Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
251
|
Stretched Out Snatch
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations network (26 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- plenty of hot talent. Some of the standouts were: Sarah Shevron, Zoe Holloway, Leya Falcon, and Lyla Storm
- Mostly solo action with a sprinkling of girl/girl
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- More anal action than I was expecting given the site's theme |
| Cons: |
- The last update was in 2015 - doesn't look like they update at all anymore.
- Only about 70 videos on this site.
- Lack of organization is a problem. With this much content, you really need more search capability than star/Date/"popularity"
- Some scenes offer trailers most do not
- I couldn't get my download manager to work.
- Ads behind paywall
- Most movies have little or no plot (I know I'm old-fashioned) |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a decent site except for the lack of updates and amount of content (Apart from that Mrs. Lincoln how did you enjoy the play- lol).
What I'm trying to say is this is a good site that fills a nitch - but there just isn't enough here to get a top-notch score. The women are hot - the production value is good. The theme is followed. But at the end of the day, there isn't enough there; there.
In short if you want the rest of the network this is a nice corner to check out. But it won't take you long. |
|
07-17-18 08:29am
Replies (0)
|
Review
252
|
Sunny Lane Live
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- over 100 pix in most photo sets
- mix of content includes: solo, boy/girl, girl/girl, light (very light) bdsm, BTS, lots of BJ content
- Sunny is a nice mix of sexy innocent turned bad girl. She's very hot!
- unless I'm mistaken, large, natural breasts.
- some of her work from other places is collected here
- cam network and mult-site memberships included. Cam network has multiple girls a day: between 3-5/day!
- really I'm having a hard time balancing out what I'm about to say in the cons |
| Cons: |
- Has not updated since late Summer of 2011 :(
- rather small content library only about 85 videos
- painful organization: all the videos are loaded chronologically (with only about 85 it doesn't take long to look through all the shoot descriptions.) Photos are organized by: solo, g/g, b/g, and bts
- no zip downloads for pix
- no HD videos. There's 640X480 1.1 mbps, 720X480 1.3 mbps, 853X480 2.1 mbps
- none exclusive content |
| Bottom Line: |
I don't like to write negative reviews and I'm trying to stay positive here. I like Sunny but the experience on the site makes me feel like I'm back in the internet of the early 90s
This one is a skip. Normally for a star's site I'd at least say fans should pick it up. But if you're a fan you either already have most of this or can pick it up someplace else (videoz or videobox).
The star power of Sunny don't make up for the downsides of out of date design and quality, lack of content, and non exclusive content. |
|
01-18-13 08:44pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
253
|
Sweet Leah Luv
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Hot girl, great personality - fits the young niche well.
- 15 site network with Dylan Ryder, Ashley Fires, Puma Swede, Tara Lynn Foxx, Bruno B., Devon Lee, Hanna Hilton and others.
- Files available in many formats: flash, mp4, mpeg, iOS, PSP.
- Zips of picture sets available
- About 48 videos
- About 48 picture sets
- Some kinky stuff in addition to F/F, M/F, MM/F, FF/M, Solo. (there's anal, gangbang, interracial)
- Lots of variety great to see things mixed up.
- Fun personality Leah is a great performer and it shows in this site! She play the young "innocent" well.
- Braces in some scenes (contributes to the young look, She's born in '84)
- Good video quality - professional quality all around. Much of it looks like stuff taken from her other work.
- Natural Tits (small - but that's ok with me) |
| Cons: |
- No longer updating. Last update was in 2008. This is the biggest factor that kept me from giving the site a higher score.
- Says live shows are achieved, I could not find them :(
- Network focuses on interaction little of it is available on this site, even the twitter feed is inactive.
- Ads inside member section.
- Non-HD videos. 640X480 1mbps is the highest encoding available. |
| Bottom Line: |
What's here is definitely more HOT than not.
The site is so small you can go through it in a day and then explore the rest of the network. It's good quality even if not a lot of quantity.
BOTTOM BOTTOM LINE:
Join for Ashley Fires and Dylan Ryder (still updating) but then don't forget to check out Leah!
Leah has great hardcore stuff and puts herself into her work. She can talk dirty (love that), and still be cute and innocent looking. She makes it easy for you to have fun cause she looks like she's having fun! |
|
08-25-12 06:20am
Replies (4)
|
Review
254
|
Talia Shepard
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Talia is young (I'm guessing early 20s 🤷♂️), beautiful, very BUSTY (I'm guessing implants
- Ava seems to really enjoy her site and it shows in her smile and work
- Max video quality is great: 1920X1080 7.7 mb/s. There's 14 4K videos available. I'm still in 1080 HD land and suspect so are many others.
- Picture sets really shine zips are available and photos are very high quality 4000X2662, 72 pixel/inch, 2mb file size
- about 50 pictures a set
- Just under 300 pix sets
- 144 video updates as of January 15, 2020
- Update schedule: 1/week
- Includes access to belle network; 14 sites (including BRYCI.com and KATIEBANKS.com - both of which are awesome!)
- camming is partnered with chaturbate I think that means extra charges. I'm not a camming guy so I have no interest.
- Good organization though tagging/keyworkds and member ratings
- Comments available on videos, I find this very helpful in sorting what's download worthy.
- Well priced |
| Cons: |
Pro Cont:
- Some exhibitionism content (big plus for me)
- Some light girl/girl action (rare)
- Fair mix of boy/girl and solo
Cons:
- clips are not dates so I'm not sure what the update schedule looks like
- videos run 3-15 minutes (there a lot of vatieation. Newer stuff is generally longer)
- While it's clear Talia is having fun, there's very little personality. It reminds me of the sites in the 90s where it was enough for a hot ameature model to put up some pictures and videos. Most sites today have more interaction this is omitted here). |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a solid site and Talia is very talented. She can sometime put together a really hot scene with a bit of a set up and plot. Most of the time it's either her or her lover enjoying themselves and being a little goofy - it's sweet.
I'm normally a vidoe guy - but the photo sets in this site are really great and I've downloaded way more than I typically do from a site. I esspecially like the imagination and costumes. Sadly I was first introduced to Talia by seeing her Slave Leia pictures poste on tumber/twitter. I'm guessing without authorization - since the water mark was missing. I'm glad I found her site and was able to support the work that goes into production. If you join don't neglect the pictures!
I'm a little disappointed in the amoung of content available. It would be nice if they were updating faster.
All in all this is a hot woman with a decent site. There's nothing extraordinary. It's not bad it's not the best I've seen. It's a solid B. Nothing to be ashamed about, but nothing standout either. The big plus is there's a good network to underly the site so there's plenty here for your very reasonable membership cost. |
|
01-15-20 03:11pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
255
|
Teens Like It Big
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all Brazzers network (30 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Top notch talent. The squirting scenes with Rhiannon Ryder are really good. Also deserving of a look is Kali Roses and Kimmy Granger
- Clean search. Keyword searching along with a search bar. Lots of sub-topics to pick up on.
- scenes have clear descriptions so you can see how hot each shoot is
- action break down you can cut right to the positions/stuff you like
- 1080p 1.8 mb/s
- The mobile site works well on my iPhone.
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- Still updating: average 3-4 times a month
- Almost 550 scenes as of January 7, 2018
- Now that I have a long-term membership I'm appreciating the ability to save and like scenes for better organization |
| Cons: |
- I couldn't get my download manager to work. (Maybe I messed something up?)
- Preview is very limited. I wish I could have explored more before buying. But the price is certainly reasonable for such a large catalog
- Picture sets are large (a couple of 100 pics in each set) they are mostly screenshots of the action in the video.
- Cross-sells at sign up.
- Capta to enter (for me every time I log in) - Recently this improved and I'm not being asked as often. Maybe I fixed something? Or maybe they changed things with the 1st of the year? |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm not that big into the "teen" content. So this site wasn't what pulled me to the network. All in all, it's standard big name porn. Nothing of any note. If your favorite starlet has done work here maybe grab a membership the production value is high. But there's nothing stand out here (a little bit of novelty with the plots - but even that is not as strong as other parts of the Brazzer Network.
My recommendation: Unless you're dying to have the newest scene your favorite girl shot. Skip this one. There's plenty of fish in the sea. |
|
01-07-18 12:44pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
256
|
The Dick Suckers
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Access to network: manojob.com (hand job site) and MrPOV.com (m/f hardcore), Finishesthejob.com (umbrella property for all sites)
- Oral sex focus. (duh 🙄). With plenty of dirty talk. I think this family of sites does the BEST job of dirty talk.
- Consistant theme. Despite that they manage to be rather creative in setups and scenarios.
- Max quality 1080p (1920X1080). approx 5.2 mbps.
- Smaller sizing/streaming available
- Model interviews/just pop shot available
- videos run about 15 minutes. A little set up (introduction to the talent 2-4 minutes, action, cumshot (almost always a facial), wrap-up (girl talking dirty with her facial still in place)
- Good model mix; New girls and established stars. MILFS and "barely legal"
- Amazing models: Larking Love, Anikka Albrite, Christie Stevens, Zoey Nixon, Brooklyn Chase, Dylan Ryder (boy I miss her!), India Summer |
| Cons: |
PROS CON:
- Updates are about once a week, seems to be a 50/50 split of remastering previously shot and new material. I'm not disappointed by the upgrade in quility from old stuff since there are some real gems there
- Great organization. You can favorite content, grade content on a 5 point scale, use tags, search. I was able to find my favorite stuff very easily.
- Commenting is also available, but as these things go seems underused by the membership.
- Responsive customer service. I had a day off and was downloading a bunch of stuff while I had good wifi. I hit the anti-piracy cap. A quick email and I was right back to enjoyment. Any time I've reached out to the site I've recieved a quick and courteaus reply.
CONS:
- About 175 videos as of December 12, 2019
- Not a lot of model diversity. Mostly attractive white women (some racial diversity, some body type diversity, but like most porn it's a little rare.) |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS:
- Not much bad to say. I'm very happy. I'd like to see more of a discout for long term membership, but boy am I streching when I list that as a complaint.
Bottom Line:
After being dormant for a while the site owner has refocused on this property and it shows.
I've always been a fan of the director, Billy. He worked for DogFart.com for a long time and I think he brings out the best in the models he works with. I'll see a girl somewhere else and then see the performace that he encourages and it can be night and day.
I'm a little disappointed in only ~175 videos with as many years that they've been around. But reading the owner's blog it clear that was the result of being at Dogfart.com, now he's focused here and I for one am delighted.
I give this one a solid buy. If you like seeing oral and like dirty talk this site is perfect. For me I'm all about the dirty talk so I couldn't be happier. I've beena member for about 4-5 months, and as long as Billy keeps his focus here, I'll proably stick around for a year or more. |
|
12-12-19 04:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
257
|
The Dick Suckers
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Great direction. Iv'e seen many of these girls on other sites and their best work is always here.
- Male talent stays out of the way so it's more about the girl's performance. (nothing is worse than male talent trying to make it about him)
- 1920X1080 about 5.5 mbps.
- good combination of established stars and up and
comers. You never know who you will see next.
- clean organization; chronological and by favorite star.
- Network: you also get manojob.com and mrpov.
- Huge catalog with over 500 videos.
- stream through .flv, or download in wmv or mp4
- updates 1/week
- back catalog stretches back to 2005
- great dirty talkin' (my favorite part of porn) |
| Cons: |
- A few sites deviate from all oral; but like the name says: it's just dick sucking
- $30/month is a little pricey (but I can't at all argue with the quality)
- can't do a keyword search "redheads" for example
- no zip downloads for pix |
| Bottom Line: |
I really like this site. It's one of my all time favorite. I think their production value and attention to detail is topped only by kink.com. TDS has great audio and lighting so you hear the girl playing with herself during the performance. It's some of the hottest content on the net.
I wish they had some more aggressive pricing; but like is often noted in the PU formum, porn is under increased competition - so I understand the position they're in. Like I said above you get a very polished product for your dollar. I was satisfied :)
The site is packaged with manojob (a handjob site) and mr. pov. These are a good mix cause they round out the mainstream porn content. If I were to offer any expansion I would say to add an all anal site - but maybe that's just shooting for the moon. |
|
05-27-13 02:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
258
|
The Lesbian Experience
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations networks (27 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive (to the best of my knowledge)
- 4K videos available (no extra charge)
- Storylines are quick and to the point. While there is a setup there isn't much of one
- while there were some exceptions most of the actions seems to be legitimately enjoyed as opposed to "gay for pay"
- Mix of MILF and new talent.
- Great talent including Ryan Keely, Dana DeArmond, Cassidy Klein, Krissy Lynn and especially: LENA PAUL, & LAUREN PHILLIPS. Cory is a particular stand-out in this genre she's been making content on this theme longer than anyone I know of.
- STILL UPDATING
- Decent search (some tags but too limited), search bar
- Approx 145 scenes (warning! includes BTS/interviews) |
| Cons: |
PROS CONT:
- Star rating system
- excellent production lighting/set/talent everything looks great
- good use of toys (especially the Symbian)
- As a middle-aged straight dude - always good to see hot girl-girl action (I always try to learn something to bring home!)
CONS:
- updates about 1X/month
- little diversity (unless you count hair color and trimming regiment). There are very few women of size (most are porn valley clones - the MILFs tend to be an exception). Hardly any ethnic diversity.
- No user forum/comments available
- No previews available either download it or stream it to see if it's what you're looking for
- Ads behind a paywall (seems like everyone is doing it these days)
- BTS interviews. I'm listing this as a con because pretty much any I've ever checked out was a waste of time (also noted above). |
| Bottom Line: |
When I first reviewed this site I was rather underwhelmed. They've made good progress in the last few years. I'm really happy to see the production increase.
Everything here is solid. The talent is good. Direction is good (action gets started quick but with enough motivation to make it seem logical heck even sometimes plausible - LOL). Camera work is spot on with views of full bodies and a mix of "gonzo". I really like everything.
Ok if there is so much good why not a higher score? - Biggest reason. Lack of sizable catalog, and slow update schedule. Hopefully, this will change soon and the next time I review the score will be even higher.
To buy or not buy? Big draws are a mix of MILF and new talent. Not many sites combine that. Everything here is professional grade. All in all, I recommend it. You may only stick around for a month or two. But there's plenty of bang for your buck here. |
|
08-24-21 08:21pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
259
|
The Lesbian Experience
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations network (26 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Plenty of hot new stars: Bree Daniels, Katrina Jade, Allie Haze, Bonnie Rotten, Riley Reid (this BDSM inspired scene was one of the gems!)
- The catalogue goes back to 2014
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- Now that I have a long-term membership I'm appreciating the ability to save and like scenes for better organization
- most scenes have a good plot
- Way more kink then I was expecting: "step sister" setups (not for me), foot insertions, BDSM. a nice surprise |
| Cons: |
- Sporadic updates. Only 1 in 2018
- Lack of organization is a problem. With this much content, you really need more search capability than star/Date/"popularity"
- Some scenes offer trailers most do not
- I couldn't get my download manager to work.
- Ads behind paywall
- uploads of New Sensation DVDs
- Only about 45 scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
I know my score is low considering the long list of pros and the small list of cons. Here's are my thoughts:
The quality is good but there just isn't enough content to rate the site higher. Plus to have such infrequent updates means if you are interested in this site you'll blow through the back catalogue very quickly.
I like that they have great talent. I like that they use fun and interesting plot devices. I wish they would stop flirting with "sister" ideas - it's a turn off for me.
I myself like more hardcore in my porn. So girl/girl stuff usually isn't my thing. However, that said - the direction is top notch and the result is I found a lot more here than I thought I would.
I'd say skip this site and look at kink.com if you want hot girl/girl kinky stuff. If you want tender plot stuff - this site does that well. |
|
08-12-18 10:59am
Replies (0)
|
Review
260
|
The Lone Star Angel
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Fun Amateur Site. Angel has that Texas twang that I just love.
- Angel is a real woman. There nothing fake about her. She has typical breasts and is in her mid-late 30s (I'm guessing)
- Diversity of content. girl-girl,, plenty of blow jobs, solo material, hardcore, and quite a bit of anal for an amateur site. Angel also has some semi-public (outdoor) material
- Lots of Content. Almost a 100 videos and nearly 300 picture sets. Each picture set is approx. 25 images.
- Adequate video/picture quality.
- Most video is 1280X720 6.6 mb/s. Older stuff 360X240 .7 mb/s
- Image quality is good at 1024X680 pixels.
- Regular updates.
- Network. Angel is part of the Dreamnet.com network. There are 14 active women (mostly MILFs) and another 50 inactive sites included.
- Naughty. Angel is not afraid to get naughty with dirty talk or fun toy play. She enjoys herself on camera and brings passion |
| Cons: |
- If you are a breast man this is not the site for you. (I love all women, so this was not a problem for me).
- Limited fan interaction. You can email her and there's a blog.
- Liquor and fun. Angel is enjoying herself in her videos and more than sometimes that involves a cocktail. I'm no prude and whatever gets you in the moods is fine with me, but it may be objectionable to you. |
| Bottom Line: |
I liked this site. It was part of a network and I don't think I would have joined if it was on its own, but there was certainly enough here to keep me happy. A nice amateur site with a good amount of content. No complaints, but I don't think I'll stick around long. |
|
03-06-15 04:04pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
261
|
The Minion
(0)
62.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
CAUTION ATTEMPT AT HUMOR BELOW!
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 640X480 3.2 mbps (more of a con)
- scenes generally run 30 minutes(maybe that should be a con? 🤔)
- mobile site
- all content is exclusive (thank goodness!)
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. Organization done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well.
- 173 updates as of July 1, 2019
- dirty and degrading (that's not what I'm in to but maybe that's your thing) |
| Cons: |
-NO LONGER updating. Which is really confusing because they keep pushing out old scenes but don't remaster them at all. I don't understand what the motivation for that is. If the webmaster is reading this please let us know the motivation. I can't figure it out.
- I can't tell how long ago they started but they max resolution is 640X480 3.2 mbps. That's ancient quality by today's standards.
- Scenes can sometimes feel repetitive.
- I don't know what the word is for this kinda porn "vore" maybe? Anyway, scense are often shot with a gross factor that isn't a turn on to me. |
| Bottom Line: |
OK this is a very unusual site. It's centered on the male talent "Minon" the concept is sort of he's a disgusting guy and it would be hot for porn stars to have shoot with this gross guy. For me, this wasn't a turn on.
It was more about doing gross things to degrade the talent rather than a woman being so turned on she loses herself to the passion. So while I can find a rimming scene hot - these rim jobs weren't that.
A lot of times there is a playfulness with smashing food and things like that - other times it goes back to the gross with deliberate shots of gagging and vomiting.
I'm all about porn being whatever the producer and audience agree that it is - but for me, there was nothing here worth recommending. The nice thing is it was just one site within a very large and hot network so I checked it out and MOVED ON!
I kept the score out of the 50s because it does what it sets out to do. But I keep the score low because of the dated production quality, relatively few videos, and the repetitive nature of the work. Usually, this network does a great job of drawing the talent out and into some hot dialog. I didn't even find that here 😞 |
|
07-01-19 08:42am
Replies (2)
|
Review
262
|
The Stripper Experience
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Part of the Spizoo network (10 sites)
- multiple file size available (.mp4) for me I find 780p is the perfect balance between size and quality. These files are about 1 GB and 1280X720 5.2 mbps
- 1080 files are about 2.75 GB 1920X1080 12.1 mbps.
- I don't have a 4K monitor so I didn't download anything that size.
- comments on videos allowed (although doesn't seem to be widely used)
- Scoring system with favorites and likes (again either isn't widely used or there are very few members here. I see a lot of great videos that have under a dozen likes)
- Decent tagging system (could be made better with more options or even user suggested ones),
- Plenty of great talent some of my favorites are: Christi Ann, Anna Bell Peaks, Alix Lynx, LAUREN PHILIPS, AALIYAH LOVE (I think I could watch Lauren Philips all day long 😍)
- Just over 120 scenes
- Good handling of photos. You can download .zips of the screenshots (about 100 pix) and the photoshoots (about 300 pix) |
| Cons: |
PRO CONT:
- Good organization. Viewing can be arranged by: date, popularity, title, or category (sort of a "tag").
- Search works well even though there are a lot of videos I was able to locate something I'd found earlier with relative ease.
- Exclusive scenes
- More diversity than most sites (age (MILFS!), curvy, ethnicity)
CONS;
- Still updating? Last update was in July of 2019. They were on schedule for 1-2/month. But missing the last few months is alarming.
- Condoms in some scenes (not many but I noticed it)
- Adds behind the paywall, constant drumbeat of "buy more"
- .wmv only available in 480p format
- "let's fuck a stripper" plot line gets old fast.
- This is a high quality site. But with no real distinguish feature it feels tired. Don't get me wrong the girls are hot - bu that's most places. There's no originialty
- Very few scenes have plot most is just straight to the action with no explanation. (I know I'm old fashioned.)
- Only 15 videos load/page. I know this seem |
| Bottom Line: |
While it kills me that there are ads behind the pay wall - I appreciate taht I don't feel nickled and dimed. For example you don't have to pay extra to download, or pay exra for highest quality 4K videos.
I would have put their score in the 90s if they had more content and/or had a more agressive updae schedule. But there just isn't enough here to warrant a "great" - but they are a solid "good" - there plenty of grat talent and it's all shot well. While this site lacks indirty talk and seeing agirls personality - they are a high production company and cover all their bases.
Hopefully Spizoo will kick start this site and it will unleach the potential it has. |
|
10-20-19 12:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
263
|
The Tabu Tales
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations networks (27 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive (to the best of my knowledge)
- Pilot reminds me of a bad soap opera (the plots are unrealistic and the acting is fun - it's intentionally over the top and I like that in this genre - you can see everyone is having fun with it and not being too serious)
- Notable performers include Romi Rain, Zoe Wood, Riley Reid (you didn't need me to tell you that!), Cherie DeVille, Brandi Love (can't have MILF content without those two favorites!), Brenda James and through here I found Ariella Ferrera - A new favorite for me.
- STILL UPDATING
- Decent search (some tags but too limited), search bar |
| Cons: |
- as of September 7, 2021 only 125 scenes (less really see below)
- Erratic update schedule. Sometimes 1X/week then months go by with nothing (the last update was May 2021; so I think they ARE still updating)
- No user forum/comments available
- No previews available either download it or stream it to see if it's what you're looking for
- Ads behind a paywall (seems like everyone is doing it these days)
- BTS interviews. I'm listing this as a con because pretty much any I've ever checked out was a waste of time (also noted above). |
| Bottom Line: |
I don't know how New Sensations supports too "family" themed sites. I would have guessed that the market is too small for that - but apparently, I'm wrong. Although given that this TabuTales.com is so small maybe this one should only count as 1/2?
This site has a lot going for it. The high production, excellent acting, and directing all get the highest of marks. That said there's just not enough here to warrant a buy-in and of itself. While I keep a long-term membership to newsensations.com - I hardly ever venture to this part of the network. Mostly because there's seldom anything new here.
So why this score? It really comes down to lack of catalog/duplication of theme in network/lack of routine updates. I really like the artistic direction but can't justify a higher score with these numbers. Take a look at Familyxxx.com (in the same network). That will give you a better idea of what to expect. If you like the things there this site will be a good bonus for the network - otherwise pass on this one. |
|
09-07-21 07:34am
Replies (0)
|
Review
264
|
The Tabu Tales
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations network (26 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in a .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Plenty of hot new stars: Lauren Philips, Siri, Carter Cruise, Dakota Sky, Brandi Love, India Summer
- The catalog goes back to 2014 and obviously, that has lower quality
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 MB/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- About 450 scenes dating back to 2014 STILL UPDATING
- A lot of age play. There was more MILF/Teen female talent then I was expecting. I appreciate that it wasn’t all "teens".
- They keep to the plot and role play. I appreciate that even if the niche wasn’t for me.
- Now that I have a long-term membership I'm appreciating the ability to save and like scenes for better organization
- Theme consistency. I'm not a fan of the so young theme |
| Cons: |
- Lack of organization is a problem. With this much content, you really need more search capability than star/Date/"popularity"
- Some scenes offer trailers most do not
- Ads behind paywall
- I really am not a fan of the “step” family plot device
- Couldn't get a download manager to work |
| Bottom Line: |
I can't fault them for following their theme. And I didn't penalize them just because it's not my thing - but I find the "taboo" genre a turn off and a distraction. If this is your kink then they serve it well.
Video quality, star quality, good sound and lighting. It's a solid site and if it's what you're into you should grab a membership. The back catelog is solid. Other than the theme there's nothing I have a big complaint with. The only thing that held their score down with me was not having more content. (And the poor organization that plagues the entire network)
If you are getting the network maybe there's some hot stuff here you'll like.
For me, I wouldn't buy the network just for this site. For me I'm mostly ignoring it. |
|
09-05-18 03:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
265
|
The Training Of O
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- email alerts for when your favorite star/site updates
- Includes access to over 34 sites each with its own focus
- 50 "channels" with limited access to other sites' content. I've had good luck finding new sites to join based on these samplings.
- Updates about twice a month (Before Covid)
- Over 900 videos each video about an hour long.
- Videos 1280X720 approx 5 mb/s. Videos typically run about 1 hour
- great production value. As part of the kink.com family, there's never a time when you don't see good action. Camera work and direction are tip-top
- Allows download managers
- All star cast. Not surprising most new girls don't book something like this first. The advantage is all the talent is top of the line and professional
- Billing by rocketpay
- scenes are rated and you can heart them. I like this because I can then mark the ones I've already viewed/downloaded.
- tags help you find more of what you like
- over 550 scenes |
| Cons: |
PROs CONT:
- pix available as .zip files
- Some of my favorites (and it was hard to pick) were: Gabriella Paltrova, Dani Daniels, Karla Kush, Dee Williams,Carter Cruise and Britney Amber (another awesome MILF that is better every time I see her)
CONS:
- zips are available for pix but they are small sets. Typically less than 50
- download limit but it doesn't say what it is
- pricy, but you get a lot of bang for your buck
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- no 1920X1080 option. I would have thought they'd remaster some of these gems by now. If they have I couldn't find them. |
| Bottom Line: |
Even though this site is no longer updating I still went with a high score. Normally that's a pretty hard rule for me - sites that aren't updating can't get more than a "B". What makes TrainingofO.com different is its extensive back catalog (noted above) and unique niche. While there are other BDSM sites out there none take you inside what a prolonged session would look like. It's as much psychological as it is physical. the fact that they book top talent for this is the icing on the cake. Even if you join short term and enjoy all the back catalog it's more than worth the membership fee
No one does BDSM like kink.com does - and this site is probably the best in the network for seeing a performer be challenged and try something rather different. Even though the site has serious demerits for not remastering and no longer updating, there's just no getting around this site does its job very well.
All in all if you like BDSM this site should absolutely be on your buy list. |
|
09-07-21 06:59am
Replies (0)
|
Review
266
|
The Training Of O
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Premier kink content. Scenes are very heavy on BDSM - lots of spanking, whippings, gags, and discipline. Most scenes have an interesting setup with why the
- Includes access to 24 sites each with its own focus
- Updates once/2 weeks (approximately)
- Over 550 videos with a catalog years deep
- Good scene descriptions and user comments. You can get a good idea of if you'll like a shoot or not before loading it.
- Top fetish models. If she's a big name she's probably worked here. There's also more diversity of ethnicity/body type/etc. than any other network, I can think of.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- pix available as .zip files |
| Cons: |
- Organization is terrible for such a marquee site. You can filter by amount of pubic hair - but can't filter searches once they've been run. A feature other big site has had for years. With so much content I'm having a really hard time finding things that I know are here.
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- Rather pricey - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Hardcore means just that there's some stuff here that will probably not be your cup of tea. But if you like hardcore BDSM action you can't go wrong with here
-That quality comes at the cost of large files. This can be a little frustrating because each video contains an approximate 10-minute post-interview in which the model explains the good time she ha |
| Bottom Line: |
The theme of most shoots a "slave" is trained. The earlier shoots typically show several "days" of training with new skills being developed each day.
I give this site a solid buy. The action is hot. There's a lot of it. Updates keep coming. There's plenty of variety. I think kink should keep this site going.
I enjoyed this site a lot - in fact, it's one of my favorites in the network. Like the rest of kink it's not for the faint of heart. There's lots of electricity play, fisting, gagging, anal, and "impact play". That said there is a pre and post interview to make clear that everyone enjoyed themselves during the shoot. I especially like the fact that top talent will shoot for kink. The scenes with Riley Nixon, Holly Micheals, Lyla Storm, and Allie James were particularly good |
|
10-19-17 02:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
267
|
The Upper Floor
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- email alerts for when your favorite star/site updates
- Includes access to over 34 sites each with its own focus
- 50 "channels" with limited access to other sites' content. I've had good luck finding new sites to join based on these samplings.
- Over 500 videos each video about an hour long.
- Videos 1280X720 approx 5 mb/s. Videos typically run about 1 hour
- great production value. As part of the kink.com family, there's never a time when you don't see good action. Camera work and direction are tip-top
- Allows download managers
- Casting seems to be top line professional. But if you look in the background (and sometime in the main shoot) there are what I assume to be local members of the kink community. I find that very hot
- Billing by rocketpay
- scenes are rated and you can heart them. I like this because I can then mark the ones I've already viewed/downloaded.
- tags help you find more of what you like |
| Cons: |
- pix available as .zip files
- Some of my favorites (and it was hard to pick) were:Lauren Philips (they say redheads can handle more pain - she seems to be an example!), Aidan Starr is one of the main doms and she is hot as hell, Dee Williams (I love the MILFs), Penny Pax (red head and MILF). In short the talent is always good and the scenes are always hot. It's unusual to find a bad shoot)
CONS:
- zips are available for pix but they are small sets. Typically less than 50
- download limit but it doesn't say what it is
- "Partners" means you sometimes find content that's for sale on an outside site
- Expensive (but high quality)
- Occasionally I feel like the camera is panning too much - but I'm really being nit-picky here.
- Last update was June 2020 I'm willing to bet that's covid related. To pull a shoot like these off with Covid protocols must be a mess. I'm sure this site will be back in time |
| Bottom Line: |
I love this site. Shooting gangbangs is really hard (well or so I imagine anyway). This site and the ameature CathyCreampie.com I think do it the best of anyone. I seldom feel like I'm missing out on good action when the camera moves on.
I don't think there's a better BDSM site than kink.com and I think the upper floor is one of the top 5 sites on the network.
Action centers on a sub or two need to be challenged and prove herself. It's always hot seeing the dynamic play out. There's normally side activities that can just have hot as the main attraction
I thought about throwing down a 100 because when it comes to gangbang BDSM I think no one does it better (even with the competition within the network I think this site does it best because they make it hot without making it over the line - for me - a very subjective call to be sure.)
In the end, I decided that the lack of new updates and the historic inconsistent updates kept them from a top score. But the whole kink team should be proud of this site. It is truly top-notch. |
|
09-16-21 05:26am
Replies (8)
|
Review
268
|
The Upper Floor
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great orgy scenes. A lot of times I can't follow the action. Upper Floor doesn't jerk around like some other sites so you can see what's happening.
- About 550 scenes
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Lighting and sound are well done. I give them a lot of credit that especially hard when there's so much action going on.
- Lots of guy on girl and girl on girl action. Almost always multiple partners.
- zip downloads are back.
- more model diversity here than many other places. Mostly in ethnicity somewhat in body shape.
- Lots of big name talent. If you favorite porn star shoot fetish content she's probably worked for Kink - and UF in particular.
- Updates about 3 times per month
- scene length is usually over an hour I think one of the longest I saw was almost and hour and a half. |
| Cons: |
- While I'm happy to see picture access is back. I'm still frustrated with the user interface. It is deviling to find more of what you're looking for. There are keywords available but they are both very broad and not ever shoot is tagged correctly.
- Cross sells inside the member side. It frustrating to see search results come up for another site offering for you to buy more- especially because Kink.com is not a cheap membership
- Expensive (but high quality)
- Occasionally I feel like the camera is panning too much - but I'm really being nit picky here. |
| Bottom Line: |
The theme of most shoots a "slave" is proving herself to the community and finishing a final ordeal of submission/service. It is certainly hot. Many of my favorites were ones that deviated from this worn route.
Competition is often used - blow job, who can go without coming longer, that sort of thing. It made the site a lot more fun than it might otherwise be.
I give this site a solid buy. The action is hot. There's a lot of it. Updates keep coming. There's plenty of variety. I think kink should keep this site going.
While I have a couple of complaints they really are small. I'm unaware of any better orgy BDSM site. |
|
02-10-17 10:09am
Replies (0)
|
Review
269
|
Thundercock, formerly Big Cock Bully
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- From NaughyAmerica.com so access to a vast catalog and more updates than I could find a number for.
- zips for photos normally 300-500 in a set. Often model stripping down and then still of the action
- LOTS of 4K (I guess I really do need to update my monitor)
- UNLIMITED DOWNLOADS. This is harder and harder to find especially on the big network sites. Occasionally you have to solve a CAPTA to download.
- Most videos have a preview so you can see before you download (which is good even the 1920X1080 12 MB/S content runs about 4.5 Gigs per file!) My poor hard drive can't handle it - LOL
- Organization by date/recommended (worked pretty well - or I'm not picky LOL)/most popular/most favorite/star/"toy synched - I'm new to that idea!/length
- The best shoots have models that can act. Standout include Angela White, Brandi Love, Ashley Fires, Lauren Phillips, Britney Amber, Alexis Faw, Casca Akashova, Michele James, Cherie DeVille, Penny Pax, |
| Cons: |
PRO Cont:
- Over 40 niche sites so if you like a particular plot device they may well have a few dozen (hundred?) scenes in your favorite.
- Tags (for EVERYTHING you could think of!), search bar, suggested next watch
- feedback is available through comments (with staff responding)
- Star system for rating
- playlists available for organizing
- multiple formats are available so you can pick 4K to lower resolution.
- Normally Naughty America is below average on dialog and directing. This time I give them an above average. Most of the moaning is just repeating the star's favorite line over and over ("OMG!"/"Yeah that's it"). Maybe because these are more experienced performers, the dialog tends to be better.
- Excellent production you see and hear all the action.
- MOSTLY MILFS! AND REAL MILFs at that!
- Creative setups typically a wife or mom is trying to get an "alpha man" to stop bullying by bribing him with sex
- More interracial content on this site than most of network |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS:
- cross-posting. Things now get filed in multiple channels at the same time so you get Naughty Office stuff Naughty Doctors (if the setting was the doctors' office). It just makes wading through this big catalog all the more difficult. I've come to accept I'll never see it all
- "On Demand" shoots inside the members' area (ie buy individual movies).
- Cross sales inside member side
- slow update schedule less than 1/month
- no updates in several months (maybe covid related?)
- "smaller" site. Hard to count with infinite scrolling instead of pages. I'm guessing about 250 videos
- Too many facials/cum on tits for my taste. I like a good creampie
Bottom line:
This is one of the hottest sites on the Naughty America Network. The dialog tends to be better and the sex tends to have more energy. I get off on the intensity. The opening dialog also tends to be sexier rather than the typical porn cliches
Even more than other porn, this requires a model that can do more than reading lines. There has to be that tease of "she's going to but why is she going to" It's that whole she wants to but for some reason it's wrong. The result is when it's good it's great but when it's bad it terrible. That's a long way of saying there is a ton of inconsistency (thankfully the recommendation engine help separate the good from the bad)
All in all some of the best porn on the network is here. If you like cuckolding/MILF porn (bad moms too), there's a good chance you'll like this
I rate it at a buy (for $17.76 - cute - with the PU link it's a bargain to boot!) |
|
10-27-21 07:39am
Replies (0)
|
Review
270
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
To start, I'm not a fan of transexual porn but since I was reviewing the other parts of the network I thought I'd help out anyone who was interested.
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Most videos are about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- Over 250 scenes. 2 updates/month. Still updating
- Search bar (although limited navigation tools). If you know what you want you can find it pretty easily. If you're looking to browse there are very few tools to help.
- "featured" section give good access to greatest hits. |
| Cons: |
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I'm really disappointed that they haven't
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price. Perhaps the price is worth it because this is a hard to find niche? |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm not an expert in TS porn, but it since I don't stumble across it often I'm thinking its a harder to find niche. For that reason I bumped the score into the 90s (from what would have been the high 80s) because I think it's filling an underserved niche.
Another nice plus is the setups. They diversify the action. To be perfectly candid I looked at titles and skimmed about 10 videos so that I could complete a fair review.
This site doesn't have some of the extreme treatment that much of the rest of kink.com has. For sure there's rough sex, but it's not as over the top as many of the other sites.
I think if you're at all interested in TS content you should try this site. Kink has a great reputation and there other work is solid. The production value is always top notch (good camera angles, good lighting and sound, good set ups). Plus they allow 5 previews a day so there no reason to not give them a look. |
|
04-10-17 07:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
271
|
TS Seduction
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus - including a second TS site (I also reviewed that one)
- Updates once/week (pattern is every Tuesday)
- over 550 videos with a catalog years deep
- Good scene descriptions and user comments. You can get a good idea of if you'll like a shoot or not before loading it.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour
- Lots of different cross kinks for example: "mommy" play/public/domination/humiliation/multiple partners |
| Cons: |
- Organization is terrible for such a marquee site. You can filter by amount of pubic hair - but can't filter searches once they've been run. A feature other big site have had for years. With so much content I'm having a really hard time finding things that I know are here.
- Shoot have some stills that you can preview before loaded the video - but no downloads.
- photo zips have been added back - but when I was last a member they didn't reapply that for the whole back catalog
- Rather pricy - but this may be one of those time that you get what you pay for.
- Cross sells on the member side plus a "buy kink gear" adverts seems unnecessary given the high membership fee. But there is NO BETTER for these niches quality than kink sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
Important note: This is not my fetish, so in all candor I've only explored enough to write a competent review. I hope you find it useful.
With a large catalog and president updates I think this site is a firm buy if this is your kink. I went with a rather high score because I think this is a rather hard to find niche and people who are looking for it will appreciate the hard work kink.com puts in.
Shoots are long (about 45 minutes of action). And varied I'm constantly amazed at the imagination of the "writers".
Kink brings together top talent (on all it's other sites; I'm assuming the same is true here - sorry I don't know much about TS models) and great production value. If you can handle the high price you'll be very happy. |
|
05-16-17 02:24pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
272
|
Twistys Network
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Launched in 2004. Mostly focused on girl-girl action (some hardcore ff/m and m/f action but that's an exception, not the rule)
- Picture galleries really stand out. While most sites do them at twisty's they shine.
- High-quality video. It's gotta be 1080 at least cause it looks amazing on my old monitor (no 4K for me)
- as of September 3, 2021, 3519 scenes
- Amazing talent. All my favorite MYLFs are here (Lauren Philips, Brandi Love, Cherie DeVille, Britney Amber), along with lots of new stars (my sense is that many new girls start out with girl/girl shoots). I particularly liked finding: Scarlett Bloom, Kadence Marie, Molly Stewart (and while I'd seen here before ALEX COAL is fantastic)
- Tags available
- Good descriptions of each shoot
- Streaming player has advanced controls (skip 10sor 30s, volume, full-screen toggle)
- like/dislike, favorite, watch later allow for flexible scene sorting.
- short plots than straight to the action
- never a bad shoot Light/audio/drct. all good |
| Cons: |
PROS CONT:
- diversity in casting (tattoos, age, ethnicity. Not body shape pretty much everyone is "porn star perfect"
- excellent search features the "filter" really helps narrow down what you're looking for.
- Updates come once a week
CONS
- download will cost you extra (one fee gets you both .zip downloads of photo galleries and video shoots).
- ads behind the paywall. Heck, you have to click past an ad every time you log back in.
- No previewing/trailer available. So you have to check out the pictures or skip through the video to see if it's your thing
- most models have boob jobs. I love all shapes and sizes but I know some have a real aversion to augmentation.
- cross-sales are everywhere. It would be nice if they threw the occasional shoot from one of those sites at you just to see if it was up your alley |
| Bottom Line: |
I *hate* the way the industry is moving toward low prices to get in with streaming extra fees for downloads. I know it's fighting the tube sites and such but still, this old-timer doesn't like it one bit. I feel like I'm constantly being hit up for money.
I generally don't buy many girl/girl sites but this one exceeded my expectations. Normally these sites can be overly repetitive; not at twisty's they did a good job of keeping the action moving and different in each scene (that said focus here is on mainstream and
not kink porn).
I went in for a year membership (I figured with streaming-only I didn't want to be rushed in testing them out). While I'm not disappointed. I won't be re-upping either. My main motivation was wanting to check out Holly Randell's work. I've been listening to her podcasts and wanted to see it for myself (twisty's is also a sponsor of her podcast) so I guess advertising works)
I went with a B+ grade because they do everything well but are not killing it. I think there must be better all-girl stuff out there somewhere. I like that they have good organization and a deep catalog. But the big killers are not being able to download (I'm sure others know how to cheat that - but I'm not interested). Also holding them back is a general timidness. There's no character here. Other than all girl/girl what's the hook? (Maybe I'm jaded and that should be enough - fair enough)
Twisty's is above average in every way (booking/directing/production) I don't think I saw a bad shoot of anything in the last 2 years). That said there's nothing that's standout or exemplary either. They do very well. But they're not pushing themselves (and maybe they don't need to, to hit the target audience they're going for) |
|
09-03-21 07:59am
Replies (0)
|
Review
273
|
Ultimate Surrender
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Girl/Girl fight than get it on. Fun idea. (I liked this site better than I thought I would. Especially the more recent vides - last 2 years or so)
- Top of the line talent. Even one of my lesser know favorites, Paris Kennedy and Wenona have shot here.
- Updates about once a week
- Fun idea with 1st I dominate you then I make you cum.
- Good amount of multiple action if you want groups
- Good preview policy you can see 5 previews a day.
- Over 900 shoots
- High quality 1280X720 4.1 mb/s
- Lots of strap on and toy play |
| Cons: |
- Narrow niche. I got tired of the concept much sooner than I thought I would.
- No picture downloads available
- Cross sells inside the membership side
- Poor organization. You have to know either the model or the date to find anything. This was really frustrating when I was looking through trying to find something I'd seen before but could only remember that it was a masked "fighter".
- I couldn't understand how scoring was conducted (than decided it didn't matter 😛) |
| Bottom Line: |
Kink is a leader in BDSM content. Although this is sort of different than most BDSM.
It was a lot of fun seeing the different positions they could twist into - also kind of hot to see a woman showing off and exposing her body while trying to defend herself and wrestle with another woman.
The action always ends with an interview reassuring the viewer than everything was consensual and enjoyable.
This site exceeded my expectations. I like the wide variety of models While most of the wresters are fit, obviously often at the gym types, there was plenty of mix. The MILF fights were particularly good.
I hope kink keeps updating this site. I'd hate to see it go. |
|
01-22-17 08:41am
Replies (0)
|
Review
274
|
Unlimited MILFs
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations networks (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos. This is down 3 sites from when I last reviewed them a few years ago. Not sure what's missing. Maybe the internet archive can solve this mystery?
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 3840x2160 2.5 mb/s
- For me, the 1920X1080 1.2 mb/s is a perfect mix of quality and storage
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- Steaming and downloads available (much to my chagrin something that's becoming rare these days)
- Mobile version of the site was easy to use on my iPhone.
- loading and downloading is quick even on my basic cable connection
- all content is exclusive (to the best of my knowledge)
-plenty of hot talent. Some of the standouts were: INDIA SUMMER, Priya Ria, Alexis Fawx, Kaylani Lei, MONA WALES, Krissy Lynn, REAGAN FOXX, RYAN KEELY
- A good product that keeps producing |
| Cons: |
Pros Con't
- NEW content 3 new shoots were added in May of 2021
- Approx 360 videos
- I like that the women are really MILFs (meaning they're in their 30s-40s). It's not the "teen mom" look.
- Good directors many of the talented actresses give some of their best performances here
CONS:
- Since my last membership (probably back in '19) they've had surprisingly few updates in that time (I'm sure some of that is covid related.) Maybe
- Cross-posting across the network (ie: Mom is also a hotwife, the video is posted to both sites in the network.)
- Lack of organization is a problem. With this much content, you really need more search capability than star/Date/"popularity" I really can't understand how amateur sites have better search than a company like NS. I identified this same problem in my review years. I know it's a bigger fix than adding 4K, but I think it's a bigger problem. What good is having all this content if you can't find what you like? |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS Con't:
- Trailers are not available so separating the good from the bad is tough. Although I see they partner with a popular "tube site" where you can get 10-12 minute previews of many of their videos. Kills me that they don't just add that to their page.
- Ads behind a paywall
- Most models have implants (I'm not critical - but I know for some it's a big turn off)
- Most models have the "porn valley look" more make-up than needed. The result is so much of the talent looks interchangeable. Which is sad because they hire beautiful talented women and then don't let them shine.
Bottom Line:
The big thing that keeps the score down on this site is the lack of updating. Even excusing the covid period it doesn't seem like this is the priority of the network. Which is a shame I'm a big MILF fan and this site is among the best around.
The biggest pluses are the talent (they even brought in some talent I haven't seen other places and I watch a lot of MILF content).
Overall I rate this a buy, but only for the MILF fans. It's worth sticking around for a month or two, but you probably don't need the year-long membership. |
|
06-06-21 07:45am
Replies (2)
|
Review
275
|
Unlimited MILFs
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
01-09-19 06:15pm (Update History)
Reason: added additional information to get an excellent rating.
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations network (26 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- Steaming and downloads available
- Mobile version of the site was easy to use on my iphone.
- loading and downloading is quick even on my basic cable connection
- all content is exclusive (to the best of my knowledge)
plenty of hot talent. Some of the standouts were: RayVaness, Shay Fox, INDIA SUMMER, Priya Ria, Brenda James, Shannon Kelly,
- I like that the woman are really MILFs (meaning they're in their 30s-40s. It's not the "teen mom" look
- The best part of this site is all the classic stars. There are women here that I haven't seen in a while and it was great to see their updates. |
| Cons: |
- The last update was in October 2013 - doesn't look like they update at all anymore.
- Less than 100 updates dating from 2007 (older content is lower quality than newer)
- Lack of organization is a problem. With this much content, you really need more search capability than star/Date/"popularity" I really can't understand how amateur sites have better search then a company like NS
- Trailers are not available so separating the good from the bad is tough
- I couldn't get my download manager to work.
- Ads behind paywall
- Most movies have little or no plot (I know I'm old-fashioned)
- Most models have implants (I'm not critical - but I know for some it's a big turn off) |
| Bottom Line: |
I enjoyed the site. I wish they were still updating. If they were I probably would have gone 5-7 points higher in my score. The bottom line is unless one of the actresses that you haven't seen in a while has a shoot here - there probably isn't much here to attract you.
The price is fair considering the back catelog and wide network. But after a month or two, you're likely to get bored.
My recommendation is to join on a deal but only stick around for a month, if this is the only site you're into. The wider network is solid and I've been a member for about 6 months.
The category of MILF can be a little all-encompassing. I wish there was a little more attention to the theme - but that's being rather knit-picky. |
|
10-02-18 05:36pm
Replies (0)
|
|
