Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
76
|
Dirty Masseur
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all Brazzers network (30 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- 260 scenes as of November 30, 2017
- current update schedule is about 3X a month
- 1st opened back in 2011
- Top notch talent. My current favourites like Lauren Philips (she's been around for a while and I can't get enough of her). And stars that have faded - Jenni Lee & Aalyiah Love for example.
- Clean search. Keyword searching along with a search bar. Lots of sub-topics to pick up on.
- action break down you can cut right to the positions/stuff you like
- 1080p 1.8 mb/s
- The mobile site works well on my iPhone.
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive |
| Cons: |
- Typical porn valley look. Make-up tends to be heavy. "Big Tits" means nearly all the models are surgically enhanced.
- preview is very limited. I wish I could have explored more before buying. But the price is certainly reasonable for such a large catalogue
- Picture sets are large (a couple of 100 pics in each set) they are mostly screenshots of the action in the video.
- Cookie-cutter porn. Very few surprises
- Niche is sometimes stretched to the point that I forgot which part of the network I was in
- Cross-sells at sign up
- Capta to enter (for me every time I log in) |
| Bottom Line: |
I know plot writing in porn is a joke that writes itself. That said I can't believe they continue to come up with novel setups after almost a decade of operation. While some shoots do stray from the theme (husband and wife playing with a messager for example)
While the porn is formulaic I do get a kick out of seeing how they will write each new shoot.
While the site is enjoyable I don't think it's the best part of the network. I'd liken it to the appetizer before a holiday buffet. You could make a meal of it if you wanted to - but there's so much more goodness to come.
Buy or don't buy. I'd say only if you are interested in other parts of the network. It's good but not great and isn't unique or outstanding in anyway (except for the fact that they book top-notch talent). |
|
11-30-17 08:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Rating
77
|
Dirty Talking Wife
(0)
80.0
|
No Review.
|
02-23-13 08:43pm
|
Review
78
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- An unbelievable array of set ups. I like plot and they never fail to come up with crazy new situations. Medical, corrupt politicians, cuckolding, lots of fun stuff
- email alerts for when you favorite star/site updates
- Includes access to 34 sites each with it's own focus
- 50 "channels" with limited access to other sites content. I've had good luck finding new sites to join based on these samplings.
- Updates about once a month (sometimes 2X)
- Over 465 videos each video about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about 1 hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Allows download managers
- More model diversity than is typical in a network site. There are a variety of body types and ethnicities including pregnant models.
- Billing by rocketpay
- Bi action if that's what you're looking for
- Top notch talent: especially Lauren Phillips (I think I join ever site she shoots for lol), Dee Williams, Maitresse Madeline, Mona Wales, Cherry Torn) |
| Cons: |
Pro Cont:
- scenes are rated and you can heart them. I like this because I can then mark the ones I've already viewed/downloaded.
- tags help you find more of what you like
- photos available as .zip
- plenty of extremes (if that's a pro?). Nipple tortue, pegging, castration play, ball crushing. For me it was sometimes too much
CONS:
- No 4K videos yet
- download limit but it don't say what it is
- pricy, but you get a lot of bang for your buck |
| Bottom Line: |
I thought I liked Femdom. But this was too much for me. I was able to find some good cuckold scenes and found some hot pegging content, but a lot of it just went too far (CBT, Castration play for example)
I have to say they do have top notch talent. Kink has been around for over 20 years and they have a great reputation for treating their talent with resepect. For that reason it seem like they attract and keep the best performers. And for that I really appreciate my membership at kink. Furthermore it's fun to see women play submissives in one scene and then take on a dominiate role in another.
While this is an expensive site, and some of it is more intense that I could handle I would give it a buy for anyone interested in BDSM content. The women are great. The direction/lighting/sound are all of the highest quality and there's a LOT of it here. While I only found 50 sites that I really loved. 50 is plenty to justify the cost. Hell I think 15 would have been enough.
I was satified enough to push my membership to a year long subscription. |
|
05-19-20 12:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
79
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- An unbelievable array of set ups. I like plot and they never fail to come up with crazy new situations
- Includes access to 24 sites each with it's own focus
- Updates about 1 a week
- Over 200 videos each video about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about 1 hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Allows download managers
- More model diversity than is typical in a network site. There are a variety of body types and ethnicities including pregnant models.
- Bi action if that’s what you’re looking for |
| Cons: |
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I'm really disappointed that they haven't
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price.
- No photo sets available. (Probably not a huge minus for this site, but if you were hoping for it within the network it's lacking)
- Very hardcore domineering. This is harsh femdom and if that’s not what you won’t this is over the top. |
| Bottom Line: |
I thought I liked Femdom. But this was too harsh for me. I like more of a firm tease I guess. Lots of strap on and soundings (didn’t know what that was till now) just a too rough for me. But if you look at what they put there female talent through - what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
While there are only about 200 scenes in this site - I only found about 10 that really interest me. I guess this is just not my thing
While I can give a strong recommendation to the network as a whole and really like the production value that goes into each shoot. I think you should really check out the preview section before laying down the money for a rather expensive membership. |
|
01-26-17 12:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
80
|
Doctor Adventures
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Access to all Brazzer network (30 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models over 1,000 videos.
- Good variety inside the theme. For example "mad scientist" doctor, of course naughty "wet" nurse, couple's therapy. I'm always amazed that they come up with fresh takes.
- Lots of top name talent. Brandi Love, Bonnie Rotten, Lisa Ann. A lot of MILF cross-overs.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format
- Clean search. Keyword searching along with a search bar.
- $30/month.
- 1080p 1.8 mb/s.
- Mobile site work well on my iPhone.
- Some scenes in Spanish (I don't speak Spanish so I skipped them but for those who care. There it is)
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- over 500 shoots
- support was top notch. I had a little hiccup and they fixed it quickly.
- all content is exclusive
- New shoots on the network come everyday on this site about 2 a month. |
| Cons: |
- Typical porn valley look. This isn't an amateur site, but sometime that means everyone looks over stylized and over make-oped. These women are beautiful on their own and don't need all that.
- preview is very limited. I wish I could have explored more before buying. But the price is certainly reasonable for such a large catalog - While the picture sets are large (couple of 100 pics in each set) they are mostly screen shots of the action in the video.
- Standard porn flow: intro. oral, oral, 2-3 positions, money shot. I like the diversity in into. Wish there was more in the action as well
- Cross sells at sign up |
| Bottom Line: |
I like this site. I even found some new talent that I hadn't seen anywhere else. I was especially impressed with redhead Ella Hughes. If you haven't check her out she is gorgeous!
You'll never find a bad scene here. Everything is very professional (sometime that comes off as clinical and that the talent is just going through the motions) but you can't ask for better quality.
Brazzers is a long standing brand in porn. So between their deep catalog and reasonable price there's no reason not to check them out.
They recently added a new parent method. You can now use gift cards from popular stories and apply them to a membership. It looks like a simple process, but I used the old fashion plastic for my purchase. |
|
08-30-16 09:06am
Replies (0)
|
Review
81
|
Dog Fart Behind The Scenes
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos.
- Plenty of hot new stars:
- The catalog goes back to 2011 and obviously, that has a lower quality
- content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 mb/s (very few)
- scenes generally run 10-30 minutes (I know that's a wild jump - but there you have it)
- all content is exclusive
- STILL UPDATING
- Very generous preview section lets you stream most new stuff (a lot of non-nude, but still hot)
- as of April 25, 2019 1259 scenes
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network.
- Hot stars - bot up and comers and marquis talent. Some of the best are Sara Jay, Whitney Grace (something about a girl with a southern accent always gets me), Layla Price (Always amazing) |
| Cons: |
- Nonmembers cannot download (reasonable)
- Not enough action. It can be totally hit or miss as to if the girl is undressed or not. In some scenes the action from set continues (the Sara Jay one has full hardcore and creampie!) in others it's just boring. The Laura Philips is her getting her ass ready for anal - OMG amazing.
- Photo sets are not available
- Most content maxes out at 1280X720 3.2 mbps |
| Bottom Line: |
Normally I think Behind the Scenes stuff is a waste of time. With this site, I check out each girl.
I think it's great that you can stream a whole bunch of content in the preview section. I've long said that Billy at Dogfart is one of the best directors he does a great job of making girls feel at ease and letting out their inner (or outer?) dirty girl. The BTS is worth it with this network. While I've only found a few that are download-worthy - I think this is the only site I've ever wanted to download a BTS shoot.
If I wanted to sum up this site in a couple of words here's what I'd say: hot girls answering dirty questions often while naked/flashing. "what's the best sex you've ever had", "How did you get into porn", Don't get me wrong not every interview is a slam dunk there's plenty of "how do you spend your free time" (the answer -smoke week- comes up with alarming frequency -btw.
Buy or no buy?: It's great as part of a network. The free side is sure worth a look. I can't recommend a BTS site (no matter how good); I'm an action kinda guy. |
|
04-25-19 05:59pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
82
|
DogFart
(0)
100.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,700 videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Plenty of hot newcomers like Karma Rx, Febby Twigs, Vanessa Vega.
- Big star: India Summer, Adriana Chechi, Natasha Nice, Penny Pax, LAUREN PHILLIPS, Britiniy Amber, Jasmine Jae.
- The catalog goes back to 2002 and obviously, that has a lower quality
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 MB/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- as of July 7, 2020 over 5,725 videos!
- STILL UPDATING usually 1x/week
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. The organization is done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well. If anything it returned too many hits. (better than missing content I suppose)
- Wide variety of niches. (However, all of the network is interracial) |
| Cons: |
These are really minor points as you can tell from the excellent score
- The picture downloads are mostly screenshots of the shoot. (However the newer stuff has the model holding posterboard of a hot massage or two - some are witty and fun)
- extra fee for 4K content (I'm seeing a lot more places doing things like this maybe it's becoming industry standard?) |
| Bottom Line: |
I know 100 is a controversial score (as we discussed on the forums: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=6023. That said I still stand by it. I think dogfart is the leader in interracial porn (more on that in a minute). This network is one of the granddaddies of internet porn - and they've kept up with the changing time rather well. So why 100? Because they have a giant catalog that is unmatched because they have top of the line quality (some of my favorite stars have given some of their best performances here) because they update frequently because they evolve and maintain creativity (although the sex is often formulaic with the same positions used in the same order).
I know we are having a moment about race in society right now. I myself am IR sex agnostic. I'm not particularly drawn to it - but I don't shy away from it either. To me, the strength of this site is its passion. While adjectives like raw, passionate, intense, hardcore used to be good to describe dogfart's style. Right now I'd describe it as hot - everyone seems to genuinely enjoy themselves (always an important part for me).
While the price is higher than others, I feel it's well worth it. Good production, top talent, and sustained catalog all cost money. I'm not afraid to pay for high quality and this network delivers it. |
|
07-07-20 05:14am
Replies (0)
|
Review
83
|
Downlow Boys
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
*****Important Note: I'm a straight male - but since I had the subscription to the network I figured it would be helpful to conduct a review. I tried to review honestly and without bias to the fact that I'm not the target audience.
- Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,000 videos. Looks like they have 2 dedicated gay sites.
- They serve the gay interracial niche. I'm imagining not many other sites do that.
- Includes TS performers. Like Kylie Maria & Audrey Kate
- Lots of interesting set ups and power dynamic exchanges
- A lot of 3 way and gangbangs scenes - more than I would have thought.
- About 355 scenes STILL UPDATING
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. Organization done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well. If anything it returned too many hits. (better than missing content I suppose) |
| Cons: |
Pros Cont.:
- Back catelog goes back to 2005
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
The Cons:
- Most shoots are with condoms. This is different from the Hetero side. Maybe that's the norm?
- Only updates about once a month
- older content at lower quality (duh)
- Not much ethnicity/body variety |
| Bottom Line: |
I rated this site high because I think it is serving a rare part of the market. I can't imagine there's that much like this out there. There also tends to be a kinky side here - power dynamics and such. Maybe that's common in gay porn? Sorry for not knowing.
Bottom line: This site is a buy - they have good quality content. Variety (I wasn't expecting the TS content) and a huge back cateloge. Everything at dogfart has good lighting and sound so that's never a problem. If this is the stuff your shopping for I don't think you'll be disappointed.
I hope this review was helpful. I didn't spend as much time on this site as I do the other ones I review. |
|
05-13-19 03:28pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
84
|
Dungeon Sex
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Great lighting and sound even when there's multiple partners (a problem many other sites have)
- Humiliation included: "slut" "cock breath" that sort of thing
- Almost ever shoot has anal
- More model diversity (ethnicity) than you find in most places.
- Great talent. If you have a fetish model you like that shoot from 2010 to 2015 she's likely here. Lexi Belle was the 1st model.
- Over 225 shoots.
- In a site like this it matters who the male talent is and they are also exceptional Kirk Lockwood, Otto Bauer, Maestro, really bring out the passion in the female talent.
- Allows download managers. |
| Cons: |
- No longer updating. Last update was March 2015
- Disproportion number of tattooed models (does't bother me, but I know it's a turn off for some. )
- Organization could be better the tagging system is weak there are missing tags and search is limited.
- Pricy. If you're only looking for this site and not the power of the network then don't spend you money for just this site.
- No way to favorite things you'd like to come back to
- Stark settings mostly a dull room with ropes for suspensions. (I know I know it's a dungeon) |
| Bottom Line: |
Great mix of bondage and rough sex. I found a lot to like here. I wish the site was still updating.
While not worth the price to join in and of itself as part of a wider network it, I consider it a buy. I keep my membership for a few months.
Some advice for those that follow after me: let the comments that accompany each shoot be your guide. I wasted a lot of bandwidth seeing what I like and what I didn't.
Plenty of great talent I really liked Roxanne Rae, India Summer, Bella Rossi, and Penny Pax (love Penny's kink content). |
|
03-25-17 11:57am
Replies (2)
|
Review
85
|
Dylan Ryder
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- It's DYLAN RYDER. I'm a big fan of hers if you haven't checker her out you should. There's enough in her preview area to give you a good idea of how hot she is!
- Big network (15 sites included with stars like: Puma Swede, Monica Mayhem, Devon Lee, and the fantastic Ashley Fires)
- Good (not over the top like Lelu Love) fan interaction (more about this in the bottom line section).
- Tailored content to the site. Exclusive BTS and pix of her day.
- HD versions of videos.
- Many different options for downloading including iOS and PSP.
- zip download of picture sets sets
- Nice "favorites" ability. You can select content that you want to be able to find again by making it a "favorite" |
| Cons: |
- Ads included in member site (I don't care, but have seen some complaints form others)
- Only updated monthly
- Organization could be improved. Site is organized chronologically, with only broad categories to help (for example: g/g, hardcore, solo).
- Not exclusive material (some of it may be but others of it certainly is not)
- About 60 movies in the site; About 112 picture sets. I expect more than that for a $30 site - then again with 15 different sites included I shouldn't complain. |
| Bottom Line: |
Does it's job well. This is a site for fans of Dylan Ryder. If you're looking for just a great porn site - you should move on. If you love Dylan Ryder this site does a great job of presenting her. There's unique goodies like pix and videos from her day and a good level of interaction with her.
While not all of her material is here (how could it be?). If you looking to collect a lot of her scenes this might be the perfect way to do it. Her stuff from Bonnie and Clyde and Cuckold Club are here (looks like a lot of her stuff from Bluebird films) But other things she's done are not (imagine the obtaining the rights would be a nightmare)
She has a nice ask me a question feature which I took advantage of. Here's the conversation:
marcdc2112 asks: Hi Dylan, I thought I saw on your twitter that you're retired. But, obviously there are new updates here. Can you explain. Is dylanryder.com for re-releasing previous stuff? Are you only shooting for this site now? Or do I have everything all wrong? Thanks for a great site!?
Dylan Says: Yes I am retired! There are still plenty of updates to come on my site....Lots of never before seen stuff updating monthly!
So I don't know where these updates come from but you can be assured from her herself, that there will be monthly updates consistently.
BOTTOM LINE: It is what it is:
a) A great site for fans of Dylan Ryder to get her content and have some interactions with her.
b) A great network of hot girls. For $30/month there's plenty to explore and enjoy. I'm happy I joined. |
|
08-09-12 06:46am
Replies (3)
|
Review
86
|
Electro Sluts
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Updates about 1 a week
- Almost 450 videos each video about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Lots of my favorite fetish models have shot here - plus a good mix of up and comers
- Allows download managers
- Search bar (although limited navigation tools). If you know what you want you can find it pretty easily. If you're looking to browse there are very few tools to help.
- Lots of model diversity not the standard "cookie cutter porn look"
- "Plot" plenty of different set ups from disciplining nuns to CIA interactions and plenty in between. A very healthy mix. This side won't bore you.
- Orgasms are real - lost of squirts too if you're looking for that. |
| Cons: |
- Just about ever scene is a girl on girl (sometimes multiple)
- Pleasure and pain mixed together sometimes a little too intense for me - I like more moans and less screams - but it is a BDSM network so it's not like I didn't know what I was buying.
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. I knock this network pretty hard for this. I'm really surprised that they have awesome video quality and poor navigation.
- No picture sets 😞
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price.
- No photo sets available. (Probably not a huge minus for this site, but if you were hoping for it within the network it's lacking) |
| Bottom Line: |
Kink.com is one of the premier fetish networks and this site won't let you down. It is a narrow niche - but if you want to see girls getting other girls off (hard) you'll find plenty of it here. With each shoot lasting about an hour there's plenty of work up (and often some discipline toys) to heat up the action.
Kink does a great job of letting your preview so you can check them out before spending a pretty hefty membership fee. While they are expensive I found them to be worth it and will keep checking back in for more updates. They've earned a spot in my rotation. |
|
01-30-17 04:53pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
87
|
Elli Nude
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Hot sexy RED HEAD (I do so love gingers!)
- HD video quality 1280X720 8.2 mbps. There were a few older slips that were of lesser quality but almost everything is in stunningly good quality.
- picture sets are all available as .zip files
- Organization is clean. Videos are arranged chronologically with key words to simplify. You can also suggest new keywords to improve the system.
- "You may also like this video" suggestions were very useful
- You can "add to favorites" if there's a video you want to keep easy access too.
- Over 200 picture sets. Each set has 30-90 pictures. Quality is good at 1024X800 pixels.
- About 150 movies. Each movie about 20 minutes long
- Network. Elli is part of the Dreamnet.com network. There are 14 active women (mostly MILFs) and another 50 inactive sites included. |
| Cons: |
- This site was very strong so I don't have many cons.
- Lots of Solo content. I'd prefer to see more partner action
- Elli is on the Mom and Pop side of the amateur spectrum. Most of the filming is POV or tripod.
- Some hardcore, some groups (girl-girl), some flashing/public. But most of what you see is solo action or solo into BJ. |
| Bottom Line: |
Really fun site. Elli posts a daily life set showing off her vacation and travels - she has a lot of personality.
I really liked this site. I wish I had more time with it. It will join my rotation of sites that I keep checking back into.
Elli has a natural beauty that comes across in all of her shoots. There is some dirty talk, but she's not the foul mouth spit-fire we might want her to be. |
|
04-01-15 11:50am
Replies (0)
|
Review
88
|
Everything Butt
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Billing through Rocketpay
- Access to 34 sites in the Kink.com family plus partner "channels" where you get a taste of other sites content.
- STILL UPDATING (2-3/month is typical)
- Approx 500 videos as of December 26, 2019
- Amazing talent. Some of my favorites are Lauren Philips, Lexi Lore, Dee Williams, Britney Amber, Penny Pax, Christi Stevens, DANA DEARMOND (wow she really shines in her scenes)
- Lots of fisting.
- Some prolaps stuff (not my thing so I didn't go looking)
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- In general, older shoots have more plot newer stuff tends to do a little get to know you and then straight to action
- scene are typically between 30-45 minutes
- Most orgasams seem real
- scenes can be hearted for finding your favorites or remembering what you've already seen.
- Exclusive, as far as I can tell |
| Cons: |
PRO CONT:
- pre & post scene interviews
- Good organization: There's a star system (although I haven't figured out how to soert by rating). There's a very extensive tagging system, and a search bar that worked well in my testing.
- models giving good dirty talk (a huge plus for me)
- good model diversity (much better than most of porn). For this site mostly in terms of age. I'm a fan of MILFs and there's no shortage here
- Trailers so you can see what's good before downloading
- Each scene has a description and member comments - with so much content this really help find the things your more into
- Models can be favoited with emails when she does a new shot
CONS:
- Ads behind the pay wall (seems typical for most non-ameature sites these days 😞)
- No 4K videos yet. I'm fine with this since I haven't upgraded to a 4K monitor but I see it's where the industry is headed.
- Download file names are non-discript. This makes it harder to keep things organized |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS CONT:
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price.
- While they do have good set-ups (not exactly "plots") I found the action tended to be rather forumaic following one of a few set patterns.
Bottom Line:
I'm not a big fan of all girl/girl action. But this site sure is an exception! The FemDom is believeable while still being playful. And the dirty talk and begging can be unbevliably good.
While it sometimes feel like things get repetative with the positioning. The introduction of new talent and new setups keeps this site from being boring.
It's a no-brainer to score kink sites in the 90s. They have the budget and practice to do everytihing right. What keeps this site from a higher score is the realitivly lower scene count. |
|
12-26-19 03:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
89
|
Everything Butt
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Updates about 1 a week
- over 500 videos each video about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps
- Allows download managers
- Lots of unique ideas. There's plenty of creativity. From alien themes to things you never would have thought to put in a butt.
- Cross sells included in membership side. So when you look through something you're sometimes given the chance to buy content from other sites. I don't care for this when I've already bought a membership
- Search bar (although limited navigation tools). If you know what you want you can find it pretty easily. If you're looking to browse there are very few tools to help.
- Lots of model diversity. Pregnant, ethnicity, body shape.
- Lots of female/female content if that's what you are looking for |
| Cons: |
- Certainly and "extreme" site. I don't fault them for being what they say they are. But I didn't enjoy this site as much as some of the others in the network. It was just a little too over to top for me.
- No way to "favorite" scenes you'd like to revisit.
- Navigation is sub par for a site that has so many resources and such a long history. They've had plenty of time to get this right. I'm really disappointed that they haven't
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price.
- No photo sets available. (Probably not a huge minus for this site, but if you were hoping for it within the network it's lacking) |
| Bottom Line: |
Kink does post interviews and in them the talent reports to have had a good time. I hope this is true cause for many of these shoots I can't imagine how it's a good time. But I prefer porn that everyone is enjoying so I'm going to hope it's true.
If this content is your thing this site does a great job with it. Again I don't see how anal fisting could be pleasurable but the actresses seem to be getting off.
Kink has top of the line production so you can see and hear all the action. They are shooting with multiple cameras and the editing is well done. I've seldom seen a shoot that is poorly done.
The preview section lets you see up to 5 clips a day with previews running about 2 minutes long. You get a good idea of what to find in the member side. Check it out before joining just in case this is more than you want
Lots of top of the line talent. I was surprised to see so many of my favorites from the other sites in kink have also filmed here.
All around a good site even if it's in a tight niche.
I watched more of the videos than I would have thought considering this isn't the type of porn I usually go for. |
|
01-17-17 07:20am
Replies (0)
|
Review
90
|
Faith 69
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Great Amateur Site. Older stuff is poorly light, but as things progress the content is pro-am. With good lighting and sound
- Faith is a real woman. In her words she is "curvy" Less so in her younger pictures/videos.
- Diversity of content. I love the flashing material. There is also interracial, girl-girl, gangbang, plenty of blow jobs, solo material, hardcore, anal. The preview section does a good job of showing off all that is inside.
- Lots of Content. Over 100 videos (Sorry I didn't count), and nearly 150 picture sets. Each picture set is approx. 25 images.
- Adequate video/picture quality.
- Most video is 960X540 2.5 mb/s. Newest material is 1280X720 6.6 mb/s. Older stuff 360X240 .7 mb/s
- Image quality is good at 1024X680 pixels.
- Regular updates. After years online Faith is still adding content.
- Network. Faith is part of the Dreamnet.com network. There are 14 active women (mostly MILFs) and another 50 inactive sites included. |
| Cons: |
- Older content is in .wmv, newer in .mp4. Usually there is not a choice of format.
- I'm running a mac, and for some reason as soon as I download content using safari, my cpu goes crazy and climbs to over 100%. However switching to chrome doesn't trigger this problem. I don't hold faith responsible for this, just wanted to let you know if you join and have the same problem - switch your browser.
- Organization is a little lacking, there's nothing to help you - each set is added chronologically. I love her flashing stuff and wish I could search or sort to get to it more easily.
- Limited interactions. Faith does a cam show once a week, and you can email her but that's not the experience she's selling. She does offer a blog and does maintain fan interaction via the blog. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm enjoying Faith's site. I've wanted to check it out for a while and I'm glad I finally got around to it.
I like that Faith is not afraid to get naughty and nasty. I particularly enjoy her public hijinks and her dirty talk. Her site is definitely worth the price of admission and you get a lot of bang for your buck.
Other than adding an organizational structure I have no complaints. I'd like to see more fan interaction (maybe a forum?), but that's being nit picky.
Faith delivers everything she promises and that's a lot of delivery. |
|
03-01-15 02:32pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
91
|
Family XXX
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations networks (27 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive (to the best of my knowledge)
- Storylines are elaborate and believable? (see my note in Bottom line.) Problem is that means you've got to have talent that can act. This site seems better than most at booking believable talent with fantasy-rich settings. They don't spoil it by being too campy.
- The talent separates this site from competitors. Krissy Lynn, Gabbie Carter, Leah Gotti, Siri, and especially: LENA PAUL, Brandi Love, CORY CHASE, & LAUREN PHILLIPS. Cory is a particular stand-out in this genre she's been making content on this theme longer than anyone I know of.
- STILL UPDATING
- Decent search (some tags but too limited), search bar |
| Cons: |
PRO CONT:
- Just under 750 videos - *beware* that also includes BTS/Interviews. I found most of these boring and not worth the time
- Male talent: I don't think I've ever made an entry about male talent, but I feel compelled to this time. Steve Holmes and James Dean do a great job of playing their parts. Holmes especially does the creep yet charming bit perfectly.
- Star rating system
- updates about 1X/week
- somewhat diverse casting. While all the body shapes are typical pornstar bodys, there is an ok (not good) mix of ethnicity.
CONS:
- No user forum/comments available
- No previews available either download it or stream it to see if it's what you're looking for
- Ads behind paywall (seems like everyone is doing it these days)
- BTS interviews. I'm listing this as a con because pretty much any I've ever checked out was a waste of time (also noted above). |
| Bottom Line: |
I know taboo/family content is all the rage now (well if Pornhub.com's starts are to be believed anyway). But I don't get the appeal of this fantasy. All porn is a fantasy and I'm not kink-shaming - ya like what you like. More than anything I want to acknowledge my bias. While I think I reviewed fairly and honestly - you should know that as you read.
How'd they get the score they got. Other than the fact that their set-up storylines don't appeal to me, there's nothing wrong with this site. Good update schedule, great talent, better writing than most. If this is your jam - I don't think you could find a better site for it. I really wish they would allow more fan interaction and make previews available. But in the grand scheme of things those are minor points. |
|
08-23-21 07:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
92
|
Fast Times at NAU
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Part of the Naughty America Network which includes over 25 sites
- About 150 shoots in this site, more than 5,050 across the network.
- Aggressive update schedule. This site updates 2-3 times a month, and within the network there's usually 2-3 updates EVERYDAY.
- Navigation is awesome. It's easy to find what you're looking for or case a wide net for a serendipitous adventure.
- The preview section is generous enough to let you know what you'll get as a member without giving away the farm
- 1080p available. Anything from post mid-2007 is in "DVD Quality". And anything older than that is decent 480 2k quality (good for the time it was shot)
- pix are available in zip format - over 150 pix per shoot.
- .wmv and .mp4 formats available.
- 5 minute preview available to let you know if the whole scene is worth it for you or not. It's nice as a highlight roll |
| Cons: |
- My biggest complaint is they discontinued the live shows that they did a few years ago. There now available as achieves, but it's not the same
- With each log in you have to go past annoying full screen ads.
- de-select sign up cross sales :(
- most girls have implants (no problem for me but I know some object).
- Almost ever shoot ends in a facial. Nice to see more variety instead. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has a fun premise and enough lee-way to mix up the scenes. The talent is top totch and the directors have been better in the more recent shoots (within the last 10 months or so)
They routinely offer discounts and there's so much here you really can't go wrong. If you've never been a member you should check them out. If you have been a member, not much has changed, maybe look to see if some of you favorites have done shoots. It may be with a discount membership to pick up some of the girls you really like. |
|
11-20-12 02:00pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
93
|
Filthy Cute Online
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Exclusive Content
1280X720 about 3 mbps. For Husband wife team, video looks great (see note in cons)
Over 225 videos
- Weekly cam show, with archived shows in flash format
- Big network: you also get Nikki Benz, Gabby Quinteros,Puma Swede, Deauxma, Angelina Castro, Francesca, Sunny Lane, Julia Ann, Carmen Valentine, Vickyathome, Bobbie Eden, Charlee Chase
Good variety: pegging (a rare find, especially in the pro-am segment), anal, lots of BJs, Hardcore and tit fucking, feet, lots of boy and girl ass play.
- pix are available in zip format. Over 200 sets.
- fun extras like a blog and wall paper
Cam network has as many as 6 girls on a day! Gotta love that |
| Cons: |
Boob job (not a down side for me, but not everyone is me).
Husband/wife team, most shooting is tripod based
- many scenes are missing a description so you need to download to see if you like it.
Back catalog is poorly encoded, they really should re-encode
Organization is hurting. There are no tools at all just chronological setup. (pix organization isn’t much better with few categories to guide you (ie: friends, panties, outside)
The earliest videos are true amateur with loud music and 480X360 1.33 mbps quality (don’t worry things get better fast)
According to TBP, daily limit is 5 gigs. With modern file sizes pushing 700 mb, it’s very easy to hit that cap when you’re checking out content across the network. I know they need to fight piracy, but perhaps a better balance needs to be struck. (2/23: 10 gig limit - no warning when you get close :( )
- no g/g action (that I noticed anyway). I don't object (really not my favorite anyway) but I know some highly value that content. |
| Bottom Line: |
Shandra is not afraid to get dirty, and I love that about her! She does talk in a bit of a high pitch some might say “little girl” voice. Some might love that, I’m rather indifferent and prefer genuine above all else.
That said if you’re looking for a hot, big titted (recently even bigger) MILF, this is the site for that. She has enough production value that you will be happy with the quality (especially the newer stuff), while still filling that Amateur) niche. I joined this network largely for Filthycuteonline, and stayed due to all the other great content. Shandra Fay is a real gem her. Great work. I highly recommend.
Shandra Fay has a great combination. She is dirty (as if the pegging and public flashing wasn’t enough to show that)! She as great personality that shines through. She has posted a number of “joke” videos and keeps a comedy section. She’s one of those people that has a contagious laugh and energy. The kind of person you can’t help wishing the best things find her. |
|
02-21-13 07:20pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
94
|
Finishes The Job
(0)
100.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Access to network: manojob.com (hand job site) and Cheici Fox (solo site)Dick Suckers(oral/facial site), MrPOV (hardcore site)
- POV (duh 🙄) pretty standard set up: intro interview, BJ, couple of positition sex, Facial with plenty of dirty talk. I think this family of sites does the BEST job of dirty talk. Just about every video ends in a facial. They then roll camera for another minute or two with the girl looking right into the camera and begging you to pop off too. As a fan of dirty talking, I don't think ANY SITE does a better job then this network
- Consistant theme. Despite that they manage to be rather creative in setups and scenarios. (most involve some idea of meet a nympho)
- "Ok" performer diversity. Casting look like most of porn, but they seem better than most at diversit
- Max quality 1080p (1920X1080). approx 5.2 mbps.
- 4K being rolled out: 4 K format h.264 3840X2160 59.94 fps 29.4 Mbps
- Smaller sizing available
- Model interviews/just pop shot available |
| Cons: |
Pros:
- videos run about 15 minutes.
- Excellent costomer service. I had a day where I was on great broadband so I took advantage to download a bunch. Of course that triggered their piracy alarm. It took a fast email to get me back up and running
- Responsive: I requested they book Alex Coal - a couple of month later there she was! I'm sure they can't always do that, but they tried
- They have great bookings so I'll limit to just a couple of favs: Lauren Phillips, Cherie Deville, Sarah Shevon, Ashley Fires, Larkin Love, Aria Alexander, Alex Coal (in 4K), Jessica Ryan
- STILL UPDATING. Everyday there's an update (sometimes upgrade of old video - most days it's something brand new)
- as of March 16, 2020 over 1,300 videos
- Great organization. You can favorite content, grade content on a 5 point scale, use tag
Cons:
- 4K just started, there aren't many videos available in that quality, yet.
- No PU discout |
| Bottom Line: |
I know it's controversial to throw down a 100 - but I always hated those teachers that said "a 100 is for perfect work and no one is perfect." To me the 100 is for a site accomplishing it's own goals and I think finishes the job perfectly does what it's trying to do.
The network's focus is on hot girls doing great dirty talk. The typical shoot starts with the performer talking to the camera giving a bit of a warm-up (this is not a get to know you interview, this is dirty fun 😊). Next is typically male talent hand job/blow job (if Mr.POV It then moves to penetration sex, good amount of anal content). Lastly- pop shot with followup dirty talk. The previews give a good estimation of the videos inside. Unlike when you go to the movies the previews don't have all the good parts 🤣. |
|
03-16-20 12:20pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
95
|
First Class POV
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- multiple file size available (.mp4) for me I find 780p is the perfect balance between size and quality. These files are about 1 GB and 1280X720 5.2 mbps
- 1080 files are about 2.75 GB 1920X1080 12.1 mbps.
- I don't have a 4K monitor so I didn't download anything that size.
- comments on videos allowed (although doesn't seem to be widely used)
- Scoring system with favorites and likes (again either isn't widely used or there are very few members here. I see a lot of great videos that have under a dozen likes)
- Decent tagging system (could be made better with more options or even user suggested ones)
- Plenty of great talent some of my favorites: LAUREN PHILLIPS, CHERIE DEVILLE, Sonia Harcourt, Natashia Nice, Julia Ann (ok I fall for the MILFs, what can I say!?), Emma Hix, Saya Song.
- about 465 videos as of August 2, 2019
- updates about 1X per week.
- Good handling of photos. You can download .zips of the screenshots (about 100 pix) and the photoshoots (about 300 pix) |
| Cons: |
PROS CONT:
- Part of the Spizoo network
- Good organization. Viewing can be arranged by: date, popularity, title, or category (sort of a "tag"). Tags well done; for example there's a tag for Japanese instead of just "Asian"
- Search works well even though there are a lot of videos I was able to locate something I'd found earlier with relative ease.
- Exclusive scenes
- More diversity than most sites (in terms of ethnicity, not body type)
CONS:
- Adds behind the paywall, constant drumbeat of "buy more"
- .wmv only available in 480p format
- No unique "hook". This is cookie-cutter porn. I like sites that have more of a personality and niche.
- If you're gonna be an "also-ran" run of the mill network you've got to have a lot of content. They're not there yet
- Very few scenes have plot most is just straight to the action with no explanation. (I know I'm old fashioned.)
- Only 15 videos load/page. I know this seems like a small complaint but it's like I'm constantly loading a new page |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is definitely a buy if you're looking for a good basic porn site. You can probably pick up a multi-month membership for a very reasonable price.
There's enough of a back catelog and plenty of big-name stars (along with plenty that I was only introduced to here). I've had a really good time exploring all the content. And there's plenty of that given that the typical shoot is over 20 minutes.
The most serious draw back is there's not a lot of personality here. Sure the girls are hot and do a great job but there's no real niche. This is serving the porn mass market (nothing wrong with that but sometimes I want something interesting - something that has more creativity).
The POV style is done well. The lighting and sound are good. The production value is high. Like I said the talent is top-notch.
To say it all in one sentence: Great porn - nothing novel/unusual. It hit all the marks. I'd score it as a solid "B" the only thing that moves it to the "B+" "A-" range is that it's not particularly creative - but it is well priced. |
|
08-02-19 06:52pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
96
|
Foot Worship
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Unique focus. I know there are foot fetish sites out there but most are amateur sites that don't bring all the weight kink.com can bring.
- Lots of model diversity: Pregnancy, interracial, female-female, male-female.
- great imagination: everything for kinky nuns to squirting strippers. I like the unpredictability of what the next update might have brought.
- Includes access to kink.com with its 24 sites
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Lots of my favorite fetish models have shot here - plus a good mix of up and comers. Penny Paz and Christy Mack were smoking hot.
- Allows download managers |
| Cons: |
- Defunct site. Last update was March of 2015
- Just over 100 scenes
- Foot insertions were a turn off for me. But I can't complain too much it's a foot fetish site.
- Organization is hurting. Shoots are uploaded chronologically, while there are keywords they're misapplied and overly broad (bare pussy for example). You can search by model but if you don't know what you're looking for you have a hard time finding it.
No way to "favorite" things for future viewing |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm not a foot fetish guy but there was still enough her for me to enjoy. Lots of different set-ups and model types kept things interesting. Part of what kept it's score down was the lack of content, no longer updating, and being too far out of the mainstream for me (I wrestled with that after all it is a foot site in a network named kink - but all the foot insertions were too much for me)
Had the site kept updating and had they been a little more sparing with the insertions I probably would have scored this site closer to a 90.
Streaming and multiple formats keep things simple.
The price is too high for just this site. That said if you are into kinky stuff this network is a gold mine. There's so much here it's certainly worth a months membership to explore. I intended to join for just a month but stayed longer and will return later now that my membership has lapsed |
|
04-10-17 07:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
97
|
Four Finger Club
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations networks (27 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive (to the best of my knowledge)
- 4K videos available (no extra charge)
- There's PLOT. I like the action has an explanation. Nothing is stale they mix in plenty of plot devices so each scene feels fresh
- Mix of MILF and new talent.
- Great talent including LAUREN PHILLIPS. Mercedes Carrera, Lexi Belle, Riley Nixon, Brett Rossi, Cherie DeVille. I discovered plenty of new (to me) talent here to (I'm guessing many new stars start out with girl-girl)
- Decent search (some tags but too limited), search bar
- Approx 500 scenes (warning! includes BTS/interviews) - that's a big back catalog for a site like this |
| Cons: |
- Star rating system
- excellent production lighting/set/talent everything looks great
- Symbian and Hitachi are used so much they should be sponsors (LOL!)
CONS:
- No longer updating(?) The last update was 2/21
- When they were updating it was spotty 2X/month and then nothing for a while. Then 4 times in a month
- off theme. While they probably have 100+ "stretching" focused 4-finger banging shoots. There's a LOT (A LOT, A LOT) of other girl-gril action cross-posted here from other parts of the network.
- little diversity (unless you count hair color and trimming regiment). There are very few women of size (most are porn valley clones - the MILFs tend to be an exception). Hardly any ethnic diversity. (unlike the rest of the network were they seem to be putting in real effort
- No user forum/comments available
- No previews available either download it or stream it to see if it's what you're looking for
- Ads behind a paywall (seems like everyone is doing it these days) |
| Bottom Line: |
I like the more extreme stretching theme. I wish they had more consistency. Basically, before you're gonna go extreme like that you have to build a really hot scene so I think those shoots are some of the best girl-girl porn shoots.
So despite all fourfingerclub.com has going for it I can't go any higher with the score. It seems like they're giving up on updates and they mix in a ton of off-brand content.
I have to give it to them they do a lot of stuff right but to move into the A range they've got to give us fans more.
Buy or Pass. Because of the strength of the network, I think you have to give this a buy. But don't put it at the top of your list. |
|
09-15-21 03:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
98
|
Four Finger Club
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations network (26 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- plenty of hot talent. Some of the standouts were: Amber Rayne, Zoe Holloway, Christie Lee, Avy Lee Roth, Kelly Wells(!), Janet Mason
- Pretty much every scene is F/F. Usually with toys. More anal play then I was expecting
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive |
| Cons: |
- The last update was in October 2013 - doesn't look like they update at all anymore.
- Less than 100 updates dating from 2007 (older content is lower quality than newer)
- Lack of organization is a problem. With this much content, you really need more search capability than star/Date/"popularity"
- Trailers are not available so separating the good from the bad is tough
- I couldn't get my download manager to work.
- Ads behind paywall
- Most movies have little or no plot (I know I'm old-fashioned) |
| Bottom Line: |
To be direct I wasn't thrilled with this site. First off just girl/girl action doesn't scratch my itch (so take the rest of this with a grain of salt).
It's fine the New Sensations Network has a site dedicated to lesbian interests. But this site is too dull to be a standout. There's not enough plot or kink to make this site anything but an also-ran.
This site is fine for the price if you're looking for the network. If you are looking for a hot girl/girl site - you should look somewhere else. The Brazzer Network or Naughty America would probably be a better fit. |
|
07-30-18 03:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
99
|
Francesca Live
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Bunch of different fetish content. There's at least one of the following: spanking, super hero, lite bdsm, prostate milking, pegging, anal, interracial, group sex, lots of good stuff :)
- Shandra Fay (of filtycuteonline), Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Charlee Chase, Sara Jay, Curious Gabby, Bobbi Eden, Carmen Valentine, Vickyathome, Angelina Castro, Nikki Benz are all included as part of the network. The whole network is in the MILF genre -so if you're a fan this is the place.
- There are about 160 vids (I'm not including BTS shoots).
- lots of excitement in videos. Some performers don't have energy that's not Fancesca.
- The focus of the site is the live shows - but there's so much more here. Across the network there's about 3 shows a day.
- pix available in zip format
- she also has guest stars so there's really a lot of diversity between the guests and the network.
- each vid has an accompanying description for those of use who still enjoy some plot with our porn. |
| Cons: |
- organization needs a reset. The video section is arranged chronologically within the categories: BTS, G/G, B/G, and fighting.
- video quality ranges from 8450X480 4.1 mbps, 740X480 1.3 mbps to 640X480 1.5. At this point I really expect at least newest content to have an HD option.
- I'm sure she's had a boob job - but I think it looks good and not over done (don't mean to erupt a debate on whether a boob job can EVER be over done).
- much of the content (maybe all of it for all I know), is non-exclusive. A good amount is directly from other DVDs |
| Bottom Line: |
Francesca is smokin' hot. While in that MILF category she has that young soccer mom look down! Great boobs, nice smile. She's a stunning woman.
The amount of kink and variety is way above most solo sites. There's a lot of guest stars, I'm really surpirsied for a site that's billed as a solo more than 1/4 of the videos have other performers in them!
Bottom Bottom Line: I gotta call this one a buy. Francesca is smokin hot. There's good personality and diversity in the shoots. There's enough on the site to warrant a month's membership free - and I think more than a month when you look at the whole network. |
|
01-14-13 06:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
100
|
Fresh Outta High School
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations network (26 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Plenty of hot new stars: ARIA ALEXANDER (she's amazing!), Samantha Hayes, Riley Reid (a few good ones), Sadie Kennedy.
- The catalog goes back to 2004 and obviously, that has lower quality
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- About 75 scenes dating back to 2008 - STILL UPDATING
- A lot of anal action if that's important to you
- Now that I have a long-term membership I'm appreciating the ability to save and like scenes for better organization
Theme consistency. I'm not a fan of the so young theme - I've reached that age where MILF are more attractive. But they stay true to their intentions. |
| Cons: |
- Lack of organization is a problem. With this much content, you really need more search capability than star/Date/"popularity"
- Some scenes offer trailers most do not
- Erratic updates. Sometimes 4 in a month, other times a month with nothing. (good thing its part of a network
- I couldn't get my download manager to work.
- Ads behind paywall
- Most movies have little or no plot |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a solid site. It scatches the itch it's trying to get at. There's decent plot (which I like) rather than just jumping into action.
The only 2 serious dings on this site are lack of frequent updates and not much of a back catalogue.
There's enough content to satisfy. The quality is good. the talent is great. And with the strength of the NS network, there's no reason to hold back from this site. I don't think you'll have enough here to keep you for a long term. But it's a very enjoyable site. |
|
08-10-18 07:03am
Replies (0)
|
|
