Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Whole site is interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- site focus on "slut wives" and has a raunchy focus.
The gils are amateur and attractive
- network has about a dozen sites in it, but much of the content is shared between them.
- Nice price: right now there is a special to pick up the whole network for $30/year.
- quality is "acceptable" 640X480 3.2 mbps.
Cons:
- Small number of models.
- No posted update schedule :( Since new posts are undated I can't even guess. It seems to me they're taking content that was shoot 10 years ago and claiming it's new updates
- Videos are only available in .wmv
- pictures are not available as .zip
- picture quality is 300X200. (From the view I bothered to look through, mostly screen shots of videos.
- organization is lack, but there isn't lot of content to keep track of.
- video chunks are added one at a time; so some videos look incomplete.
Bottom Line:
This whole network has been one long disappointment. I didn't have high hopes (with $30/year I wasn't expected the world't best website). That said they managed to fall below my low expectations.
The girls on the site are plenty hot, and the content itself is raunchy (I do so love raunchy porn). But the quality is poor, the updates are lacking, the organization is nearly non-existent. When I look for good things to say - I have a hard tie coming up with anything.
If interracial is your thing you should look somewhere else - there just isn't enough her to be bothered. Even with the ridiculously low price the frustrations don't make it worth it.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Wide variety: Vicky includes lots of “friends” so you often are surprised by who shows up for a shoot.
1280X720 about 3 mbps. For the newest videos (however many of her “HD” shoots are upscaled from lower quality videos :()
- Weekly cam show, with archived shows in flash format
- Big network: you also get Nikki Benz, Gabby Quinteros,Puma Swede, Deauxma, Angelina Castro, Francesca, Sunny Lane, Julia Ann, Carmen Valentine,filthycureonline, Bobbie Eden, Charlee Chase
- Vicky is a long time professional so there is lots of variety in the style of content (g/g, b/g, bjs, hardcore, etc.)
- fun extras like a blog and wall paper
- Cam network has as many as 6 girls on a day! Gotta love that
- Vicky is the manager of the VNA network I admire a smart woman with good business sense.
- Huge catalog with over 500 videos.
Cons:
- .wmv files are at higher quality than .mp4 (sorry if you wanted to load this onto your ipad, you can do it but it doesn't look pretty)
- Boob job (not a down side for me, but not everyone is me).
- many scenes are missing a description so you need to download to see if you like it.
- no zip downloads for pictures
- The earliest videos are 480X360 1.33 mbps quality
- According to TBP, daily limit is 5 gigs. With modern file sizes pushing 700 mb, it’s very easy to hit that cap when you’re checking out content across the network. I know they need to fight piracy, but perhaps a better balance needs to be struck. The actual limit is 10 gig - no warning when you get close :( )
Bottom Line:
Vicky is a real professional who’s shot for plenty of big name studios. She brings professionalism and great attitude.
This network specializes in two things hot MILFS and cam shows. If you like that $25/month is a fair price for a good product.
Vicky is a hot professional, with a strong fan base. If you don't know who she is a fast search will whet your appetite. This is a great place to pick up a lot of her work. Fans will be satisfied with the mix of new content and compilations form other work (although much of that at sub par quality).
To be frank I like Vicky, but in my months of membership I found myself on her partners' sites more than hers because they were more compelling to me. Not that there's anything lacking in her site, far from it, just the network has an abundance of riches
To buy or not to buy?: Buy. There's plenty to love for the longtime fan and the newbie alike.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Great value. I you join through PU you can grab this site for $12/month. I've also seen deals for as low as $8.
- 1,000s of videos and shoots.
- Good organization. There are keywords, stars, niche, and channels including content from KINK, Elegant Angel, Evil Angel.
- Roku support (although I didn't try this myself)
- Flow mode combines selected material into one viewing mode.
- Newer material is in HD
- New material everyday.
- Lots of variety you can find pretty much anything here. Although maybe not enough of it to make you happy.
- With all of this content you're sure to find your favorite girl.
Cons:
- Some content gets added multiple times because it appeared on multiple DVDs.
- all material is non-exclusive
- While they have a lot of content most of it is mainstream, if you're looking for the more niche material, you'll find it; but maybe not enough (see pro)
- some of the quality is really poor - there are some films that look like 70s 8mm
- no pix.
Bottom Line:
Great bang for your buck. To have access to this much material for about the cost of a movie ticket is stunning.
The organization is good enough that you can find what you want. I sort of had a hard time limiting myself down to a manageable list of want to sees, because of how much is here.
VB is one of the giants. If you've never joined it's well worth the cost to take a look. There will certainly be enough here that you'll get your money's worth. For me I join every few months to check things out, but don't stay around very long because it's just too much effort to find something to watch. It's like having a TV with 1000s of choices - it gets to be overwhelming.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Great site for MILF fans
- Network includes full access to: Shandra Fay (of filtycuteonline), Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Francesca, Charlee Chase, Sara Jay, Curious Gabby, Bobbi Eden, Carmen Valentine, Vickyathome, Angelina Castro, Nikki Benz, and Deauxma
- Live shows nearly every day some days have as many as 5 or 6 girls!
- Live shows are archived so you can watch them when you are available
- each individual site has it's newest updates in 1080 resolution.
- each individual site has .mp4 and .wmv format available (usually .wmv is higher quality)
- hardcore professional girls that rarely disappoint. (See next entry)
- Good mix of pro and amateurs: Vicky Vette, Nikki Benz, Puma Swede etc. are all giants in the bus. but there are also great amateurs like Sanda Fay and Angelina Castro
Cons:
- Archived shows are only available in flash format.
- while newer videos are in 1080 quality, older stuff, across the network is mostly 640X480
- only about half the sites of zip downloads for picture sets.
- nearly ever girl has implants (some object, I don't)
- In general the individual sites have poor organization.
- The archived cam shows are oly organized chronologically with as many as 6 shows added a day, it can be hard to find what your looking for.
Bottom Line:
$25/month is a great price for all the content you get. With 13 hot girls and new every day (between the individual sites and then cam shows).
It's great having such a constant stream of content. The girls keep a reliable update schedule so you can count on new material each week.
Buy or No Buy?: I rate this site a "buy". If you're into hot MILF this network is great. Between the bakers' dozen individual sites and the extensive cam network there more content they you can consume in a month. There are plenty of hot girls and enough diversity (content, not ethnicity) that you can find what you're looking for.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
*****This review is for the kink.com channel of bizarre video******
- video stills available as .zip files
- kink is adding videos a few times a week - but the videos are all from years ago (see cons)
- Variety of fetish content (bondage, insertions, master/slave, wax play, machines, latex, humour - rare find)
- 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps
- multiple qualities available for download so you can save drive space-
- Thye have been adding a new video every day so hopefully, the lack of content problem will get better.
Cons:
- Videos are about 15 minutes long. Much shorter and the 45 minutes of action typical of kink shoots.
- as of July 28, 2017, only about 6 videos available. (******the full site of wasteland.com has 100s)
- videos can be disorienting - some of it looks like it was shot on a shoulder cam.
- It's hard to say many cons when there's such limited availability.
Bottom Line:
It looks like kink.com has licensed some of the content wasteland.com to add to their network. I wish there was more available through kink. The quality looks good and the content has potential. They posted 3 videos that were light hearted - a nice change of pace; but a little boring.
Kink now has over 40 channels (but counting this one with only 6 videos in it is a little inflated.)
The limited content keeps this from being a buy. Wasteland may be worth checking out on its own but if you think you can get enough of their content through a kink subscription - you're wrong.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Plenty of hot new stars:
- The catalog goes back to 1996 and obviously, that has lower quality
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- About 60 scenes STILL UPDATING
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. Organization done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well. If anything it returned too many hits. (better than missing content I suppose)
- Theme consistency. The whole network is interracial. This wasn't the big draw for me, but it certainly is for most of their fans. This is probably the premier network for the interracial niche. As far as I know, they were the first to grab this market back in 1
Cons:
(PRO CONT.)
- I was surprised to see how many new models I found here. There were many stars that I've never seen yet. Some top talent includes Jada Stevens, Chastity Lynn, Jaelyn Fox, Hannah Hays, Ivy Rider.
- Some anal and 3-Somes.
CONS:
- A little too much of the age-play/"daddy" motif then I was comfortable with. There are some great gems here - but for me, most of the content turned me away with the description.
- Only updates once every 3-4 months.
- Some older models but most are in the teen category. It fits the theme but for me, I'd like to see a bit more of the mix. (I'm sure others will disagree with me)
Bottom Line:
Looking at the back catelog they had and the strength of the network. I decided to buy a long-term membership right off the bat. Less than a month into membership I don't regret that one bit. There's so much great content here. Right now I'm especially enjoying going back and falling for actresses I haven't seen in a while.
This site didn't take me long to go through since it has only 60 videos.
The shallow catelog and lack of current updates kept me from scoring this higher. That said this is a solid site and a great network. This is an easy site to recommend. In short your buying decision tree should look like this 1- Do you like (or not mind Interacial content) 2- do you like young looking models 3- do you like your porn more on the raunchy side. If your answer to those 3 questions is "yes" - then you will love this site.
Bottom line - wait for the newest update and then give this site a try.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- Billing through CCBill and Epoch
- Almost always FFM (some FFMM, some FM with "step-son" or "step-daughter" watching)
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Plenty of hot stars: CHERIE DEVILLE, JANET MASON, Penny Pax, JASMINE JAE (can you tell I like the MILFs? 😜 Although KAYLEE HILTON is here and amazing!)
- The catalog goes back to 1996 and obviously, that has a lower quality
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- About 95 scenes STILL UPDATING
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. The organization is done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well. If anything it returned too many hits. (better than missing content I suppose)
Cons:
PROS CONT:
- Production is strong. You can see and hear all the action.
- Unique setups often times a niche site can feel repetitive, this one stays fresh with lots of interesting plots.
- Great direction - I've seen these same girls in other sites and here they let out their inner freak. BIG plus!
- In the scene with Tara Holiday & Chastity Lynn- Chastity masturbates with a bat. My god!
- Theme consistency. A lot of sites stretch the meaning of MILF - that not the case here. These are hot older women. Usually paired with young female talent. Another common idea is son or daughter watches mom get it on with 1 or 2 guys while cheering her on.
- customer support was prompt and helpful. I had a small issue; they were back to me the same day with a good solution.
Bottom Line:
CONS:
- Only 95 scenes is too few
- The update schedule is roughly once every 3 months.
- Scenes are occasionally repetitive. The majority of scenes don't give this impression but sometimes I feel like I'm watching a rerun. Maybe that's more a testament to how many of these scenes I checked out!?
Given that I had to use most of the con box for more pros, I guess I really like this site and recommend it. I really wish they would pour some more resources into this part of the network.
Most of the scenes are fall into 2 broad categories: "Mom" reveals to "daughter" that she's a slut; usually this ends with "daughter" joining mom in enjoying a very lucky guy. Or son is a voyeur and gets off on watching "mom" with 1-3 dudes. Occasionally the scenes turn to humiliation flavored stuff but that's normally placed in their cuckolding sites. I think this is a really good balance and makes these scenes some of the hottest on the network. I've probably downloaded a greater percentage of these videos than any other part of the network.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Includes access to all 34 sites on kink.com
- 269 scenes as of March 1, 2020
- Top notch production adn quality.
- Good direction you see all the action and actresses do some of their best work here.
- Top of the line talent I really enjoyed the scenes with Bobbi Starr, Dana DeArmond, Julie Night, Sasha Gray (god how I've missed her), Phoenix Marie, Isis Love, Christina Carter (she's really hard to find and she's so good!), Dee Williams, Jade Fire, Penny Barber (I can never get enough of her)
- Model diversity. More ethnic diversity than most sites. Less body
type diversity than typical of kink network
- More creativity than I have. I wouldn't have guessed that there could be so many different ways to tie someone up and spray then/submerge them in water. I was wrong.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps.
- Light and sound is always good no poorly light shots even when they shoot in a "dungeon" set.
Cons:
PROS CONT:
- mix of action some "disciple" is handed our by men - sometimes a woman
- Post model interview focus on consent and respect
- It's interesting to see talented women pushed into interesting situtations and bondage. However I found that while there were some different setups the niche itself became retative. I found myself only tunning in to my favorite actresses
- pix available as .zip downloads
- Easy organization: tags, search
- No longer updating last update was August 2013 (there was only one update in 2018)
- No PU Discout 😞
- Narrow niche. I just couldn't get excited with the premise of the site, but that's just me.
Bottom Line:
The real value of this site comes from the kink network. Kink is a leader in BDSM porn. They care a lot about getting things right so you see the lengths they go through to demonstrate consent. They also don't cheap out on production they have dedicated sound and multiple cameras for all the action.
The preview side give you up to 5 previews a day. The previews run almost two minutes so you can see enough to know if this is what you're into or not. Try before you buy.
The site is a little pricy so if this is all you were into I don't know if I can say if justifies the price. That said I don't think you can get content like this anywhere else on the web. So you may be out of options.
All in all I would give this a pass except for the most die hard BDSM fans. The fact that they haven't updated in a while and don't seem likely to restart is a bit of a killer.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Unique niche. I'm not aware of any other water based BDSM site.
- Top of the line talent I really enjoyed the scenes with Bobbi Starr, Dana DeArmond, Julie Night, and of course Sasha Gray.
- Model diversity. More ethnic diversity than most sites. Less body type diversity than typical of kink network
- More creativity than I have. I wouldn't have guessed that there could be so many different ways to tie someone up and spray then/submerge them in water. I was wrong.
- Includes access to all 24 sites on kink.com
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps.
- Light and sound is always good no poorly light shots even when they shoot in a "dungeon" set.
- Post model interview focus on consent and respect
- mix of action some "disciple" is handed our by men - sometimes a woman
Cons:
- No longer updating last update was August 2013
- Narrow niche. I just couldn't get excited with the premise of the site, but that's just me
- My biggest complaint with this whole network is the lack of search. They have keywords but very few shoots are tagged. There is not much you can search for other than model and date. The result is if you don't know what you're looking for - it's hard to find without lots of browsing.
- no photos for download
- I like porn with a plot (I know I'm a weirdo). Anyway there's very little of that. Most shoots have just action and little/no reason as to why it happening.
Bottom Line:
The real value of this site comes from the kink network. Kink is a leader in BDSM porn. They care a lot about getting things right so you see the lengths they go through to demonstrate consent. They also don't cheap out on production they have dedicated sound and multiple cameras for all the action.
Water Bondage has over 250 shoots with each shoot being over 45 minutes. I myself was bored with the length - but as I said above this site just didn't scratch my itch. I don't hate on them for being what they are.
The preview side give you up to 5 previews a day. The previews run almost two minutes so you can see enough to know if this is what you're into or not. Try before you buy.
The site is a little prices so if this is all you were into I don't know if I can say if justifies the price. That said I don't think you can get content like this anywhere else on the web. So you may be out of options.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- As of March 11, 2019, 90 scenes available
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- mobile site (works well on iPhone)
- all content is exclusive
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. Organization done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well.
- Still updating
- shoots can be rated and favourited
- Stand out talents include Kira Noir, Kandie Monaee, Sarah Banks, Aaliyah Hadid (her Arab themed stuff is great!), Jasmine Webb, Cherry Hilson, Teanna Trump
- Heavy on the gangbang content, next often is probably MMF, followed by 1 on 1. FFM is rare
- Lots of anal
Cons:
PROS Cont.
- The site dates back to 2014 so all of the back catalogue is available at high quality.
- Extra fee for 4K content.
- Updates about once per month.
- Some pregnancy fetish content (there's a real diversity of ethnicity and body type!)
CONS:
- The picture downloads are mostly screenshots of the shoot. (However the newer stuff has the model holding posterboard of a hot message or two - some are witty and fun)
- While I'm often impressed with the direction in the dogfart network, on this site the director doesn't seem to be able to get the talent to "let go" in the same way as he does on the other sites. In the other sites, it seems like everyone is consumed by desire - here it feels like the motivation is the paycheck (there are exceptions are real gems, but they're harder to find).
Bottom Line:
This site serves a bit of a rare niche for find sites. You can find plenty of male talent interracial content. This is unique, as far as I know, to put the female talent forefront. There are too many beautiful women here that you don't see in "mainstream" porn as often. I'm not saying these girls are B-listers. My point is that most mainstream porn ignores beautiful black women.
Plenty of variety. The set-ups are always unique catalogue you don't feel like you're reliving the same scene with a different actor each time.
In most of this network, I've found the wisdom of crowds help separate the great from the meh. This site seems to be the exception. I found myself disagreeing with many of the scenes that were voted up. If you join don't be afraid to go off the beaten path.
I give this site a buy - while I'm not thrilled with several of the performances; there just aren't many places providing this content. And like the rest of the dogfart network the production/ lighting/editing/sound are all top rate.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Launched in 2011. All female action featuring mostly A-Lister talent (there were some short career girls in the back catalog. Some one and dones)
- Decent picture galleries. Normal progression strip then action. I will say the model positioning is better than most. Unlike other sites where several out-of-focus pictures are sprinkled in. Here everyone is a winner
- High-quality video. It's gotta be 1080 at least cause it looks amazing on my old monitor (no 4K for me)
- Some top scenes to look out for: Spencer Bradley, Liv Revamped, Skye Blue, Molly Stewart, Lauren Phillips with Lisey Sweet (I normally don't care for food play but these two were AMAZING together)
- fun silly vibe it seems like the talent all got along and were just being playful and enjoying
- hot dialog. I'm a fan of dirty talk so this put a big plus down when I noticed that
- Tags available
- Good descriptions of each shoot
- Streaming player has advanced controls (skip 10sor 30s, volume, full-screen toggle)
Cons:
PRO cont:
- like/dislike, favorite, watch later allow for flexible scene sorting.
- short plots than straight to the action. There's novelty and for sure a fun vibe that is apparent at every turn
- Professional production the action is always well staged and the direction is good. Staging, costumes and directing are always good. You can tell that they don't cheap out on details.
Good back log at just under 500 scenes
- update schedule about 1X/Week
CONS
- download will cost you extra (one fee gets you both .zip downloads of photo galleries and video shoots).
- ads behind the paywall. Heck, you have to click past an ad every time you log back in
- No previewing/trailer available. So you have to check out the pictures or skip through the video to see if it's your thing
- limited model diversity. Some ethnic diversity but not much. Most body types are straight from porn general casting. Tattoos are common (I think that can be hot but I know some are opinionated. Same thing with boobs)
Bottom Line:
While girl-girl isn't my go to most of the time I really liked this site. I appreciated the high production value. You can tell time and money was spent to make everything look beautiful. The talent is all top of the line. As girl-girl action goes I think this is solid and well done
Everything here is solid. So why not a A+ score (good question). If anything they could go with some more creativity. I'd like so see parody/"public"/Cuckoldress/etc. The site could be better with some series or something on-going.
- To be clear that is really knit picking. This sites is a home run and should be on anyone's buy list
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good creativity. While it's tempting to set everything in a dungeon (especially when you're kink.com and own a whole building with several of them - lol). The resist that trope and mix it up everything from Santa's north pole to a comfy couch, to the office is used as a set and situation)
- email alerts for when you favorite star/site updates
- Includes access to 34 sites each with its own focus
- 50 "channels" with limited access to other sites content. I've had good luck finding new sites to join based on these samplings.
- Updates about twice a month (Before Covid)
- Over 900 videos each video about an hour-long.
- girl-girl action
- Videos looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about 1 hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Allows download managers
- More model diversity than is typical in a network site. There are a variety of body types and ethnicities including pregnant models.
- Billing by rocketpay
- Bi action if that's what you're looking for
Cons:
Pro Cont:
- scenes are rated and you can heart them. I like this because I can then mark the ones I've already viewed/downloaded.
- tags help you find more of what you like
- photos available as .zip
- plenty of extremes (if that's a pro?). Nipple torture, anal, drooling (not my fav), suspension/rope play
- Top-notch talent: especially Aiden Starr (recently listened to her in a podcast - the dom persona comes natural and it shows), Mona Wales (she is one of my favorite "switches", Jene Wilde (she's new to me but quickly becoming a favorite she beings excitement like few other performers), Riley Nixon (she's added weight since she 1st started and looks more beautiful than ever!)
CONS:
- No 4K videos yet
- download limit but it doesn't say what it is
- pricy, but you get a lot of bang for your buck
- While the setups are unique I got a little tired of the all girl-girl format
Bottom Line:
While they are expensive this is one of those times where you get what you pay for. There's no arguing the camera/sound/direction/light are all professional. Each shoot models good BDSM etiquette and goes through consent protocols.
I'm really struck by the level of production here. One of the scenes features Julia Ann (I just got done doing a big review of her site JuliaAnnlive.com so I'm familiar with her typical performances). The people at kink do such a great job of taking performers (even legends like Julia Ann) and pulling over the top shoots from them. Really no one does it like kink (well I guess that's not true there are no imitators, but kink is the OG of BDSM content).
While this site isn't at my tippy top (because I wasn't more than all-girl action) for those that are in that market this one is a buy
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Updates about 1 a week
- over 850 videos each video 45 minutes to an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps
- Allows download managers
- They stay true to their niche. The site is intense with fisting, clothes pins along whole body, and large strap ons.
- Plenty of ethnic diversity.
- Lots of top name talent. Many of my favorite fetish stars were here
- Lots of anal content (could be a con?)
Cons:
- Cross sells included in membership side. So when you look through something you're sometimes given the chance to buy content from other sites. I don't care for this when I've already bought a membership
- all content is girl on girl
- high price of membership (but you do get great production and top of the line talent.
- While there is ethnic diversity there is little diversity of body type.
- Search bar (although limited navigation tools). If you know what you want you can find it pretty easily. If you're looking to browse there are very few tools to help.
Bottom Line:
Lots of extreme content. Definitely look at the previews before you join to make sure it's what you're into. Many scenes feature multiple partners. Plenty of fisting (including anal fisting) and BDSM until skin is red (not bloody as a generalization). Each scene ends with a model interview where everyone says they have a good time. A lot of scenes have squirting and the orgasms look real to me (but I also think professional wresting is real).
I found the niche a little too narrow and a little too repetitive. I also don't care for exclusive girl/girl action - so maybe this site just wasn't a good fit for me.
The have a huge network and that a very significant plus, along with great production value. If you really like this niche - this is right on. If you're not already a big fan - I don't think this kink "channel" is going to convince you.
For me, not being a dedicated fan, the price is too high for this one.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Gabrielle is a hot model. She is one of the best looking amateur models I've ever seen.
- Whole site is interracial content (I don't care one way or the other, but know it will be either a big plus or big minus to some).
- site is on the raunchier side (as the name implies) and is hitting the "cuckold" market.
- updates every monday (but it looks like they put up material that has been shot long ago. In addition video/pix are put up in parts so you will wait a LONG time before you get all the set).
- Looks like a rather large network (maybe 15 sites?). I'm not sure because my password won't work with some of the "bonus" material. Also a lot of the content is cross shared so I'm not always sure what belongs with what.
- Attractive price (I know my friend Pat362 will disagree), but when you're spending between $15-20 a month or in the case of their special $30 for year, how high can your expectations be?
Cons:
I hate having a con list longer than a pro list - but this time I really don't think it can be avoided.
- This site seems like it was made 10-15 years ago and just left. I can't imagine there shooting new. Everything about this site screams 1997.
- Terrible quality 480 X 300 0.7 mbps.
- pictures are not available as .zip
- picture quality is poor 420X640 pixels. ("older stuff" is 300X200).
- only about 20 picture sets (about 75-125 images in a set)
- organization is lack, but there isn't lot of content to keep track of.
- there isn't a lot of content. 6 videos of Gab (but since each video is sliced into a 1 minute chunk, it's a pain to work with). There are other videos available but those are content shares from the rest of the network.
Bottom Line:
I'm glad I check out this site and satisfied my curiosity. And having a year long membership will allow me to take my time and explore every corner (of their rather poorly designed network).
But I would not recommend spending your money her. Gabby is smokin' hot and I wish she pick up working for some studios. She has an amazing body and can get dirty on a set (I love dirty).
But the abysmal quality, the slicing of all the content into tiny pieces, and waiting weeks to get the full length video is too much to bear.
Find someplace else to spend your money. If this content is what you'r looking for try myhotwife.com (I haven't joined yet but it's one of my next ones) or Leslie Grey (I was a member of her previous site lustcouple.com and enjoyed it).
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Wicked is a major player (owned by Gamma I think?) they have a huge catalog of over 6,250 videos.
- Parodies, Parodies, Parodies. This is probably the best selling feature on wicked. They have a TON of Axle Braun's stuff (maybe exclusive partnership?)
- zips for photos normally about 50 in a set. Often screen grabs of the video action (sometimes promo material thrown in)
- LOTS of 4K (I guess I really do need to update my monitor)
- UNLIMITED DOWNLOADS. This is harder and harder to find especially on the big network sites. If there's a cap - I didn't hit it.
- Video previews available (normally this is just the trailer of the full video not unique to the scene you may be looking at)
- Organization by latest, engaging, views and upcoming
- keywords and search are a lifesaver. With so many great models and so much content, I'm glad to see the search and keyword tagging works great
Cons:
Pros CONT:
- favorite and like video functions (this is good for me I use that as a way to keep track of what I've checked out already)
- So many top models have worked with them. Some of my favs were: Sarah Shevon, Britney Amber, Kimberly Kane, Lacy Lennon, Dani Jensen, Lauren Phillips, Cherie DeVille, Penny Pax and Kenzie Taylor
- Excellent super hero parodies especially: Captain Marvel, Wonder Woman, Batman (all of them!), Super Girl (don't know why but DC movies make for better parodies
- Bonus content from Adult time - this was really good when it came to the pandemic and they brought in stars to do virtual shows.
- feedback is available through comments (with staff responding)
- multiple formats are available so you can pick 4K to lower resolution.
- Excellent production you see and hear all the action.
- REAL MILFs. I enjoy women closer to my age bracket. I'm glad they don't stretch the MILF category to teen moms.
Bottom Line:
PROS Cont Again!:
- Creative! You know with wicked you're going to get hot sex but the writing can be fun and clever. If you did watch through the dialog you typically get some good jokes. You can tell fans are making the content.
- Updates come 1X/week with 4 scenes dropping at once
CONS:
- Cross sales inside (I find this to be the minorest of sins)
- Mainstream porn though and through. Predictable acting/sex positions/etc. Everything is well made but predictable.
- Plot lead-ins can be too much. I'm a plot and dialog person but this was sometimes too much for even me.
- Content rotation. I guess all companies do this but it's a little crappy when it's parodies that should be more timely to take advantage of the zeitgeist.
Bottom Line:
This site was FUN. I'm glad I checked them out but I only hung around for one month (that's unusual for me I normally do nothing less than 3 months).
I know I focused on the parody aspects but that's not all they have. They had some older (looked like older 5-10 years back) stuff from the back catalog. All the favorite stuff - squirting, female-female action, co-eds, and car washes. Mainstream porn - nothing of note which is why I focused on their unique stuff.
Why didn't I go higher with the score? The biggest thing is a lack of creativity. Even with the parody stuff where they shine, I don't feel like they're leaning into that as they could. There's so much more they could be doing. I look at some of the pro-am stuff and they're killing it. I'd like to see the big-budget guys join their unique takes on superheroes.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- A lot of new talent. Most of the girls here are ones I've never seen before. Unlike the rest of the network there are very few big stars on this site. Probably some of that has to do with the way they mix in degradation with the action. Most of the things written on the models are meant to be shocking.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 640X480 3.2 mb/s
- scenes generally run 15-30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- Organization and search is clean and easy to use.
- Just ballparking, it seems like about 1/2 the content is Blow Jobs only. The other is full hardcore.
Cons:
- The keep re-releasing old content onto the site. This is a problem because then it has a new date, so I don't know how old this content is.
- New material is "re-released" but isn't upgraded in quality. So it's the same 640X480 3.2 mb/s file that was put up years ago. I don't know why they're bothering.
- About 40scenes NO LONGER UPDATING
- Formulaic. While there is some creativity with what's written on the model, after watching a dozen videos I felt like I'd seen everything they could think of.
Bottom Line:
I think this site is a skip. If you like the degradation of the models then that may lead you to a different conclusion.
I appreciate that the production value is high. The talent, direction, sound, lighting are all good. The camera always captures the unique beauty of each woman. And each model is interviewed and encouraged to ham it up for the camera.
Kiera Lynn, Tina Tyler, Aspen Stevens, Nikol Jules, LEAH LUV, ALEX DIVINE, and Billie Morrison are all standouts for great talent. I would suggest checking their previews to make sure you're still interested. If you don't like their work you're unlikely to like the rest of the site.
It's a shame this site is abandoned. I think there's plenty of potential to play with the power dynamic and do more of a dom/sub kink. Unfortunately they never went in that direction and instead drove headlong into this "my boyfriend is white and unsatisfying"
In short: between the lack of new updates and the dated video quality there just isn't enough reason to buy this site. It's a nice addition to a big network but it doesn't offer enough all by itself.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Billing through Rocketpay
- Access to 34 sites in the Kink.com family plus partner "channels" where you get a taste of other sites content.
- Approx 540 videos as of January 18, 2020
- Amazing talent. Some of my favorites are: the legiondary Sasha Grey, Bobbi Starr, Harmony, Trinity Post, DANA DEARMOND, KATIE KOX, KRISSY LYNN, Asa Akira. Great Lily LeBeau as a dom!
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- scene are typically between 30-45 minutes
- scenes can be hearted for finding your favorites or remembering what you've already seen.
- Exclusive, as far as I can tell
- Good plot setups: Everything from slutty land lady to punished teacher, revenge fucking, etc,
- pre & post scene interviews
- Usually a girl/girl power dynamic. I found this more erotic than I tho
Cons:
Pros Cont:
- Fair number of exhibitionism shoots, a bit of a kink.com specialty.
- One of the few places to find fisting (vaginal and anal)
- Good organization: There's a star system (although I haven't figured out how to sort by rating). There's a very extensive tagging system, and a search bar that worked well in my testing.
- Trailers so you can see what's good before downloading
- Each scene has a description and member comments - with so much content this really help find the things your more into
- Models can be favoited with emails when she does a new shoot
Cons
- NO LONGER UPDATING: last update January 2016
- Ads behind the pay wall (seems typical for most non-ameature sites these days 😞)
- No 4K videos yet. I'm fine with this since I haven't upgraded to a 4K monitor but I see it's where the industry is headed.
- Download file names are non-discript. This makes it harder to keep things organized
- A little pricy.
Bottom Line:
Kink.com is one of the best in the business and this site is a solid good site. This site has a good niche, the tortured orgasm is rather rare and and in the fem/fem dynamic and this might be the only site of it's kind.
While I'm sad they stopped updating to be honest I was starting to feel like the shoots were repetative. While the talent is top notch there just wasn't as much variety as I would have hoped.
The production is top notch: from the quality, to the sound, to the lighting and directing - kink is one of the best networks out there - and with 20+ years of practice it's no wonder they've gottten good.
So what keeps this site from the 90s, the lack of updates for the last few years hurts and so does the high price (although you get a lot of value for your dollar).
If you're into this niche this might be the only spot to find it. And once your into the kink.com network you'll find a lot of BDSM stuff to enjoy. If you've never had a kink.com membership you should check them out. They are top shelf for sure.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Updates about 1 a week
- over 500 videos each video about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- Search bar (although limited navigation tools). If you know what you want you can find it pretty easily. If you're looking to browse there are very few tools to help.
- Top talent. If you have a favorite fetish model she's probably worked for kink and most likely for Wired Pussy.
- Orgasms seem real to me 😃
Cons:
- Narrow focus. For me this niche was too tailored and didn't keep my interest.
Much of my complaints from Kink.com apply here:
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I'm really disappointed that they haven't
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price.
- No photo sets available. (Probably not a huge minus for this site, but if you were hoping for it within the network it's lacking)
- Last update was January of 2016 - the one before that was 2014.
Bottom Line:
Site focuses on girls being tortured with pleasure. There's a strong bend for restraints. I find the site enjoyable but too routine. I checked out my favorite models. But really wasn't impressed. All and all there just wasn't enough variety/plot (I know plot - go figure)
With it's lack of new content and high price I would search other places if this is the only content your into. If you want this as part of the wider Kink package then it's worth it. Kink is a little price - but you get what you pay for in variety quality and quantity. (although the more I explore the site I'm finding how much gay porn there is. Great if that's your thing, but it's not for me. So while there are 24 sites in the network 8 are gay and 3 are what they call she male).
I really wish they would add a voting system, like so many other sites do. It would be a lot easier for finding the greatest hits. The organization is keyword and chronology based. So if you don't know what you're looking for you have a very hard time browsing.
If you do join I recommend the shoots with Sarah Shevron, and anything with Lily LeBeau.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- I have a hard time saying anything negative about a model. Tanya is a beautiful woman who's look is copied all throughout porn. She has enhancements and a MILF look (I'm a big fan of MILFs)
- Part of the Spizoo network (10 sites)
- For a solo site there's a little bit of everything: soft and hardcore. Girl-girl; multip partners, light BDSM, gonzo. (A lot of Girl/Girl)
- Billing by Epoch and CC
- multiple file size available (.mp4) for me I find 780p is the perfect balance between size and quality. These files are about 1 GB and 1280X720 5.2 mbps
- 1080 files are about 2.75 GB 1920X1080 12.1 mbps.
- I don't have a 4K monitor so I didn't download anything that size.
- comments on videos allowed (although doesn't seem to be widely used)
- Scoring system with favorites and likes (again either isn't widely used or there are very few members here. I see a lot of great videos that have under a dozen likes)
- Good handling of photos. You can download .zips of the screenshots (about 100 pix)
Cons:
PRO:
- Decent tagging system (could be made better with more options or even user suggested ones)
- Good organization. Viewing can be arranged by date, popularity, title, or category (sort of a "tag")
CONS:
- Under 40 scenes. Hard to be postive when there's so little content.
- NO LONGER UPDATING. Last update was June 2013!
- Adds behind the paywall, constant drumbeat of "buy more"
- .wmv only available in 480p format
- Only 15 videos load/page. I know this seems like a small complaint but it's like I'm constantly loading a new page.
Bottom Line:
The lack of updates and shallow catelog drive me to a lower score. While the access to the network helps some - it's still too little there there.
There's some nice solo work if your a big Tanya fan. But if not I'd say skip this site. There's nothing unique here.
While you can find one of their specials if you time it right, if not your not getting enough bang for your buck.
I'm trying to stay positive but I was really underwhelmed. Tanya is great and a professional performer. I don't want to be disrepectful to her in anyway. I think the production could have used her better and kicked the heat up a notch or two.
If you joing the network take 5-10 minutes to look at her work. It won't take you long to find the ones you like best.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
04-11-1510:15am (Update History) Reason: I wanted to add enough to receive points for my contribution. I see how it was too minimal before.
Pros:
- Big Busty MILF. Very attractive eyes. Large breasts
- Picture sets are available as .zip files. About 35 pictures in a set
- Lots of sexy stripping and lingerie sets
- Movies are good quality 960X540 4.3 mbps
- Photos are 1600X1200 pixels
- Hardcore, solo, (mostly) interracial and girl/girl content
- Includes Dreamnet network (faith69.com, rebeccasorrice.com, lodestarangel.com, taylorupton.com, aligned.com). There's plenty of entertainment for your dollar across the network.
Cons:
- Small video collection 17 movies
- Small pix collection less than 50 picture sets
- Amateur through and through, so much of the lighting and sound is sub part
- Taylor Ann is a moaner not a talker. I prefer lots of dirty talk.
- Not much scene set up. I like shoots that have some plot (what can I say I'm old fashioned)
Bottom Line:
This is was included in the network I bought, so I'm checking it out. Sadly there isn't too much here, so I'm going through it way too quickly. Taylor Ann is very sexy so I hope she adds to what is here very quickly.
I can't recommend this site due to it's lack of content. Although I would endorse the network - which includes
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Dedicated girl/girl interracial site - might be the only site serving this niche 🤔
- Great showcase of African American porn talent - a talent pool that doesn't get tapped as much. Some standouts are: Cecilia Lion, McKenzie Sweet, Candice Nicole, Kira Noir
- Plenty of hot stars: India Summe, Cali Carter, Abella Danger, RILEY REID, NATASHA NICE, KELLY WELLS, Kate England. They don't skimp on talent
- The catalog goes back to 2007 and obviously, that has lower quality
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- STILL UPDATING
- Easy cancellation
- plot - I'm old fashion and like when people fuck for a reason.
- Good and fast customer service
- Good mix of action. Usually, there's some form of light domination (not bondage) involved.
Cons:
PRO CONT.
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. Organization done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well. If anything it returned too many hits. (better than missing content I suppose)
THE CONS:
- Only updates once every 3-4 months. This really is a big deficit considering they haven't built up a large catelog yet.
- scene comments and rating system make it easy to find the best stuff.
- About 73 scenes. That said the site started over 10 years ago. It's crazy that they only have 72 shoots up with that kind of runway
- 4K content is for sale scene by scene behind the paywall. ($3-$5/video)
- lack of tags. It would be nice if they extended their tagging system to make things easier to find - the current system is too broad "blond" or "shaved" for example.
Bottom Line:
It's hard giving a high score when the production schedule is so slow. That could be overcome if there was a bigger back catelog but the two together keep me from pushing this any higher.
Digfart always has great production: the lighting, sound, direction and novelty make this network top flight. Despite the 10 year span of this site they keep the shoots fresh. You don't get the feeling that you're watching the same thing over and over again.
I really like the concept of girl/girl interracial with the self-aware humor dogfart brings. I think this site has everything going for it - it just needs more. I understand it's probably a reflection of demand. The interracial demand is probably stronger for M/F content then F/F content. It's just a shame because Zebra Grils does this so well.
Over time I would be able to rate this as a buy but I don't think until they have 125-150 videos. Right now I'd call it a network enhancer. It probably will keep me a member for a little longer but it's not strong enough on its own to recommend.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Low price. You can get access to this site for less than the cost of an issue of playboy.
- Clean organization. You can favorite sets that you like, search by model, and see top rankings. I found the search function reliable and extensive.
- LOTS of content. They update multiple times a week and have 100s of sets available.
- Public shots. Appx 25% the shoots contain women flashing or being risky in public places.
- A diversity of body types (sort of). Most of the models fit the mold of gorgeous early 20s beauty. They also include many other beautiful women, while certainly not catering to those tastes - beautiful women are appreciated in all their forms.
- Racial diversity. Maybe 15% of the models. It would be nice if it was more but that's better than most
- Mostly natural. This site focus on beautiful women as they are. While some are "enhances" it's not typical
- Many amateurs, while I have seen somefamilialr faces. Most are women I haven't seen a million times before
Cons:
POS Continued:
- Newer shoots (Within the last 2 years or so). Have short (under 10 minutes) videos. Mostly of the girls being silly.
- Users can make comments so you can see which models are getting the most buzz.
CONS:
- I'd like to see the addition of tags. It would be great if they were user editable. Right now you can comment and give feedback. It would be even better if users could help expand the search.
- Search is too broad "Black" returns models wearing black, african-american models and girls with black hair.
Bottom Line:
It's been almost 3 years since I renewed my membership. But this time I did a full year. This is a great site that does what it sets out to do (not something all sites can say).
I've started using their stuff as my rotating desktop wallpaper. After all, what could be better than seeing a beautiful 1/2 dress woman as you work?
I appreciate that the site doesn't try to be all things to all people. It's not a hardcore site. They do "teasing" and do it well.
Since coming back I've noticed they have more total nudes then I saw in the past. While I love the naked female form, I don't know how I feel about this. Part of what I liked about the site was it left a little something to the imagination (sort of like the playboy magazines I used to sneak, a million years ago).
Zach, the owner, photographer, makes excellent use of twitter, Tumblr, Instagram and other social media. I would check out his work (as well as the preview page of the site) to see if this scatches you itch. Really for the money he charges I think it's a great deal.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Low price. You can get access to this site for less than the cost of an issue of playboy
- Clean organization. You can favorite sets that you like, search by model, and see top rankings. I found the search function reliable and extensive.
- LOTS of content. They update multiple times a week and have 100s of sets available.
- Good deal of public shots. This is what attracted me to the site. I like the premise of women getting naughty in public. About 20% of the shoots contain women flashing or being risky in public places.
- Diversity of models (sort of). Most of the models fit the mold of gorgeous early 20s beauty. They also include many other beautiful women, while certainly not catering to those tastes - beautiful women are appreciated in all their forms.
- Mostly natural. This site focus on beautiful women as they are. While some are "enhances" it's not typical
- Many amateurs, while I have seen some faces faces. Most are women I haven't seen a million times before
Cons:
- Limited video content. Only a few sets have videos with them. Videos tend to be less than 5 minutes and tend to consist of dancing and "being silly"
- I'd like to see the addition of tags. It would be great if they were user editable. Right now you can comment and give feedback. It would be even better if users could help expand the search.
- Search is too broad "Black" returns models wearing black, african-american models and girls with black hair.
Bottom Line:
"It is what it is". I'm a big fan of sites fulfilling their promises and not overselling. Zishy delivers exactly what it says it will. Software, beautiful women with high quality pictures.
I like that the sets (typically about 50 pictures in each) are high quality.
Sets are easy to download in zip format, again formatting and organization are clean and easy.
At the end of each set is a recommendation for other material you might like. I found it to be useful as I spent a lot of time using that to explore other models I enjoyed.
I was very satisfied with the value for my dollar. I let my membership lapse so I could enjoy some of what I already have. But I will definitely return.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
