
- Not a lot of ethnic diversity. Kink is usually better about that.
- Most scenes are just m/f. There are some with multiple partners but they are few and far between.
- Narrow focus. For me this niche was too tailored and didn't keep my interest.
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I'm really disappointed that they haven't
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price.
- No photo sets available. (They are brining pictures back to the network, but I don't think they'll alter a defunct site) |
Bottom Line: |
The concept is pretty straightforward: girl is tied and "punished" before being pleasured and ultimately orgasming. There is usually suspension play to go with the rather intense "torture" (clothes pins, rough anal play, whips, etc).
While I enjoy the kink network and appreciate the size and scope of the network I was not disappointed by the shutdown of this site. Much of it's niche is filled by other parts of the network. Much of the content was just over the top for me. Usually reading the descriptions was enough for me to know I could skip that one with nothing lost. There are some gems here for example: Felony, Phenix Marie, Ashley Lanes, Ashley Fires (always a fav), and Skin Diamond.
Sadistic Rope is too small, too expensive and too narrowly tailored to be worth a buy on it's own. If you join the larger kink network check out this site for your favorite models, but there just isn't enough here to warrant a recommendation. |
|
02-22-17 12:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
235
|
Sara Jay
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Sara Jay has been described as being a "butter face" performer (beautiful "but for her face"). I think that criticism is harsh. While she has had plastic surgery to be overly enhanced I think she retains her "real girl" beauty. I sometimes think her hair could be done in a more flattering way - but that's a small complaint.
- Weekly cam show with Sara. Across the included cam network there are about 3 shows/day.
- High energy; Sara dives into her scenes making them fun and nasty. Gentle love-making is not her specialty.
- Great MILF network: Shandra Fay, Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Charlee Chase, Francesca, Carmen Valentine, Angelina Castro, Maggie Green Nikki Benz are all included as part of the network. The whole network is in the MILF genre -so if you're a fan this is the place.
- guest stars keep things interesting
- updates normally 1X/week
- Mobile formatting friendly |
Cons: |
Pros CONT:
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- as of July 7, 2020 687 videos
- pictures available as zips
CONS
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago. |
Bottom Line: |
I've come to really like Sara as a performer. She brings personality and passion to her work. She seems to be a porn performer who loves sex and is having fun with her work. I always find that endearing.
for a solo performer, she mixes in a lot of different genres and works with many different male and female co-stars. She seems to lean toward interracial content - so those of you interested in that might find this to be a plus.
All in all, this is a solid site. I would give it a "buy". She doesn't blow my doors off and make me think that I'll be a long term member (for me long term is a year or more). But I'm very satisfied and not leaving after the 1st month either.
I haven't caught one of her cam shows yet (I'm really trying to figure out a time to do that!) My guess is that she would be amazing at that instant feedback environment |
|
07-07-20 08:02am
Replies (0)
|
Review
236
|
Sara Jay
(0)
81.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- photo shoots available in zip format. Each set has over 100 pix in it. There are over 450 picture sets available
- Weekly cam show with Sara. Across the included cam network there are about 3 shows/day.
- Also sells one-on-one cam shows to members.
- Over 300 videos with good range: interracial, light bdsm, anal, group sex, cougar, cuckold/hotwife, girl/girl, foot fetish
- High energy; Sara dives into her scenes making them fun and nasty. Gentle love-making is not her specialty.
- Great MILF network: Shandra Fay (of filtycuteonline), Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Charlee Chase, Francesca, Curious Gabby, Bobbi Eden, Carmen Valentine, Vickyathome, Angelina Castro, Nikki Benz are all included as part of the network. The whole network is in the MILF genre -so if you're a fan this is the place.
- cam shows are achieved (everything in the network) - but it's not organized, and is only available in flash
- lots of hot guest stars |
Cons: |
-big boob job. If you're a natural purist, you will not like the Sara's implants.
- video quality ranges from 8450X480 4.1 mbps, 740X480 1.3 mbps to 640X480 1.5. At this point I really expect at least newest content to have an HD option.
- Terrible organization: the photo and video sections are given broad sub-categories: hardcore, interracial, girl/girl dvds. and solo. There's also a BTS section
- Much of the content comes from other sources (I don't care but know some want to know this ahead of time).
- the video section is all in little GIFs, which drove my older laptop to a grinding pace (serves me right for not upgrading, and skimping when I bought it).
- the lack of organization and HD make the site look like it hasn't moved out of the 90s. |
Bottom Line: |
Sara is a hot curvy MILF. If that's your thing you're getting it here. She's definitely on the dirty side of hot. There was a poll question on PU about dirty talk. Sara does dirty talk but tend to be the repetitive: "Oh baby" variety. There isn't a lot of imagination in her performance. That said she's still a great performer - just not one of the best in class.
Bottom Bottom Line:
I'd have liked Sara much better if she wasn't in the network she is. What I mean by that is: I can't help but compare her to the other memberships I'm getting, and when I do, they're better than she is. Sara's enjoyable, but I'm finding I'm spending a lot more time enjoying the other members of the network.
Buy or Not? Fence. Look at her other work - she makes the rounds with the big studios - if you like her work this site gives you your money's worth. If you're into MILFs, look at the rest of this network, it's their specialty. If you're into curvy MILFs this is a fine site to get your fix. |
|
01-16-13 12:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Rating
237
|
Sara Next Door
(0)
82.0
|
No Review.
|
02-23-13 08:43pm
|
Review
238
|
Seduced By A Cougar
(0)
82.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- About 280 shoots on this site alone. More than 5,000 across the entire network at Naughty America.
- Quality lighting and sound - you can see and hear all the action from a top of the line production studio
- About 120 shoots are in "standard definition" (not bad for when they were shooting. In 2007 they started offering "DVD Quality" 720X540 3mbps. That means more thank 280 videos are available in that quality.) About 130 videos are in "HD 1080" 3.5mbps. Streaming (.flv) or download .mp4 or .wmv
- zips for downloading pix (more than 150 pix per shoot)
- good organization with searching by date, stars, location, act, model type (blond, fake tits, tattoos, really more options than I would have thought of)
- a lot of different talent there are "girls" on here that I've never even heard of.
- Some real stand out talent: Raven Black, Brandi Love, Rayveness, Gabby Quintero, I like that they book pro-am girls, as well as pros. |
Cons: |
- mainstream porn: nearly each shoot follows the same action blueprint: BJ, pussy lick, fuck in 2-3 positions, cum shot on face.
- most girls have fake tits
- standard buy is over priced in my opinion, but they often offer discounts so watch for them.
- For my taste their were too many women that were past the cougar stage. That's just my opinion. |
Bottom Line: |
While I like the Naughty America network. This site is not one of my favorites. I guess I'm just not that big a fan of MILFs. I have to give NA credit they recruit great girls for this site. If you're looking for hot cougars that's what they have so you won't be disappointed.
Over the sites on NA this one tends to have more dirty talk (which I love) and more variety in the set-up. Which is also welcome since many of their sites feel like every shoot is exactly the same.
I have to give them credit for creating what they set out to create. While it's not my favorite site. It is what it says it is. And I appreciate that! |
|
11-02-12 05:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
239
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
97.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- Premier kink content. Scenes are very heavy on BDSM - lots of spanking. There's a good mix of partner action and multiple partners. Most scenes have a interesting set up everything from revenge to naughty maids.
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus
- Updates once/week
- Close to 700 videos with a catalog years deep
- Good scene descriptions and user comments. You can get a good idea of if you'll like a shoot or not before loading it.
- Top fetish models. If she's a big name she's probably worked here. There's also more diversity of ethnicity/body type/pregnant etc. than any other network I can think of.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. |
Cons: |
- Organization is terrible for such a marquee site. You can filter by amount of pubic hair - but can't filter searches once they've been run. A feature other big site have had for years. With so much content I'm having a really hard time finding things that I know are here.
- Shoot have some stills that you can preview before loaded the video - but no downloads.
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- photo zips have been added back - but when I was last a member they didn't reapply that for the whole back catalog
- Rather pricy - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. But if you like hardcore BDSM action you can't go wrong with here
-That quality comes at the cost of large files. This can be a little frustrating because each video contains an approximate 10 minute post interview were the model explains the good time she had |
Bottom Line: |
***April 22, 2017***** After reviewing some wise comments from the community I decide to back away from the 100 point score I previously entered. I hate the notion that "you can't score a 100", but they are correct this is not the site to exemplify that notion. THANK YOU for taking the time to critique me.
I know some people will challenge my rating of 100. Please read this before killing me in the comments. I rate a site based on what it reports to be. And S & S does exactly what it says. They deliver hardcore kinky BDSM content with flawless production values. You can see and hear all the action. The camera doesn't jerk around wildly and there are interesting "plots". I could knock them down to a 98 or 99 because "no one is perfect" but to me it's not about an arbitrary measure of perfect; it's how close did you come to delivering what you promised. Sex and Submission hits the mark.
Kink is a huge player and I view Sex and Submission as their flag ship site. It is one of the more frequently updates; gets the bigger talent, and has the broadest appeal. That said: Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. But if you like hardcore BDSM action you can't go wrong with here.
Although it is pricy I think everyone should check out kink.com; and S&S in particular. They allow 5 previews a day and the previews give a good taste of what's inside. Along with Brazzers, Reality Kings,and Naughty AmericaI I view kink.com as something you owe it to yourself to at least get a months membership once. |
|
04-20-17 02:42pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
240
|
Sex With Stephanie
(0)
87.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
First thing to know about me as a reviewer is I'm very generous so while I was generally disappointed I scored it at an 87 for the price and because I didn't try to contact the admin with my issues.
- mobile site is a plus especially for a solo site like this
- hot girl (she is got a lot of tats in her newer stuff if you don't like that you need to know it)
- good chemistry with her and male talent (husband)
- $15 a month tough to say no to (I couldn't)
- Lots of backlog to explore
- Live shows
- Frequent updates (about 1 per week)
- Content swaps with other hot girls |
Cons: |
- Not always the best filming (lighting/sound sometimes a problem - I could get over it, but I know some people can't
- Not a lot of imagination with setting or roleplaying. The videos are hot, but its basically - "you look hot, let's fuck",
- Not as interactive as most solo sites (no twitter, blog, etc.)
- Organization needs improvement. Titling of videos is also not very telling ("shoot your load" for example is a great video - but how do I know it's what I'm looking for until I watch it?)
- Mobil site is great to have but it's still tough to navigate. I don't have enough experience with these things to offer constructive feedback but the current setup is painful. |
Bottom Line: |
My biggest complaint is the site had some sort of malfunction about a week into my membership and I couldn't access it (I hadn't been thrilled with everything in that week and decided to cancel my membership thinking they shut down. A little while later they site came back up but I was closed out of my membership even though we weren't through the moth yet. I'm certainly partly to blame for never contacting them about this issue - but there it is non the less).
It's a bargain site and I'd still say you get what you pay for. It's half the price of most of it's competitors and that is a big plus. (I may even give them another try someday).
For me the bottom line was it just wasn't worth it. There are plenty of great sites out there and this just didn't live up to my expectations. If you join, know that you're getting a $15 site, don't expect a $30 site for $15. This is what it is. |
|
07-30-12 12:34pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
241
|
Shanda Fay
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Sandra Fay is a busy Canadian with wild dyed hair, an unforgettable voice and one of the dirtiest amateurs I've ever seen. She brings a passion to her videos that few others provide. And her prolific toy collection leaves quite the impression
- STILL updating But very recently sporadic.
- The strength of this site is her the fact that she's crazy dirty. Lots of hot dirty talk, role play (twin/nurse/etc). She also has a strong exhibitionism streak (to my untrained eye it looks authentic) and she kills it with Cosplay her Jessica Rabbit is among the best (also does batgirl and poison ivy really well)
- There's plenty of pegging (mostly non-femdom_
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- About 350 video
- pictures available as zips |
Cons: |
Pros Cont:
- The network includes 43 sites.
- Over 16,000 cam archives. I'm not much of a cam guy but I'm enjoying exploring. Cams include Lelu from LeluLove.com. That's the site I never quit, so I was stoked to find an easy search for her stuff here.
- Cam shows are for members (so you don't have the talent waiting until she hits her minimum to start)
CONS
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
- only 6 videos load per page. This means lots of search time wasted with page loads.
- Ads on the member side
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Still updating but slow 1/month is typical
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago.
- older content is 640X480 0.9 mbps (it looks like some of that is being remastered for better quality).
- Cam archive is poorly organized |
Bottom Line: |
While I like Shandra's attitude and playfulness I warn you that some will find her voice offputting. It seems like she is intentionally raising her voice like a characteracture of a porn star. I don't mind it at all, but I've seen comments where some have complained.
Normally a site like this would be right up my ally. I like amateur, I like public stuff, I like Cosplay. All that said I went with a rather lower score because there doesn't seem to be a personality with Shandra. She seems like a projection of what people are expecting her to be. I'd love to see her let her hair down and let her fans know who she is.
That said there are some real gems here (but again they're hard to find because of the site structure.).
If your thinking of buying I would say skip it. If you like the rest of the network make sure you stop here for some treasure hunting. |
|
05-29-20 08:41am
Replies (2)
|
Review
242
|
Shane Diesel XXX
(0)
81.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations network (26 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Extensive back catalog and plenty of hot new stars. For classics, Kelly Wells is great as is Vixen and Annette Schartz. Newcomers include: Kate England, Candace Lux, and Anna Bell Peaks
- The catalog goes back to 2004 and obviously, that has lower quality
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- Lots of cuckold content (much of it husband humiliation maybe that's good; maybe it's not)
- A lot of anal action if that's important to you
- Now that I have a long-term membership I'm appreciating the ability to save and like scenes for better organization |
Cons: |
- Lack of organization is a problem. With this much content, you really need more search capability than star/Date/"popularity"
- Some scenes offer trailers most do not
- Infrequent updates 5 or so a year
- No updates since August of 2017
- Much of the content was shot for DVD and moved onto the web (some of it looks like a right acquisition)
- I couldn't get my download manager to work.
- Ads behind paywall
- Most movies have little or no plot |
Bottom Line: |
If you're looking for interracial or cuckolding porn this is a good place to hit for a month or two. There are just over 300 scenes here.
There's a good amount of variety in the women - although there's a leaning toward pale skin; light-haired women.
Since things are mostly from DVDs there's a rut of scenes that are all very common (usually cause they're into part 7 of their run).
I recommend but only if you want the wider network or don't plan on sticking around. The lack of updates is the biggest deal breaker |
|
06-04-18 08:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
243
|
Sharing My Wife
(0)
89.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- Stays true to it's premise
- hot ladies
- fun cuckold site (seems to be a new trend for porn)
- Even though it's the same premise with each video they do a bunch of different takes so it's fun. - There's no strict formula to get bored with.
- for a cuckolding site it's not a raunchy site as others (cum eating cuckolds for examples); also not a campy as others - (like please bang my wife) - Don't know if this is a "pro" or not |
Cons: |
- Site hasn't been updated in a while seems like it's been abandoned.
- Video quality was good at the time but is now sub-par. Not HD
- Claims exclusive content but it's shared within the network of sites
- No Zip files for pix |
Bottom Line: |
Look at the previews and see if there's some girls there you like. The scenes are defiantly hot. I was happy joining just for Felony Foreplay (who they call Amy), who with Rayvaness were enough to justify a 1 month subscription.
To me I looked at the site and said: "If that were a DVD I'd buy it" - just don't expect any updates - cause they're not coming.
For $30 you see some great content. I wish they were still updating - I'd go right back to them! |
|
07-26-12 10:54am
Replies (2)
|
Review
244
|
Sharing Paris
(0)
93.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Paris is incredibly HOT. She does a great job at talking dirty, and has a kinky side that I really like.
Downloads are fast without sacrificing quality.
Pix are hot with a lot of finger banging action
While I'm new to this site I would definitely recommend it to those who like amateur sites |
Cons: |
Still a new site - I look forward to more content!
Site is part of naughtyathome company but you don't get all in one membership. Nor is there any information about getting a multi site discount.
(PS I love naughty at home with Desirae! see my review of her site) |
Bottom Line: |
Good site definitely give it a test drive if you like Amateur sites with a bit of kink.
I think this will grow into a high quality site and it's best to get in on the ground floor if you stay with a site for a long time (this way you lock in to pricing while it's low). |
|
03-14-07 06:27am
Replies (6)
|
Review
245
|
Shoplyfter
(0)
70.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Good production - they capture the action form 2-3 different stationary cameras and sometimes POV shots
- Good role play - everyone stays in character (while I found the niche to be repetitive. They did a good job of keeping the motif going.
- Decent diversity of model types (by that I mean there where some ethnicities and body shapes here, not just all porn central casting). It's still not what it should be - but I'm looking for positives.
- A few mmf and ffm scenes are thrown in but most are one on one.
- 1920X1280 12 mbps best video resolution with smaller files available for those of us with limited hard drive space.
- If you like "reluctant porn star" content this will scratch your itch
- weekly updates
- mostly teen content (sometimes "mom" or "big sister" is along too)
- Lauren Philips is here - I think she's incredible and would pay a $20 fee just go get her content.
- Krissy Lynn, Bobbi Dylan, Christi Stevens, Ella Knox, Emma Hix, Samantha Hyaes all offer top jobs |
Cons: |
PRO Cont:
- Trailers available so you can get a scene of if you want to download it or not.
- Good lighting and sound (I'm done with joining sites were you can't hear and see what's happening!)
Cons:
- Every shoot seemed to be the same - basic set up, sex, some reluctance ending either in excitement or continued excitement
- maybe it's just the age of #metoo, but it made me feel a little skeevy to be watching videos with pretend lack of consent.
- I'm a guy who likes plot so when I say there's too much exposition before action believe me there's toooo much lead in before action!
- captcha at every login
- |
Bottom Line: |
I received a free year's subscription to shoplyfters (not the whole team skeet network), though PU. While I was very greatfull for the chance to check out some new porn. I have to say I'm rather disappointed.
I was rather disappointed - even by free porn standards - the set ups are soooo similar it borders on boring. The camera angle the male talent everything is so much the same time and time again. While there is some actress variation, in whether or not she come around and enjoys it or just tolerates it, to me this site was a yawn.
Other than they are just too narrow cast I could get behind a good rating for this site. They have good production. 1/week is alright for a network site. The talent is good. The big problem I have is I feel like I'm watching the same show every week. It's like the groundhog's day of porn (please tell me you get the Bill Murray reference?!). I just can't deal with seeing the same thing week after week with the only variable being the sexy woman star.
Wish I could have said otherwise. This one is a no buy . |
|
03-17-19 05:45pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
246
|
So Cal Coeds
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Great network. Naughty America is huge with tons of girls and a new shoot just about every day
- Hot talent Julia Bond, Penny Flame, Haley Paige. Tiffany Taylor
- Easy organization. There are keywords and categories plus a cool "find my fantasy" feature where you can select the most minuet detail of what you want to see.
- pix with zip downloads
- mobile version of site available
- mp4 and wmv formatting. "trailers" available for download so you can "preview" a shoot before downloading it all (useful if you're still on dialup).
- they keep your favorites - even if you laps your membership they maintain this info. |
Cons: |
- Dead site. Last update was in 2007.
- Only about 40 shoots in this site
- Live shows of amateur are available (but it seem like every girl I like requires an extra charge).
- I've seen some of these girls in other shoots and for some of them, this is not their best work. (bad directing I guess).
- cross sells when you join and ads in member section |
Bottom Line: |
The network is good. It's a shame this site is not updated any more.
I Love the way they offer discounts to those on their twitter feed/email newsletter.
Bottom Bottom Line: If you join the network, check out this site (there are some hot girls and there aren't that many scenes). The discounts often make it worth it and I can't think of a girl that shoots pro that hasn't done Naughty America. While it's not usually my favorite example of a girls work, you can't argue with the range NA covers. They specialize in fantasy scenes and whether you're looking for nurses, milfs, or teachers - they probably have it here. |
|
10-22-12 04:46pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
247
|
Sophie Dee Live
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Sophie is a busty curvy MILF from the UK (I'm not good enough at picking accents to say if it's Welch or English, regardless it's sexy as hell!) I think Sophie is a rare find porn pro MILF who's not afraid to make dirty content (some riming for example)
- Weekly cam show with Maggie. Across the included cam network there are about 3 shows/day.
- Great MILF network: Shandra Fay, Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Charlee Chase Maggie Green, Penny Pax, It's Cleo, Carmen Valentine, Angelina Castro, Kimberlee, Sarah Jay are all included as part of the network. The whole network is in the MILF genre -so if you're a fan this is the place.
- guest stars keep things interesting
- Good mix of action (weighted toward solo, but plenty of hardcore and group stuff) For a solo site there was more group action then I was expecting (both all-girl, MMF, and FF+M)
- Mobile formatting friendly |
Cons: |
PRO CONT:
- Professionalism. Sophie has earned her Porn Star title. So when she does a scene (j.o.e., orgy, blowbang, girl-girl) she brings full energy. Her dirty talk is on point and she is a master of getting her costars to cum hard.
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. Older videos have reduced quality
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- 398 videos
- pictures available as zips. About 38,815 pictures (not sets just pix)
CONS
- No longer updating. Last update was October 2018
- No longer active in live cams. I'm not sure when she stopped but she hasn't made an appearance in the last couple of weeks at least - probably longer (does anyone know if she's still in the business?)
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in |
Bottom Line: |
CONS CONT:
- limited downloading options (mobile/desktop versions)
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago
Bottom Line:
I really struggled with the score for this review. I wanted to put it in the 80s. I think Sophie deserves a high score for her talent and her energy. She has a fun party person aura, she's hot as hell, and did I mention her accent is SEXY!?
Despite all these positives, there's no getting around the fact that there is not not enough content to rate a higher score. The fact that this seems to be a zombie site only cements the fact that this is a cautionary buy.
If you've seen Sophie Dee in other things and like her this site will not disappoint you. It's worth a month's membership for sure. If you're a general porn enthusiast I think you should skip this one. If you join the network, this is a great spot to wet your whistle.
If Sophie Dee went into retirement I hope she's enjoying it. I've always been a fan of hers's so this site left me with no regrets. |
|
07-24-20 06:51am
Replies (11)
|
Review
248
|
Spizoo
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- 10 sites included (focusing your interest)
- multiple file size available (.mp4) for me I find 780p is the perfect balance between size and quality. These files are about 1 GB and 1280X720 5.2 mbps
- 1080 files are about 2.75 GB 1920X1080 12.1 mbps.
- I don't have a 4K monitor so I didn't download anything that size.
- comments on videos allowed (although doesn't seem to be widely used)
- Scoring system with favorites and likes (again either isn't widely used or there are very few members here. I see a lot of great videos that have under a dozen likes)
- Decent tagging system (could be made better with more options or even user suggested ones)
- Plenty of great talent some of my favorites are: Natasha Nice, Penny Pax, Nickey Huntsman, Kate Kennedy, Karma Rx, Dana Dearmond, Alliya Hadid, Aaliyah Love
- as of November 9, 2019 over 2,000 scenes
- Good handling of photos. You can download .zips of the screenshots (about 100 pix) and the photoshoots (about 300 pix) |
Cons: |
PROS CONT:
- Good organization. Viewing can be arranged by: date, popularity, title, or category (sort of a "tag").
- Search works well even though there are a lot of videos I was able to locate something I'd found earlier with relative ease.
- Exclusive scenes
- More diversity than most sites (in terms of ethnicity not body type)
Cons:
- Adds behind the paywall, constant drumbeat of "buy more"
- .wmv only available in 480p format
- No unique "hook". This is cookie cutter porn. I like sites that have more of a personality and niche.
- If you're gonna be an "also ran" run of the mill network you've got to have a lot of content. They're not there yet
- Very few scenes have plot most is just straight to the action with no explanation. (I know I'm old fashioned.)
- Only 15 videos load/page. I know this seems like a small complaint but it's like I'm constantly loading a new page. |
Bottom Line: |
Because they're rather unremarkable with no real hook or niche (just well shot porn), I was going to put their score at a solid B (an 85). But since they have so much content I went higher with a B+.
With a new update pretty much every day (sometime thy must take a day off- lol), there's always something new. The problem is the heat can be totally hit or miss. There are some that are so steamy I think my laptop will catch fire. Other times I feel a yawn mid-way through.
The great thing about this site is you can often find their specials. I grab a year long membership for a very reasonable price. For what I paid I don't mind sorting through to find the gems. And there are some real gems.
They tease who is coming next, so I've found reason to check this site every 2-3 days to see the latest release schedule. I like that there's a good mix of up and comers and established porn stars.
In short: You'll find great porn here for a reasonable price. But you won't have your niche or kink catered to. |
|
11-09-19 03:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
249
|
Spring Thomas
(0)
70.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 640X480 3.2 mbps (more of a con)
- Spring is beautiful. I think she looks like a young Britney Spears (Britney as she looked in the early '00s)
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- mobile site
- all content is exclusive
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. Organization done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well.
- All interracial.
- Spring's character is the super slutty young lady (oxymoron?). Sort of the small town girl goes away to college and gets wild sort of thing.
- Some FFM content along with plenty of gangbangs, MMF.
- Spring is awesome at dirty talk. If you want to be degraded, she looks right into the camera and delivers her lines well |
Cons: |
-NO LONGER updating. Which is really confusing because they keep pushing out old scenes but don't remaster them at all. I don't understand what the motivation for that is.
- I can't tell how long ago they started but they max resolution is 640X480 3.2 mbps. That's ancient quality by today's standards.
- Just under 200 shoots. Enough to warrant the membership price - but just.
- Scenes can sometimes feel repetitive. I rather enjoyed them all (there aren't that many) but they certainly have a formula
- Scenes definitely feel repeated. While they do throw in some great guest stars from time to time. There's only so many times you need to see a hot woman deliver the same theme again and again. I'd love to see Spring now do a guest appearance on some of dogfarts other properties) |
Bottom Line: |
Spring was the perfect girl to carry dogfart in it's first few years. She has personality, charm, acting chops, a killer body, the ability to be sweet one moment and nasty the next. There are very few stars I've seen be able to play the range of porn that Spring does. It's incredible to see her be dominate to her "cuck"/BBC convert one moment and then submissive to her lover the next.
I'd love to see a return of Spring. I was drawn to her site years ago but never got around to getting a membership. Now that I've had a chance to explore the dogfart network. I've become a huge fan.
With all that said I wish I could recommend this site. But unless your smitten with Spring (or want to imagine a VERY naughty Britiney Spears). I don't think they're reason to get a multi month pass to this site. (Maye a quick one month in you find it on sale?).
The problem, as I'm sure you've guessed, is the lack of updates. If I'm spending $30 for a site I want to see the latest and greatest. Both in terms of new stuff and high-quality footage.
While the rest of dogfart has that- this corner of their empire does not.
If you're listening DF please remaster Spring's content and release it! |
|
01-21-19 02:33pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
250
|
Strapon Squad
(0)
82.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
*****This review is for the kink.com channel of strapon squad ******
- video stills available as .zip files
- kink is adding videos a few times a week - but the videos are all from years ago (see cons)
- Dirty talk is emphasized ("you want this don't you" - that kind of thing.) But often sounds put on and disingenuous.
- 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - however, this looks compressed to me
- multiple qualities available for download so you can save drive space |
Cons: |
- Sound quality was an issue. I would guess they don't use a boom mic so action goes from bearly audible to wake the wife up LOUD.
- The last update was in 2016.
- Videos are about 20 minutes long. Much shorter and the 45 minutes of action typical of kink shoots.
- as of August 11, 2017, only 15 videos available. (******the full site of Strapon Squad has 100s) |
Bottom Line: |
It looks like kink.com has licensed some of the content straponsquad.com to add to their network. I liked what was available more than I thought I would although the production value isn't as high as native kink content. I've certainly been spoiled with my membership. The focus of the site is pretty straight forward girl on girl domination often 2 on 1.
I wish there was more available through kink.com The quality looks good and the content has potential. They posted 3 videos that were light hearted - a nice change of pace; but a little boring.
The limited content keeps this from being a buy. With only 15 adds since January, it doesn't make sense to buy kink.com if this is the only site you're interested in. However, if you liked SS and are missing them since they haven't updated in months kink has similar sites that will scratch your itch. |
|
08-11-17 06:52am
Replies (1)
|
|